Q1. Define Motivation. Discuss The Various Theories of Motivation
Q1. Define Motivation. Discuss The Various Theories of Motivation
Q1. Define Motivation. Discuss The Various Theories of Motivation
Abraham Maslow postulated that a person will be motivated when all his needs are
fulfilled. People do not work for security or money, but they work to contribute and to
use their skills. He demonstrated this by creating a pyramid to show how people are
motivated and mentioned that ONE CANNOT ASCEND TO THE NEXT LEVEL
UNLESS LOWER-LEVEL NEEDS ARE FULFILLED. The lowest level needs in the
pyramid are basic needs and unless these lower-level needs are satisfied people do
not look at working toward satisfying the upper-level needs.
Physiological needs: are basic needs for survival such as air, sleep, food,
water, clothing, sex, and shelter.
Safety needs: Protection from threats, deprivation, and other dangers
(e.g., health, secure employment, and property)
Social (belongingness and love) needs: The need for association,
affiliation, friendship, and so on.
Self-esteem needs: The need for respect and recognition.
Self-actualization needs: The opportunity for personal development,
learning, and fun/creative/challenging work. Self-actualization is the
highest-level need to which a human being can aspire.
2. Hertzberg’s two factor theory
McClelland affirms that we all have three motivating drivers, which do not
depend on our gender or age. One of these drives will be dominant in our
behaviour. The dominant drive depends on our life experiences.
The three motivators are:
Achievement: a need to accomplish and demonstrate own
competence. People with a high need for achievement prefer tasks that
provide for personal responsibility and results based on their own
efforts. They also prefer quick acknowledgement of their progress.
Affiliation: a need for love, belonging and social acceptance. People with
a high need for affiliation are motivated by being liked and accepted by
others. They tend to participate in social gatherings and may be
uncomfortable with conflict.
Power: a need for controlling own work or the work of others. People
with a high need for power desire situations in which they exercise
power and influence over others. They aspire for positions with status
and authority and tend to be more concerned about their level of
influence than about effective work performance.
4. McGregor’s theory X and theory Y
His theory suggests that there are three groups of core needs: existence (E),
relatedness (R), and growth (G). These groups are aligned with Maslow’s levels
of physiological needs, social needs, and self-actualization needs, respectively.
Existence needs concern our basic material requirements for living, which
include what Maslow categorized as physiological needs such as air, sleep,
food, water, clothing, sex and shelter and safety-related needs such as health,
secure employment, and property.
Relatedness needs have to do with the importance of maintaining
interpersonal relationships. These needs are based in social interactions with
others and are aligned with Maslow’s levels of love/belonging-related needs
such as friendship, family and sexual intimacy and esteem-related needs such
as gaining the respect of others.
Growth needs describe our intrinsic desire for personal development. These
needs are aligned with the other part of Maslow’s esteem-related needs such
as self-esteem, self-confidence, and achievement and self-actualization needs
such as morality, creativity, problem-solving and discovery.
Q2. Define the concept and meaning of Leadership. Discuss the Likert’s
Leadership styles.
Leadership is essentially a continuous process of influencing behaviour. It may
be considered in context of mutual relations between a leader and his
followers. The leader tries to influence the behaviour of individuals or group of
individuals around him to achieve desired goals.
Leadership is a dynamic process, which deserves study. It is a relational process
involving interactions among leaders, members and sometimes outside
constituencies. Good leaders are made not born. If you have the desire and
willpower, you can become an effective leader.
Rensis Likert established management styles called Likert's management
systems in the 1960s. To characterize the interaction, engagement, and roles
of managers and subordinates in industrial contexts, he proposed four
management systems.
The Likert’s Management system consisted of four styles and they are
Exploitative Authoritative, Benevolent Authoritative, Consultative and
Participative. The four styles were developed with a lot of research and
observation. These systems indicate the stages of evolution of patterns of
management in different organizations.
