Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1K views

    04 Quiz 1 Legal Aspects in Tourism and Hospitality

    Uploaded by

    kamella joy remiendo
    This document discusses whether a hijacking incident on a Philippines Airlines flight would be considered a force majeure, exempting the airline from liability. It notes that hijackings are uncontrollable events where hijackers seize planes when they are airborne, leaving the airline with no ability to prevent it. However, the plaintiffs in a lawsuit argue that the airline should not be exempted from liability because security measures and screening could have prevented the robbers from boarding with weapons. The document concludes that the armed robbery on board was an uncontrollable event since the airline was not allowed to search passengers for firearms, making the airline not liable.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    04 Quiz 1 Legal Aspects in Tourism and Hospitality

    Uploaded by

    kamella joy remiendo
    1K views2 pages
    This document discusses whether a hijacking incident on a Philippines Airlines flight would be considered a force majeure, exempting the airline from liability. It notes that hijackings are uncontrollable events where hijackers seize planes when they are airborne, leaving the airline with no ability to prevent it. However, the plaintiffs in a lawsuit argue that the airline should not be exempted from liability because security measures and screening could have prevented the robbers from boarding with weapons. The document concludes that the armed robbery on board was an uncontrollable event since the airline was not allowed to search passengers for firearms, making the airline not liable.

    Original Description:

    04 quiz 1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document discusses whether a hijacking incident on a Philippines Airlines flight would be considered a force majeure, exempting the airline from liability. It notes that hijackings are uncontrollable events where hijackers seize planes when they are airborne, leaving the airline with no ability to prevent it. However, the plaintiffs in a lawsuit argue that the airline should not be exempted from liability because security measures and screening could have prevented the robbers from boarding with weapons. The document concludes that the armed robbery on board was an uncontrollable event since the airline was not allowed to search passengers for firearms, making the airline not liable.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    1K views2 pages

    04 Quiz 1 Legal Aspects in Tourism and Hospitality

    Uploaded by

    kamella joy remiendo
    This document discusses whether a hijacking incident on a Philippines Airlines flight would be considered a force majeure, exempting the airline from liability. It notes that hijackings are uncontrollable events where hijackers seize planes when they are airborne, leaving the airline with no ability to prevent it. However, the plaintiffs in a lawsuit argue that the airline should not be exempted from liability because security measures and screening could have prevented the robbers from boarding with weapons. The document concludes that the armed robbery on board was an uncontrollable event since the airline was not allowed to search passengers for firearms, making the airline not liable.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    LEGAL ASPECTS OF TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY

    REMIENDO
    BSHM

    Is the incident onboard the airplane Flight Fokker “Friendship” PIC-536 considered force majeure,
    which exempts Philippines Airlines liability?
     For me, I agreed it is a specific hijacking that establishes force majeure. Hijackers do not board
    an airliner through a brazen display of firepower and extreme wrath. The objective of modern-
    era hijackers searches to display the compelling force coming to the uncontrollable event only
    when it is most effective what is when the jetliner is extemporary speech habit at Himalayan
    altitudes and unwise heroics by either the company or passengers would transmit the
    multimillion-peso aircraft and the precious lives of all allure occupants into certain demise and
    demolition. Philippine Airlines manage not to be abandoned for want of diligence. The necessary
    use of ultimate cultured photoelectric discovery devices and magnetometers, the deception of
    harsh punishments, the happening of screening processes, the assemblage of carjackers
    concerned with the manner of behaving sketches, the assignment of azure marshals, and the
    burden of abused experience opinion can have underrated robbery but all these have confirmed
    of loaded hijackers want to take the place of a plane departure, they can avoid new combined
    management and airlines manufacturing measures.

     Contending that the said earlier is a result of the gap of PAL’s permissible responsibility to bear
    them and their chattels and belongings to their Manila goal outside deficit damage, and forms
    weighty delinquency of PAL’s legal charge to exercise amazing vigor in the carefulness over the
    alike, following this opinion’s chance passage, to restore the value of the feature extinct by
    bureaucracy to the robbers in addition to moral and ideal damages, attorney’s expense and
    expenses of the action. The plaintiffs declared that their suit was begun under Civil Code items
    1754, 998, 2000 and 2001 and on the ground that concerning pronounced Civil Code item 2001
    the grumbled –of act of the supplied robbers is not an uncontrollable event, as the use of arms
    or iressistible force was not used by pronounced supplied robbers in acquiring entrance to
    defendants hapless plane in questions. Pal ordered an answer renouncing debt, alleging bury
    Alia that the stealing all the while the departure and subsequently the airplane was against
    one's will acquired at the Manila Airport acted indeed form uncontrollable event, and neither
    the plaintiffs had informed PAL or allure crews or attendants that they were in the ownership of
    cash, German marks and valuable jewelries and more or surrendered pronounced articles to the
    crew or cadre onboard the airplane. While it is valid that the use of treasure was not used
    apiece robbers to win entrance to the accused’s hapless plane, the armed robbery that accepted
    place forms an uncontrollable event for the accused is invulnerable cause the robbers were
    capable to gain entrance to the plane with revolvers they secondhand before in their ownership,
    that case keeps not have existed obviated nor avoided for one accused because it was not
    approved to search allure passengers for firearms and lethally armaments. As the allure of
    robbery establishes an uncontrollable event, the accused is invulnerable.

    You might also like