Actualidad y Vigencia Del Barroco
Actualidad y Vigencia Del Barroco
Actualidad y Vigencia Del Barroco
net/publication/326192792
CITATIONS READS
0 21
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Shelly Jarrett Bromberg on 09 March 2019.
PAULETTE A. RAMSAY
The University of the West Indies
the 1800s, however, much of Latin America was involved in the wars of
Independence, the definition and redefinition of nations and borders, and
the creation of new modes of experience and expression. Artistic ties to
Europe were ignored or forgotten as these new countries sought to create
and consolidate national identities unencumbered by their shared colonial
pasts. Still, as both Spain and Latin American entered the twentieth
century, the Baroque would again surface on both sides of the Atlantic,
where its revival impacted a wide array of artists, musicians and writers.
One of the most influential intellectuals of this renewed appreciation,
would be the Catalan writer, Eugenio d’Ors whose treatise titled simply, Lo
Barroco (1935), became one of the most significant writings on the
Baroque. D’Ors believed the Baroque was the “revalación del secreto de
una cierta constante humana,” that existed outside of any particular history
or place (quoted; 51). The diffuse, dynamic and chaotic nature of the
Baroque, however, also means that it is impossible to definitively describe
it and/or its multiple manifestations.
While d’Ors, for instance, refers to the contemporary Baroque as “el
Barroquismo,” in Latin America it is often described as “el Nuevo Mundo
Barrroco,” or even “el Neobarroco.” It is to this plethora of meaning and
expression within Latin America that Martínez next turns in Chapter Three
as he discusses the aesthetic and artistic Baroque of Carpentier, Lezama
Lima and Sarduy and the renewed baroque expression as “un índice de
identidad cultural” (55). Basing his discussion on essays about the Baroque
by each author, Martínez highlights points of contact among the various
works and divergences. Carpentier, Lezama Lima and Sarduy share a
conviction that the Baroque is a natural outgrowth of the New World
experience. So too they see the Baroque in ahistorical terms, much like
d’Ors, arguing instead that the New World Baroque, at least, is outside of
conventional delimiters of the space/time continuum. Carpentier, for
instance, contended that both Modernism and Marvelous Realism were
simply “rebirths” of the Baroque in uniquely New World terms (58).
Lezama Lima, meanwhile, traces the origins of his Neo Baroque to pre-
Colombian times adding that it was the encounter between the
autochthonous and the European forms of the Baroque that resulted in “un
arte de la contraconquista” (61). Of the three, Sarduy’s profound
explanation of the Baroque through the use of Johannes Kepler’s
cosmology is both the most ambitious and original discussion of how and
why the Baroque is such a fitting expression of New World identity.
Focusing on Kepler’s use of the elliptical rather than circular orbit, Sarduy
argues that the decenter nature of Kepler’s cosmology, “tiene profundas
repercusiones ideológicas” in the New World including “la inarmonía [y] la
ruptura de la homogeniedad” (64).
625