Business of Cancel Culture Study: 2021 Porter Novelli
Business of Cancel Culture Study: 2021 Porter Novelli
Business of Cancel Culture Study: 2021 Porter Novelli
Business of
Cancel Culture
Study
One Voice.
Years ago, that voice may not have gained too much traction—it may have moved
forward for a bit, or floundered before reaching too many ears. Even armed with
a bullhorn or a bully pulpit, it could be difficult to amplify a message to the
masses. Yet, today a voice can carry. Social media has transformed the impact
of a single voice—it has allowed stories to grow, opinions to become trending
topics and movements to solidify into hashtags. Social media has created power.
Suddenly, one voice has become many, and these voices can no longer be ignored.
Now, collective voices spreading like digital wildfire can sway public opinion.
One misstep or wrong word from a person, a celebrity or brand can put that
entity in a social media maelstrom—when mutual disapproval puts that entity on
the outs. It’s a phenomenon that has come to be known as “cancel culture.”
2
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
Contents
04 Unpacking Corporate Cancel Culture
3
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
Unpacking Corporate
Cancel Culture
Cancel culture has emerged because voice to influence companies. Further,
social media has given power to Americans see cancelling a brand as a
the masses and amplification to the way to not only get attention (69%)
individual. Americans are emboldened for an issue or act, but also change a
to share their opinions and misgivings company's ways (68%).
not only with their own networks but
In the world of cancel culture,
directly with the offending company.
companies are accountable for both
In fact, nearly three-quarters (72%) of
their brand voice but also those of their
Americans feel more empowered than
employees—especially as this relates to
ever before to share their thoughts
leadership. The majority of Americans
or opinions about companies. The
(87%) think companies need to
primary vehicle for sharing this
take responsibility for the words and
feedback is through social media—64
statements of executives.
percent think it has given them a
64
think social media has given them
%
72
feel more empowered than ever before to share
%
4
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
company if it is Purpose-driven
5
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
Yet, even the practice of cancelling effective but overused, causing too
companies is divided. While a third many companies to be put on check.
(34%) of Americans believe cancel A further one-in-five think cancel
culture is good for society, in that culture is bad for society overall,
it gets companies or individuals to and the act is used too freely, so that
recognize bad behavior, others have individuals and brands must tread
a less positive view of the act. Thirty lightly at all times.
percent of individuals think it’s
34 %
good for society—it gets companies/
individuals to recognize bad behavior
30 %
effective, but overused—too many companies/
individuals are being cancelled
20 %
bad for society—companies/individuals can’t do or
say anything without being cancelled
6
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
a way to engage
hopes that a company would fire an
employee responsible for an offensive
with companies
statement. Yet, overall, Americans see
cancel culture as a way to engage with
companies, voice opinions and move
toward progress—with just 14 percent
of Americans stating their primary
objective for cancelling a company is
so that organization would “go away”
(e.g., out of business) completely.
7
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
reasons 27%
A company to change policies/stances surrounding political
involvement
Americans A company to fire the individual(s) responsible for an offensive
would cancel a 26% statement
company: 22%
A company to disassociate itself from a celebrity or
spokesperson who said or did something offensive
2% Other
The cancel culture movement continues in their usage of the act. The majority
to grow, taking over media and newsfeeds (30%) of that group have cancelled just
on a regular basis. And although most one or two brands with just one percent
Americans still have not participated in of individuals stating they’ve cancelled
cancel culture directly, there is a good more than five brands over the past 12
portion of individuals who have activated months. This leaves more than half (56%)
their online voices and disapproval of of Americans who have refrained from the
brands. In fact, one-in-three (36%) movement thus far, mirroring Americans’
Americans cite they’ve cancelled a brand undecided nature over the aim, impact
in the past year, but most are selective and effectiveness of cancel culture overall.
8
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
9
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
10
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
11
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
take to be 33%
Fire the person responsible for making the offensive
statement or policy
“uncancelled”:
20% Change branding and or external representation
12
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
13
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
Goya
What Happened:
When Goya’s president Robert Unanue stated “We’re all truly blessed
at the same time to have a leader like President Trump,” this July, the
executive brought the company into a very divided political conversation.
This angered some long-term Goya fans and energized others—spurring
boycotts and counter-boycotts across the country.
Social Snapshot:
Although online conversation around Goya has been historically limited,
the cult food brand enjoyed a baseline of positive conversation. Yet,
following Unanue’s statement, Goya exploded onto the social scene with
a massive spike in brand mentions in mid-July. Although by early August
the conversation spike ebbed quite quickly, the impact to the overall
conversation around Goya has persisted. Chatter around the brand staying
consistently negative since the statement and is still continuing today.
