ISO - DIS - 10675-1 - (E) 2013 Critérios de Aceitação RT
ISO - DIS - 10675-1 - (E) 2013 Critérios de Aceitação RT
ISO - DIS - 10675-1 - (E) 2013 Critérios de Aceitação RT
ISO/DIS 10675-1
ICS: 25.160.40
Contents Page
Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................ iv
1 Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 5
2 Normative references ............................................................................................................................ 5
3 Radiographic technique ........................................................................................................................ 5
3.1 General ................................................................................................................................................... 6
4 Acceptance levels .................................................................................................................................. 6
Annex A (informative) Guide to the limitations of radiographic testing .................................................... 10
A.1 Volumetric imperfections in butt welds Porosities and gas pores (2011, 2013, 2015 and
2017) Wormholes and elongated cavities (2016 and 2015).............................................................. 10
A.2 Cracks in butt welds ............................................................................................................................ 10
A.3 Planar imperfections in butt welds .................................................................................................... 10
Annex B (informative) Examples for determination of area percentage (%) of imperfections ............... 11
Annex C (informative) Calculation of the sum of acceptable areas ........................................................... 13
C.1 Clustered Porosity............................................................................................................................... 13
C.2 Linear porosity ..................................................................................................................................... 13
C.3 Elongated Cavities and Wormholes .................................................................................................. 14
Bibliography ...................................................................................................................................................... 15
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies
(ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO
technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards
adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an
International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
ISO 10675-1 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 44,Subcommittee SC 5, and by Technical
Committee CEN/TC 121, in collaboration.
This second/third/... edition cancels and replaces the first/second/... edition (), [clause(s) / subclause(s) /
table(s) / figure(s) / annex(es)] of which [has / have] been technically revised.
1 Scope
This part of ISO 10675 specifies acceptance levels for indications from imperfections in butt welds of steel,
nickel, titanium and their alloys detected by radiographic testing. If agreed, the acceptance levels may be
applied to other types of welds or materials.
The acceptance levels may be related to welding standards, application standards, specifications or codes.
This part of ISO 10675 assumes that the radiographic testing has been carried out in accordance with
ISO 17636-1 and ISO 17636-2.
When assessing whether a weld meets the requirements specified for a weld quality level, the sizes of
imperfections permitted by standards are compared with the dimensions of indications revealed by a
radiograph made of the weld.
2 Normative references
The following documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this document and are indispensable
for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition
of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 5817, Welding — Fusion-welded joints in steel, nickel, titanium and their alloys (beam welding excluded)
— Quality levels for imperfections
ISO 6520-1, Welding and allied processes — Classification of geometric imperfections in metallic materials —
Part 1: Fusion welding
ISO 17636-1, Non-destructive testing of welds -- Radiographic testing -- Part 1: X- and gamma-ray techniques
with film
ISO 17636-2, Non-destructive testing of welds -- Radiographic testing -- Part 2: X- and gamma-ray techniques
with digital detectors
3 Radiographic technique
Depending on the weld quality level, radiographic technique A or B in accordance with ISO 17636-1 and ISO
17636-2 is used as shown in Table 1.
B B 1
C Ba 2
D A 3
a However, the minimum number of exposure for circumferential weld testing may correspond to the requirements of
3.1 General
Welded joints shall be visually tested and evaluated in accordance with ISO 17637 before radiographic
testing.
The acceptance levels in this part of ISO 10675 are basically valid for evaluation of imperfections which
cannot be detected and evaluated by visual testing. Surface imperfections (such as undercut and excessive
penetration, surface damage, weld spatter etc.) which, due to object geometry, cannot be evaluated, but
where the interpreter suspects the ISO 5817 quality levels are not fulfilled, shall be subject to more specific
testing.
When quantification of undercut and/or excessive penetration by radiographic testing is required, specific
procedures using test exposures may be applied in order to establish a basis for approximate quantification in
accordance with the requirements of ISO 5817. This shall be specified in the adopted specification/procedure.
4 Acceptance levels
The acceptance levels for indications are shown in Table 2 and Table 3. The types of imperfections are
selected from ISO 5817 and defined in ISO 6520-1.
Σl summary length of imperfections within L, in millimetres. Indications shall not be divided into different
ranges L.
