Last Minute Tips In: Bar Review Institute University of The Philippines College of Law
Last Minute Tips In: Bar Review Institute University of The Philippines College of Law
Last Minute Tips In: Bar Review Institute University of The Philippines College of Law
1
relationship
Q: What is social justice?
02
ANS: Social justice is "neither communism, Q: How may the existence of an
nor despotism, nor atomism, nor anarchy," employer-employee relationship be
but the humanization of laws and the ascertained?
equalization of social and economic forces ANS: Under D.O. 147, Sec. 3, the four-fold
02
by the State so that justice in its rational and test must be satisfied, viz:
objectively secular conception may at least 1. Selection and engagement of the
be approximated. Social justice means the employee
promotion of the welfare of all the people, 2. Payment of wages
I2
the adoption by the Government of
measures calculated to insure economic
stability of all the competent elements of
3. Power of dismissal
4. Power to control the conduct of the
employee — “control test”
BR
society, through the maintenance of a
proper economic and social equilibrium in Q: What is the control test?
the interrelations of the members of the ANS: Under the control test, an
community, constitutionally, through the employer-employee relationship exists
adoption of measures legally justifiable, or where the person for whom the services are
AW
extra-constitutionally, through the exercise performed reserves the right to control not
of powers underlying the existence of all only the end achieved, but also the manner
governments on the time-honored principle and means used to achieve that end. [Royale
of salus populi est suprema lex. [Calalang v. Homes Marketing Corporation, G.R. No.
Williams, G.R. No. 47800 (1940)] 195190, July 28, 2014]
PL
should be made clear that when the law tilts 1. Termination by Employer
the scale of justice in favor of labor, it is but a. With just cause (Art. 297)
a recognition of the inherent economic b. With authorized cause (Art.
inequality between labor and management. 298)
Never should the scale be so tilted if the c. Disease (Art. 299)
result is an injustice to the employer. [Phil. 2. Termination by Employee –
Geothermal, Inc. v. NLRC, G.R. No. 106370 Resignation (Art. 300)
(1994)]
1
ANS: The authorized causes for termination by
The just causes for termination by the the employer are: (Art. 298)
02
employer are: (Art. 297) 1. Installation of labor saving devices
1. Serious misconduct a. Introduction of machinery,
a. Grave and aggravated in equipment or other device
character done in good faith and for
02
b. Must relate to the the purpose of saving on
performance of the costs, enhancement of
employee’s duties efficiency, or similar aim
1. Willful disobedience of the lawful 2. Redundancy
I2
orders of the employer
a. Willful or intentional
b. Order must be reasonable,
a. Superfluity of positions or
services of employees
b. Positions or services are in
BR
lawful, and made known to excess of what is reasonably
the employee demanded by the actual
c. Order must pertain to the requirements of the
duties which he has been enterprise to operate in an
engaged to discharge economical and efficient
2. Gross and habitual negligence of manner
AW
duties 3. Retrenchment
3. Fraud or willful breach of trust a. Reasonably necessary and
reposed in him by the employer likely to prevent business
a. Pertains to certain acts or losses
omission b. Losses must not be de
PL
1
invoked. If the cause is due to installation of 5. Living wage
labor saving devices or redundancy, 6. Policy and decision-making
02
separation pay is 1 month per year of processes affecting their rights and
service or 1 month pay, whichever is higher. benefits as may be provided by law
If the cause is due to retrenchment or 7. Just share in the fruits of production
closure, separation pay is ½ month per year
02
of service or 1 month, whichever is higher. Q: Who may join labor organizations?
However, when closure is due to serious ANS:
financial losses, separation pay may not be GENERAL RULE: All employees shall have
paid by the employer. (Art. 298) the right to self-organization and to form,
IV.
I2
Requirements
contracting
for labor-only
join or assist labor organizations of their
own choosing for collective bargaining.
(Sec. 3, Art. XIII, 1987 CONST.)
BR
● Includes government employees
Q: When is there labor-only contracting? (Sec. 2(5), Art. IX-B, Constitution)
ANS: There is “labor-only” contracting EXCEPTIONS: The following cannot form,
where the person supplying workers to an join, or assist labor organizations:
employer does not have substantial capital 1. Managerial employees (Art. 255)
or investment in the form of tools, 2. Confidential employees – those
AW
1
aid and protection and other
legitimate purposes (Samahan ng Q: What is the doctrine of management
02
Manggagawa sa Hanjin Shipyard v. prerogative?
Bureau of Labor Relations, G.R. No. ANS: Under the doctrine of management
211145, October 14, 2015). prerogative, every employer has the
3. Aliens – generally not allowed, but inherent right to regulate, according to his
02
allowed if they have legal status and own discretion and judgment, all aspects of
the concept of reciprocity is fulfilled employment, including hiring, work
(Art. 284) assignments, working methods, the time,
4. High-level government employees place and manner of work, work
I2
whose functions are normally
considered as policy-making or
managerial or whose duties are of a
supervision, transfer of employees, lay-off
of workers, and discipline, dismissal, and
recall of employees. The only limitations to
BR
highly confidential nature – allowed, the exercise of this prerogative are those
but cannot join the organization of imposed by labor laws and the principles of
rank-and-file employees (E.O. No. equity and substantial justice. [Peckson v.
180) Robinson’s Supermarket Corporation, G.R. No.
198534 (2013)]
Q: What are the rights of legitimate labor
AW
1
● Inducement of a worker to quit his
present employment for another Q: What is the jurisdiction of the Labor
02
unless the transfer liberates a worker Arbiter?
from oppressive terms and ANS: The Labor Arbiter has exclusive
conditions of employment original jurisdiction over the following:
● Influencing or attempting to 1. Unfair labor practice cases;
02
influence any person or entity not to 2. Termination disputes;
employ any worker who has not 3. If accompanied with a claim for
applied for employment through his reinstatement, those cases that
agency workers may file involving
I2
● Engagement in recruitment or
placement of workers in jobs
harmful to public health or morality
wages, rates of pay, hours of
work and other terms and
conditions of employment;
BR
or to the dignity of the Philippines 4. Claims for actual, moral,
● Contract substitution exemplary and other forms of
● Withholding or denying of worker’s damages arising from the
travel documents before departure employer-employee relations;
for monetary or financial 5. Cases arising from any violation
consideration other than those of Article 264 of the Labor Code,
AW
1
workers for overseas claims for employees’ compensation,
employment, including claims social security, medicare and
02
for actual, moral, exemplary, and maternity benefits (Art. 217(6) )
other forms of damages (R.A.
No. 8042 as amended by R.A. Q: What is the procedure for filing an
No. 10022, Sec. 10) appeal involving labor standards
02
10. Contested cases under the violations?
exception clause of Art. 128(b), ANS: The aggrieved party from a decision
Labor Code as amended by R.A. No. of the Secretary of Labor may file one
7730 motion for reconsideration within ten (10)
I2
Q: What is the procedure for filing a case
involving labor standards violations?
days from receipt thereof. If the motion for
reconsideration is denied, the party may
appeal via Rule 65 to the Court of Appeals
BR
ANS: If an employer-employee relationship within 60 days from receipt of the denial.
still exists, any aggrieved employee may file Upon denial, the party may proceed via
a complaint, regardless of the amount of Rule 45 to the Supreme Court. [St. Martin
monetary claims, before the DOLE regional Funeral Home v. NLRC, G.R. No. 130866
office, or its provincial field offices, which (1998)]
has territorial jurisdiction over the
AW
either: 229)