THE EFFECT OF PLAY-BASED LEARNING ON STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC

ATTAINMENT

Abstract
This study was on the effect of play-based learning on students’ academic
attainment. Several debates have been ongoing on how effective play-based
learning can contribute to the academic development of a student. The study
focused on KS1 students with ages between 5-7 years. A qualitative research
method using the document analysis approach was adopted for the study. the
primary source of data for the study was secondary data gotten from published
academic works, books, past projects, literature relating to play-based learning
and childhood educational development. An inductive data analysis was used to
analyse data categorizing them into emerging themes and patterns. Findings from
the study showed that, play-based learning can contribute to the academic
attainment of students through, the development of the child’s language skill,
memory retention and active engagement. Also, play-based learning has a
positive impact on the psychomotor development, fosters cooperation, enhances
problem-solving and develops creative thinking task (Griva & Semoglou, 2012). In
conclusion, play-based learning can contribute to the academic attainment of
students if it is properly designed into the school curriculum and properly
understood by the teacher who implement them. The author recommended that,
for play-based learning to be effective, the process and procedures must be
modeled to ensure effective understanding.
Keywords: Play-based learning, student, academic attainment, childhood
education.

1
 CHAPTER ONE

1.1 Scene setting

Preschool is an important stage in a child's academic and social growth. According

to Ankita (2013), poor academic achievement in a learning setting refers to a

child's failure to satisfy a predetermined standard of performance in a specific

evaluation activity, such as a test, examination, or series of continuous

evaluations. This denotes that a candidate who receives a score of less than or

equal to a specific criterion is regarded as a poor academic performer. Poor

academic performance is a well-known occurrence and a common source of

academic anxiety among students. Students who are exposed to unfamiliar

educational contexts struggle to comprehend, recall, and apply what they have

learned. "To achieve fairness, the curriculum must include important knowledge

and experience, reflective of all groups, not privileging one group to the expense of

others," writes Klenowski (2009; p. 83). Educators must provide a learning

environment in which all students, regardless of their circumstances, may

succeed. Hence, the rationale of this study, which focuses on the effect of play-

based learning on students’ academic attainment. The focus of this study is on

KS1 students aged 5-7 years. They are generally referred to as pupils however,

the term pupil is gradually being replaced by students in the UK. For the purpose

of this research, they will be referred to as students.

This study highlights the benefits of incorporating play-based learning into school

curricula, as well as how best play-based learning might be applied to help

students achieve academic success. It gives a clear benefit of play-based learning

to government organizations, as well as what policies should be established to

2
encourage academic institutions to incorporate it into their curricula. More so,

educational institutions will understand how play-based learning can help students

achieve academic success as well as the limitations of play-based learning. This

will enable them to design strategic educational plans that would include play-

based learning in their academic courses.

1.2 Research Background

Children are born with the desire to play. The play-based strategy was developed

by Fredrick Froebel. According to Froebel, children enjoy playing (2010). Play-

based learning is a child-centered learning strategy in which the teaching method

is informal and tailored to the child's interests. Schools that adopt a play-based

approach believe that the greatest way to learn is via play (Waite, 2000). It

revitalizes the learning of the children. It enhances their learning abilities. A play-

based education approach allows a child's curiosity to run wild while

simultaneously supporting their growth.

Play is extremely beneficial to children's development and learning. It aids children

in developing difficult-to-teach socio-emotional, physical, and cognitive skills

through teacher-directed instruction. Because of the qualities and nature of play,

children have a variety of options; nevertheless, the quality of those options

enhances the possibility that they will learn through play (Zigler, Singer & Bishop-

Josef, 2004). Piaget and Vygotsky both emphasized the importance of play in

early childhood education. From a cognitive perspective, Piaget believed that play

has a substantial impact on young children's cognitive processes and learning.

Vygotsky believed that children developed via play and perceived development

3
through the lens of social interaction. A child's most significant achievements occur

during playtime (Hoorn, et al., 2007).

This is the preferred method of instruction for children. In a casual and

unstructured environment, the children can absorb concepts and ideas. Toys can

be used to educate pupils intellectual concepts on occasion. Play-based tactics

can be beneficial in the classroom for languages, arithmetic, and social subjects.

Through a range of activities such as music, free-play, gardening, construction

activities, arithmetic games, checkers, magic squares, puzzles, and building

blocks, teaching and learning become a memorable experience for both learners

and teachers.

