Galloso Revise

i
VALENZUELA CITY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE

Kamagong St. Fortune Village VI Brgy. Parada Valenzuela City
Four-Wheeled Trolley Rack to Transport and Store

Plywood and Lumber
A Technological Research
Presented to the Faculty of
The Formal Education Department
Valenzuela City Polytechnic College
In Partial Fulfillment of
The Requirements for the
Degree of Bachelor of Technical
Teacher Education Major in Civil Technology
Golloso, Emmanuel E.
Candelaria, Thomas Nelson F.
Nacino, Camilla Mae M.
2022
ii
APPROVAL SHEET
This research proposal entitled “ FOUR-WHEELED TROLLEY RACK TO

TRANSPORT AND STORE PLYWOOD AND LUMBER” prepared and
submitted by Golloso, Emmanuel E., Candelaria, Thomas Nelson F.,Nacino,
Camilla Mae M., in partial fulfillment of the requirements to the degree of
Bachelor of Technical Teacher Education Major in Civil Technology has been
examined and is recommended for the ORAL EXAMINATION
DR. JOSE M. RAPSING, LPT, Ph.D.

Professor/Adviser
Approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

Bachelor of Technical Teacher Education Major in Civil Technology by the
committee on oral examination with a grade average of ____ on ____
DR. DONATO S. GALLEGO

Chairman
ENGR. FLORINO T. OIGA DR. GINA R. SEÑORA

Statistician Grammarian
MS. MARY GRACE MAGANA
Coordinator
ACCEPTED and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree
of Bachelor of Technical Teacher Education Major in Civil Technology.
DR. MARICEL F. MAURICIO YOLANDA GADON, Ph.D.

College Dean College Administrator
iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The researchers heartily express profound gratitude first to the Almighty
God, the source of wisdom, strength and courage for the completion of this thesis
and to the following persons who unselfishly helped the researchers make this
study a success.
Dr. Jose M. Rapsing, the researcher adviser, whose guidance, knowledge
and time, served as motivation to pursue the completion of this paper.
Ms. Mary Grace Magana, CVT Coordinator, for sharing ideas, support,
guidance, knowledge, and advice with regards to the study.
Dr. Donato S. Gallego, Chairman of the panel, for giving ideas,
suggestions, and advice to the researchers.
Engr. Florino T. Oiga, Statistician, for assisting with the research data
analysis and correction of formulas to be used.
Dr. Gina R. Señora, Grammarian, for helping us to correct our grammar
and checking our format in research.
Dr. Maricel F. Mauricio, College Dean, for permitting the researchers to
conduct this study and for giving encouraging words to the researchers.
iv
Yolanda Gadon, Ph.D, College Administrator of the Valenzuela City
Polytechnic College, for her encouragement and guidance for allowing the
researchers to conduct the study in there are of jurisdiction and for the
assistance during the administration of questionnaires.
And most of all the glory and honor is given to the Lord Jesus Christ for all
the blessings, wisdom, knowledge, and strength in making this research
possible.
THE RESEARCHERS
E.E.G.
C.M.N.
N.F.C.
v
TABLE OF CONTENT
PRELIMINARIES PAGE
Title Page .................................................... i

Approval Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
Acknowledgement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..v
CHAPTER I: THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND AND REVIEW OF

RELATED LITERATURE
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Conceptual Framework ....................................3
Paradigm of the Study ....................................4
Statement of the Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Hypothesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Significance of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Scope and Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Review of Related Literature
Foreign Literatures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Foreign Studies ........................................ .9
Local Literatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Local Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Definition of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
CHAPTER II: METHODOLOGY

Research Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Research Locale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Respondent of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Instrumentation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Sample and Sampling Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Data Gathering Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
CHAPTER III: PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF

DATA
Demographic Profile of the Respondents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

The Level of Acceptability of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Significant Differences on the Level of Acceptability of . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
CHAPTER IV: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND

RECOMMENDATION
vi
Summary of findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Recommendation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 34
BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36
APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38
CURRICULUM VITAE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65

vii
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

APPENDIX B Tally of the Respondents in terms of Affordability as to Age .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
APPENDIX C Tally of the Respondents in terms of Durability as to
Age . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
APPENDIX D Tally of the Respondents in terms of Usability as to Age . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
APPENDIX E Tally of the Respondents in terms of Affordability as to
Number of Years of Work Experience. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 43
APPENDIX F Tally of the Respondents in terms of Durability as to Number
of Years of Work Experience. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 44
APPENDIX G Tally of the Respondents in terms of Usability as to Number
of Years of Work Experience. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 45
APPENDIX H Level of Acceptability of Respondents in terms of
Affordability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
APPENDIX I Level of Acceptability of Respondents in terms of
Durability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
APPENDIX J Level of Acceptability of Respondents in terms of Usability . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .48
TABLE 2.1 Level of Acceptability of Four-wheeled Trolley Rack to

Transport and Store Plywood and Lumber according to age
in terms of affordability, durability and usability. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49
TABLE 2.2 Level of Acceptability of Four-wheeled Trolley Rack to
Transport and Store Plywood and Lumber according to
Number of Years of Work Experience in terms of
affordability, durability and usability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . 51
viii
APPENDIX K Significant difference in the level of acceptability according to

Age in terms of
Affordability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53
APPENDIX L Significant difference in the level of acceptability according to
Age in terms of Durability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 55
APPENDIX M Significant difference in the level of acceptability according to
Gender in terms of Affordability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
APPENDIX N Significant difference in the level of acceptability according to
Gender in terms of Durability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59
APPENDIX O Significant difference in the level of acceptability according to
Occupation in terms of Affordability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .61
APPENDIX P Significant difference in the level of acceptability according to
Occupation in terms of Durability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
1
CHAPTER I
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND AND REVIEW OF RELATED

LITERATURE
Introduction
In our generation, many people are continuously constructing houses and
buildings. But construction is a high hazard industry, workers are exposed on
activities that might put their lives in danger, such as lifting and transporting of
materials on a construction field. It has been one of the hardest works that gives
so much problem to the workers. So, what product should the researcher can
provide in order to help workers? Is it more convenient and safer tool?
The most conspicuous utilization of pressed wood is in primary
applications. Compressed wood can normally withstand a ton of stress and full
climate openness. Underlying compressed wood is best utilized for shafts and
hoardings, however it is generally utilized in cases, canisters, interior designs,
open air furniture, and boxes. In order to lift a plywood for a building construction
we utilize our exposed hands with the goal that it takes a ton of laborers to lift a
pressed wood. When holding an object with an extremely small mass applying
precision grip, the grip load examination was scrutinized healthy adults (N=17)
grip a portable apparatus, further measurement of grip force dependent finger
surface contact location and finger skin indentation as well as the discrimination
of test of weight. The parallel relationship was change when the object is smaller
than 30 g. safety margin in the static grip force and normalized to moment were
2
also elevated towards the lower end of the object and both surfaces. The result
indicated that the strategy of grip force with extremely small mass differs with a
mass above 30 g. skin indentation and weight discrimination decrease the level
of cutaneous feedback signal from the finger pads might have played some role
in efficient grip force to control low mass objects, the signal dependent, internal
noises and anticipated inertial forces on the object due to acceleration of arm and
hand also contributed to the cost function. (Hiramatsu et al. 2015).
According to Stefan R. (2017), the common practices in industries is
manual lifting to move or transport an object to desire place. Nowadays,
mechanized equipment is popularly available as an essential way of manual
lifting which is still considered to perform material handling task. It is important for
construction, which require numerous materials, and people that directly affects
the value and time of construction.
The Bachelor of Technical Teacher Education Major in Civil Technology
Students of Valenzuela City Polytechnic College is building research about an
Four-wheeled trolley rack to transport and store plywood and lumber. First,
planning to develop the study on how the materials easily to transport and carry
through the use of four-wheeled trolley rack to transport and store plywood and
lumber for civil work for less manual difficulties to help construction workers. The
aim of this study is to develop a four-wheeled trolley rack to transport and store
plywood and lumber for construction. This product is use to easily transport and
carry a construction material such as lumber and plywood specifically when the
3
plywood needed to be paint. This research study aims on testing the conceptual
hypothesis of similar and different research studies about four-wheeled trolley
rack to transport and store plywood and lumber for construction field.
Conceptual Framework
The flow of study is show in paradigm below:
INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