1. Exploitative Authoritative System
Under this style Likert states that the ultimate power lies in the hands of
the top subordinates. The Top management makes the policies and rules
and the employees in the lower level are bound to follow the
instructions given to them by their superiors. Here, it is observed that
the workers at the lower level do not feel free to discuss their work with
their superiors. The communication and teamwork in this system are
very little. The leaders in the system of Exploitative authoritative have a
lower level of concern for their employees. They use threats or methods
that involve fear to achieve their work. The method of threat works well
and the employees work efficiently upon entering the organization. The
leaders are ignorant of the psychological feelings of the employees and
the communication between them is almost nil. In this type of system,
the upper management burdens employees with a heavy workload and
they are to finish the work without fail. The monetary benefits and work
satisfaction in this type of system is very less.
2. Benevolent Authoritative System
Under this system of Likert’s, it is observed that the authority lies in the
hands of the managers and not in the hands of the lower-level workers.
The superiors have a small amount of confidence and trust in the
employees. The superiors have less control over the employees. They do
not use methods of threats. However, the employees are rewarded and
punished as per their performance in the organization. In this system of
management, the employees are involved in some of the decision
making processes. But the ultimate power lies in the hands of the
superiors. Here also the communication is very little and the employees
do not feel free to share their work experience with the superiors.
3. Consultative System
This is the third style of leadership given by Likert. In this system, Likert
has stated that responsibility and authority are spread widely
throughout the organization. The subordinates in the different levels of
the organizations are given different responsibilities. The employees and
subordinates work as a team on certain decisions. There is fair
communication between the employees and the superiors. However,
the power to form policies and rules lies in the hands of the top
management. Under this system, the employees are rewarded for better
performance and at the same time, they are also punished for bad
performances. The employees are free to communicate with their
superiors and subordinates. They can share their work-related issues
with the superiors freely. The system promotes a healthy work
environment for the employees and motivates them to work efficiently.
4. Participative System
This is the last style of leadership given by Likert. Under this style, Likert
states that the power and responsibility to achieve the goals of the
organization is distributed among all the employees and subordinates in
the organization. According to this system, each employee has a certain
role to play in the success of the organization. The superiors have the
utmost confidence and trust in their employees. The employees are
made to participate in the decision-making process of the organization.
The system states that there is a continuous flow of information in both
an upward and downward direction. The employees are provided with a
healthy work environment and they are motivated continuously by their
superiors.
B. BEHAVIOUR THEORY:
In Behavioral Theory, the focus is on the specific behaviors and actions
of leaders rather than their traits or characteristics. The theory suggests
that effective leadership is the result of many learned skills. Some of the
important behavioral theories are:
C. CONTINGENCY THEORIES:
Contingency theories of leadership focus on particular variables related
to the environment that might determine which particular style of
leadership is best suited for the situation. According to this theory, no
leadership style is best in all situations. Some of the contingency
theories are discussed below:
D. SITUATIONAL THEORIES:
The Situational Theory is similar to the Contingency Theory as it also
proposes that no one leadership style supersedes others. As its name
suggests, the theory implies that leadership depends on the situation at
hand.
UNIT-3
Q1. What do you mean by Group? Discuss the various stages of group
development?
Ans. A group can be defined as two or more interacting and interdependent
individuals who come together to achieve particular objectives. A group
behaviour can be stated as a course of action a group takes as a family.
A team cannot be expected to perform well right from the time it is formed.
Forming a team is just like maintaining a relationship. It takes time, patience,
requires support, efforts and members often go through recognizable stages as
they change from being a collection of strangers to a united group with
common goals.
This process of learning to work together effectively is known as team
development. Research has shown that teams go through definitive stages
during development. Bruce Tuckman, an educational psychologist, identified a
five-stage development process that most teams follow to become high
performing. He called the stages: forming, storming, norming, performing, and
adjourning.
1. Orientation (Forming Stage):
The first stage of group development is the forming stage. This stage
presents a time where the group is just starting to come together and is
described with anxiety and uncertainty. Members are discreet with their
behaviour, which is driven by their desire to be accepted by all members
of the group. Conflict, controversy, misunderstanding and personal
opinions are avoided even though members are starting to form
impressions of each other and gain an understanding of what the group
will do together. At this stage, group members are learning what to do,
how the group is going to operate, what is expected, and what is
acceptable.