In early education, play-based learning is frequently examined from two

perspectives: one that focuses on the benefits of play for developmental learning,

and the other on the benefits of play for academic learning (Ramani & Eason,

2015). Developmental learning includes social emotional skills, general cognitive

development, and self-regulation abilities. In papers concentrating on the

developmental benefits of play-based learning, the relevance of child-directed free

play in the classroom has been widely recognized. These academics have

expressed concerns about a decrease in free play time as a result of a higher

emphasis on meeting academic objectives through teacher-directed instruction

(Bowdon, 2015). It has been proposed that children construct knowledge about the

world and exercise problem-solving abilities during times of child-led exploration at

various play centers (Fredriksen, 2012).

According to multiple researches, students engage in more effective problem-

solving behaviors in child-directed play situations than in more formal, teacher-

4
directed settings (De La Riva & Ryan, 2015). Child-directed play with peers has

been highlighted as an important way for children to learn social and emotional

skills such as leading and obeying rules, resolving conflicts, and supporting the

emotional well-being of others (Fredriksen, 2012). Giving children opportunity to

negotiate and follow rules during play has also been connected to the

development of self-regulation skills (De La Riva & Ryan, 2015).

Many developmental learning benefits have been linked to child-directed free play

circumstances in which educators play a secondary or non-active role, such as

watching or arranging the environment to facilitate free play (Wood, 2014). On the

other side, research on play and academic learning has looked at how play-based

activities affect student learning in academic areas such as reading and

mathematics. These studies advocate for the use of mutually driven and teacher-

directed play activities to aid academic learning, in which educators actively

participate in the play by conducting pre-designed games, interacting with

students, and interfering in child-led play to incorporate learning objectives

(Presser et al., 2015; Sharp, Escalante & Anderson, 2012). Proponents of play-

based learning argue that it may be used to teach mandated academic goals in an

enjoyable and developmentally appropriate way. In this environment, free play is

typically considered as insufficient to facilitate academic learning, necessitating

active teacher participation in play (Presser et al., 2015).

In a recent study, this type of play-based learning was found to be advantageous

to academic achievement. Students in schools employing a play-based

kindergarten math curriculum with teacher-directed arithmetic activities

outperformed students in control classrooms on general measures of

5
mathematical aptitude (Sharp, Escalante & Anderson, 2012). Children who took

part in a play-based literacy program centered on mutually-directed play in which

educators inserted target vocabulary terms into play contexts were demonstrated

to use these newly learnt words more frequently than children who received direct

instruction (Van Oers & Duijkers, 2013).

1.3 Research Gaps

Different developmental and academic perspectives on play-based learning have

arisen, including the types of play that should be fostered and the ideal role for

educators in implementing this methodology (Pyle, DeLuca & Danniels, 2017).

Recent classroom research has revealed comparable differences in educators'

perspectives and implementations of play-based learning, leading to a perplexing

scenario for educators. There is also no guidance on how educators might include

and balance numerous recommended approaches within an academic-focused

program (Leggett & Ford, 2013). Educators have also identified a number of

common challenges in implementing play-based learning curricula, including a

struggle to recognize the academic benefits of play, a lack of formal play-based

learning training, and pressure to participate in direct instruction to meet

prescribed academic targets. Here lies the research gap for the study.

1.4 Aim of the Study

The aim of this study is to assess the effect of play-based learning on students’

academic attainment. To achieve this aim, the following objectives were stated for

the study;

6
  To determine the effect of play-based learning on students’ academic

development.

 To understand the effect of play-based on language development and

socialization.

 To assess the effect of play-based learning on students’ self-reflection.

1.5 Research Outline

The study begins with setting the scene in chapter one followed by the background

to the study and the research gap. Chapter two covers the reviews on the concept

of play, theoretical insights in play-based learning, play-based curricula and review

of empirical studies related to the subject matter. Chapter three covers the

methodology adopted for the study and it begins with the research design which

was the content analysis, the aim of the study, sources of data for the study as

well as method of data analysis and ethical consideration. Chapter four covers the

result and discussion of the findings. Chapter five served as the conclusion of the

study which covers the summary of the study, theoretical contributions and study

limitations, recommendation for further studies and the implications for policy and

practice.

7
 Chapter Two

Literature review

2.0 Introduction

This chapter covers the reviews on the concept of play, theoretical insights in play-

based learning, play-based curricula and review of empirical studies related to the

subject matter.

2.1 Review of concepts

2.1.1 The concept of Play

Play is a difficult concept to describe and categorize. Because play is such a broad

and nebulous concept, numerous resources offer a variety of meanings. Hughes

(2003) suggests three criteria for defining play: personal satisfaction, freedom of

choice, and a focus on the activity rather than its outcomes. The researchers

discovered a variety of features of play (Johnson, Christie, & Wardle, 2005). It has

a positive influence at first; it is usually happy and enjoyable. The motivation to

play comes from within the player. It is not motivated by external factors such as

gaining power or receiving a reward. It comes with its own set of advantages.