1. Profile of the 1. Preparing of
respondents in terms of:
the materials:
1.1 Age
1.2 Years of working
2. Formulation of
experience
the survey tools
2. The level of
acceptability of the 3. Conducting
four-wheeled trolley the survey Four-wheeled
rack to transport and
store plywood and 4. Data gathering trolley rack to
lumber as perceived by
the respondents in 5. Analysis of the
terms of: data transport and
2.1 Affordability
2.2 Durability store plywood
2.3 Usability
3.Significant difference and lumber.

in the level of
acceptability of four-
wheeled trolley rack to
transport and store
plywood and lumber” in
terms of affordability,
durability and usability
as perceived by the
respondents when their
profile is considered.
Figure1. The Paradigm of The Study
The paradigm of the study is composed of three frames, which is the input,
the process and the output. The input describes the profile of the respondents in
4
terms of age and years of working experience, the level of acceptability of four-
wheeled trolley rack to transport and store plywood and lumber as perceived by
the respondents in terms of: Affordability, Durability, and Usability. Also, the
significant difference in the level of acceptability of four-wheeled trolley rack to
transport and store plywood and lumber as perceived by the respondents when
their profile is considered is included.
The second frame is the process which contains the preparation of the
materials, the formulation of the survey tools, the conducting of the survey, the
data gathering and the analysis of the data.
The third frame is the output which is the four-wheeled trolley rack to
transport and store plywood and lumber.
Statement of the Problem
This research study aims to determine the level of acceptability of four-
wheeled trolley rack to transport and store plywood and lumber as perceived by
the respondents.
Specifically, this study sought to answer the following questions:
1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of:
1.1 Age
1.2 Years of working experience
2. What is the level of acceptability of the four-wheeled trolley rack to transport
and store plywood and lumber as perceived by the respondents in terms
of:
5
2.1 Affordability
2.2 Durability
2.3 Usability
3. Is there significant difference in the level of acceptability of four-wheeled trolley
rack in terms of Affordability, Durability and Usability as perceived by the
respondents when their profile is considered?
Hypothesis
There is no significant difference in level of acceptability of four-wheeled
trolley rack in terms of Affordability, Durability, and Usability as perceived by the
respondents when their profile is considered.
Significance of the Study
The result of this study will be helpful and may have beneficial to the
following:
Student: The information they will get in this examination will be valuable
such that their abilities can be upgraded further.
Workers. It will be a big help in their work field to lessen difficulties and
time span they are struggling with when transporting other construction materials,
lumber and plywood specifically when the plywood needed to be paint in
construction.
Future Researchers. This research will guide future researchers in
developing more tools to assist the worker in their work place, most especially
6
about the Civil technology students. This may be a tool for their future studies
especially if this is related to this topic.
Scope and Delimitation
The focus of the study is to determine the acceptability of four-wheeled
trolley rack to transport and store plywood and lumber. The study was
undertaken at Barangay. Veinte Reales, Dalandanan and Gen. T. de Leon in
Valenzuela City. The respondents of this study were 30 construction workers
from these barangays. The study used purposive sampling to determine the
respondents of this study. Descriptive and experimental method were used in this
research. Statistical tools such as, percentage, weighted mean, chi-square were
also used to analyze the data gathered. This study was undertaken this school
year 2021-2022
Review Related Literature and Studies
Foreign Literature
This project aims to develop a cart-trolley that can support the physical
distribution of goods. Currently, this process is carried out using manual tools
and equipment. This system consists of three components, namely, a cart, a fork,
and a flat plate. When stretched, the system turns into a cart, while when tilted, it
elevates the cart. It then turns into a trolley when folded. The system is controlled
by a pair of wiper motors. The circuit board is composed of a wireless module,
relays, and wires. The microcontroller (ESP8266EX) is used to control the cart's
7
operation. The cart-trolley was tested and showed that it could handle the weight
of various objects with high efficiency and throughput. (Oluwayomi J. et al., 2020)
Manual handling and repetitive tasks involving the use of manual props
and pull forces are very common in factories and industrial settings. Doing these
activities can become dangerous and cause injuries if done improperly. The
study involved the evaluation of the pull strength of an apparel cart/trolley puller
and the muscular activity of upper limbs. The data was collected through an
electronic data acquisition system (IDSA). Electromyographical data was
collected on the muscles involved in the pull tasks. The subjects were observed
to perform pull tasks while seated. The results indicated that the isometric value
of torso pull while seated is higher than that of arm lift. Time study is a process
utilized for measuring the times required for various tasks in a repetitive
manufacturing process. This technique is commonly used in garment production
lines. The factory was producing work wears for men and women. The study
analyzed the existing set up and its effects on the production line. The findings
revealed that the existing set up could be improved through a series of activities
and line balancing. A time study was carried out to analyze the productivity of a
machine before and after implementing various changes. The results indicated
that the productivity boost was significant. The study revealed that by using a
process that is optimized for material flow and production line, it can reduce work
in process and make the finished products more attractive to customers. (Savino
M. et al., 2019)
8
Foreign Study
The studies highlight the intelligent trolley has provided more
convenience, besides convenience it has save time there is no need for the
consumer to stand and wait in the long queues to pay for they purchases which
the customers have been complaining about before. My research conducted over
the intelligent trolley highlights the impact it had over the supermarkets and the
retail store. this research revealed that the introduction of this technology would
require some finance and the stores would have to bare some cost in order to
upgrade the IT systems. The introduction of intelligent trolley would provide
competitive edge to the stores as they would be offering extra services to the
customers. The price that the store are offer are almost the same these new
features offered in the form of intelligent trolley would attract more customers.
(Sami Muslat Alataibi 2012)
The aim of this work is the non-linear study by the finite element method
(FEM) of the mechanical performance of timber joints’ systems for the beam
elements used in the construction of roofs, whenever they are bent at the same
plane. A full three-dimensional numerical analysis was carried out assuming an
orthotropic behavior model of the material with a failure criterion based on the
requirements of the Eurocode 5 rule. The non-linearity is because of the contact
between the joint's bolts and the wood's components and compressed wood's
components just as the huge removals in the framework. The investigation
likewise incorporates the full-scale exploratory trial of six whole brackets of 6 m
range and 1.0 m high, subject to bowing in four focuses as indicated by the
9
system set up in the UNE-EN 595:1996 standard. Three examples have the
association object of this investigation while the other three leftover ones have
the steel fitting utilized consistently in these wood structures. The purpose of this
work is to replace the joint pieces used regularly up to now, built with steel fitting,
with other pieces made with wood’s sections obtained from birch plywood board.
This aim is achieved comparing the resistant characteristics of both connection
methods and validating the developed numerical model. In order to know the
influence of the most important variables in the structural behavior of the plywood
board timber connection, a design of experiments (DOEs) is carried out. Finally,
the more meaningful conclusions from the models and analyses carried out are
exposed, showing a good agreement between the numerical results and
experimental tests, as well as a very similar performance between the connection
systems analyzed: steel fittings and birch plywood board. Diaz D. et al., (2012)
Local Literature
Storage rack systems are made up of columns, beams, and bracing made
out of cold-formed steel structural elements. The rack columns have unusual
design features in that they include perforations to aid in system assembly,
making them more challenging to evaluate using cold-formed steel structure
design rules. There are many design codes proposed by manufacturers
associations, such as the Rack Manufacturers Institute (RMI) specifications,
which are used in the United States alongside the American Iron and Steel
Institute specifications (AISI). For determining the resistance of stub columns,

