Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Bsee 3b-Bosh Job Hazard Analysis Project-Exam

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS

Tools and or Equipment


Division Office / Project: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT required: ID No:

Job Location: home Date Prepared:

JOB/ACTIVITY/OPERATION: Kitchen Fire

Approved by PM:

Responsible Supervisor: ENGR. (NAME) ENGR. JOSEPH NATHAN B. MARQUEZ

Date: May 12, 2022


RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION
JOB STEP EXISTING & POTENTIAL HAZARD RISK RATING (Eg, Using the risk (Eg. Remove overhead cable or isolate/sheath
(Eg. Set Up Crane) (Eg. Electrocution from 11Kv Cables) assessment matrix- Low, Medium, High. ) overhead or monitor with a spotter) Training PPE
Needs

Mar 2022 Page 1 of 6 BOSH


INSTRUCTIONS.
1. Please refer to pages 5 and 6 for your names with the corresponding Job/Operation/Activity that will be the basis of your Job Hazard
Analysis.
2. The guidelines of your JHA are on page 4 of this file. Kindly read it carefully and understand it.
3. Submit your output in a separate file in our Google Classroom.
4. Submission is on May 12, 2022, at 11:59 pm ONLY. Late submission will have a grade of 78.
5. This will be your Final Exam so take it seriously and comply.
6. GOODLUCK ENGINEERS!

RUBRICS

Scale
Criteria
Criteria Weight Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Good Fair Poor
Rating
(6) (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

The student acquired The student The student acquired The student The student The student acquired
completely relevant acquired to a great to some extent of acquired little acquired very little no relevant
information for the extent of relevant relevant information relevant information relevant information information for the
1. Know development of information to the to the development of for the for the development of
15% *
ledge understanding of the development of understanding of the development of development of understanding of the
given problems. understanding of the given problems. understanding of understanding of given problems.
given problems. the given problems. the given problems.

Demonstrates deep Demonstrates a lot Demonstrates a little Demonstrates very Barely Demonstrates no
analytical processing of analytical analytical processing little analytical demonstrates analytical processing
of information and can processing of of information and processing of analytical of information and
perform with a lot of information and can can perform with information and can processing of can perform with
competence perform with some some competence perform with some information and can some competence
2. Skill
processes, i.e., competence processes, i.e., competence perform with some processes, i.e.,
or
25% interpret; translate; processes, i.e., interpret; translate; processes, i.e., competence interpret; translate; *
Proce
convert or express the interpret; translate; convert or express interpret; translate; processes, i.e., convert or express
ss
information given in convert or express the information given convert or express interpret; translate; the information given
the problem into a the information in the problem into a the information convert or express in the problem into a
required output given in the problem required output given in the the information required output
specification. into a required specification. problem into a given in the specification.
output specification. problem into a
Mar 2022 Page 2 of 6 BOSH
required output required output
specification. specification.

Demonstrates deep Demonstrates fair Demonstrates little Demonstrates very Barely Demonstrates
understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the little understanding demonstrates an negligible
situation in the given situation in the given situation in the given of the situation in understanding of understanding of the
3. problem by using problem by using problem by using the given problem the situation in the situation in the given
Understa 30% relevant and accurate relevant and relevant and accurate by using relevant given problem by problem by using *
nding detail in the accurate detail in the detail in the and accurate detail using relevant and relevant and accurate
application. application. application. in the application. accurate detail in detail in the
the application. application.

The student The student The student strives in The student shows The student shows The student shows a
demonstrates moderately using logical and/or inadequacy in the difficulty in lot of difficulties in
4. effectively the ability in demonstrates the technical skills in using logical and/or using logical and/or using logical and/or
Transfer using logical and/or ability in using producing the technical skills in technical skills in technical skills in
of 30% technical skills in logical and/or required output producing the producing the producing the *
Understa producing the required technical skills in specification. required output required output required output
nding output specification. producing the specification. specification. specification.
required output
specification.
Total
Total 100%
Rating

Legend: * - Criteria Rating = (Scale Value / 6) * Weight

Total Rating - Sum of Criteria Rating

At least 60 % of the students obtain a grade of 80% and above.

Mar 2022 Page 3 of 6 BOSH


RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX Step 1. Identify the Basic Job Steps -Watch carefully as a worker performs
the entire job at least once (watch videos from YouTube and at least 3 - 5 major
steps).
1) As the operator performs the job again, list the individual steps on the left-
hand column.
2) Using simple action phrases that are short and to the point
3) Steps should always be numbered to indicate the order

Step 2. Determine the Existing & Potential Hazards: - Identify all of the
existing or potential actions or conditions that could lead to an injury or illness,
or harm to the environment.
Hazard Guide:
1) The method or physical actions required for that specific step.
2) The materials used.
3) The machine/equipment used.
4) The environmental conditions under which the step is normally performed.