When children play, they are less concerned with the activity's aims and more

concerned with the activity itself. It is more concerned with the process than with

the final outcome. Freedom of choice is another important aspect in young

children's impressions of play. Play is open-ended, flexible, and voluntary in

character, as well as self-directed and self-selected (Johnson et al., 2005).

8
2.1.2 Play-Based Learning: Theoretical Insights

Although there is universal agreement on the value of play in early childhood,

there are many different concepts and notions about play (Bergen 2014). Despite

the fact that play is widely recognized as a basis for learning in early life, attempts

to connect the two conceptions have resulted in a wealth of literature with no

definitional consensus (Brooker, Blaise & Edwards 2014).

A variety of play taxonomies are in use. They're divided into sections based on a

number of intertwined themes. Others focus on different types of play behavior,

such as physical (exercise or rough-and-tumble play), object (involving purpose-

made toys), or pretense play (role or socio-dramatic play), while some focus on

the content of play, such as differentiating between functional, symbolic, and rule-

governed play (Vorkapic & Katic 2015). (Smith 2005).

Another common variation focuses on the play participants, specifically the level

and nature of their participation. Child–adult play can be thought of as a multi-

dimensional continuum, with child-initiated and child-led free play with voluntary

involvement, no preconceived educational objective, and no adult interference on

one end and structured, adult-led non-play with an acknowledged instructional

purpose on the other. In the area between free play and non-play, there are

variations of guided play and play-based learning. Along this spectrum, adult

responsibilities might range from parallel players, teammates, mentors, and

advisors to largely overseeing outsiders (Wood, McMahon & Cranstoun 1980).

The question of play's positive impact on child development is another major

component of the academic discussion on play pedagogies. This line of research,

which can be traced back to the "theoretical giants" of the twentieth century such

9
as Freud, Erikson, Piaget, and Vygotsky (Bergen, 2014), distinguishes between

different developmental areas, particularly cognitive, academic, social, and

emotional, and how these can be supported through various forms and types of

play. While there is a lot of empirical research out there, it does not give a clear

picture of the linkages between different types of play and their developmental

impacts (Pyle, DeLuca & Danniels 2017; Lillard et al. 2013).

Researchers in early childhood education (ECE) have recently challenged the

false dichotomization of play and learning, as well as the 'free play'

–'non-play/direct instruction' continuum (Nicolopoulou, 2010). Using sociocultural

learning theories, Rogoff and Vygotsky highlight the following: learning and

development are promoted by shared co-construction of meaning, scaffolded aid,

and guided engagement in cultural activity, such as play. They emphasize the

following points:

1. Play and learning are inextricably linked.

2. The proactive and changeable responsibilities of adults in children's play, as

well as

3. How, in a holistic and mutually supportive manner, various play-based

learning techniques can contribute to and encourage not only children's

social, emotional, and physical development, but also their academic and

cognitive growth (Pyle, DeLuca & Danniels 2017; Wallerstedt & Pramling

2012).

Within this perspective, participants in imaginative play may adopt a form of

double subjectivity, viewing themselves as both inside and outside of play

(Kravtsova, 2014).

10
A substantial body of study has also investigated empirically teachers' views and

attitudes about play and play's function in early childhood education using diverse

theories and terminology. Teacher beliefs, as well as pre-service training and

professional development, are widely accepted to have a substantial impact on

practice (Vorkapic & Katic, 2015; Hegde et al. 2014).

2.1.3 Play-based Curricula

Despite the fact that some countries, such as the United Kingdom, have a play-

based curriculum, the documentation refers to "well-planned, deliberate, and

possibly instructional" play (Rogers, 2011). This meets two aims: adult-determined

play goals are met, and children are engaged in meaningful and inspirational play

activities. The benefits of non-curricular adult-led play in developing aesthetic,

expressive, artistic, and ethical identities are frequently disregarded by such

programs (Rogers, 2011). Individual teacher responsibilities, beliefs, and

practices, as well as how they influence play in early childhood education, have

been shown to influence play (Bennett, Wood & Rogers, 1997; Ranz-Smith, 2007).

2.1.4 The Concept of Play-Based Learning

Play-based learning is when you learn while having a good time. Play-based

learning is distinct from the broader concept of play, which is currently debated in

research (Wallerstedt & Pramling, 2012). Although learning is not required for an

activity to be considered enjoyable, it is necessary for the concept of play-based

learning to be realized (Pyle & Danniels, 2017). Free play, which is directed by the

children themselves (Fleer, 2011), and guided play, which includes some teacher

instruction or participation, have been the main focus of studies looking at the

benefits of play-based learning (Fisher, et al., 2013).

