The Source of Lead in The Osen Sandstone Lead Deposit On The Baltic Shield, Norway
The Source of Lead in The Osen Sandstone Lead Deposit On The Baltic Shield, Norway
The Source of Lead in The Osen Sandstone Lead Deposit On The Baltic Shield, Norway
Abstract
The sandstone-hosted lead depositson the Baltic Shield occurin marine late Precambrian
to Early Cambriansedimentaryrocks.A ground-watermodel in which the basementis pos-
tulated as the metal sourcehasbeen proposedfor thesedeposits.To test this model the Osen
depositwasselectedbecauseit liesdirectlyon a homogeneous granitebasement.
On the basisof U-Th-Pb whole-rockisotopicanalysesfor three samplesof unweathered
basementgranite (Trysil granite), a basementage of 1,598 m.y. was established.The lead
isotopiccompositions of four out of five specimensof galenafrom the Osendepositplot
betweenisochrons calculatedfor the graniteat 500 m.y. and 540 m.y. This is strongsupport
for the hypothesisthat the lead sourcewasbasementgraniteand suggests that mineralization
took placesoonafter sedimentation.A basementsourcefor the lead is further substantiated
by the regionalpatternof lead isotopiccompositions of sandstoneleaddeposits, whichreflects
the characterof adjacentbasementterranes.
0561-0128/82/12/450-1052.50 430
lationshipbetweenpostulatedsourcerock (basement)
and hostrock (sandstone)than in many other Baltic
Shielddepositsof this type. This alsosuggested the
possibilityof a simpleisotopicrelationshipbetween
postulatedsourcerock (basement)and ore. The study
of sandstone-hosted depositson the Baltic Shield is
continuingwith the useof samplesfrom severalad-
ditionaldeposits,and it will further testthe regional
correlationbetween basementcompositionand the
lead isotopiccompositionof the galenain the over-
lying sandstone.
Geologic Setting
In theOsenarea(Fig.2) thePrecambrianbasement
is overlainby Cambrian sandstoneand shale;this
autochthonoussequenceis overlain by the Osen
nappe which consists mainly of late Precambrian
feldspathicsandstoneand quartzite (VangsasFor-
mation).
Basement
I • Shallow
• Continental marine and Lundqvist(1970). Priem et al. (1970) combined
margin their own data for Trysil plutonicand volcanicrocks
with thoseof Welin and Lundqvistand obtainedan
• Major galena deposit. . ß isochron indicatingan age of 1,624 ___42 m.y.
Minor disseminated
o Kilometres
500 galena deposit ....... 0 The Trysil area was also affected by a tectono-
Minor galena vein thermal event about925 m.y. ago, as evidencedby
occurrence .......... •
the Rb-Srand K-Ar agesof separatedbiotites(Priem
FIG. 1. Distributionof sandstonelead depositson the Baltic 2In accordance with presentconvention,Rb-Sragesreferredto
Shield(modifiedslightlyfrom Bjorlykke,1974). in the text are with referenceto the 1.42decayconstant.
SAMPLE NO
et al., 1970).This corresponds
to the widespreadSve-
conorwegian orogeny.
The unweathered graniteshavean averagecontent
BLA[K SHALE
of 20 ppm Pb, 49 ppm Zn, and 5 ppm Cu (H•y,
1977).Usingan increasein the ratio (A12Os+ K20)/
(MgO + Na•O) as an index of the degreeof weath-
ering,lead and zinccontentswere foundto decrease CONGLOMERATE
overlyingsandstone
isgradualin mostplaces.Passing
upwardsfrom the unweatheredgranitethe orienta- lO-----
tion of the mica becomes more horizontal and the
feldsparand mica contentsdecrease.The thickness
of this basalarkoseis <1 m. The arkosegradesinto
a unit i to 4 m thick of coarseblue quartziticto feld- FIG. 3. Lithostratigraphic
sectionof the Osenarea showingthe
spathic sandstone.The latter unit is cemented by relativestratigraphicpositionsof galenaand granitesamples.