10
these programmed suggest experimental stub column testing. The commercial
software ANSYS is used in this study to perform material and geometric non-
linear analysis of these columns, and the findings are compared to experimental
data obtained through stub column tests for a typical piece of racks built in Brazil.
(Khosrow G, Eduardo M. 2005)
Local Study
Manual material handling (MMH) task contributes to a large percentage of
musculoskeletal disorder cases and injuries in occupational settings.
Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) often involve strains and sprains to the lower
back, shoulders, and upper limbs. They can bring about the openness of laborers
to hazard factors that at last transform into expensive wounds and lost
usefulness. A few examinations have shown that powerful ergonomic mediations
can diminish the actual requests of manual material dealing with undertakings in
this way bringing down the event and seriousness of MSD and word related
wounds. To control the nature and severity of these injuries in the MMH task, this
paper aims to design an ergonomic trolley to assist the tasks of workers. The
researchers were able to come up with a design of a 6-wheel trolley that has the
capacity to carry a load of 100-kg weight. It has a Tri-Star hub that rotates to
overcome uneven floors and stairs that will enable to single-handedly transport
load safely. Moreover, the handle stature and handle breadth of the streetcar
depended on anthropometric components of Filipino laborers to be specific
standing elbow stature furthermore, handgrip breadth to coordinate with the plan
11
of streetcar to the anthropometric necessities of Filipino clients. The 3D design of
the trolley was made using Fusion 360 software. After which, the trolley was
fabricated using a plasma cutter and lathe machine. It was then tested on three
different pushing positions (rough surface, elevated surface, and staircase) to
compute for its mechanical advantage. The researchers then analyzed and
computed for the actual force that must be applied comparing it to the load that
can be transported by six-wheeled trolley. The findings of the study have proved
that the newly designed trolley will be able to reduce the risks in manual pushing
and pulling operations involving whole-body effort as evidenced by the result
RAPP tool analysis. (Querubin M. et al., 2020)
Definition of terms
To make this research or study more applicable and understandable the
following terms were defined as follows:
Acceptability. Acceptability refers to determining how well intervention
will be received by the target population, and the extent to which the new
intervention or might meet the needs of the target population and organizational
setting. (Guadalupe X Ayala et al. J Public Health Dent. Winter 2011).
Affordability. It is the extent to which something is affordable, as
measured by its cost relative to the amount that the purchaser can pay.
If something is affordable, its price is reasonable, it is inexpensive, most people
can afford it. An affordable product or service is within most people’s budget.
(Market Business News)

12
Durability. It can be defined as the ability of a physical product to remain
functional, without requiring excessive maintenance or repair, when faced with
the challenges of normal operation over its design lifetime (definition stolen from
Tim Cooper).
Plywood. It is a structural material consisting of sheets of wood glued or
cemented together with the grains of adjacent layers arranged at right angles
or at a wide angle. (Merriam Webster)
Rack. Is a framework, stand, or grating on or in which articles are
placed (Merriam Webster)
Safety. The condition of being safe from undergoing or causing hurt,
injury, or loss.
Wood. A hard substance that forms the branches and trunks of trees and
can be used as a building material, for making things, or as a fuel.

13
CHAPTER II
METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the research design, respondents, setting,
and research instrument, procedure of data gathering and statistical treatment of
data used in this study.
Research Design
The descriptive-evaluation method of research employing a questionnaire
and documentary analysis will be used since this study will deal only with the
level of acceptability of four-wheeled trolley rack to transport and store plywood
and lumber. Copies of the questionnaire will be issued to the target respondents
who are construction workers in the City of Valenzuela to obtain a
comprehensive data about their perception as to the claims of the device.
Analysis of the data is likewise to be undertaken to gather substantial information
of their perceptions.
Descriptive method is a research method that describes the features of
the population or subject under investigation. This methodology emphasizes the
"what" of the research subject rather than the "why" of the research subject.
Experimental method is research involves the manipulation of variables to
establish cause and effect relationships. The key features are controlled methods
and the random allocation of participants into controlled and experimental
groups.
14
Research Locale
This study was conducted in three (3) barangays. The respondents were
composed of thirty (30) individuals from three (3) different barangays, ten (10)
respondents from Dalandanan, ten (10) respondents from Viente Reales and ten
(10) respondents from Gen. T. de Leon.
FIGURE 2: VICINITY MAP OF DALANDANAN

15
FIGURE 3: VICINITY MAP OF VEINTE REALES
FIGURE 3: VICINITY MAP OF GEN. T. DE LEON

16
Respondents of the Study
The researchers involved thirty (30) construction workers as respondents.
These research respondents were chosen by purposive sampling which then
take part in evaluating the level of acceptability of Four-wheeled trolley rack to
transport and store plywood and lumber based on the indicators in the
conceptual model.
Sample and Sampling Technique
Judgement or Purposive Sampling was utilized in the study. This sampling
technique relies on the judgement of the researcher when choosing who to ask to
participate. Using this technique, the researchers will find a respondent that will
suit to the characteristics that is needed in this study.
Instrumentation
The instrument that was used is a researcher-made questionnaire to
gather the needed data for the respondent profile and the questions about the
acceptability of the Four-wheeled trolley rack to transport and store plywood and
lumber. After formulating the questionnaire, the researchers asked experts to
validate the questionnaire.
Likert Scale was also be used in this study to determine the acceptability
of the four-wheeled trolley rack to transport and store plywood and lumber. Likert
17
Scale is a rating scale, often found on survey forms, that measures how people
feel about something.
Likert Scale
Rating Scale Range Adjective Descriptive

5 4.51 - 5.00 Highly Acceptable
4 3.51 – 4.50 Acceptable
3 2.51 – 3.50 Moderately Acceptable
2 1.51 – 2.50 Less Acceptable
1 1.00 – 1.50 Not Acceptable
Data Gathering Procedures
The researchers secured permission from the Dean of the College through
their research adviser before convening the thirty (30) Construction workers for
the evaluation of the level of acceptability. The questionnaire was given to all the
chosen respondents.
The researchers personally conducted the evaluation and administration
of the distribution and retrieval of the copies of the questionnaire with the
cooperation and assistance of the fellow researchers. This process was under
the strict supervision of the research professor and research adviser.
As soon as the respondents have finished the evaluation process, the lead
researcher personally collected them.

18
The results of the evaluation were consolidated, organized, tallied and
tabulated in distribution table.
Procedures, Materials, and Product Design
Phase Number Procedure
Phase I Make a drawing plan.

Phase II Prepare the tools and materials. Grinder welding machine and
angle bar
Phase III Cut 7x7 and 3x3 angle bar for the size of the base
Phase IV Cut angle bar based on the sized that you need for your base
and frame.
Phase V Cut 2 6x6 and 2 3x3 angle bar for top triangle
Phase VI Welding 8 angular bars to form a 2 square.

Phase VII Welding the all 6x6 and 3x3 to make a top triangle, make slant
design through the use of angular bar and weld it.
Phase Vlll Make a stoper to the both end of your base.
Phase lX Apply anti-rust properties on your trolley rack.
Phase X Lastly attach the four wheels under it.
Materials:
QTY. Amount Amount

ITEMS SIZE Pieces Per Unit
Angular Bar 16 m 4 400 1600
Bolts 8 5 40
Wheels 9 cm 4 20 80
Welding Rod 20 50/box 50
Total 1,770
Expenses
19
Kamagong Street Fortune Village Parada Valenzuela City
Product Design
Statistical Treatment
The research study used
the following statistical tools:
percentage, mean, weighted
mean, chi- square test, and
Likert scale.
20
Percentage- the use of percentage distribution was employed to find the answers
to the questionnaire checklist profile formula.
Formula:
P = f x 100
Where:
P= Percentage
f = frequency of respondents
n = total number of respondents
Mean – refers to the average that is used to derive the central tendency of data in
question
Formula:
Where:
X = mean
= total sum of the product of x and frequency
n = given sample data
Weighted Mean = weighted average is a mean calculated by giving values in a
data set more influence according to some attitude of the data.