11
Free play is defined as child-directed, voluntary, internally driven, and enjoyable

play (Holt, et al., 2015). Sociodramatic play is a type of encouraged free play in

which a group of youngsters engage in imaginative role-playing by forming and

following social rules such as pretending to be different family members (Holt, et

al., 2015). Guided play, on the other hand, refers to play activities that involve

some adult involvement in order to embed or extend additional learning

opportunities inside the play itself (Weisberg, 2013). Centre-based learning

(Kotsopoulos, et al., 2015) and purposefully framed play (Cutter-Mackenzie &

Edwards, 2013) are two terminology used to describe different types of directed

play activities. However, one distinction that may be made is who is in charge of

the play activity: Some activities, such as carefully designed games, are regarded

as teacher-directed (Presser, et al., 2015), others are defined as jointly directed, in

which teachers participate in the activity without taking over or modifying it,

allowing both teachers and students to have some control over the game (Hope-

Southcott, 2013).

2.2 Empirical Review

According to multiple researches, students engage in more effective problem-

solving behaviors in child-directed play situations than in more formal, teacher-

directed settings (Wood, 2014; De La Riva & Ryan, 2015). Child-directed play with

peers has been identified as an important activity for children to learn social and

emotional skills such as leading and obeying rules, resolving conflicts, and

supporting others' emotional well-being. Giving children opportunity to negotiate

and follow rules during play has also been connected to the development of self-

regulation skills (De La Riva & Ryan, 2015).

12
Many developmental learning benefits have been linked to child-directed free play

scenarios in which educators play a secondary or non-active role, such as

watching or arranging the environment to facilitate free play (Wood, 2014). On the

other side, research on play and academic learning has looked at how play-based

activities affect student learning in academic areas such as reading and

mathematics. These studies advocate for the use of mutually driven and teacher-

directed play activities to aid academic learning, in which educators actively

participate in the play by conducting pre-designed games, interacting with

students, and interfering in child-led play to incorporate learning objectives (Sharp,

2012; Presser, et al., 2015). Proponents of play-based learning argue that it may

be used to teach mandated academic goals in an enjoyable and developmentally

appropriate way (Sharp, 2012). In this setting, free play is typically considered as

insufficient to facilitate academic learning, necessitating active teacher

participation in play (Presser, et al., 2015).

In a recent study, this type of play-based learning was found to be beneficial to

academic achievement. Students in schools using a play-based kindergarten math

curriculum with teacher-directed arithmetic activities outperformed students in

control classrooms on general measures of mathematical aptitude (Sharp, 2012).

Children who took part in a play-based literacy program centered on mutually-

directed play in which educators inserted target vocabulary terms into play

contexts were demonstrated to use these newly learnt words more frequently than

children who received direct instruction (Van Oers & Duijkers, 2013).

13
 Chapter Three

Methodology

3.1 Research Design

According to Ali (2006), research design comprises a systematic and scientific

plan for an investigation; it specifies the structure and strategy that drives the

investigation's activities, as well as the method for obtaining relevant and

appropriate data for answering the research questions. There are a variety of

research designs available, however for this study, we used a content or

document analysis strategy.

Document analysis is the process of extracting information from relevant

documents by examining their content or language. Content analysis is another

term for the technique. According to Chisaka (2013), content includes items like

photos, words, ideas, symbols, themes, or any other message that may be

communicated, whereas text includes everything written, visual, or spoken that

serves as a channel for communication or artefacts. Once the items to be

examined have been identified, the process can begin. Document analysis,

according to Guest, Namey, and Mitchell (2013), is a procedure that involves

selecting documents and analyzing their content. A document, according to them,

can be any printed content. This method entailed obtaining data from previously

published works on the topic area, describing events, and then organizing or

analyzing them in order to meet the goal of the study and address the problem

statement.

14
3.2 Aim of the Study

The aim of this study is to assess the effect of play-based learning on students’

academic attainment. To achieve this aim, the following objectives were stated for

the study;

 To determine the effect of play-based learning on students’ academic

development.

 To understand the effect of play-based on language development and

socialization.

 To assess the effect of play-based learning on students’ self-reflection.

3.3 Sources of Data

Secondary sources of data for this study were academic published works (articles

and journals), books, previous projects, literature pertaining to the subject, and

online sources. The researcher looked at relevant publications to come up with a

common theme and pattern about the use of play-based learning, its effectiveness

in early childhood development, and how it affects a child's educational attainment.

The study's analysis will focus on the developing themes and trends.

3.4 Method of data analysis

For this study, qualitative data analysis was used. In order to analyze the

secondary data, the researcher used an inductive approach. Using the theoretical

framework and literature review processes as guides, the inductive approach

involves starting with the known and eventually proceeding to the unknown.

