SPA Petition - Tabulators Case
SPA Petition - Tabulators Case
SPA Petition - Tabulators Case
NOW COMES Dana Nessel, Attorney General for the State of Michigan, and
1. The Michigan State Police and the Michigan Department of Attorney General
2. The Michigan State Police and the special agents with the MDAG have
completed a preliminary review and it is now time for a prosecutorial review for
charges that include but are not limited to Conspiracy, MCL 750.157a; Using a
the MDAG and MSP investigate third party access to vote tabulators,
now been presented to the Criminal Trials and Appeals Division seeking
coordinated plan to gain access to voting tabulators that had been used in
Roscommon County the clerk stated she was told by Rep Rendon that the House
5. All 5 tabulators were taken to hotels and/or AIRBNB’s in Oakland County where
Lenberg, Cotton, Penrose and Logan broke into the tabulators and performed
6. Howard coordinated printing of fake ballots to be run through the tabulators and
recruitment of “volunteers.”
7. Irving Township Clerk Sharon Olson indicated that she was asked by Barry
8. When this investigation began there was not a conflict of interest. However,
during the course of the investigation, facts were developed that DePerno was
10. A conflict arises when “the prosecuting attorney has a personal interest
(financial or emotional) in the litigation.” People v Doyle, 159 Mich App 632
(1987).
11. It is hereby understood and agreed that pursuant to the provisions of MCL
handle any matter on behalf of the petitioner, all costs of prosecution, other than
the charging request and handle any prosecution that may result against
B. For any additional relief that law and justice may require.