Property Law Syllabus - Sy 2022 2023
Property Law Syllabus - Sy 2022 2023
Property Law Syllabus - Sy 2022 2023
COURSE SYLLABUS
Aklan College of Law
st
1 Semester, SY 2022-2023
BOOK II – PROPERTY,
OWNERSHIP, AND ITS
MODIFICATIONS
2nd Week -
3rd Week
A. Kinds of Property
Real or immovable ----- Art. 415 (Memorize)
Personal or movable ----Arts. 416-418
Cases:
1. Leung Yee v. Strong Machinery Co, 37 Phil.644
2. Prudential Bank v. .Judge Panis, GR No. 50008, Aug. 31,1988
3. Bicerra, et al. v. Teneza, et al., L-16128, Nov. 29, 1962
4. Standard Oil Company v. Jaramillo, 44Phil.631
5. Toledo-Banaga v. Court of Appeals, 102 SCAD 906, 302 SCRA 331, 1999
6. MindanaoBusCo. v. City Assessor,GR No. L-17870, September 9,1962
7. Davao Sawmill Co. vs. Castillo, 61 Phil. 709 / GR No. 40411, August 7,1935
8. Valdez v. Central Altagracia, Inc., 225 U.S. 58
9. B.H. Berkenkotter v. Cu Unjieng, 61 Phil. 663
10. Ago v. Court of Appeals, et al., L-17898, Oct. 31, 1962
1
11. People’s Bank and Trust Co. v. Dahican Lumber Co., -17500, May 16, 1967
12. Associated Insurance v. Iya, 103 Phil.9725
13. Tumalad v. Vicencio, 122 SCRA296
14. Sibalv. Valdez, 50 Phil.512
15. Tsai vs. CA, GR No. 120098 October 2,2001
16. Caltex Phils. Inc., v. Board of Assessment Appeals GR No. L-50466 May 31,1982
17. Board of Assessment Appeals vs. Meralco, 119 Phil 328, 119 SCRA 68
18. Serg’s Products, Inc., et al vs. PCI Leasing and Finance Inc., 338 SCRA 499
19. Manila Electric Co. v. Central Board of Assessment Appeals, 114 SCRA 273
20. Ladera v. Hodges, Vol. 48 No. 12 Official Gatte 5374
21. Makati Leasing & Finance Corp. v. WeareverTextile Mills, Inc., GR No. L-58469
22. Yap v. Tañada, GR No. L-32917, 18 July 1988
23. Manila Electric Company v. City Assessor,GR No. 166102, August 5, 2015
24. Capitol Wireless, Inc. v. Provincial Treasurerof Batangas, GR No. 180110, May 30, 2016
4th Week
Cases:
1. Mun.of Cavite v.Rojas, 30Phil. 602
2. Valiao et.a. lv.Republic, GR No. 170757, November 28, 2011
3. Maneclang, et al. v. IAC, GR No. 66575, Sep.tember 30, 1986
4. City of Manila v. Ins. Gov’t., 10 Phil.327
5. Santos v. Moreno, GR No. L-15829, Dec. 4,1967
6. Laurel v. Garcia, G.R. No. 92013 July 25,1990
7. Villongco, et al. v. Florencio Moreno, et al. L-17240, Jan. 31,1962
8. CEBU OXYGEN AND ACETYLENE CO. V. .BERCILLES, 66SCRA431
9. Rabuco v. Villegas, GR No. 92013, 92047, July 25, 1990
10. Macasiano v. Diokno, GR No. 97764, August 10, 1992
11. Republic v. Court of Appeals, GR No. 100709, November 14, 1997
12. Province of Zamboanga del Norte v. City of Zamboanga, GR No. L-24440, March 28,
1968
13. Chaves v. Public Estates Authority, GR No. 133250, July 9, 2002
14. Villlarico v. Sarmiento, GR No. 136438, November 11, 2004
15. Heirs of Malabanan v. Republic, GR No. 179987, Septemner 3, 2013
16. Repubic v. Santos, III, GR No. 160453, November 12, 2012
17. Navy Officers’ Village Association, Inc. v. Republic, GR No. 177168, August 3, 2015