quartz,but pressuresolutionbetweenprimary quartz
grainsis uncommon.Illite and someamorphouscar-
bonoccurin the matrix.The oreassemblage includes Depositionalenvironments:The Lower Cambrian
galena, sphalerite,barite, and calcite occurringas sedimentaryrocksare interpretedto have been de-
disseminations in the quartz cement or as poikilo- positedas a marine transgressive succession. Depo-
blasts. sitionof basalsandstone wasprobablyin a beachen-
Dark fine-grainedsandstone: The basalsandstone vironment.The dark, fine-grainedsandstone unit was
becomesfiner upwardand passes into a unit of dark probablydeposited,with severalsmallbreaksin sed-
fine-grainedsandstones 2 to 4 m thickwhichcontains imentation,under tidal conditions(Nystuen,1969a).
thin conglomerateand green shaleinterbeds.Both Overlying green siltstoneand shalemay have been
verticaland horizontalburrowsare present,and rip- depositedin a subtidalenvironment.
ple marks,crosslaminations, and ball and pillow struc- Middle Cambrian black shales
tures have been observed(Nystuen, 1969a). Frag-
mentsof fossils(1-10 mm) from the conglomerate After a break in sedimentation,the Middle Cam-
have been identified as Hyolithes sp. and Torellella brian sedimentarysequencestartswith a conglom-
laevigata(Nystuen,1969a). The conglomeratealso erate20 to $0 cm thickcontainingfragmentsof sand-
containsroundeddiscoidalfragmentsof fossiliferousstoneand shalethat are in somecasesphosphatic.
dolomite. Immediately above the conglomeratefollow dark-
A weak dissemination of fine-grainedpyrite and gray to black shales(Alum shales)with nodulesof
galenaoccursin the sandstone, and someclustersof carbonateand pyrite depositedin a relativelyshallow
the samemineralsoccur in the conglomerate. marine environment.The autochthonous sequenceis
Green siltstone and shale: The dark sandstone interrupted 10 to $0 m from the base of the black
gradesinto a thin unit, i to 4 m thick, of greensilt- shalesby the Osennappe,which here consists of late
stoneand shale.The primary beddingin this unit is Precambriansandstones (VangsasFormation).
disruptedby a heavy bioturbation,but thin, coarse, Becausethis study attemptsto place an absolute
often more calcitic beds 5 to 10 mm thick can still age on lead mineralizationhostedby Lower Cam-
be seen.Large nodulesof pyrite are common. brian sandstone,it is relevant to considerthe ap-
Sample
number "ø•Pb/2ø4Pb 2ø7pb/2ø4Pb "ø•Pb/2ø4pb U(ppm) Th(ppm) Pb(ppm) '2•2Th/"ø4Pb v•U/•ø4Pb
161-
in •ø•Pb/•ø4pb for sampleI from 25.262 to 25.272 is
sufficientto give agreementin calculatedagesat
1,594m.y. This increasein •ø•Pb/•ø4pb of about0.04
16.0- percentis a little greater than the averageanalytic
15.9- error for the laboratory but is still within the ex-
pectablerange of error. This adjustmentcould be
15.8 - distributedbetweensamplesI and 10 and wouldthen
be well within the averagedeviationexpected.If the
15.7- Weathered granite....... o
adjustment ismadeto the•7Pb/•4pb ratio,a decrease
024 Unweathered granite ..... ß
of a little lessthan0.01 percentin thisratiofor sample
21.5 22.5 23.5 1, from 16.281 to 16.2794,will give agreementat a
206 Pb/204 Pb