21
Formula: WM = TWF/N
Where:
WM= Weighted Mean
TWF= total weighted frequency
N = Total number of respondents
Chi-Square Test = the Chi-Square statistic is commonly used for
testing relationships between categorical variables. The null hypothesis of
the Chi-Square test is that no relationship exists on the categorical variables in
the population; they are independent.
Formula:
Where:
Chi-square test
O = Grand total observed frequency
E = total product of frequency
Expected Frequency- are counts calculated using probability theory.
Formula: E = RT x CT
OT
Where:
22
RT = Row Total
CT = Column Total
OT = Overall Total
Degree of Freedom - Degrees of freedom are the number of independent values
that a statistical analysis can estimate. This is used to look the critical values for
an equation using a critical value table, which in turn determines the statistical
significance of the results.
Formula: df = (r-1) (c-1)
Where:
r = Number of Rows
c = Number of Columns
23
CHAPTER III
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This chapter presents the analysis and interpretation of the data obtained
through a survey using a questionnaire and documentary materials pertinent to
the specific questions posed in Chapter 1.
1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents
Table 1.1
Distributions of the Respondents according to Age
Age Frequency Percentage
19-23 8 26.67
24-28 10 33.33
29- above 12 40.00
Table 1.1 shows the distribution of the respondents according to Age. Age
29 and above got the highest percentage of 40 with the total frequency of 12.
Moreover, 10 or 33.33 percent are from age 24 to 28, and the lowest has the
percentage of 26.67 within the frequency of 8 coming from the age of 19 to 23.
The findings indicate that the average age of the respondents is 27 years old.
Table 1.2
Distributions of the Respondents according to Number of Years
24
of Work Experience
Number of Years of Work Frequency Percentage
Experience
1-6 years 14 46.67
7-12 years 15 50.00
13- and above 1 3.33
TOTAL 30 100
Table 1.2 In terms of number of years of work experience, the table 1.2
shows that 14 or 46.67 percent have 1 to 6 years of work experience; 15 or 50.00
percent have 7 to 12 years’ experience and those with 13 years and above
working experience has 1 or 3.33 percent. This implies that the highest numbers
of years of work experience of the respondents has the frequency of 15 or 50.00
percent in the 7 to 12 years.

25
2. The Level of Acceptability of Four-wheeled Trolley Rack to Transport

and Store Plywood and Lumber as Perceived by the Respondents in
terms of Affordability, Durability and Usability
Table 2.0
The level of Acceptability of Four-wheeled Trolley Rack to Transport and

Store Plywood and Lumber
Indicators Average Weighted Verbal Interpretation
Mean
AFFORDABILITY 4.12 Acceptable
DURABILITY 4.62 Highly Acceptable
USABILITY 4.52 Highly Acceptable
Average Weighted 4.42 Acceptable
Mean
The indicator “Affordability” obtained a 4.12 average weighted mean which
was interpreted as acceptable. The indicator “Durability” obtained a 4.62 average
weighted mean which was interpreted as highly acceptable. The indicator
“Usability” obtained a 4.52 average weighted mean which was interpreted as
highly acceptable. The result shows that the level of acceptability of four-wheeled
trolley rack to transport and store plywood and lumber is acceptable as
perceived by the respondents.
3. Significant different in the level of acceptability of wood ash as an

additive in making concrete bricks compared to standard cement in
terms of Affordability and Durability.
Table 3.1
26
Significant Difference in the Level of Acceptability of Four-wheeled

Trolley Rack to Transport and Store Plywood and Lumber
as Perceived by the Respondents in terms of Age
Indicator Df x2 - x2 - Decision Interpretation
Tabular Computation in Ho
@0.05
Affordability 6 12.592 9.321 Accept H0 Not Significant
Durability 4 9.488 2.569 Accepted Not Significant
Usability 4 9.488 4.360 Accepted Not Significant
Table 3.1 shows the significant difference on the level of acceptability of
four-wheeled trolley rack to transport and store plywood and lumber as perceived
by the respondents when their age is considered.
Affordability obtained a chi-square computed value of 9.321 with the
degree of 6 and a tabular of 12.592 at 0.05 level of significance. Since the
computed value was less than the tabular value, the decision was to accept the
null hypothesis. There was no significant difference on the level of acceptability of
by the respondents when their age was considered.
Durability obtained a chi-square computed value of 2.569 with the degree
of 4 and a tabular of 9.488 at 0.05 level of significance. Since the computed value
was less than the tabular value, the decision was to accept the null hypothesis.
27
There was no significant difference on the level of acceptability of four-wheeled
trolley rack to transport and store plywood and lumber as perceived by the
respondents when their age was considered.
Usability obtained a chi-square computed value of 4.360 with the degree of
4 and a tabular of 9.488 at 0.05 level of significance. Since the computed value
Table 3.2
Significant Difference in the level of Acceptability of Four-wheeled

Trolley Rack to Transport and Store Plywood and Lumber
According to Number of Years of Work Experience
Indicator Df x2 - x2 - Decision Interpretation
Tabular Computation in Ho
@0.05
Affordability 6 12.592 6.532 Accepted Not Significant
Durability 4 9.488 1.302 Accepted Not Significant
Usability 4 9.488 3.906 Accepted Not Significant
Table 3.2 shows the significant difference on the level of acceptability of
by the respondents when their years of work experience is considered.

28
Affordability obtained a chi-square computed value of 6.532 with the
degree of 6 and a tabular of 12.592 at 0.05 level of significance. Since the
computed value was less than the tabular value, the decision was to accept the
null hypothesis. There was no significant difference on the level of acceptability of
by the respondents when their age was considered.
Durability obtained a chi-square computed value of 1.302 with the degree
of 4 and a tabular of 9.488 at 0.05 level of significance. Since the computed value
Usability obtained a chi-square computed value of 3.906 with the degree of
4 and a tabular of 9.488 at 0.05 level of significance. Since the computed value

29
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
This part of the study presents the overall summary, results of findings,
conclusion and recommendation. After the respondents answer the questionnaire
the researchers found out that the Four-wheeled Trolley Rack to Transport and
Store Plywood and Lumber is accepted in terms of Affordability, Durability and
Usability.
Summary:
This study which dealt with the analysis of acceptability was conducted during
the second semester of SY: 2021-2022.
More specifically, this study sought answers to the following specific problems:
1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of:
1.1 Age
1.2 Years of working experience
2. What is the level of acceptability of the four-wheeled trolley rack to transport

and store plywood and lumber as perceived by the respondents in terms of:
2.1 Affordability
2.2 Durability
2.3 Usability
30
3. Is there a significant difference in the level of acceptability of four-wheeled
trolley rack to transport and store plywood and lumber in terms of Affordability,
Durability and Usability as perceived by the respondents when their profile is
considered?
The researcher used descriptive method of research, employing a questionnaire
and documentary analysis, was used in conducting this study. Thirty (30)
respondents were chosen purposely to participate in this study.
The survey data from questionnaire and documents were consolidated,
organized and presented in various tables. The data were analyzed and
interpreted by using the weighted mean and the Chi-Square (X2) test for
independence for significant difference.
The findings for this study are presented in the preceding statements.
Findings
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the level of
acceptability of Four- Wheeled Trolley Rack to Transport and Store Plywood and
Lumber in terms of Affordability, Durability and Usability.