18. City of Lapu-Lapu v. PEZA , GR No. 184203, 187583, November 26, 2014
19. Republic v. Aboitiz, GR No. 174626, October 23, 2013
20. Alolino v. Flores, GR No. 198774, April 4, 2016
5th Week
Title II – Ownership
2
Distinctions between accion reivindicatoria, accionpubliciana and accioninterdictal
Distinctions between forcible entry and unlawful detainer
Actions for recovery of possession of movable property
Distinctions between real and personal rights
Cases:
1. MonasterioPe v. Tong GR 151369 March 23, 2011
2. Sps. Ong vs. Socorro Parel and CA GR No. 143173, March 28, 2001
6th Week
1. Doctrine of Self-Help and Acts in State ofNecessity (Arts. 429 & 432)
2. Surface Rights (Art. 437)
3. Concept of HiddenTreasure (Arts. 438-439)
4. Modes of Acquiring Ownership
Original
Derivative
5. Limitations
General limitations: taxation, eminent domain, police power
Specific limitations: those imposed by law (sic utere tuo, nuisance, stateof
necessity), easements voluntarily imposed by owner (servitudes, mortgages imposed
by contract)
Cases:
1. German Management and Services, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 177 SCRA 495
2. Caisip v. People, 36 SCRA 17
3. People v. Pletcha, Jr., 22 CA Rep. 807
4. Diamond Farms, Inc. v. Diamond Farm Workers Multi-Purpose Cooperative, GR No.
192999, July 18, 2012
5. Spouses Fuentes v. Roca, GR No. 178902, April 21, 2010
6. Andamo v. Intermediate Appelate Court, GR No. 74761, November 6, 1990
7. Republic v. Rural Bank of Kabacan, Inc., GR No. 185124, January 25, 2012
7th Week
3
A. Right of Accession
i. For immovables:
1. Accession discreta (natural, industrial, civil fruits) and continua (over
immovables: artificial/industrial and natural)
2. Accession industrial (building, planting, sowing in good faith or bad faith)
3. Accession natural (accretion, avulsion, rivers, islands)
Cases:
1. PNB v. De Jesus, 411 SCRA557(2003)
2. Balucanag vs. Francisco GR No. L-33422, May 30, 1983
3. Pecson vs. CA G.R. No. 115814 May 29,1995
4. Ignacio vs. Hilario GR No. L-175 April 30,1946
5. Quemuelv. Olaes GR No. L-11084, April 29,1961
6. Depra vs. Dumlao GR No. L-57348 May 16,1985
7. Reynante vs. CA GR No. 95907, April 8,1992
8. Florezav. Evangelista, 96 SCRA 130(1980)
9. Tan Quetov. CA, et al. GR No. 35648, Feb. 27,1987
10. Torbelavs. Sps Rosario and Banco Filipiino GR No. 140553 December 7,2011
11. Communities Cagayan, Inc. V. Spouses Nanol , GR No. 176791, November 14, 2012
12. Department of Education v. Tuliao, GR No. 205664, June 9, 2014
13. Spouses Aquino v. Spouses Aguilar, GR No. 182754, June 29, 2015
14. Department of Education v. Casibang, GR No. 192268, January 27, 2016
8th Week
4
- Prelims -
5
9th Week
Quieting of Title
Purpose
Distinction Between Quieting of Title and Removing/Preventing aCloud
Requisites for the Existence of a Cloud
Requisites for an Action to Quiet Title toProsper
Prescriptive Period
Cases:
1. Realty Sales Enterprise vs. IAC (G.R. No. L-67451 September 28,1987)
2. Lucasanv. PDIC (GR No. 176926 July 4, 2008)
3. Heirs of Tappa v. Heirs of Bacud, GR 187633, April 4, 2016
4. Spouses Galang v. Spouses reyes, GR 184746, August 15, 2012
5. Green Acres Holdings, Inc. V. Cabral, GR 175542, 183205, June 5, 2013
6. Heirs of Pocdo v. Avila, GR 199146, March 19, 2014
10th Week
A. Concept of Co-ownership
B. Nature of Co-ownership
C. Dual Aspect of Co-ownership: The undivided Thing and the Aliquot Portion.
D. Special Rules
E. Concept of condominium
(i) Condominium Corporation
(ii) Interest in Real Property
(iii) Concept of Common Areas, Amendment
(iv) Documents to Consider (Master Deed, Declaration of Restrictions, Articles and
By-Laws of the Condominium Corporation or the Association, where
applicable)
Rights and Obligations of Condominium Owners
(v) Contributions/Dues
(vi) P.D. 957, The Subdivision and Condominium Buyers' Protective Decree and R.A.
6552, Realty Installment Buyer Act
Grounds for partition of common areas, or dissolution of the condominium
F. Sources of Co-Ownership
G. Rights of Co-Owners
Distinction Between Right to Property Owned in Common and Full Ownership
Over His/Her Ideal Share
Right to Oppose Acts of Alteration
1. Right to Partition
2. Right to Contributions for Expenses (necessary expenses, taxes)
3. Waiver
4. Right to Redemption of Co-owner’s Share
Cases:
1. Heirs of Protacio G., Sr. vs. Servacio and Go GR NO. 157537 Sept. 7, 2011
2. Baloloy v. Hular 438 SCRA 80(2004)
3. Lacbayan vs. Samoy, Jr. G.R. NO. 65427 March 21, 2011
4. Cruz vs. Catapang 544 SCRA 512(2008)
6
5. Sanchez v. CA 404 SCRA 540(2003)
6. Del Bnaco v. Intermediate Appellate Court, 156 SCRA 55
7. Heirs of dela Rosa v. Batongbacal, GR 179205, July 30, 2014
8. Arambulo v. Nolasco, GR 189420, March 26, 2014
9. Quintos v. Nicolas, GR 210252, June 16, 2014
10. Apique v. Fahnestich, GR 205705, August 5, 2015
11. Catedrilla v. Lauron, GR 179011, April 15, 2013
11th Week
H. Termination/Extinguishment
Effect of Partition
Rights Against Individual Co-Owners in Case of Partition
Partition in Case Co-Owners Cannot Agree
Cases:
1. Heirs of Salud Dizon Salamat v. Tamayo, 298 SCRA313
2. Heirs of Restar vs. Heirs of Cichon, 475 SCRA731
3. Caro v. Court of Appeals, 113 SCRA 10
4. Bailon-Casilao v. Court of Appels, 160 SCRA 738
5. Aguilar v. Court of Appeals, 227 SCRA 472
6. Tomas Claudio Memoorial College, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 316 SCRA 502
7. Robles v. Court of Appeals, 328 SCRA 97
12th Week
Title V – Possession
A. Characteristics
B. How acquired (Art.531)
C. Effects of possession
Possessor in Good Faith (Arts. 544, 526-527)
1. Right to Pending fruits (Art.545)
2. Right to Be Reimbursed
a. Necessary and Useful Expenses (Arts.546-547)
b. Expenses for Pure Luxury (Art.548)
Possessor in Bad Faith (Arts. 449, 549, 552)
D. Loss or Unlawful Deprivation of a Movable (Arts. 559, 1505(3)
Cases:
1. Rizal Cement Co., Inc. v. Villareal, 135 SCRA 15
2. Wong v. carpio, 203 SCRA 118
3. Somodio v. Court of Appeals, 235 SCRA 307
4. Maglucot-Aw v. Maglucot, 329 SCRA 78
5. Cequena v. Bolante, 330 SCRA 216