McMillian and Schumacher (2010) state that, the inductive process of organizing

data into categories and discovering comparable patterns among them is the

15
foundation of qualitative data analysis. Data analysis was determined in this case

by interpreting data from published scholarly publications on the subject to identify

themes and patterns relevant to this investigation. In simple terms, it was classified

according to common attributes. The researcher focused on particular themes,

issues, or patterns that emerged from the data within the framework of the study.

A two-step coding process was employed in the analysis. After reading each piece

of data, key phrases were highlighted and a summary word or phrase was written

in the right-hand column of the paper. Themes/issues that recurred were

determined and categories were indicated above the key phrases. These

categories included: Play-based learning, academic attainment, early childhood

education, child development and socialization.

3.5 Ethical consideration

This study was carried out with strict compliance to data protection from the

secondary data sources. Also, the study followed the ethical guidelines outlined by

the school faculty in carrying out a research study.

16
 Chapter Four

Result and Findings

4.1 Result

4.1.1 Research Objective one: The effect of play-based learning on

students’ academic development

Children in early childhood education require far more than rote memory lessons

and sedentary discipline as they seek to prepare for their future. Students are

expected to be docile and idle while getting a lot of spoken instruction in traditional

teaching methods. After that, students must retain the information and

demonstrate their understanding of it in a written exam. It is vital that pupils have

the chance to participate in physical activity while in school. Through tactile

learning, children will have a better understanding of the material.

Children's play is an intentional activity to which they devote significant effort and

devotion, regardless of their cultural background or experience (Rieber, 1996).

Cekaite and Aaronson (2005) discovered that children used different dimensions

of language in performing and engaging in humorous events when they were

playing. Joking is a type of humor and another type of everyday language activity.

When students are able to use humor in their practice on a regular basis, they will

be able to comprehend it more deeply and thus improve their language skills (Bell,

2005).

When humor was included in the classroom's play-based activities, children felt

more comfortable taking chances and risks because learning was placed in a

relaxed, comfortable style. Russ and Kaugars (2001) discovered that children who

17
were more emotionally involved in their learning responded with more unique

responses. Memory retention and active involvement with learning have also been

found to benefit through play-based learning (Marley et al., 2010). Physical

activities not only help children develop literacy skills, but they also help them

develop psychomotor skills, foster cooperation, improve problem-solving skills,

and develop creative thinking tasks (Griva & Semoglou, 2012), which aligns with

the idea that language play is one of the forces behind creativity and its application

in literacy development (Bell, 2005).

Without this experience, it would be impossible for the child to continue to grow

and strengthen his or her problem-solving skill set. All children must have these

holistic experiences since they will evolve and develop with the children over time.

As this youngster grows older, he or she will be familiar with the aspect of trial and

error, as well as the necessity to evaluate the puzzle piece logistically to establish

its proper placement. This child will then look for new methods to challenge his or

her thinking. Perhaps the child is currently in Kindergarten and learning how to

measure things. After learning how to manipulate a piece into an image, this same

child can now use a ruler to manipulate a piece into an image. Learning that

numbers and concrete objects have diverse meanings, and that large objects may

not fit into little boxes unless they are trimmed down.

4.1.2 Research Objective two: The effect of play-based on language

development and socialization.

The use of play-based learning is extremely beneficial to children's socialization

and language development. To get the most out of language play, use examples

from narrative works that are relatable to the children. Narration has long been the

18
most common way for humans to organize, experience, and justify their actions

(Coryell et al., 2010). Because it is the most familiar and relatable genre for kids, it

will face the least amount of opposition when used for student learning.

For instance, stories in Native American narratives, such as the Arizona Tewa,

have a formulaic beginning and ending that almost always feature a song linked

with the protagonist (Kroskrity, 2009). This formula appears frequently in children's

literature from diverse cultural groups, demonstrating its usefulness in language

play. This type of play is frequently used as an informal learning technique, and

exposing students to this type of play may be crucial in exposing them to linguistic

ideals present in a variety of ethnic groups.

Talk story is another type of language play that has been used in Hawaii. While

the narrator recounts the story's events, students examine the story's key features

and apply their own knowledge in this method. In comparison to other language-

based activities, students have more opportunities to discuss text concepts and

utilize Standard English. The Kamehameha Elementary Education Program in

Hawaii was able to reorganize teaching activities in ways that were familiar to its

kids by employing this technique. They discovered that this was a more successful

method of enhancing students' language acquisition than substantially altering the

classroom environment and procedure.