calculatedage of 1,591 m.y. This adjustmentis well
FIG. 4. Lead isochronplot for the Trysil granite. The slope within the limit of accuracyof measurement.How-
shownis for the unweatheredgraniteand corresponds to an age ever, in spiteof the fact that agreementis achieved
of 1,602 q- 60 m.y. betweencalculatedagesfor the z•sU-•ø•Pb and z•sU-
•7Pb systems with suchsmalladjustments to the mea-
stagesof ground-wateractivity,and the relativeen- suredlead isotoperatiosof either sampleI or 10 (or
richmentof uranium can possiblybe related to de- both),the measuredratiosmay still be correct.Small
positionof the overlyinguranium-richblack Alum errorsin the measured • values(•sU/•ø4pbratios)for
shale. the samples,for which the error limits are greater
In orderto obtainthe bestagefor the granitefrom than for the lead isotoperatios,couldalsoaccountfor
a plot of the data on a concordiadiagram,it is first the slight discordanceobserved.Thus it is obvious
necessaryto selecta reasonablelead isotopiccom- that in leadisotopestudiesof rocks,assuming that the
positionfor the commonleadin the granitesamples. samplesrepresentperfectlyclosedsystemsinsofaras
The commonlead compositionis subtractedfrom the U, Th, and Pb are concerned,very accuratemea-
measuredratiosto obtainthe radiogeniccomponent. surementsof (1) the lead isotoperatios•and in par-
This processis particularly critical in the case of ticularof the •?Pb/•4pb ratios•and (2) the amounts
whole-rockspecimens becausethe proportionof com- of U, Th, and Pb presentare necessaryin order for
monleadismuchgreaterthanit is in a uranium-rich them to fall exactlyon concordia.
systemsuchasthat providedby zircons.The common Concordiaplotscombiningthe U-Pb and Th-Pb
lead compositionwill lie on or very near the rock systems wereusedin orderto assess the 2øSPb/•ø4pb
leadisochron shownin Figure4. Parent-daughter is- ratio of the common(initial) lead in the graniteand
ochronplotsin the U-Pb system(Figs.5 and 6) for the concordancy of the Th-Pb systemin the samples
the unweatheredgranitesuggest a commonleadcom- studied.In a plot of •øSPb/•ø4pb against•Th/•ø4Pb
position of 2ø•Pb/•ø4pb= 16.142 and •?Pb/2ø4pb (Fig. 8), the three unweatheredgranitesamplesare
= 15.1382, when relianceis placedon samplesI and not collinear.A dashedline joiningsamplesI and 10
10. This relianceappearsto be justifiedby (1) the in theplotof Figure8 givesanintercept(initial•øSPb/
closeagreementbetweenparent-daughterisochron
agesof 1,591m.y. (Fig. 5) and 1,594m.y. (Fig. 6)
basedon thesesamples, and the Pb-Pbisochronage 26 - 1'
of 1,602 _+60 m.y., (2) the fact that testcalculations 25-
• 21--
• 20-
\•0
17-
lead givesa concordiaplot (Fig. 7) in which a dis-
16- . 2
cordialine, drawn throughthe point for sample4,
15
intersects concordiaat 1,598 m.y. This is in excellent
agreementwith the Pb-Pb isochronage. 238U/204 Pb
It is interestingto calculatethe small adjustments FIC. 5. This parent-daughterplot for granitesamplesi and l0
that are necessary to the measuredlead isotoperatios suggests an initial (commonlead)e•Pb/•4Pb ratio of 16.142.
16.3 -
cent, and the reasonfor the discordanceremains ob-
16.2 -
scure.