Step 3. Identify the Risk Rating using the Risk Assessment Matrix (on the
left)
a. Probability- Low, Medium, High
b. Severity – Low, Medium, High

Step 4. Recommend Corrective Actions


A. Engineering Control
B. Administrative Control
C. PPE

Mar 2022 Page 4 of 6 BOSH


NAME OPERATION/JOB/ACTIVITY
1. Aduviso, Wiljun Oloverio 1. AISLES AND STAIRWAYS
2. Asanza, Jan Paul Villoso 2. AMMONIA LEAKS
3. ASBESTOS CONTAMINATION
3. Baldago, Judy Jr. Monarca
4. BENCH GRINDING
4. Balunsay, Jayson Atibula 5. BLAST FURNACE OPERATION
5. Barcela, Nica Mae Castro 6. BURN FROM ACID SUBSTANCE
6. Bayrante, Joshua Almanza 7. BUSTED LIGHTBULB
7. Begornia, Kristine Grace Regaspi 8. CLOSE STEAM-HEATED PRESSURE
8. Bisenio, Lorena, Busadre VESSELS
9. Bisenio, Menchie Tirao 9. DIE CASTING
10. DIGGING
10. Borjal, Rey Vincent Cestina 11. ELECTRIC ARC WELDING
11. Broncano, John Alberto Iraola 12. EMPLOYEE FACILITIES
12. Cardeño, Gemma Corbito 13. EXCESSIVE NOISE FROM WATER
13. Cortez, Daniel Allain Monte PUMP
14. Cuya, Justin Carl Barroga 14. EXPORSURE TO AIR CONTAMINAT
(PARTICULATES)
15. De Lima, Joe Cedric Edroso
15. FALL INJURY
16. Dimanarig, Francis Juthel Blanco 16. FIRE EXTINGUISHER STORING
17. Dorosan, Jose Jr. Alarcio 17. FOOT AND LEG INJURY
18. Flores, Jude Vincent Dammang 18. HAND AND ARM INJURY
19. Ibardo, Jansen Bagaporo 19. HAND DRILLING
20. Ibarlin, Mark Daniel Infante 20. HANDLING HIGHLY COMBUSTIBLE
MATERIALS
21. Ibarreta, Jose Rowil Cerbas
21. HANDLING OF HIGHLY FLAMMABLE
22. Imperial, Mark Kenchi Valencia 22. HIGH AIR HUMIDITY
23. Jaron, Michael Leonel Oronan 23. HORIZONTAL PUSHING OR PULLING
24. Junio, Kaye Cid OF AN OBJECT
25. Landagan, Nissa Bulalacao 24. KITCHEN FIRE
26. Laniog, John Hendrix Villar 25. LATHE TURNING
27. Layosa, Ron Emmanuel Gascon 26. LIFTING COMPACT LOAD
27. LIFTING SHEET MATERIALS
28. Leonor, Emmanuelle Tan
28. LOGGING ENGINE OPERATION
29. Lomeda, John Lee Navarro 29. LOW HEAD CLEARANCE
30. Lumibao, John Carlo Miday 30. MAINTAIN LIGHT FIXTURES
31. Magistrado, Kent Gabalfin 31. METAL BENDING
32. Manzano, Avene Carl Nosares 32. METAL BRAZING
33. Moraña, Mike Adrian Sawali 33. METAL CUTTING
34. Nidea, Kier Vincent Bas 34. METAL PUNCHING
35. MILLING
35. Obis, Christian Jay Soliman 36. OBJECT AN LIFTING
36. Orfila, Jeferlou Visitacion 37. OIL SPILL CONTROL

Mar 2022 Page 5 of 6 BOSH


37. Peconcillo, Joy Balaton 38. PESTICIDES HANDLING
38. Peregrino, John Larry Sumil 39. RAISING DRUMS FROM THE GROUND
39. Periabras, Rona Quincose 40. REPAIRING HIGH VOLTAGE WIRES
40. Requiz, Caster Troy Luis 41. SCAFFOLDINGS ERECTION
42. SHOVELING
41. Reyes, Jayrus Boncayao 43. SITTING POSTURE
42. Rillones, John Rey Soriano 44. SOLDERING
43. Robosa, Ali Vince Robosa 45. STEAM HEATED PRESSURE
44. Saldivar, Juliet Porlante VESSELS
45. Sapugay, Marlai Embestro 46. TORSO/FULL BODY INJURY
46. Siano, Brawn Hesler Roselada 47. USING A PALLET JACK
47. Sinfuego, Jay Baal 48. USING A ROLLING PLATFORM
49. VENTILATION SYSTEM CLEANING
48. Siocson, John Francis Cuatrona 50. VERTICAL PUSHING OR PULLING AN
49. Sumayo, Jonathan Filio OBJECT
50. Umali, Elmar Orilla 51. VIBRATION DAMPING
51. Valera, Jomar Navo 52. WASTE DISPOSAL
52. Villa, Betty Mae Bon 53. WORKING WITH RECIPROCATING
53. Villamer, Mark Arnel Marpuri MACHINES

Mar 2022 Page 6 of 6 BOSH

You might also like