Role play is another type of language play used by Native Americans and

Hawaiian educators. Educators adapt stories and narratives into role-play activities

to incorporate creative play into their instructional repertoire. These activities

depict a real-life situation within a scenario that the students are familiar with from

their own lives. Its goal is to help them comprehend the experience they have had

19
with a certain scenario (Magos & Politi, 2008). Students participating in this type of

creative play are expected to practice their skills and develop the proper attitudes

to deal with a specific issue. The importance to role-playing activities is that they

encourage students to participate actively in the learning process. Students must

become active recipients of information in order to acquire a language; they must

be engaged in the act and experience the activity's shape and function. This not

only improves their skills in the chosen second language, but it also improves their

first language skills.

When English Language Learner (ELL) students use play-based learning, they

may communicate with their peers in a more encouraging way. Play-based

learning allows students to achieve the curriculum's objectives in a holistic manner

that requires collaboration. An ELL child will be able to visually understand the

concepts that their peers are demonstrating in the classroom, participate in the

learning process through play, and receive aural input of the knowledge that is

being transmitted among peers.

4.1.3 Research Question three: The effect of play-based learning on

students’ self-reflection

Self-reflection and the creation of meaningful interpretations assist children to

value the effort put in to accomplish a short-term goal, such as completing a basic

chore. This is frequently used during a child's playtime. During this time, children

learn to value the process that went into achieving a short-term objective, as well

as the importance of continuing to build on their work in order to reach a larger,

long-term goal. Furthermore, children will learn that quality takes effort, and that

self-reflection can help them feel more secure in their capacity to succeed

20
academically. This has a favorable impact on their emotional reactions to grades

and the grading system in general.

Students' reactions will improve over time, according to Wilson and Gilbert, and

they will value the hard work and effort put in to achieve good scores (Johnson,

1980). Students will be better equipped to comprehend what is going on if they

receive more meaningful feedback from their educators on a personal level.

Children would benefit mentally from the feedback they receive from their

educators under this new strategy. Children eagerly anticipate opportunities to

interact with their peers and educators while playing and exploring their

surroundings.

Students who participate in play-based practices and are given the opportunity to

collaborate with their instructors and family in their academic setting have less

behavioral concerns (Williams, 2006). The value of preventative vs corrective

actions is discussed by Brotman et al (Wilson & Gilbert, 2005). Students who are

unfamiliar with the different norms and routines that exist in a new setting may be

confused when they visit the classroom for the first time. It is critical for educators

to encourage youngsters to engage nicely with one another.

"Social and emotional well-being corresponds with holistic methods to teaching

and learning... in which children explore multiple components of their identity

(including social and emotional) through their play and relationships," according to

Garvis and Pendergast (2015). Play-based learning is a comprehensive approach

that is being promoted in academic contexts. Students who exhibit challenging

behavior during their early educational experiences are more likely to drop out

than their peers. Brotman et al (2011) emphasize the importance of intervening

21
before a problem arises. Play-based learning is used as part of the intervention,

including self-reflection as a technique of enhancing the learning experience.

4.2 Discussion

The benefits of play-based learning outweigh the drawbacks of traditional teaching

methods. They will be able to incorporate not just the meaning component of their

work, but also the additional health benefits. Learning can be beneficial to one's

health, and the duration of the approach can be beneficial both mentally and

physically. Students who have completed Pre-Kindergarten should continue to

work on their independence, social skills, socio-emotional development, motor

function, and other abilities. It's hard to think that a child can develop these skills in

just one academic year. As a result, it is vital to continue to learn through play

throughout one's early childhood years (from birth to eight-years-old).

Pre-kindergarten kids are given multiple opportunities to exhibit their grasp of each

curricular topic in a holistic approach, such as through representational painting,

verbal dialogue, and manipulative projects. Teachers must keep track of each

student's knowledge expressions and use them to justify the student's progress

toward the curriculum's goals. If teachers are allowed to adopt this comprehensive

approach to data collecting, it is more natural for both the child and the instructor.

Teachers will feel more at ease participating in meaningful interactions with

students, and students will feel more at peace with their exams (Wilson & Gilbert,

2005). Students will also feel more valued for the naturally creative display of their

problem-solving ability that they utilized to express the subject they studied

(Brotman, Calzada & Huang, 2011).

22
Students learn the majority of their information through carefully choreographed

actions in their environment from the time they are born until they are eight years

old (Garvis & Pendergast, 2015). When a toddler first grips a puzzle piece, they

are struck by its color, form, and texture. The child may try to deduce what this

piece's purpose or meaning is over time. This is where an educator can intervene

and assist this young mind. This will give them the push they need to finish the job.

Play-based learning in the classroom is significantly more important than

imagining children wandering around unsupervised by their teachers. Students will

work hard to achieve a challenging goal that will captivate their interest in the

project. Instructors must require students to self-reflect after finishing the work to

ensure that the task was fully comprehended. This is what drives children to

educate themselves what they believe they require. Learning via play is a normal

component of life. The educator's goal is to direct a child's play experiences such

that the child has a thorough understanding of the academic objectives.