6. Carbonilla v. Abiera, GR 177637, July 26, 2010
7
13th Week
Cases:
1. Aragon v. Insular Government, 19 Phil. 223
2. Catholic Vicar Apostolic of the Mountain Province v. CA, 183 SCRA 639
3. Supapo v. Spouses de Jesus, GR No. 198356, April 20, 2015
Cases:
1. EDCA Publishing & Distributing Corp. v. Santos, G.R No. 80298, April 26,
1990, 134SCRA614
2. De Garciav v. Hon. Court of Appeals, G.R No. L-20264, January 30, 1971,
37SCRA129
3. Dizon v. Sunta, 47 SCRA 160
4. Ledesma v. Court of Appeals, 213 SCRA 195
5. Subic Bay Legend Resorts and Casino, Inc. V. Fernandez, GR No. 193426,
September 29, 2014
C. Fruits
Cases:
1. nd Adobo v. Eusebio, 105 SCRA 569
2. Cordero v. Cabral, 123 SCRA 532
D. Expenses
Cases:
1. Mendoza and Enriquez v. de Guzman, 52 Phil. 164
2. Robles and martin v. Lizzaraga Hermanos, etc., 42 Phil. 584
3. Metropolitan Waterworksand sewerage System v. CA, 143 SCRA 623
E. Possession of Animals
- Midterm –
14th Week
Title VI – Usufruct
A. Classification
B. Usufruct and Lease Distinguished
C. Rights of the Usufructuary (Arts. 566-582)
As to the Thing and Its Fruits
As to the Usufruct Itself:
Cases:
1. Hemedes vs. CA, GR No. 107132 October 8,1999
2. Fabie vs. Gutierrez David, GR. No. L-123, December 12,1945
D. Obligations of theUsufructuary (Arts. 583-602)
Before Exercising the Usufructuary:
During the Usufruct:
8
Cases:
Vda. De Aranas v. Aranas, 150 SCRA 415
15th Week
Cases:
1. Quimen vs. C.A, 257 SCRA163;
2. Leogario Ronquillo vs. Jose Roco GR No. L-10619 February 28,1958
3. Crisencia Cristobal vs. CA GR. No. 125339
4. Sps. Cesar & Sta. Maria vs. CA GR. no.127549
5. Dichoso, Jr. vs. Marcos GR No. 180282 April 11, 2011
6. Alolino v. Flores, GR No. 198774, April 4, 2016
7. Calimoso v. Roullo, GR No. 198594, January 25, 2016
8. Andres v. Sta. Lucia Realty & Development, Inc., GR No. 201405, August
24, 2015
9. Republic v. Santos, III, GR No. 160453, November 12, 2012
16th Week
Cases:
1. Hidalgo Enterprises, Inc. V. Balandan, 91 Phil.
2. Rana v. Wong, GR 192861-62, June 30, 2014
3. Cruz v. Pandacan Hiker’s Club, Inc., GR 188213, January 11, 2016
9
17th Week
Cases:
1. Garrido u. CA, 236SCRA 450 (Capacity to sue to annul donation)
2. Puig vs. Penqflorida, 15 SCRA 276 (Donations Mortis Causa)
3. Central PhilippineUniversity, GR 112127, July17,1995 (Revocation;
Non-Compliance; Resolutory Condition)
4. Carinan v. Spouses Cueto, GR 198636, October 8, 2014
5. Calanasan v. Spouses Dolorito, GR 171937, November 25, 2013
6. Victoria v. Pidlaoan, GR 196470, April 20, 2016
7. Heirs of Gozo v. Philippine Union Mission Corp. of the Sventh Day Adventist
Church, GR 195990, August 5, 2015
18th Week
Title IV – Prescription
I. Definition (Art.1106)
A. Acquisitive (Art.1117)
1. Characteristics
2. Ordinary
a) Good faith (Art.1127)
b) Just Title (Arts.1129-1130)
3. Extraordinary (Arts. 1137 and 1132, second par.)
4. Requisites (Arts. 1118-1125)
5. Period (Arts. 1132, 1134, 1138)
6. What Cannot Be Required by Acquisitive Prescription
B. Extinctive
1. Characteristics
2. Requisites
10
3. Periods
Cases:
1. Abalos v. Heirs of Torio, GR 175444, December 14, 2011
2. James v. Eurem Realty development Corp., GR 190650, October 14,
2013
- Finals -
11