Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Session 13. Capital Structure Decisions Part II

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Session 13.

Capital Structure Decisions Part


II
PGP, IIM INDORE
Recap
•Financial Leverage and ROE
•Does financial leverage affect firm value?
• Modigliani Miller Theorems
• World without taxes and other assumptions: Value of levered firm = Value of an unlevered
firm
• In the presence of corporate taxes: Value of a levered firm is higher by present value of
tax shields
• Does that mean that the optimal level of debt would be 99.99% debt?
• Costs of Financial Distress and Bankruptcy
• Value of Levered firm = value if all-equity financed + PV(tax shield) - PV(costs of financial distress)
• Trade-off theory
• Capital Structure decisions in the presence of information asymmetry
Capital Structure Decisions

Static Trade-off
Benefit from Tax
Theory: Bankruptcy Pecking Order
Deductibility of
Costs and Costs of Hypothesis
Interest
Financial Distress
Equity and Debt Issues with Information Asymmetries
•Information asymmetries
•Managers know more about their firm’s prospects, risks and values, than outside investors
• That is, there are information asymmetries between managers and outside investors

•Managers are less likely to issue equity when it is undervalued.


•In fact, managers are more likely to issue equity when it is overvalued
— Investors anticipate this, and they watch corporate action to interpret the value of equity
— Equity issuance often signals overvaluation
— Therefore, as a step 1: Use internal financing first
— Step 2: Issue debt next. If you have exhausted your debt capacity – issue new equity as the last
resort
The Pecking-Order Hypothesis
—The pecking-order theory implies:
—Firms prefer internal finance
—If external finance is required, firms issue debt first, then hybrid security
(possibly), then equity as a last resort.
—There is no target D/E ratio (contrary to Trade-off theory)
— There are two kinds of equity: one (internal) at the top of the pecking order
and one (external) at the bottom
—The theory also implies
—Profitable firms use less debt
— They may not need external funding
—Companies prefer to have financial slack
The Pecking-Order Hypothesis
—Financial Slack (cash, near cash, easily saleable real assets, spare debt
capacity)
—Positives of having financial slack: It is valuable.
—If positive NPV opportunities arise, you use internal funding or easily
access debt markets
—Negatives of financial slack: Lead to agency problems – misuse of cash
Is there a Theory of Optimal
Capital Structure?
Is there a theory of optimal capital
structure?
•There is no ONE theory that captures everything about the Debt-equity
choice
•Profitable firms:
• Have lower debt ratio, because they can rely on internally generated profits for
funding investments (pecking order hypothesis)
• This is contrary to the prediction of Trade-off theory that more profitable firms
could use tax shields, and thus should lever up.
•Tangible assets: Firms with higher fixed assets (as % of Total assets)
• They tend to borrow more
• Assets can serve as collateral and reduce financial distress
Is there a theory of optimal capital
structure?
•Smaller growth company:
• Less need for interest tax shields
• Preserving debt capacity / financial slack is more important
• Costs of financial distress are high
• They are most likely to use equity financing (confirms to Trade-off theory)
•Mature public corporation:
• Often follow pecking order
• Information asymmetries deter large equity issues
Reference
Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., Allen, F., & Mohanty, P. (2015). Principles of corporate finance. Tata
McGraw-Hill Education. Referred to as BM hereafter.
◦ BM: Ch 17 & 18

You might also like