31
Based on the analysis and interpretation of data, the following findings are
presented:
1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents
1.1 Age range 19-23 had 8 respondents with the percentage of 26.67
percent. Age range 24-28 had respondents with the percentage of 33.33 percent.
Age range 29- above had 12 respondents with the percentage of 40.00 percent.
This implies that the age range 29- above had the most respondents while age
range 19-23 had the least number of respondents.
1.2 Number of years of working experience, 1-6 years had 14
respondents with the percentage of 46.67 percent. 7-12 years had 15
respondents with the percentage of 50.00 percent. 13 to 18 years had only one
respondent with the percentage of 3.33 percent.
2. The level of acceptability of the four wheeled trolley rack to transport
and store plywood and lumber in the perspective of the target respondents
in terms of Affordability, Durability, and Usability
The average weighted score of Affordability is 4.12 interpreted as
acceptable, Durability got an average weighted score of 4.62 interpreted as
acceptable and Usability got an average weighted score of 4.52 interpreted as
acceptable.
32
3. The significant difference in the level of acceptability of four
wheeled trolley rack to transport and store plywood and lumber in terms of
Affordability, Durability and Usability as perceived by the respondents
when their profile is considered.
A. Affordability, Durability, and Usability according to Age
The computed x² value for Affordability, Durability, and Usability in terms
of Age was less than the tabular x² value, the decision was to accept the null
hypothesis. Therefore, there has no significant difference in the level of
acceptability of four wheeled trolley rack to transport and store plywood and
lumber as perceived by the respondents when the age is considered.
B. Affordability, Durability, and Usability according to Years of Worker’s
Experience
The computed x² value for Affordability, Durability, and Usability in terms
of Years of Worker’s Experience was less than the tabular x² value, the decision
was to accept the null hypothesis. Therefore, there has no significant difference
in the level of acceptability of four wheeled trolley rack to transport and store
plywood and lumber as perceived by the respondents when their Years of
Worker's Experience was considered.

33
Conclusion
Based in the findings in this study which was shown in the presentation
and analysis of data,
1. As perceived by the demographic profile, the researchers concluded that,
most of the respondents participated in this study are in the age of 29 and
above, and also those most of the respondents participated in this study
have 7-12 years of working experience.
2. Some characteristics of the product, such as its affordability and usability,
need to be enhanced or upgraded in order to make the product more
effective and cost efficient, as well as for this product to be highly acceptable.
3. The finding presents there's no significant difference in the level of
acceptability of four-wheeled trolley rack to transport and store plywood and
lumber when the demographic profiles of the respondents were considered.
Recommendations
Based on the findings and conclusion presented, the researchers arrived at the
following recommendations:
1. The researchers would like to recommend to have more extensive studies in
four wheeled trolley rack to transport and store plywood and lumber so that
34
they can better understand the usefulness of the product for the age 28 and
under.
2. The researchers would like to recommend Four-Wheeled trolley rack to
transport and store plywood and lumber, can be used in Vocational Institutions
and industries that involves carpentry, masonry, plumbing and other related
fields.
3. Future researchers must consider the materials that will be used or added to
the product (if any) in order to maintain and increase the product's quality.
4. As an off-shoot to this study, Four-wheeled trolley rack to transport and store
plywood and lumber should be considered for future study.

35
BIBLIOGRAPHY
36
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Electronic References
Querubin M. E., Jasper M. V., Kichan Y, and Engr. Sherwin S. M (2020)
An Ergonomic Design of Six-Wheeled Trolley for Transportation of a 100-
kg Weight Load. Retrieved from Resource Media Website
http://www.ieomsociety.org/detroit2020/papers/28.pdf.
Alotaibi, Sami (2012) Intelligent trolley. Resource Media. Retrieved from
Resource Media Website:
https://uobrep.openrepository.com/handle/10547/302716
J.J.del Coz DíazaP.J.García NietobA.Lozano Martínez-LuengasaF.J.Suarez
DomínguezaJ.Domínguez Hernándezc. (2013)
Non-linear numerical analysis of plywood board timber connections by DOE-FEM
and full-scale experimental validation. Retrieved from Resource Media
Website: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/
S0141029612005597
O.J.OyejideaM.OOkwuabL.K.TartibubO.IOlayodeb (2020) Development of sensor
controlled convertible cart-trolley. Retrieved from Resource Media Website:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827120307873
Khosrow G, Eduardo M. (2005) Analysis of steel storage rack columns. Retrieved
from Resource Media Website:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0143974X050004
37
APPENDICES
38
APPENDIX A
Survey Questionnaire for Four-Wheeled Trolley Rack to Transport and
Store Plywood and Lumber
Dear Respondents.
We, the researchers and 3rd year students major of Civil Technology in Valenzuela City
Polytechnic College are conducting a survey about the level of acceptability of “Four-Wheeled
Trolley Rack to Transport and Store Plywood and Lumber” as a major requirement of our
research class. With this, we are kindly asking for your participation in answering this survey
questionnaire.
Thank you for your consideration and participation.
Sincerely yours,
BTTE-Civil Technology 3B
Part A. Directions: Please answer the following questions by writing your answer on the blanks.
Name: (Optional)
Age:
Number of years of work experience:
Part B. Directions: Below are questions that would state your opinion on the acceptability of the
Four-Wheeled Trolley Rack to Transport and Store Plywood and Lumber. Rate the following
using 5 being the highest and 1 the lowest.
5-Highly acceptable
4-Acceptable
3-Moderately acceptable
2-Less acceptable
1-Not acceptable
The Level of Acceptability of “Four-Wheeled Trolley Rack to Transport and Store Plywood and
Lumber” in terms of:
Affordability 5 4 3 2 1
1. Would you consider investing in a four-wheeled trolley rack
rather than buying a normal trolley cart?
2. How strongly you accept that using four-wheeled trolley rack is
cost effective?
Durability 5 4 3 2 1
1. Four-wheeled trolley rack is good for transporting plywood and
lumber
2. Four-wheeled trolley can last long.
Usability 5 4 3 2 1
1. Four wheeled trolley rack has all the function and capabilities
to transport and store materials.
2. I believe that this product could more functionable when It’s
transformed into a table at the same time.
39
APPENDIX B
Tally of the Respondents in terms of Affordability as to Age
Age 5 4 3 2 1 Total
19-23
1 IIII IIII 0 0 0 8
2 IIIII III 0 0 0 8
Total 9 7 0 0 0 16
Average 4.5 3.5 0 0 0 8
24-28
1 III IIIIIII 0 0 0 10
2 III IIIIII I 0 0 10
Total 6 13 1 0 0 20
Average 3 6.5 0.5 0 0 10
29 and above
1 I IIIII-III III 0 0 12
2 0 IIIII-III III I 0 12
Total 1 16 6 1 0 24
Average 0.5 8 3 0.5 0 12
APPENDIX C
40
Tally of the Respondents in terms of Durability as to Age
Age 5 4 3 2 1 Total
19-23
1 IIIII-I I I 0 0 8
2 IIIII-I II 0 0 0 8
Total 12 3 1 0 0 16
Average 6 1.5 0.5 0 0 8
24-28
1 IIIII-I IIII 0 0 0 10
2 IIIII IIIII 0 0 0 10
Total 11 9 0 0 0 20
Average 5.5 4.5 0 0 0 10
29 and above
1 IIIII-II IIIII 0 0 0 12
2 IIIII-III IIII 0 0 0 12
Total 15 9 0 0 0 24
Average 7.5 4.5 0 0 0 12
APPENDIX D
Tally of the Respondents in terms of Usability as to Age
41
Age 5 4 3 2 1 Total
19-23
1 IIIII-I II 0 0 0 8
2 IIIII-II I 0 0 0 8
Total 13 3 0 0 0 16
Average 6.5 1.5 0 0 0 8
24-28
1 IIII IIIII I 0 0 10
2 IIIII IIIII 0 0 0 10
Total 9 10 1 0 0 20
Average 4.5 5 0.5 0 0 10
29 and above
1 IIIII-I IIIII-I 0 0 0 12
2 IIII IIIII-III 0 0 0 12
Total 10 14 0 0 0 24
Average 5 7 0 0 0 12
APPENDIX E
Tally of the Respondents in terms of Affordability as to Number of Years of
Work Experience
42
No. of Years 5 4 3 2 1 Total