Type of internal
imperfections in
No. Acceptance level 3 a Acceptance level 2 a Acceptance level 1
accordance with
ISO 6520-1
5d Elongatedcavities (2015) h < 0,4s, max. 4 mm h < 0,3s, max. 3 mm h < 0,2s, max. 2 mm
and wormholes
(2016) Σl ≤ s, max. 75 mm, Σl ≤ s, max. 50 mm, Σl ≤ s, max. 25 mm,
L=100 mm L=100 mm L=100 mm
8d Slag inclusions (301), h < 0,4s, max. 4 mm h < 0,3s, max. 3 mm h < 0,2s, max. 2 mm
flux inclusions (302) and
oxide inclusions (303) Σl ≤ s, max. 75 mm Σl ≤ s, max. 50 mm Σl ≤ s, max. 25 mm
L = 100 mm L = 100 mm L = 100 mm
a Acceptance levels 3 and 2 may be specified with suffix X, which denotes that all indications over 25 mm are unacceptable.
b See Annex C, Figure C.1 and Figure C.2 (normative)
c See Annex C, Figure C.3 and Figure C.4 (normative)
d See Annex C, Figure C.5 and Figure C.6 (normative)
e If the length of the weld is below 100 mm, then the maximum length of indications shall not exceed 25% of that weld
Table 3 – Surface imperfections: The acceptance levels are those defined for visual testing.
These defects are normally evaluated by visual testing
Type of surface
imperfections in
No. Acceptance level 3 a Acceptance level 2 a Acceptance level 1
accordance with
ISO 6520-1
h ≤ 0,2t, max. 1 mm
h ≤ 0,1t, max. 0,5 mm h ≤ 0,05t, max. 0,5 mm
For 0,5 mm ≤ t ≤ 3 mm
For 0,5 mm ≤ t ≤ 3 mm For 0,5 mm ≤ t ≤ 3 mm
l ≤ 25 mm, h ≤ 0,2t
l ≤ 25 mm, h ≤ 0,1t not permitted
14b Shrinkage groove (root Smooth transition is Smooth transition is Smooth transition is
undercut 5013) required required required
For t > 3 mm For t > 3 mm For t > 3 mm
0,5 mm ≤ t ≤ 3 mm
Type of surface
imperfections in Acceptance level 3 a Acceptance level 2 a Acceptance level 1
No.
accordance with
ISO 6520-1
l ≤ 25 mm, l ≤ 25 mm, l ≤ 25 mm,
18b Root concavity (515)
s > 3 mm
h ≤ 0,2 t, h ≤ 0,1 t, h ≤ 0,05 t,
0,5 mm ≤ s ≤ 3 mm
0,5 mm ≤ s ≤ 3 mm
s > 3 mm
a Acceptance levels 3 and 2 may be specified with suffix X, which denotes that all indications over 25 mm are unacceptable.
Annex A
(informative)
NOTE The numbers between brackets conform to those used in ISO 6520-1.
A.1 Volumetric imperfections in butt welds Porosities and gas pores (2011, 2013, 2015
and 2017) Wormholes and elongated cavities (2016 and 2015)
Solid inclusions (300)
The above imperfections listed in Table 2 will be readily detected using radiographic technique A or B of
ISO 17636-1 or -2 as shown in Table 1 of this part of ISO 10675.
Cracks (100)
The detectability of cracks by radiographic testing depends on the crack height, the ramification (presence of
branching parts), opening width, direction of the X-ray beam to crack orientation and radiographic technique
parameters.
Reliable detection of all cracks is therefore limited. The use of radiographic technique B or better, as specified in
ISO 17636-1 or -2, will provide better crack detectability than radiographic technique A.
The detection of lack of fusion and lack of penetration depends on characteristics of imperfections and
radiographic technique parameters.
Lack of side-wall fusion will probably not be detected (except it is associated with other imperfections such as
slag inclusions) unless it is radiographed in direction of the side-wall.
Annex B
(informative)
The following figures give a presentation of different area percentage (%) of imperfections. This should assist
the assessment of imperfections on radiographs and fracture surfaces.
Figure B.7 — 5 %
Annex C
(informative)
The sum of the different pore envelop areas (A1+A2 ...) related to the evaluation area L × wp (Figure C.1) shall be
calculated.
If D is less than dA1 or dA2, whatever is smaller, an envelope surrounding the porosity areas A1+A2
shall be considered as one area of imperfection (Figure C.2).
The sum of the different pore areas related to the evaluation area L × wp (Figure C.3) shall be calculated:
If D is smaller than the smaller diameter of one of the neighbouring pores, the full connected area of the two
pores shall be taken into the sum of imperfections (Figure C.4).
The sum of the length of indications Σl shall be determined for each testing length L (Figure C.5).
If D is smaller than the shorter length of one of the neighbouring imperfections, the full connection of the
two imperfections is to be taken into the sum of imperfections (Figure C.6).
Bibliography
[1] ISO 17635, Non-destructive testing of welds — General rules for fusion welds in metallic materials
[2] ISO 17637, Non-destructive testing of welds — Visual testing of fusion-welded joints
[3] IIW. Reference radiographs for assessment of weld imperfections according to ISO 5817
[English/French/German]. DVS, Düsseldorf