Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Question 4

Download as odt, pdf, or txt
Download as odt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

In your own words, describe the appropriate attitudes towards Vaiñëavas and discuss the

consequences of inappropriate attitudes with reference to Çré Upadeçämåta text 6 and


purport. (Personal Application) (400 words)

Verse 6 of Çré Upadeçämåta describes the proper attitude towards Vaiñëavas as follows:
Kṛṣṇa’s devotee is not subjected to material conditions, even though his bodily features
may appear materially conditioned. One should therefore not see a pure devotee from a
materialistic point of view. One should not criticize the bodily defects of a pure devotee. If
there are such defects, they should be overlooked. What should be taken into account is
devotional service, pure service to the Supreme Lord.

As stated in BG (9.30): api cet suduräcäro… Even if a devotee sometimes seems to


engage in abominable activities, he should be considered a sädhu, a saintly person,
because his actual identity is that of one engaged in the loving service of the Lord. In other
words, he is not to be considered an ordinary human being. Even though a pure devotee
may not be born in a brähmaëa or gosvämé family, if he is engaged in the service of the
Lord he should not be neglected. This is quite evident from the example of Rūpa Gosvāmī
and Sanātana Gosvāmī who had practically become Mohammedans but, Śrī Caitanya
Mahāprabhu Himself made them gosvāmīs. Therefore the gosvāmī title is not hereditary. A
devotee is not controlled by the senses, but is the controller of the senses. Consequently
he should be called svāmī or gosvāmī, even though he may not be born in a gosvāmī
family.

The consequences of inappropriate attitudes towards are described as follows:


If we consider the bodily defects of a Vaiṣṇava, we should understand that we are
committing an offense at the lotus feet of the Vaiṣṇava. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu has
described this offense as hātī-mātā, the mad elephant offense. A mad elephant can create
a disaster, especially when it enters into a nicely trimmed garden.

When one thus criticizes a pure devotee, he commits an offense (vaiṣṇava-aparādha) that
is very obstructive and dangerous for those who desire to advance in Kṛṣṇa
consciousness. A person cannot derive any spiritual benefit when he offends the lotus feet
of a Vaiṣṇava. Everyone should therefore be very careful not to be jealous of an
empowered Vaiṣṇava, or a śuddha-vaiṣṇava. It is also an offense to consider an
empowered Vaiṣṇava an object of disciplinary action. It is offensive to try to give him
advice or to correct him. One can distinguish between a neophyte Vaiṣṇava and an
advanced Vaiṣṇava by their activities. The advanced Vaiṣṇava is always situated as the
spiritual master, and the neophyte is always considered his disciple. The spiritual master
must not be subjected to the advice of a disciple, nor should a spiritual master be obliged
to take instructions from those who are not his disciples.

You might also like