Chapter 3 - Consumer Behaviour
Chapter 3 - Consumer Behaviour
Chapter 3 - Consumer Behaviour
IMPORTANT
MRS is given as the the marginal rate of substituion of good on the y axis for x axis, so
if MRSX y then it is Delta Y/ Delta X
Normally, indifference curves dont touch the axis because people dont derive the
maximum satisfaction from just one good rather than a basket unless in very rare cases
of corner solution
Survey: Coca Cola example- Whether they didn't ask if they liked Blue Cola more than
Red Cola, they just said do you like blue cola - Sales crashed caause even tho they
liked blue cola, not more than the red one
Consumer Behaviour: Description of how consumers allocate incomes among different
goods and services to maximise their well-being
Consumer Behaviour: Description of how consumers allocate incomes among different
goods and services to maximise their well-being
Steps
2. Budget Constraints: Consumers have limited income which restricts the quantities
of goods
Consumer Behaviour:
Assumptions:
4. More is better than less: goods are assumed to be desirable and the more the
better even if a little better.
Indifference Curves:
Curve representing all combinations of market baskets that a consumer with the same
level of satisfaction.
Indifference Maps:
The preferences remain the same due to which the shape of the IC remains the
same
To describe a consumers preference for all the combinations of food and clothing,
we can graph a set of different indifference curves called as an Indifference Map
Shape
The more clothing and the less food a person consumes, the more clothing he will
give up in order to obtain more food. Similarly, the more food that a person
possesses, the less clothing he will give up for more food.
MRS of food for clothing- The MRS of food F for clothing C is the maximum amount
of clothing that a person is willing to give up to obtain one additional unit of food.
a. Yes. As more and more of one good is consumed, we can expect that a
consumer will prefer to give up fewer and fewer units of a second good to get
additional units of the first one.
c. Consumers generally prefer balanced baskets as in 3.5, A has 16+1 goods and
D has 6+3 and they both have same level of satisfaction
d. It means that food and clothing aren't close substitutes- thats why the IC is
concex
Perfect Substitutes: Two goods for MRS of one for the other is a constant
Here you're willing to give up only one of one product for the other
Even if only one is preferred, that wouldnt make a difference- therefore touches
the axes
Perfect Complements- Two goods for which the MRS is zero or infinite, the ICs are
shaped as right angles
Increase in one without the increase in other will not give any additional utility,
hence L shaped curve
Hence MRS is 0, cause obv no amount of one shoe can substitute for another
type of shoe, like no amount of right shoes can substitute even one left shoe
Figure 3.7- The more steeper it is, the more is the MRS- willing to sacrifice a lot for 1
unit
The more gentle slopping it is- willing to not sacrifice a lot for 1 additional unit
Utility
Numerical score representing the satisfaction that a consumer gets from a given
market basket.
Iso Utility Curve- All long the curve the utlity remaine the same
3.8
For this reason, a utility function that generates a ranking of market baskets is
called an ordinal utility function.
The ranking associated with the ordinal utility function places market baskets in the
order of most to least preferred.
A utility function that describes by how much one market basket is preferred to
another is called a cardinal utility function.
Ordinal Utility: Utility function that generates a ranking of market baskets in order of
most to least preferred
Maybe we can measure utility by the amount of money we are willing to give up, but
it also depends from time to time
3.2
Budget Constraints
Constraints that consumers face as a result of limited incomes
Budget Line: All combinations of goods for which the total amount of money spent is
equal to income.
I = PF F + PC C
PC C = I − PF F
C = (I/PC ) − (PF /PC )F
(Assumption: We aren't saving for the future aka making a choice between current
and future consumption
Income Changes
Cause a shift in the budget line (because the vertical intercept increase/ decrease),
because slope remains the same ( why - because slope is the ratio of prices that
does not change ) hence since the slope remains the same a shifted budget line,
parallel to the previous one is made
Price Changes
a. C = (I/PC) − (PF/PC)F
b. Change in slope
d. BL rotates outward
2. Price of both the goods change but leaves ration unchanged (change in the same
percentage
a. No change in slope
Purchasing power is determined not only by income, but also by prices. For
example, our consumer’s purchasing power can double either because her income
doubles or because the prices of all the goods that she buys fall by half.
Consumer Choice
Assumption:
2. It must give the consumer the most preferred combination of goods and services.
Note that point B on indifference curve U1 is not the most preferred choice, because
a reallocation of income in which more is spent on food and less on
clothing can increase the consumer’s satisfaction
Satisfaction is maximum at
Marginal Benefit: Benefit from the consumption of one additional unit of a good.
is equal to the
1. The marginal benefit is measured by the MRS. At point A, it equals 1/2 (the
magnitude of the slope of the indifference curve), which implies that the consumer is
willing to give up 1/2 unit of clothing to obtain 1 unit of food.
2. At the same point, the marginal cost is measured by the magnitude of the slope
of the budget line; it too equals 1/2 because the cost of getting one unit of food is
giving up 1/2 unit of clothing (PF 1 and PC 2 on the budget line).
4. If the MRS is less or greater than the price ratio, the consumer’s satisfaction has not
been maximized
By this, we can use the prices of the goods to found out the MRS, but we cannot
find the quantity of goods purchased cause that is dependent on individual
preferences
Corner Solutions
Optimal point off solution is where the IC and Budget line intersect with one of th
axes
Revealed Preference
If a consumer chooses one market basket over another, and if the chosen market
basket is more expensive than the alternative, then the consumer must prefer the
chosen market basket.
1. comparing A, B and D
2. since B or any other basket below L1 could've been bought, but wasn't, we can say
b is preferred to a. (a>b)
3. direct comparison between a and d is not possible as the lie on different lines.
Hence in the pink shaded area, the right angle type things from A, E and G would
be preferred over A because
They have either more of both quantities, or more of one and equal of the other
comparedto A, E and G respectovely
Utility maximization is achieved when the budget is allocated so that the marginal
utility per dollar of expenditure is the same for each good.
what we intend to prove: MUF /PF = MUC /PC
Additional consumption of food will delta F will generate marginal utility MUF ,
hence, total increase in utility will be MUF ∗ (delta)F
As the consumer gives up more and more of C to obtain more of F, the marginal
utility of F falls and that of C increases, so MRS decreases.
Hence, utility maximization is achieved when the budget is allocated so that the
marginal utility per dollar of expenditure is the same for each good.
Rationing:
Sometimes mostly wars etc the govt. fixes prices (rations) of goods rather than
leaving it to market forces.
that while rationing is a less efficient means of allocating goods and serves, under any
particular rationing
scheme some individuals may well be better off, even though others will necessarily be
worse off.