16.1 -
If it is assumed
that at 540 m.y. weatheredgranite
16.0 -
samples9•9•and 9•4had lead isotopiccompositions that
•. 15.9-
fell on the 540 m.y. isoehronfor the unweathered
o4158-
•. 157-
Trysilgranite(seeFig. 9), thenthe calculatedtzvalues
o4 15•6-
for thesesamplesfor the past540 m.y. are 18.47and
155-
19.63, respectively.In comparison,measuredvalues
15,4 -
are 17.13and 11.43.This suggests that the U-Pb sys-
15.3 -
tem of sample9•4,in particular,hasbeen disturbed
152
between540 m.y. andthe present,andthat itspresent
lead isotopiccompositionis thus the result of more
238U/204 Pb than two stagesof growthsinceintrusionof the Trysil
F]c. 6. Similar parent-daughterplot to Figure 5. An initial granite 1,598 m.y. ago. If the calculatedtz valuesof
•ø?Pb/•ø•Pb
ratio of 15.382is indicated. 18.47and 19.6:3represent the averagevaluesfor sam-
ples22 and 24 duringthe last540 m.y., then the first
stagetzvalues(•asu/•ø4pb ratios),from 1,598m.y. to
2ø4pbratio)of :35.178,andtheslopeof thelinesuggests540 m.y. ago,calculatedfor thesesamplesare 14.67
an unacceptablegranite age of 1,674 m.y. Conse- and8.14, respectively. Thesevaluesindicatethat sub-
quently,two approximations of the initial ratio were sequent to the first stageof evolution,and perhaps
obtainedby drawinglineswith a slopecorresponding during palcoweathering about 540 m.y. ago,the sam-
to an age of 1,597 m.y. throughthe data pointsfor pleswereenrichedin uraniumrelativeto leador were
samplesI and 10 in Figure 8. The valuesobtained subjectedto lesslossof uranium than of lead.
for the initial 2øspb/•ø4pb ratio were :35.599and
Lead IsotopeData for Galena and Pyrite
:35.$70,respectively.When theseratiosare usedto
make the common lead correction to the measured The isotopicanalysesfor a singlepyrite and five
•øSPb/•ø4pbratio,samples I and 10, respectively, plot galenaspecimensfrom drill holesthroughthe Osen
nearlyon a U-Th concordiain the combinedsystems. sandstone lead depositare presentedin Table 2. The
With an initial ratio of :35.:370,
an increasein •a2Th/ generalstratigraphicpositions of thesespecimens are
•ø4Pbfor sampleI of about2.8 percentfrom 101.9:3 shownin Figure :3,and their lead isotopiccomposi-
to 104.8wouldbe necessary in order for it to plot on tionsare plottedin Figure 9.
the U-Th concordiawith sample10. In view of the The pyriteisnotconsidered at the momentbecause
estimated i percent error in these ratios, it seems it is from a shale-siltstone unit above the mineralized
unlikelythat the analyticerror is asgreatas2.8 per- horizon and for an additional reason noted below.
4
44- 11
43-
42-
41-
o 24
. 40-
1598 Ma
280- mtersechOn/•"
1580
Me 1600
o//1.10Ma . 39-
o4 38-
Intercept J•/
37-
36-
1500
/ //'• Weathered
granite
o •'""'"•
Int
er•;•i
•'• 35-
Ma
ø 022 Unweathered
gramte
.ß I I I i
i
120
33 314 315 316 317 318 39 41o 411 412 232 Th/204 Pb
207 Pb/235U
FIG. 8. Th-Pb parent-daughterplot for unweatheredTrysil
FIc. 7. Concordiaplot for the Trysil granite usingthe lead granitesamplesshowingthe range of commonlead •ø•pb/2ø•pb
isotoperatiosfor commonleadasderivedin Figures5 and 6. ratios (interceptvalues)discussed
in the text.