23
 Chapter Five

Conclusion

5.1 Summary

This study was on the effect of play-based learning on students’ academic

attainment with emphasis of KS1 student with age group 5-7 years. Three

research objectives were stated for the study, document analysis was used as the

research design. Secondary data sources (published academic works on play-

based learning, books, previous projects, literature pertaining to the subject, and

online sources) were used for gathering data for the study. A qualitative data

analysis was carried out on the secondary data with emphasis on identifying

themes and patterns relevant to this study. findings from the study showed that,

play-based learning had a positive impact on the students’ academic attainment

through improving their academic development, language skill and socialization as

well as encouraging self-reflection among the students. The study summarizes the

advantages of play-based learning and how it can have a significant impact on a

child's educational path. The use of PBL is a departure from many traditional and

commonly utilized educational methods, but its benefits contain limitless potential

for students who participate in them.

5.2 Theoretical Contributions

A widespread misunderstanding among educators is that a curriculum is "...a

finished product and an immutable truth that must be handed on without inquiry."

(Nieto, 2010, p. 106). Educators had to follow a curriculum that had been

approved, implemented, and overseen by a regulatory body for years. However,

24
we now know that when teachers use culturally relevant teaching methods,

children benefit. The following conclusions were reached after a rigorous

examination of many empirical studies on the impact of play-based learning on

children's academic growth and achievement;

 Whatever type of play an educator chooses, it's important to remember that

these activities should take place in social, collaborative groups rather than

in isolation. Not only with the intended language targets, but also with peers

who are participating in the activities alongside them, play should allow for

interaction and active engagement because, when students are placed in

flexible groupings with students of diverse abilities, the most productive

groups and interactions occur (Griva & Semoglou, 2012).

 To be successful and effective, play-based learning requires an awareness

of the language required as well as proper application (Magos & Politi,

2008). For all of the benefits of PBL, students must be familiar with and

comfortable with the activity's approach. Students cannot be expected to

perfect a skill on their first exposure, as with all elements of training and

learning. To promote effective knowledge, the process and processes must

be modeled.

 The total efficacy of PBL is naturally influenced by the activity's content, as

well as the educator's and students' attitudes and participation in the

activities (Magos & Politi, 2008). It will not work if an educator does not

believe in its effectiveness, just as it will not work in any other academic

pursuit.

5.3 Study Limitations

25
This study is limited to KS1 students between the ages of 5 and 7 years. Findings

of this study may differ from age groups higher or below the case study age group.

5.4 Recommendation for further studies

This study focused group was KS1 students with ages between 5-7 years. Further

studies should be carried on to assessed if play-based learning can be still very

effective on students above 7 years of age. More so, the role of school

administration in the implementation of play-based learning curricula should also

be investigated. In addition, the perception of parents on play-based learning

should be investigated.

5.5 Implications for policy and practice

This study was on the effectiveness of play-based learning in students’ academic

attainment. After a careful analysis of the empirical studies, the following are the

implication for policy and practice;

 Since play-based learning has some positive academic outcome on

students, concerned institutions should enact policies that encourages the

practice of play-based learning by teachers.

 Academic curricula should be designed to incorporate play-based learning

as a part of teaching pedagogy used by teachers.

 Intending teachers who which to use play-based learning as part of their

teaching methods should be trained properly for effective implementation of

such teaching methods.

26
References

Ali, E., Constantino, K., Hussain, A. & Akhtar, Z. (2018). The Effects of Play-Based
Learning on Early Childhood Education and Development. Journal of
Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 7. 10.14260/jemds/2018/1044.

Antokhin, N. (2006). Language play. Applied Language Learning, 16(2), 86-90.

Retrieved from http://www.dliflc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/all16two.pdf

Barton, G. M, Baguley, M. & MacDonald, A. (2013). Seeing the bigger picture:

investigating the state of the arts in teacher education programs in Australia.
Australian Journal of Teacher Education; 38(7):74-90

Bowdon, J. (2015). The common core’s first casualty: Playful learning. Phi Delta
Kappan. 96(8):33-37.

Brotman, L. M., Calzada, E. & Huang, K. Y. (2011). Promoting effective parenting

practices and preventing child behavior problems in school among ethnically
diverse families from underserved, urban communities. Child Development.
82(1):258-76.

Cekaite, A., & Aronsson, K. (2005). Language play, a collaborative resource in

children’s L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 169-191.
doi:10.1093/applin/amh042

Chisaka B. (2013). Action Research: Some practical ideas for educational practice
save the children. Harare, UNICEF.