of Work
Experience
1 to 6 years
1 IIIII-I IIIII-II I 0 0 14
2 IIIII-II IIIII I I 0 14
Total 13 12 2 1 0 28
Average 6.5 6 1 0.5 0 14
7 to 12 years
1 II IIIII-IIIII-I II I 0 15
2 I IIIII-IIIII-I III 0 0 15
Total 3 22 5 0 0 30
Average 1.5 11 2.5 0 0 15
13 to 18 years
1 0 I 0 0 0 1
2 0 I 0 0 0 1
Total 0 2 0 0 0 2
Average 0 1 0 0 0 1
APPENDIX F
Tally of the Respondents in terms of Durability as to Number of Years of
Work Experience
43
Number of 5 4 3 2 1 Total
Years of
Work
Experience
1 to 6 years
1 IIIII-IIII IIII I 0 0 14
2 IIIII-IIII IIIII 0 0 0 14
Total 18 9 1 0 0 28
Average 9 4.5 0.5 0 0 14
7 to 12 years
1 IIIII-IIII IIIII-I 0 0 0 15
2 IIIII-IIII IIIII 0 0 0 15
Total 18 12 0 0 0 30
Average 9 6 0 0 0 15
13 to 18 years
1 I 0 0 0 0 1
2 I 0 0 0 0 1
Total 2 0 0 0 0 2
Average 1 0 0 0 0 1
APPENDIX G
Tally of the Respondents in terms of Usability as to Number of Years of
Work Experience
44
Number of 5 4 3 2 1 Total
Years of
Work
Experience
1 to 6 years
1 IIIII-IIII IIII I 0 0 14
2 IIIII-IIIII IIII 0 0 0 14
Total 19 8 1 0 0 28
Average 9.5 4 0.5 0 0 14
7 to 12 years
1 IIIII-II IIIII-III 0 0 0 15
2 IIIII-I IIIII-IIII 0 0 0 15
Total 13 17 0 0 0 30
Average 6.5 8.5 0 0 0 15
13 to 18 years
1 0 I 0 0 0 0
2 0 I 0 0 0 0
Total 0 2 0 0 0 2
Average 0 1 0 0 0 1
APPENDIX H
Age 5 4 3 2 1 N TW WM Interpretation
45
19-23 4.5 3.5 0 0 0 8 36.5 4.5625 Highly

Acceptable
24-28 3 6.5 0.5 0 0 10 42.5 4.25 Acceptable
29 and 0.5 8 3 0.5 0 12 44.5 3.7083 Highly

above Acceptable
Total 8 18 3.5 0.5 0 30 123.5 4.1167 Acceptable
AWM 4.12 Acceptable
Working
Experience
1-6 years 6.5 6 1 0.5 0 14 60.5 4.3214 Acceptable
7-12 years 1.5 11 2.5 0 0 15 59 3.9333 Acceptable
13-18 years 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 4 Acceptable

Total 8 18 3.5 0.5 0 30 123.5 4.1167 Acceptable
AWM 4.12 Acceptable
LEVEL OF ACCEPTABILITY OF RESPONDENTS IN TERMS OF

AFFORDABILITY
APPENDIX I
46
19-23 6 1.5 0.5 0 0 8 37.5 4.6875 Highly

Acceptable
24-28 5.5 4.5 0 0 0 10 45.5 4.55 Highly
Acceptable
29 and 7.5 4.5 0 0 0 12 55.5 4.625 Highly
above Acceptable
Total 19 10.5 0.5 0 0 30 138.5 4.6167 Highly
Acceptable
AWM 4.62 Highly
Acceptable
Working
Experience
1-6 years 9 4.5 0.5 0 0 14 64.5 4.6071 Highly
Acceptable
7-12 years 9 6 0 0 0 15 69 4.6 Highly
Acceptable
13-18 years 1 0 0 0 0 1 5
Highly 5
Acceptable
Total 19 10.5 0.5 00 0 30 138.5 4.6167 Highly
Acceptable
AWM 4.62 Highly
Acceptable
LEVEL OF ACCEPTABILITY OF RESPONDENTS IN TERMS OF DURABILITY
APPENDIX J
47
LEVEL OF ACCEPTABILITY OF RESPONDENTS IN TERMS OF USABILITY

19-23 6.5 1.5 0 0 0 8 38.5 4.812 Highly

5 Acceptable
24-28 4.5 5 0.5 0 0 10 44 4.4 Acceptable
29 and 5 7 0 0 0 12 53 4.416 Acceptable

above 7
Total 16 13.5 0.5 0 0 30 135.5 4.516 Highly
7 Acceptable
AWM 4.52 Highly
Acceptable
Working
Experience
1-6 years 9.5 4 0.5 0 0 14 65 4.64 Highly

Acceptable
7-12 years 6.5 8.5 0 0 0 15 66.5 4.43 Acceptable
13-18 years 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 4 Acceptable

Total 16 13.5 0.5 0 0 30 135.5 4.52 Highly
Acceptable
AWM 4.52 Highly
Acceptable
Table 2.1
48
The Level of Acceptability of Four-wheeled Trolley Rack to Transport and

Store Plywood and Lumber According to Age in terms of Affordability,
Durability and Usability
Indicators Age Grand Verbal
Weighted Interpretation
Mean
19-23 4.56 Highly

Acceptable
AFFORDABILITY 24-28 4.25 Acceptable
29 and 3.71 Highly Acceptable

above
Total 4.12 Acceptable
19-23 4.69 Highly

Acceptable
24-28 4.55 Highly
DURABILITY
Acceptable
29 and 4.63 Highly
above Acceptable
Total 4.62 Highly

Acceptable
19-23 4.81 Highly Acceptable
24-28 4.4 Acceptable
USABILITY 29 and 4.42 Acceptable

above
Total 4.52 Highly Acceptable

49
2.1 The Level of Acceptability of Four-wheeled Trolley Rack to Transport

and Store Plywood and Lumber According to Age in terms of Affordability,
Table 2.1 shows the acceptability of four-wheeled trolley rack to transport
and store plywood and lumber as to respondents according to Age. For the
Affordability, age 19 to 23 got the highest weighted mean of 4.56 and the verbal
interpretation was Highly Acceptable while the age between 29 and above got the
lowest weighted mean of 3.71 and the verbal interpretation was Acceptable. For
the Durability, age between 19 to 23 the weighted mean was 4.69 and the verbal
interpretation was Highly Acceptable while the age bracket between 24 to 28 got
the lowest weighted mean 4.55 and verbal interpretation was highly acceptable.
50
Table 2.2
The Level of Acceptability of Four-wheeled Trolley Rack to Transport and

Store Plywood and Lumber According to Number of Years of Work
Experience in terms of Affordability, Durability and Usability
Indicators Working Grand Verbal
Experience Weighted Interpretation
Mean
1-6 years 4.32 Highly

Acceptable
AFFORDABILITY 7-12 years 3.97 Acceptable
13-18 4 Highly Acceptable

years
Total 4.12 Acceptable
19-23 4.61 Highly

Acceptable
DURABILITY 24-28 4.6 Highly

Acceptable
29 and 5 Highly
above Acceptable
Total 4.62 Highly

Acceptable
19-23 4.64 Highly Acceptable
24-28 4.43 Acceptable
USABILITY 29 and 4 Acceptable

above
Total 4.52 Highly Acceptable

51
2.2 The Level of Acceptability of Four-wheeled Trolley Rack to Transport

and Store Plywood and Lumber According to Age in terms of Affordability,
Table 2.2 shows the acceptability of four-wheeled trolley rack to transport and
store plywood and lumber as to respondents according to Work Experience. For
the Affordability,7 to 12 years got the highest weighted mean of 4.97 and the
verbal interpretation was Highly Acceptable while the 13 to 18 years got the
lowest weighted mean of 4 and the verbal interpretation was Acceptable. For the
Durability, 13 to 18 years got the highest weighted mean of 5 and the verbal
interpretation was Highly Acceptable while 7 to 12 years got the lowest weighted
mean of 4.6 and the verbal interpretation was Highly Acceptable. For the
Usability, 1 to 6 years got the highest weighted mean of 4.64 and the verbal
interpretation was Highly Acceptable while 13 to 18 years got the lowest weighted
mean of 4 and the verbal interpretation was Acceptable