Key Insight:
Without taking a remedying step such
as explaining Unanue’s comment further
or disavowing the executive, Goya’s
perception in social media conversation
has suffered.
14
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
1.6M
1.2M
800K
400K
40%
0%
-35%
-70%
15
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
L'Oréal Paris
What Happened:
Following the lead of many brands in the wake of the murder of George
Floyd, L'Oréal Paris issued a statement of support for the Black Lives Matter
movement. The makeup brand was immediately accused of "gaslighting" by
trans model Munroe Bergdorf, who had been fired by L'Oréal after she spoke
out about the racism surrounding violence in Charlottesville in 2017.
Social Snapshot:
L'Oréal enjoyed steady online conversation throughout the year, with a spike
in February attributed to the announcement of GOT7’s Jackson Wang as
Global Ambassador for L’Oréal’s Skin Care Line for Men. The second major
spike occurred following Bergdorf’s criticism of the brand, causing an increase
in overall conversation around L'Oréal but a drop in positive sentiment.
Conversation and sentiment fell back to baseline by early August, following
steps by L'Oréal including issuing a public apology, re-hiring Bergdorf and
asking her to sit on the brand’s U.K. Diversity & Inclusion Advisory Board.
Key Insight:
Within a week, L'Oréal took a number of
mitigating steps to acknowledge, learn and
improve. Although the company recognizes
it still has work to do, the initial steps helped
to improve the overall conversation around
the brand after its initial cancellation.
16
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
48.8K
36.6K
24.4K
12.2K
50%
0%
-50%
-100%
17
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
Wells Fargo
What Happened:
Wells Fargo CEO Charles Scharf was put on check after stating it was
difficult to hire diverse employees because of a "very limited pool of Black
talent to recruit from." This led to many people on Twitter, including Rep.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Sherrod Brown, calling for a boycott of
the company.
Social Snapshot:
Wells Fargo has had limited social conversation over time—with an average
of less than 50,000 tweets per day. Further, sentiment around the company
in online discussions has been historically negative. Yet, following Scharf’s
statement, Wells Fargo chatter shot up to more than 250,000 individual
posts. While total conversation quickly resumed to Wells Fargo’s standard
baseline, negative sentiment dipped further than normal and remained
steadily negative for nearly two months.
Key Insight:
Although Scharf did eventually apologize
for his statement in an internal memo,
the act wasn’t enough to assuage the
historically negative sentiment Wells
Fargo endures online.
18
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
208K
156K
104K
52K
0%
-50%
-100%
19
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
OREO
What Happened:
Earlier this year, OREO launched an LGBTQ+ focused campaign including
rainbow cookies and an ad of a mom supporting her daughter after bringing
home her girlfriend. While this campaign was well received by many, the
conservative advocacy group One Million Moms fought back—calling for a
boycott on the snack brand for “pushing the LGBTQ agenda on families.”
Social Snapshot:
OREO enjoys steady conversation throughout the year on social with a
primarily positive sentiment. Following the statement from One Million Moms,
conversation did spike to around 10,500 tweets; however, sentiment remained
steadily positive, revealing that while the calls for boycotts generated
conversation, they did not impact overall brand love in online conversation.
Key Insight:
While some may have been offended by
OREO’s campaign, the calls for a boycott
had little impact on overall social media
conversation around the brand. Loyal fans
likely supported OREO, attributing to its
steadily positive sentiment over time.
20
2021 PORTER NOVELLI BUSINESS OF CANCEL CULTURE STUDY
568K
426K
284K
142K
40%
0%
-30%
21
Final Thoughts
Cancel culture, while a relatively new phenomenon,
is gaining traction and brands should be prepared.
Still, to be cancelled is not a finality. In the eyes of
many Americans, they see cancellations as a way to
share their voice—and disapproval—with companies
so that change can be made. It’s a way for individuals
to exercise their collective online voice and boycott
power to influence organizations. Although our case
study research shows some brands still choose not
to take part in this dialogue, those that do—either
through explaining why it is staying true to its values
or by acknowledging wrongdoing and creating a plan
to change—tend to fare better in creating a positive
public discourse once again. For some, a cancellation
is not the end, but a beginning.
22
Methodology
Porter Novelli fielded a survey to gather people’s opinions of “cancel
culture.” This wave was fielded online using Engine’s online CARAVAN®
Omnibus survey between December 4-6, 2020, and a total sample of 1,004
U.S. general market adults was collected. The data were weighted to U.S.
Census population estimates and the margin of error is +/- 3.1% at a 95%
confidence level. In addition, 13 months of Twitter conversation for each
case study was analyzed using social listening platform TalkWalker.
23