TABLE2. Lead IsotopeData for Sulfidesfrom the OsenDrill Holes,Norway, and for Other Sandstone-Hosted
Deposits
Sample
Deposit number 2•'Pb/2"4pb 2ø7pb/2ø4Pb a"sPb/aø4Pb Laboratory(reference)
Osen Galena 4429 20.487 15.885 39.462 GeospecConsultants,1980
Osen Galena 4436 20.328 15.868 39.454 GeospecConsultants,1980
Osen Galena 4418 20.238 15.850 39.353 GeospecConsultants 1980
Osen Galena 4420 20.296 15.866 39.394 GeospecConsultants 1980
Osen Galena 4415 20.273 15.862 39.410 GeospecConsultants 1980
Osen Pyrite 18A 20.026 15.819 39.337 GeospecConsultants1980
Vassbo V7 20.849 15.901 39.823 GeospecConsultants 1980
Vassbo V3 20.852 15.927 39.947 GeospecConsultants 1980
Vassbo V2 20.878 15.923 39.948 GeospecConsultants 1980
V assbo 20.790 15.901 39.882 B. R. Doe (pets. commun.)
La isvail 21.406 16.003 40.039 B. R. Doe (pers. commun.)
Kluken TQ75-3 19.737 15.793 38.407 Geol. Surveyof Canada, 1976
Gurrogaissa 79 18.546 15.712 38.533 GeospecConsultants,1981
G urrogaissa 83 18.152 15.642 38.088 GeospecConsultants,1981
cipitategalenaand allow any zinc presentto remain We are gratefulto J. M. Franklin,D. F. Sangster,
and
in solutionand passonward in the system. G. L. Cummingfor their commentson an early draft
Conclusions of the manuscript,and to D. F. Sangsterfor helpful
suggestionson a later draft.
1. Whole-rockU-Th-Pb analyses for threesamples This paper is a contributionto the IGCP Proiect
of the basementTrysil granite from beneaththe No. 60, Correlation of Caledonian Strata-bound Sul-
Osensandstone leaddepositestablishan ageof about phides.
1,598 m.y.
April 28, July 6, 1981
2. Five lead isotopiccompositions for galenafrom
the Osendepositagreewith a 520-m.y.isochronthat REFERENCES
can be constructed for the granite.This is essentially
Bi•rlykke,A., 1977,Om blyfoekomster i Eokambriske/Kambriske
conclusive supportfor a sourcein the localbasement sandsteiner p5 det BaltiskeSkiold,in Bi•rlykke,A., Lindahi,L,
rocksand/or the arkosicpedimentsediments derived and Vokes, F. M., eds, KaledonskeMalmforekomster:Trond-
from them.Thusthe isotopedataare compatiblewith heim, BergverkenesLandssammenslutnings Industrigruppe,
a ground-watermodelfor genesis of deposits of this TekniskeVirksomhet,p. 72-76.
type (Samama,1976;Bi•rlykke and Sangster,1981). Bi•rlykke, A., andSangster,
leaddeposits
D. F., 1981,An overviewof sandstone
andtheir relationto red-bedcopperandcarbonate-
3. The implicationof the aboveresultsis that the hostedlead-zincdeposits:E½O•. GEO•..,Seventy-fifthAnniv.
basinalbrinemodelproposed by Rickardet al. (1979) Vol., p. 179-215.
for the Laisvall area is not applicable to the Osen Bi•rlykke, K., 1974, Depositionalhistoryand geochemicalcom-
deposit.In this model it is postulatedthat the lead positionof LowerPalaeozoic epicontinentalsediments from the
OsloRegion:NorgesGeol.Unders•kelse,
no. $05, 81 p.
was extracted from sediments,which must have had Black, L. P., Gale, N. H., Moorbath, S., Pankhurst, R. J., and
different U-Th-Pb ratios than the basement, a rela- McGregor,V. R., 1971,Isotopic datingof veryearlyPrecambrian
tively long time (130 m.y.) after depositionof the amphibolitefaciesgneisses from the Godthaabdistrict,West
hostrocks.The isotopedata at Osendo not fit this Greenland:Earth Planet. Sci. Letters.v. 12, p. 245-259.