52
APPENDIX K
Significant difference in the level of acceptability according to Age in terms
of Affordability
Age 5 4 3 2 1 Total
O E O E O E O E O E
19-23 4.5 2.1333 3.5 4.8 0 0.9333 0 0.1333 0 0 8
24-28 3 2.6667 6.5 6 0.5 1.1667 0 0.1667 0 0 10
29 and 0.5 3.2 8 7.2 3 1.4 0.5 0.2 0 0 12
above
Total 8 8 18 18 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 30
8x8 8x10 = 2.6667 8x12 = 3.2

= 2.1333
30 30 30
18x8 18x10 = 6 18x12 = 7.2
= 4.8
30 30 30
3.5x8 = 0.93 3.5x10 = 1.1667 3.5x12 = 1.4
30 30 30
0.5x8 = 0.13 0.5x10 = 0.1667 0.5x10 = 0.2
30 30 30
53
(4.5-2.1333) 2 (3-2.6667) 2 (.5-3.2) 2 (3.5-4.8) 2 (6.5-6) 2 (8-7.2)2

x =
2
+ + + + +
2.1333 2.6667 3.2 4.8 6 7.2
(0-0.9333) 2 (0.5-1.1667) 2 (3-1.4) 2 (0- 0.1333) 2 (0-0.1667) 2 (0.5-0.2) 2

+ + + + + +
0.9333 1.1667 1.4 0.1333 0.1667 0.2
(2.3667)2 (0.3333)2 (-2.700)2 (-1.3000)2 (0.5000)2 (0.800)2

x = 2.1333 + 2.6667 + 3.2
2
+ 4.8 + 6 + 7.2
(-0.9333)2 (-0.7667)2 (1.6)2 (-0.1333)2 (-0.2)2 (0.3)2
+ + + + + +
0.9333 1.1667 1.4 0.1333 0.1667 0.2
x2 = 2.6256 + 0.0417 + 2.2781 + 0.3521 + 0.0417 + 0.0889

+ 0.9333 + 0.381 + 1.8286 + 0.1333 + 0.1667 + 0.45
x2 = 9.321
Df = (Row-1) (Column-1)
Df = (3-1) (4-1)
Df = (2) (3)
Df = 6
x2 Tabular @ 0.05 = 12.592

54
55
APPENDIX L
Significant difference in the level of acceptability according to Working
Experience in terms of Affordability
Working 5 4 3 2 1 Total
Experience O E O E O E O E O E
1-6 years 6.5 3.733 6 8.4 1 1.6333 0.5 0.2333 0 0 14
3
7-12 years 1.5 4 11 9 2.5 1.75 0 0.25 0 0 15
13-18years 0 0.266 1 0.6 0 0.1167 0 0.0167 0 0 1

7
Total 8 8 18 18 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 30
8x14 8x15 = 4 8x1

= 3.7333 = 0.2667
30 30 30
18x14 18x15 = 9 18x1
= 8.4 = 0.6
30 30 30
3.5x14 3.5x15 3.5x1

= 1.6333 = 1.75 = 0.1167
30 30 30
0.5x14 0.5x15 0.5x1

= 0.2333 = 0.25 = 0.0167
30 30 30
56
(6.5-3.7333) 2 (1.5-4) 2 (0-0.2667) 2 (6-8.4) 2 (11-9) 2 (1-0.6) 2

x =
2
+ + + + + +
3.7333 4 0.2667 8.4 9 0.6
(1-1.6333)2 (2.5-1.75)2 (0-0.1167)2 (.5-0.2333)2 (0.0.25)2 (0-0.0167)2
+ + + + +
1.6333 1.75 0.1167 0.2333 0.25 0.0167
(2.7667)2 (-2.5)2 (-.2667)2 (-2.4)2 (2)2 (0.4)2 (0.6333)2 (0.75)2

x2 = + + + + + + + +
3.7333 4 0.2667 8.4 9 0.6 1.6333 1.75
(-0.1167)2 (0.2667)2 (-.25)2 (-.0167)2
+ + +
0.1167 0.2333 0.25 0.0167
x2 = 2.0504 + 1.5625 + 0.2667 + 0.6857 + 0.4444 + 0.2667+ 0.2456 +

0.3214 + 0.1167 +0.3049 + 0.25 + 0.0167
x2 = 6.532
Df = (3-1) (4-1)
Df = (2) (3)
Df = 6
x2 Tabular @ 0.05 = 12.592

57
58
APPENDIX M
of Durability
Age 5 4 3 2 1 Total
O E O E O E O E O E
19-23 6 5.0667 1.5 2.8 0.5 0.1333 0 0 0 0 8
24-28 5.5 6.3333 4.5 3.5 0 0.1667 0 0 0 0 10
29 and 7.5 7.6 4.5 4.2 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 12
above
Total 19 19 10.5 10.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 30
19x8 19x10 = 6.3333 19x12 = 7.6

= 5.0667
30 30 30
10.5x8 10.5x10 =3.5 10.5x12 = 4.2
= 2.8
30 30 30
0.5x8 = 0.1333 0.5x10 = 0.1667 0.5x12 = 0.2
30 30 30
59
60
(6-5.0667) 2 (5.5-6.3333) 2 (7.5-7.6) 2 (1.5-2.8) 2 (4.5-3.5) 2 (4.5-4.2) 2

x =
2
+ + + + +
5.0667 6.3333 7.6 2.8 3.5 4.2
( 0.5-0.1333) 2 (0-0.1667) 2 (0-0.2) 2

+ + +
0.1333 0.1667 0.2
(0.9333)2 (-0.83)2 (-0.1)2 (-1.3)2 (1)2 (0.3)2

x2 = + + + + +
5.0667 6.3333 7.6 2.8 3.5 4.2
(0.37)2 (-0.27)2 (-0.2)2
+ + +
0.1333 0.1667 0.2
x2 = 0.1719 + 0.1096 + 0.0013 + 0.6036 + 0.2857 + 0.0214 + 1.0088

+ 0.1667 + 0.2
x2 = 2.569
Df = (3-1) (3-1)
Df = (2) (2)
Df = 4
x2 Tabular @ 0.05 = 9.488

61
APPENDIX N
Experience in terms of Durability
1-6 years 9 8.8667 4.5 4.9 0.5 0.2333 0 0 0 0 14
7-12 years 9 9.5 6 5.25 0 0.25 0 0 0 0 15
13-18years 1 0.6333 0 0.35 0 0.0167 0 0 0 0 1
Total 19 19 10.5 10.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 30
19x14 19x15 = 9.5 19x1 = 0.6333

= 8.8667
30 30 30
10.5x14 10.5x15= 5.25 10.5x1 = 0.35
= 4.9
30 30 30
0.5x14 = 0.2333 0.5x15 = 0.25 0.5x1 = 0.0167
30 30 30
62
63
(9-8.8667) 2 (9-9.5) 2 (1-0.6333) 2 (4.5-4.9) 2 (6-5.25) 2 (0-0.35) 2

x =
2
+ + + + +
8.8667 9.5 0.6333 4.9 5.25 0.35
(0.5-0.2333) 2 (0-0.25) 2 (0.-0.0167) 2

+ + +
0.2333 0.25 0.0167
(.1333)2 (-.5)2 (.3667)2 (-0.4)2 (0.75)2 (-.35)2

x2 = + + + + +
8.8667 9.5 0.6333 4.9 5.25 0.35
(0.2667)2 (-0.25)2 (-0.02)2

+ + +
0.2333 0.25 0.0167
x2 = 0.0020 + 0.0263 + 0.2123 + 0.0327 + 0.1071 + 0.35

+ 0.3049 + 0.25 + 0.0167
x2 = 1.302
Df = (3-1) (3-1)
Df = (2) (2)
Df = 4
x2 Tabular @ 0.05 = 9.488