Coryell, J., Clark, M., & Pomerantz, A. (2010). Cultural fantasy narratives and
heritage language learning: A case study of adult heritage learners of
Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 94(3), 453-469. doi:10.1111/j.1540-
4781.2010.01055.x.

De La Riva, S. & Ryan, T. G. (2015). Effect of self-regulating behaviour on young

children’s academic success. International Journal of Early Childhood
Special Education. 7(1):69-96.

27
Fredriksen, B. C. (2012). Providing materials and spaces for the negotiation of
meaning in explorative play: Teachers’ responsibilities. Education Inquiry.
3(3):335-352

Garvis S. & Pendergast D. (2015). Thinking differently about infants and toddlers:
exploring the reflections of future Australian early childhood teachers in
Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 40(4):117-31.

Griva, E., & Semoglou, K. (2012). Estimating the effectiveness and feasibility of a
game-based project for early foreign language learning. English Language
Teaching, 5(9), 33-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p33.

Guest, G., Namey, E.E. & Mitchell. M.L. (2013). Collecting qualitative data: A field
manual for applied research. Thousand Oaks, California.

Kim, B., Park, H. & Baek, Y. (2009). Not just fun, but serious strategies: Using
meta-cognitive strategies in game-based learning. Computers and
Education. 52(4):800-10.

Kroskrity, P. (2009). Narrative reproductions: Ideologies of storytelling,

authoritative words, and generic regimentation in the village of Tewa. Journal
of Linguistic Anthropology, 19(1), 40-56. doi:10.1111/j.1548-
1395.2009.01018.x

Lake, V. E. & Pappamihiel, N. E. (2003). Effective practices and principles to

support English language learners in the early childhood classroom.
Childhood Education. 79(4):200-3

Leggett, N. & Ford, M. (2013). A fine balance: Understanding the roles educators
and children play as intentional teachers and intentional learners within the
early years learning framework. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood.
38(4):42-50.

Magos, K., & Politi, F. (2008). The contribution of role-play technique to the
teaching of a second language in immigrant classes. RELC Journal, 39(1),
96-112. doi:10.1177/0033688208091142

28
Marley, S. C., Levin, J. R., & Glenberg, A. M. (2010). What cognitive benefits does
an activity-based reading strategy afford young Native American readers.
The Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 395-417.
doi:10.1080/002209709032548061.

McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-Based

7th Edition Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association.
Chicago Press.

Nieto, S. (2010). The light in their eyes. New York: Teachers College Press.

Ontario Ministry of Education, The kindergarten program. 2016.

https://files.ontario.ca/books/edu_the_kindergarten_program_english_aoda_
web_july21.pdf. Accessed July 27, 2017.

Presser, A. L., Clements, M., Ginsburg, H. & Ertle, B. (2015). Big math for little
kids: The effectiveness of a preschool and kindergarten mathematics
curriculum. Early Education and Development. 26:399-426.

Pyle, A., DeLuca, C. & Danniels, E. (2017). A scoping review of research on play-
based pedagogies in kindergarten education. Review of Education. 1-41.
doi:10.1002/rev3.3097.

Ramani, G. B. & Eason, S. H. (2015). It all adds up: Learning early math through
play and games. Phi Delta Kappan. 96(8):27-32.

Rieber, L. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning

environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games.
Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 43-58.
doi:10.1007/BF02300540.

Russ, S., & Kaugars, A. (2001). Emotion in children’s play and creative problem
solving. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 211-219.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1302_8

Sharp, A. C., Escalante, D. L. & Anderson, G. T. (2012). Literacy instruction in

kindergarten: Using the power of dramatic play. California English.18(2):16-
18.

29
Van Oers, B. & Duijkers D. (2013). Teaching in a play-based curriculum: Theory,
practice and evidence of developmental education for young children.
Journal of Curriculum Studies. 45(4):511-534.

Wilson, T. D. & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting knowing what to want.

Current Directions in Psychological Science. 14(3):131-4.

Wood, L. D. (2014). Holding on to play: Reflecting on experiences as a playful K-3

teacher. Young Children. 69(2):48-56.

30
Dissemination activity is missing 

Educational administrators, government organizations, educational institutions,

and parents will all benefit from this research. To educational administrators, this

study highlights the benefits of incorporating play-based learning into school

curricula, as well as how best play-based learning might be applied to help

students achieve academic success. It gives a clear benefit of play-based learning

to government organizations, as well as what policies should be established to

encourage academic institutions to incorporate it into their curricula. This study

shows educational institutions how play-based learning can help students achieve

academic success as well as the limitations of play-based learning. This will

enable them to design strategic educational plans that would include play-based

learning in their academic courses. To parents, this study will provide them with

another add teaching strategy that can be used to teach their children. To reach

them, this study will be presented an educational fair where the target audience for

this study will be present.

31