Safety Climate and Culture Hop Webinar 19 Mei 2022 PPT Rilis
Safety Climate and Culture Hop Webinar 19 Mei 2022 PPT Rilis
Safety Climate and Culture Hop Webinar 19 Mei 2022 PPT Rilis
Presented by:
Dr. Adithya Sudiarno, ST., MT., IPM, ASEAN Eng.
Industrial and System Engineering Department
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember - Surabaya
Working Experiences Brief CV Dr. Adithya Sudiarno, ST., MT., IPM., ASEAN Eng.
▪ Lecturer at Industrial and System Eng.
Dept., Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology (ITS) Industrial Partnership Experiences
▪ Expert Staff of Indonesian Young Scientist Association (IYSA)
▪ Organizational development and evaluation Sub-Directorate
Head of ITS
▪ Head of the ITS Industrial Eng. undergraduate study program
Current (on-going) Education
▪ International Diploma for Occupational Safety & Health
Management Professionals, NEBOSH, UK
Certifications
▪ General OHS Expert ▪ BNSP Assessor of Competency
▪ OHSMS Auditor ▪ Senior Professional Engineer
Awards Affiliate Membership
▪ Silver Medal, WWIEA, South Korea, 2018.
▪ Special Award, APIR, Poland, 2019.
▪ Special Award, TIA, Taiwan, 2019.
▪ Gold Medal, WIIPA, Taiwan, 2020.
▪ Mención De Honor, EXPOCYTAR, Argentina, 2020.
▪ Gold Medal, ASIE, Virginia-USA, 2021.
▪ Silver Medal, KIDE, Kaohsiung-Taiwan, 2021
What Will You Get From This Webinar?
The Chernobyl disaster was a nuclear accident that Int’l Nuclear Safety Advisory Group (INSAG) produced
occurred on 26 April 1986 at the No. 4 reactor in the two significant reports INSAG-1 (1986), and a revised
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, near the city of report, INSAG-7 (1992). In summary, according to
Pripyat in the north of the Ukrainian SSR in the Soviet INSAG-1, the main cause of the accident was the
Union. The accident occurred during a safety test on operators' actions, but according to INSAG-7, the main
the steam turbine of an RBMK-type nuclear reactor. cause was the reactor's design. Both INSAG reports
identified an inadequate "SAFETY CULTURE" (INSAG-1
coined the term) at all managerial and operational
levels as a major underlying factor of different aspects
of the accident.
Safety Culture In Indonesia
Penerapan Budaya K3 Pada Setiap Kegiatan Dengan Budaya K3 Kita Tingkatkan Kualitas
2022 Usaha Guna Mendukung Perlindungan Tenaga
Kerja Di Era Digitalisasi
Hidup Manusia Menuju Masyarakat yang
Selamat, Sehat dan Produktif
2017
Tingkatkan Budaya K3 Untuk Mendorong
Penguatan Sumberdaya Manusia Yang Unggul
2021 Dan Berbudaya K3 Pada Semua Sektor Usaha
Produktivitas Dan Daya Saing di
Pasar Internasional
2016
Optimalisasi Kemandirian Masyarakat Berbudaya Melalui Penerapan SMK3 Kita Wujudkan
2020 Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Pada Era
Revolusi Industri 4.0 Berbasis Teknologi Informasi
Indonesia Berbudaya K3 Dalam
Menghadapi Perdagangan Bebas
2015
Wujudkan Kemandirian Masyarakat Indonesia Mewujudkan Budaya K3 Untuk Menjamin
2019 Berbudaya Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3)
Untuk Mendukung Stabilitas Ekonomi Nasional
Stabilitas Usaha Dalam Mendukung
Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Nasional
2014
Budayakan K3 Disetiap Kegiatan Usaha
2018 Melalui Budaya Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja
(K3) Kita Bentuk Bangsa Yang Berkarakter Menuju Masyarakat Industri Yang 2013
Selamat, Sehat Dan Produktif
Safety Culture In Indonesia
Behaviours (symbols)
What safety ‘looks like’
Systems
How safety is ‘meant to be’
Safety Climate
Perceptions of safety’s
importance
Safety Culture
Values and beliefs about safety
Safety Culture Maturity Level
Based on Hudson ; Filho ; Anglo American Plc, Stemn
100% No one
Humans are fallible but they also
“Mistakes arise directly from contribute a lot to safety, they
the way the mind handles are capable of adapting to
information, NOT through unexpected situations, and they
stupidity or carelessness.” are aware when the risk
- Dr. Edward de Bono increases
(Charles Major ; Wes Harvard ; ICSI)
HOP Backgrounds and Rationale [#2]
How Work Really Happens : Drift And Accumulation
Expectations: Work As Planned (Imagined)
“Continuous improvement/
innovation”
Complex
Adaptive SUCCESS!
Behavior Task end
Task start
Worker become :
“violation” “master of the blue line”
Conklin / Fisher
Reality: Work As Performed (Done)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdLfDLjIqXE&ab_channel=SecuriteIndustrielle
Human & Organizational Performance [HOP] Leaders & Evolution
HOP is a systems-based approach that originated with safety thought leaders
like Todd Conklin, Sidney Dekker, Erik Hollnagel, and James Reason.
NOTE : NOTE :
HP = Human Performance HOP = Human & Organizational Performance
W = Why H = How
B = Behaviors B = Behaviors
R = Results S = System
R = Results
The Task-Based System
Human and Organizational Performance SYSTEM MODEL
▪ The Task-Based System shows that on any
task at any time, the individual performing
the task is within a system. The individual is
surrounded by other People, Programs,
equipment people
Processes, Work Environments,
organizations, and Equipment.
▪ The systemic drivers are dynamic, not static
and as they shift throughout the task, they
organization programs all impact each other, they all impact the
individual, and the individual must respond
to these shifts in systemic drivers. The
individual is an expert at adapting to
changes and optimizing our systems.
work enviro. processes ▪ A bad system will beat a good person every
time (Edwards Deming)
Todd Conklin’s 5 HOP Principles
https://www.southpacinternational.com/hop/the-five-principles-of-hop/
HOP Principle No. #1
Belief
People make mistakes
Emerging Behavior
(Baker ; Ferguson)
HOP and Safety Culture : The Connection
12 core attributes of a world-class safety culture
Engaged management Safety recognition programs
4. Organizational Alignment
▪ Do you able to speak freely and openly about unsafe conditions without getting negative judgments
from those around you? (adapted from Lingard)
▪ Did your manager respond well to your explanation of the mistakes that occurred? (adapted from
Dahl Kongsvik)
▪ Etc.
SOME IDEA TO TAKE HOME : HOP-BASED SC ASSESSMENT
Context drives behaviour Info. & Communication
#thank you