Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Map 720-M&e Lectures 3-Performance Indicators

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 25

AMREF INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY (AMIU)

MPH COURSE
MAP 720: MONITORING & EVALUATION

Dr. Nzomo Mwita, PhD


Senior Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning (MEL)
Consultant

October/November 2020
Lectures 3: Performance Indicators
Performance Indicators

 Indicators are either qualitative or quantitative criteria/or


signs used to check whether the planned result/or change
has been attained as planned.

 Performance indicators are measures of project impacts,


outcomes, outputs and inputs and are monitored during
implementation to assess progress towards project objectives.

 They are also used later to evaluate a project’s success.

 Inappropriate indicators can doom a M&E system.


Performance Indicators
• Choosing proper indicators of change is crucial to
setting up effective monitoring and evaluation system.

• Inappropriate indicators can doom an information


system (Casley D.J. and Krishna Kumar 1987).

 The criteria for selection of indicators include:


1. Unambiquous definition: The indicator must be clearly
defined in the programme's context. It should be NON-
DIRECTIONAL.
Performance Indicators

2. Consistency: The values of the indicators should stay


constant as long as they are collected
in identical conditions, no matter who does collecting.

3. Specificity: Indicators should measure specific


conditions that the programme aims to change.
Specificity usually decreases along the path from input,
effects to impact.
Performance Indicators

It will be impossible to assume that it is only the


project intervention and its activities that influence the
outcome. At both the project and the wider context
level, a whole range of unanticipated variables can
potentially influence the outcome of the project
(Oakley P. et al 1998).
Performance Indicators
4. Sensitivity: Indicators should be highly sensitive to
changes in a programme situation. For example, the
management of a programme that provides a new
seed to small holders needs to monitor the seed's
adoption rate. Short-term movement in this rate in the
early years could reveal whether or not farmers like
the seed.
Performance Indicators

5. Ease of data collection: The collection of the data


needed to calculate or assess the chosen indicators
should be within the capability of the team.
What indicators can measure

Feuerstein (1986) argues that indicators can help to determine


nine variables of change. These include:

1. Availability of something e.g. availability of service.

2. Relevance of that service in relation to people’s needs and


priorities.
3. Accessibility level to service e.g. are the services at reach of
those for whom they are meant to benefit?

4. Level of utilization of services by target population e.g. how


many of the target population are using the service?
What indicators can measure

5. Range of coverage of those who need a particular


service e.g. how many of a certain proportion of the
population are reached by the service?

6. Quality or standard of service

7. Efficiency: levels in the use of resources in relation to the


output attained.

8. Effectiveness: To what extent has the objective(s) been


achieved?
What indicators can measure

9. Impact: To what extent was the ‘effort’ or the project


making any difference?
Performance Indicators

NOTE

Indicators have to be suggested, negotiated,


adapted and approved.
Examples of Qualitative Indicators
− Level of
− Presence of
− Evidence of
− Availability of
− Quality of
− Accessibility of
− Existence of
− Sustainability of
− Improvement of
− Ability to (e.g. skills)
− Potential of
Examples of Quantitative Indicators

• Number of
• Proportion of
• Percentage of
• Amount of
• The ratio of
• Length of distance
• Weight of
• Size of
• Areas of/spread of
• Value of
Conceptual Framework for Ordering Indicators

Indicators Examples

Process Indicators Availability, accessibility

Output Indicators Activity, productivity, use of services, utilization of resources,


quality

Outcome Indicators Coverage, efficiency, efficacy

Impact Indicators Effectiveness, impact


Steps in Selecting Performance Indicators

1. Clarify the results statements

- Carefully scrutinize the results desired.

- Be clear about what type of change is expected


from the project/programme
Steps in Selecting Performance Indicators

- Clarify whether the expected change is an absolute change, a


relative change, or no change.

- Absolute changes involve the creation or introduction of


something new.

- Relative changes involve increases, decreases, improvements,


strengthening or weakening.
Steps in Selecting Performance Indicators

- No Change involves the maintenance, protection or


preservation of something that is considered fine as
is.

- Be clear about where change should appear (e.g.


children underfive, mothers of child bearing age,
etc).
Steps in Selecting Performance Indicators

- Identify the specific targets for change.

- Some activities will produce the desired change


directly while other will produce it indirectly.
For instance,
 Activities to develop micro-enterprises aim to increase
employment directly.

 Activities to reform economic policies may have the


same effect, but less directly.
Steps in Selecting Performance Indicators

2. Develop a list of possible indicators

In selecting indicators, don’t settle too quickly on the


first that come obviously to mind.

3. Assess each possible indicator


Assess and judge each possible indicator for its
appropriateness in measuring the expected
result/or change.
Steps in Selecting Performance Indicators

4. Select the ‘best’ performance indicators

- Narrow the list to the final indicators that will be used in the performance
measurement.

- Be selective. Remember the costs involved in data collection and analysis.

- Limit the number of indicators used to track each result to a few (at least (1-2).
M&E Indicator Plan

Results Outcome/Key Unit of Baseline Baseline Target Source of data Responsible LINK TO
output measure year value Agency or INTER’NAL
indicators Department OBLIGATION
(SDGS)

2019 2020

SECTOR: e.g. Public Administration

SECTOR GOAL: Improve service delivery to the public

Outcome 1: Customer Percentage 2017 35 45 55 Customer Public SDG 16


Improved satisfaction satisfaction survey Administration
service level reports Dept
delivery

Output 1.1: Number of Number 2017 20 25 30 MOU signed Public SDG 17


Partnership partnerships Administration
s established Dept
established
Performance Targets

Once a set of suitable indicators has been defined for


a programme or project, the next step is to specify
what level of performance the programme will strive
to achieve.

This involves specifying suitable performance targets


relative to current baselines.

 The baseline is the current level of performance that


the institution aims to improve.
Contact:
Dr. Nzomo Mwita, PhD
Senior Consultant-Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning (MEL)
E-mail: nzomom@yahoo.com
Phone: +254 721 440462

You might also like