Chapter 12 Transfer Taxation
Chapter 12 Transfer Taxation
Chapter 12 Transfer Taxation
Types of Transfers:
1) BILATERAL TRANSFERS – involve transmission of a property for a consideration. They are referred to as
onerous transactions or exchanges.
Examples:
1. Sale – exchange of property for money
2. Barter – exchange of property for another property
2) UNILATERAL TRANSFERS - involve the transmission of property by a person without consideration. They
are commonly referred to as gratuitous transactions or simply transfer. The right or privilege to transfer
properties is subject to “transfer taxes”. TYPES OF UNILATERAL TRANSFERS:
1.) DONATION – is the gratuitous transfer of property from a living donor to a donee. Since it is made
between living persons, it is called “donation inter vivos”.
2.) SUCCESSION - is the gratuitous transfer of the properties of the deceased person upon his death to
his heirs.
When a person dies, his legal identity including proprietary rights are extinguished. His properties
will be gratuitously transferred to his successors either by operation of law or by virtue of a written
will. Succession is a donation of all the properties of the decedent caused by his death. Hence, it is
called “donation mortis causa”.
COMPLEX TRANSFERS – are transfers for less than full and adequate consideration. These are sales made at
prices which are significantly lower than the fair value of the property sold.
WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ADEQUATE CONSIDERATION?
There is no fixed quantitative rule on what constitutes an adequate consideration. The determination of
whether or not a consideration is adequate requires consideration of the facts and the circumstances
surrounding the sale.
The adequacy of the price is influenced by the liquidity or the availability of willing buyers of the concerned
property. Hence, a discount of 20% to highly saleable goods like gold would be construed as gift due to its
relative liquidity while this may not be the case in selling big real estates.
Tax rules on transfers for adequate consideration
Transfers for adequate consideration are deemed pure exchanges and are subject to income tax, not to transfer
tax.
Transfers for less than adequate and full consideration
Transfer for less than full and adequate consideration are split into its components: transfer element and
exchange element. The transfer element is subject to transfer tax while the realized gain on the exchange
element is subject to income tax.
3. BENEFIT RECEIVED THEORY – when a person transfers property by donation or succession, the
government is a party in the orderly transfer of the property to the done or heir. This is made possible
by government laws which are enforce or effectuate donation and succession.
The transferor is actually exercising a privilege to transfer his property under government security of an
effective and orderly transmission under its laws which define and effect donation or succession.
Without these laws, the transfer could not have been conveniently possible.-
Exercising the special privilege to transfer property either inter vivos or mortis causa is a benefit to the
transferor. In accordance with the benefit received theory, the transfer should be taxed.
The benefit received theory is the most dominant rationalization of transfer taxation.
4. STATE PARTNERSHIP THEORY – the state ensures a civilized and orderly society where commercial
undertaking and wealth accumulation flourish. The government therefore is an indirect partner
behind all forms of wealth accumulation by any person within the state. Thus, when a person
transfers part or the whole of his wealth, the government should take its fair share by taxing the
transfer of the wealth to other persons.
Thus governments strive toward equitable wealth distribution as a basic policy. Taxation is a common
tool in redistributing wealth to society. When one transfers his wealth, the transfer should be taxed
so that part of the wealth will be redistributed to benefit society.
6. ABILITY TO PAY THEORY – no one could gratuitously give what he could not afford. The ability to
transfer property is an indication of an ability to pay tax. Hence, the transfer is subject to tax.
Global Donations means properties donated wherever situated across the globe. Estate means properties of
the decedent at the point of death. Global Estate means properties of the decedent wherever situated across
the globe at the point of death.
PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE PHILIPPINES
The following properties are considered locates in the Philippines:
1. Interest in a domestic business
a. Shares, obligations, or bonds issued by any corporation are Sociedad Anonima organized or
constituted in the Philippines in accordance with its laws.
b. Shares or rights in any partnership, business or industry established in the Philippines.
It must be pointed out that bills and coins (i.e., cash) are mere representation of purchasing power. They are
intangibles rather than tangible assets.
All these will be subject to estate tax since reciprocity exemption applies only to non-resident aliens to the
exclusions of resident aliens.
CLASSIFYING DONATION AS INTER-VIVOS OR MORTIS CAUSA
The timing of the gratuitous transfer of ownership or legal title over property to another determines the
classification of the transfer.
If ownership over property is voluntarily transferred by the owner during his lifetime, this is donation inter-
vivos. If the owner retained ownership until the moment of his death, death will transfer it his successor in
interest. This transfer is donation mortis causa.
The following motives precludes a transfer from being classified as one in contemplation of death:
1. To reward services rendered
2. To relieve the donor of the burden of management of the property
3. To save on income tax
4. To see children financially independent
5. To see children enjoy the property while the decedent still lives
6. To settle family disputes
Illustration
Rhad distributed a significant part of his properties worth P500M to his children. In the deed of donation, he
cited excessive income tax and his intent to save income tax as reasons to his donation.
The donation is a donation inter-vivos subject to donor’s tax.
TRANSFERS INTENDED TO TAKE EFFECT UPON DEATH
A donation that is made on the decedent’s last will and testament is a donation mortis causa. The ‘last will and
testament’ is a document expressing the decedent’s desire on how his properties will be distributed after his
death.
Similarly, a donation that is made during the lifetime of the decedent with a stipulation that ownership shall
transfer upon his death, the same is a donation mortis causa
Illustration
During his lifetime, Don Juan transferred a property to his favorite granddaughter, Karen. Don Juan allowed
Karen to obtain possession of the property but under condition that ownership will not transfer until his death.
The transfer of property during the lifetime of the donor is not intended to take effect in ownership
immediately but at the point of death. The transfer is a donation mortis causa subject to estate tax.
INCOMPLETE TRANSFERS
Incomplete transfers involve the transmission or delivery of properties from one person to another, but
ownership is not transferred at the point of delivery. The actual transfer of ownership will take effect in the
future upon happening of certain future events or satisfaction of certain conditions.
Initially, incomplete transfers are not subject to transfer taxes upon delivery of property. They are subject to
transfer tax in the future when the actual transfer of ownership occurs.
Types of incomplete transfers:
1. Conditional transfers
2. Revocable transfers
3. Transfers with reservation of title to property until death
2) QUASI TRANSFERS – there transmissions of property which will never involve transfer of ownership.
For the purpose of our discussion, let us refer to these transmissions as “quasi-transfers”. Quasi-
transfers are not taxable.
Examples:
1. Transmission of the property by the usufructuary to the owner of the naked title.
2. Transmission of the property by a trustee to the real owner
3. Transmission of the property from the first heir to a second heir in accordance with the desire
of a predecessor.