model. Christofferson,H. C., Wallin, B., Selkman, S., and Rickard, D. T.,
1979,Mineralizationcontrolsin the sandstone lead-zincdeposits
4. The Osen data show, in contrast, that ore de- at Vassbo,Sweden:E½O•. GEOL.,v. 74, p. 1259-1249.
positiontook place soonafter depositionof the host Cowie, J. W., and Cribb, S. J., 1978, The Cambriansystem,in
sediment. Contributions
to the geologictime scale:Am. Assoc.Petroleum
5. The spread in isotopiccompositionof lead Geologists, Studiesin Geology6, p. $55-$62.
Cumming,G. L., and Richards,J. R., 1975, Ore lead isotoperatios
within the Osen depositcan possiblybe accounted in a continuously changing earth:EarthPlahet.Sci.Letters,v.
for by changesin the proportionsof ground water 28, p. 155-171.
suppliedfrom different basementareaswithin the Doe,B. R., 1970,Leadisotopes: Berlin,New York,Springer-Verlag,
drainagebasinor by changesin the weatheringpro- 157 p.
of Doe,
B. R., and Delevaux, M. H., 1972, Sourceof lead in southeast
cess.Differencesin the lead isotopiccompositions Missourigalenaores:E½O•. GEOL.,v. 67, p. 409-425.
ores from the Laisvall, Vassbo,Osen, Kluken, and Heier, K. S., and Thoresen,K., 1971,Geochemistry of high grade
Gurrogaissa
sandstone
leaddeposits
arein accordwith metamorphicrocks, Lofoten-Vesteralen,North Norway: Geo-
expectations
basedonthehypothesisthatthe leadwas chim. et Cosmochim.Acta, v. $5, p. 89-99.
derived from local basement sources, and on the Heyl, A. V., Delevaux,M. H., Zartman, R. E., and Brock,M. R.,
1966,Isotopicstudyof galenas fromthe upperMississippi Valley,
knowncomplexityand characterof the basementin the Illinois-Kentucky,and someAppalachianValley mineral
the vicinity of the deposits. deposits:E½o•. GEO•., v. 61, p. 955-961.
H•y, T., 1977,Forvitringav basement,en kilde for bly/sink mi-
Acknowledgments neraliseringeri sparagmittomradit,in Bi•rlykke,A., Lindahi,L.,
and Vokes, F. M., eds, KaledonskieMalmforekomster:Tron-
This paper was preparedwhile the seniorauthor
dheim, Bergverkenes Landssammenslutnings Industrigruppe,
was a visitingscientistat the GeologicalSurveyof TekniskeVirksomhet,p. 77-84.
Canada,Ottawa.Thisopportunitywasmadepossible Lambert,I. B., and Heier, K. S., 1968,Geochemicalinvestigations
by a fellowshipfrom the Royal NorwegianCouncil of deep-seated
rocksin the AustralianShield:Lithos,v. 1, p. $0-
for Scientific and Industrial Research. 55.
Most of the isotopicanalyses,which are of very Moorbath,S., and Vokes,F. M., 1965, Lead isotopeabundance
studies
on galenaoccurrences in Norway:NorskGeol.Tidsskr.,
goodprecision,were performedby GeospecConsul- v. 45, p. 285-$45.
tants.Two galenaanalyseswere kindly providedby Nystuen,J.P., 1969a,Sedimentology of the Lower Cambriansed-
B. R. Doe of the U. S. GeologicalSurvey.The figures imentsat Ena, Nordre Osen,southernNorway: NorgesGeol.
were drafted by staff of the CartographicServices, Unders•kelse, no. 259, p. 27-45.
1969b, Precambrian ash-flow tuf• and associatedvolcanic
GeologicalSurveyof Canada,and by S. B. Green, rocksat ElverumsouthernNorway:NorgesGeol.Unders•kelse,
EconomicGeologyDivision, GeologicalSurvey of no. 258, p. 241-266.
Canada,and J. Staw, GeologicalSurveyof Norway. Piper, J. D. A., and Smith, R. L., 1980, Paleomagnetism of the