64
APPENDIX O
of Usability
Age 5 4 3 2 1 Total
O E O E O E O E O E
19-23 6.5 4.2667 1.5 3.6 0 0.1333 0 0 0 0 8
24-28 4.5 5.3333 5 4.5 0.5 0.1667 0 0 0 0 10
29 and 5 6.4 7 5.4 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 12
above
Total 16 16 13.5 13.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 30
16x8 16x10 16x12

= 4.2667 = 5.3333 = 6.4
30 30 30
13.5x8 13.5x10 13.5x12

= 3.6 = 4.5 = 5.4
30 30 30
0.5x8 0.5x10 0.5x12

= 0.1333 = 0.1667 = 0.2
30 30 30
65
2 2 2 2 2 2
x2 = (6.5-4.2667)+ (1.5-3.6) +(0-0.1333) +(4.5-5.3333)+ (5-4.5) +(0.5-0.1667) +
4.27 3.6 0.1333 5.3333 4.5 0.1667
(5-6.4)2 (7-5.4)2 (0-0.2)2

+ +
6.4 5.4 0.2
(2.2333)2 (-2.1)2 (-0.1333)2 (-0.8333)2 (0.5)2 (0.3333)2 (-1.4)2 (1.6)2

x2 = + + + + + + +
4.2667 3.6 0.1333 5.3333 4.5 0.1667 6.4 5.4
(-0.2)2
+
0.2
x2 = 1.1690 + 1.225 + 0.1333 + 0.1302 + 0.0556 + 0.6664

+ 0.3063 + 0.4741 + 0.2
x2 = 4.360
Df = (3-1) (3-1)
Df = (2) (2)
Df = 4
x2 Tabular @ 0.05 = 9.488

66
APPENDIX P
Experience in terms of Usability
1-6 years 9. 7.4667 4 6.3 0.5 0.2333 0 0 0 0 14
5
7-12 years 6. 8 8.5 6.75 0 0.25 0 0 0 0 15
5
13-18 years 0 0.5333 1 0.45 0 0.0167 0 0 0 0 1
Total 16 16 13.5 13.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 30
16x14 16x15 = 8 16x1

= 7.4667 = 0.5333
30 30 30
13.5x14 13.5x15 = 6.75 13.5x1

= 6.3 = 0.45
30 30 30
0.5x14 0.5x15 0.5x1

= 0.2333 = 0.25 = 0.0167
30 30 30
67
68
(9.5-7.4667) 2 (4-6.3) 2 (0.5-0.2333) 2 (6.5-8) 2 (8.5-6.75) 2 (0-0.25) 2

x =
2
+ + + + +
7.4667 6.3 0.2333 8 6.75 0.25
(0-0.53)2 (1-0.45)2 (0-0.0167)2

+ +
0.5333 0.45 0.0167
(2.0333)2 (-2.3)2 (0.2667)2 (-1.5)2 (1.75)2 (0.25)2 (-0.53)2 (0.55)2

x =
2
+ + + + + + + +
7.4667 6.3 0.2333 8 6.75 0.25 0.5333 0.45
(-0.0167)2
0.0167
x2 = 0.5537 + 0.8397 + 0.3049 + 0.2813 + 0.4537 + 0.25 + 0.5333 + 0.6722 +

0.0167
x2 = 3.906
Df = (3-1) (3-1)
Df = (2) (2)
Df = 4
x2 Tabular @ 0.05 = 9.488

69
70
CURRICULUM VITAE
71
EMMANUEL E. GOLLOSO
# 02 Dr. Bartolome Subd. Veinte Reales Valenzuela
City
09109600316
gollosoemman@gmail.com
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
TERTIARY:
Bachelor of Technical Teaching Education
Major in Civil Technology (BTTE-CVT)
Kamagong Street, Fortune Village Parada Valenzuela City
PERSONAL DATA
BIRTHDAY August 28, 2000
BIRTHPLACE Valenzuela City
HEIGHT 5’7
CIVIL STATUS Single
RELIGION Roman Catholic
NATIONALITY Filipino
CHARACTER REFERENCES:
Ms. Mary Grace Magana
Civil Technology Coordinator
72
THOMAS NELSON F. CANDELARIA

#810 Esteban North Dalandanan Valenzuela City
09683126941
thomasnelson@gmail.com
TERTIARY:
PERSONAL DATA
BIRTHDAY February 16, 2001
HEIGHT 5'4
CIVIL STATUS Single
73
CAMILLA MAE M. NACINO

4097 Gen.T.DeLeon Valenzuela City
0994755940
camillanacino@gmail.com
TERTIARY:
PERSONAL DATA
BIRTHDAY September 24, 2001
HEIGHT 5’4
CIVIL STATUS Single

Galloso Revise

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Galloso Revise

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Galloso Revise

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

i

VALENZUELA CITY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE

Four-Wheeled Trolley Rack to Transport and Store

This research proposal entitled “ FOUR-WHEELED TROLLEY RACK TO

DR. JOSE M. RAPSING, LPT, Ph.D.

Approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

DR. DONATO S. GALLEGO

ENGR. FLORINO T. OIGA DR. GINA R. SEÑORA

DR. MARICEL F. MAURICIO YOLANDA GADON, Ph.D.

The researchers heartily express profound gratitude first to the Almighty

Dr. Jose M. Rapsing, the researcher adviser, whose guidance, knowledge

and time, served as motivation to pursue the completion of this paper.

guidance, knowledge, and advice with regards to the study.

Dr. Donato S. Gallego, Chairman of the panel, for giving ideas,

suggestions, and advice to the researchers.

analysis and correction of formulas to be used.

Dr. Gina R. Señora, Grammarian, for helping us to correct our grammar

and checking our format in research.

Dr. Maricel F. Mauricio, College Dean, for permitting the researchers to

Yolanda Gadon, Ph.D, College Administrator of the Valenzuela City

assistance during the administration of questionnaires.

the blessings, wisdom, knowledge, and strength in making this research

Title Page .................................................... i

CHAPTER I: THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND AND REVIEW OF

CHAPTER II: METHODOLOGY

CHAPTER III: PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF

Demographic Profile of the Respondents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

CHAPTER IV: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND

CURRICULUM VITAE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65

APPENDIX A Survey Questionnaire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

TABLE 2.1 Level of Acceptability of Four-wheeled Trolley Rack to

APPENDIX K Significant difference in the level of acceptability according to

THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND AND REVIEW OF RELATED

In our generation, many people are continuously constructing houses and

buildings. But construction is a high hazard industry, workers are exposed on

provide in order to help workers? Is it more convenient and safer tool?

The most conspicuous utilization of pressed wood is in primary

hoardings, however it is generally utilized in cases, canisters, interior designs,

grip a portable apparatus, further measurement of grip force dependent finger

hand also contributed to the cost function. (Hiramatsu et al. 2015).

According to Stefan R. (2017), the common practices in industries is

manual lifting to move or transport an object to desire place. Nowadays,

mechanized equipment is popularly available as an essential way of manual

the value and time of construction.

The Bachelor of Technical Teacher Education Major in Civil Technology

Students of Valenzuela City Polytechnic College is building research about an

hypothesis of similar and different research studies about four-wheeled trolley

The flow of study is show in paradigm below:

INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

3.Significant difference and lumber.

Figure1. The Paradigm of The Study

significant difference in the level of acceptability of four-wheeled trolley rack to

their profile is considered is included.

data gathering and the analysis of the data.

transport and store plywood and lumber.

Statement of the Problem

This research study aims to determine the level of acceptability of four-

Specifically, this study sought to answer the following questions: