Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 40 views

    Round 2

    Uploaded by

    Sharmaine Delos Reyes
    1. This document outlines an activity for students in an LHC1106 labor relations and negotiations class to act as judges and present on assigned labor law cases. 2. Students are each assigned a past labor law case and must analyze the facts, issues, ruling, legal principles, and pen a dissenting opinion if desired. 3. Students will then present on their assigned case to the class, engaging their audience and defending their analysis. Their presentation skills and understanding of labor law will be evaluated based on a rubric.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Round 2

    Uploaded by

    Sharmaine Delos Reyes
    40 views6 pages
    1. This document outlines an activity for students in an LHC1106 labor relations and negotiations class to act as judges and present on assigned labor law cases. 2. Students are each assigned a past labor law case and must analyze the facts, issues, ruling, legal principles, and pen a dissenting opinion if desired. 3. Students will then present on their assigned case to the class, engaging their audience and defending their analysis. Their presentation skills and understanding of labor law will be evaluated based on a rubric.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Round-2

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. This document outlines an activity for students in an LHC1106 labor relations and negotiations class to act as judges and present on assigned labor law cases. 2. Students are each assigned a past labor law case and must analyze the facts, issues, ruling, legal principles, and pen a dissenting opinion if desired. 3. Students will then present on their assigned case to the class, engaging their audience and defending their analysis. Their presentation skills and understanding of labor law will be evaluated based on a rubric.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    40 views6 pages

    Round 2

    Uploaded by

    Sharmaine Delos Reyes
    1. This document outlines an activity for students in an LHC1106 labor relations and negotiations class to act as judges and present on assigned labor law cases. 2. Students are each assigned a past labor law case and must analyze the facts, issues, ruling, legal principles, and pen a dissenting opinion if desired. 3. Students will then present on their assigned case to the class, engaging their audience and defending their analysis. Their presentation skills and understanding of labor law will be evaluated based on a rubric.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 6

    GRADED ASSESSMENT FINALS

    LHC1106 – Sec 1

    Labor Relations and Negotiations

    Activity : Be a Judge for the Day.

    This activity is both for MOL and IS. For the IS you will be requested to present as well (please
    coordinate with your faculty for the schedule of your presentation)

    Date of Presentation: The presentation will start on November 24, 2021 (Wednesday)

    Objectives:

    1. Identify the specific principles or concepts applied in the assigned case by the court.
    2. Apply specific principles involving individual rights and labor concepts and jurisprudence while
    writing dissenting opinion.
    3. Develop analytical thinking skills while addressing the issue/s involved in the assigned case.
    4. Develop persuasive communication skills (both oral and writing) with the penned dissenting
    opinion.

    Directions:

    1. Each student will be assigned a case. Please refer to the list below.
    2. Digest the case assigned to you. Your case digest will include FACTS, ISSUE and RULING.
    3. Identify the labor law principle, principle, jurisprudence used as a basis of the court in justifying
    their decision.
    4. THE TWIST: PEN YOUR OWN DECISION (DISSENTING OPINION) regrading the ruling of the Court.
    Provide the principle/concept you used as basis for your judgment. You may also use other
    jurisprudence for your basis.
    5. Give your insights regarding the case assigned to you.
    a. Do you agree with the decision of the Court? Give an explanation why you concur or
    dissent.)
    b. Realization with regards to the specific case.
    6. Present your output in class. You may use PowerPoint slides but only the basics should be in the
    slides. (Brief and concise facts, just an outline or guide for the whole presentation).
    7. During the Presentation, you are requested to open your Camera. Try to engage your audience
    during the presentation.
    Rubrics:
    Assignment of CASES ROUND 2

    Name of Student Case Assigned


    1. Aihara, AYA – Case 4

    2. Alday, Justine Case 9


    3. Balmes, Neil Case 14
    4. Castor, NC Case 7
    5. Catibog, Raleigh Case 11
    6. Del Rosario, Case 1
    Christian
    7. Dela Cruz, Case 7
    Manuel
    8. Delos Reyes, Case 2
    Lance
    9. Delos Reyes, Case 15
    Sharmaine
    10. Ibnouf, Reem Case 13
    11. Madamba, Alfin Case 12
    12. Pajado, Leigh Case 10
    13. Salta, Christian Case 3
    14. Santos, Peavy Case 5
    15. Shiriashi, Tom Case 8
    16. Zafra, Patrick Case 16

    Cases :
    Case Topic Student
    1. Apalisok vs. RPN – G.R. Grievance Machinery and Del Rosario, Christian
    No. 138094 May 29, Voluntary Arbitration
    2003
    2. Sanyo Phils. Union vs. Grievance Machinery and Delos Reyes, Lance
    Canizares G.R. No. Voluntary Arbitration
    101619 July 8, 1992
    3. Nippon Paint Union vs. Grievance Machinery and Salta, Christian
    CA G.R Nov. 19, 2004. Voluntary Arbitration
    No. 159010
    4. Samahan Ng Grievance Machinery and AYA Aihara
    Manggagawa sa Hyatt Voluntary Arbitration
    vs. Bacungan G.R. No.
    149050 March 25, 2009
    5. Continental Steel v. Grievance Machinery and Santos, Peavy
    Montano, G.R. No. Voluntary Arbitration
    182836, October 13,
    2009
    6. Biflex union vs. Filflex Strikes and Lockouts Dela Cruz, Manuel
    Industrial
    Manufacturing G.R. Bo.
    155679 Dec. 19, 2006
    7. St. Scholastica vs. Strikes and Lockouts NC Castor
    Torres G.R. No. 100158
    June 29, 1992
    8. Jackbilt Industries vs. Strikes and Lockouts Shiriashi, Tom
    Jackbilt Union G.R.
    171617-19 March 13,
    2009
    9. Errol Ramirez, et al. vs. Strike Justine Alday
    Polyson Industries, Inc.
    and Wilson S. Yu
    G.R. No. 207898,
    October 19, 2016

    10. SAN FERNANDO COCA- Strikes and Lockouts Leigh Pajado


    COLA RANK-AND-FILE
    UNION (SACORU),
    REPRESENTED BY ITS
    PRESIDENT, ALFREDO R.
    MARAÑON,
    PETITIONER, VS. COCA-
    COLA BOTTLERS
    PHILIPPINES, INC.
    (CCBPI), RESPONDENT
    G.R. 200499 October 4,
    2017
    11. UNIVERSITY OF SAN Strikes and Lockouts Catibog, Raleigh
    AGUSTIN EMPLOYEES'
    UNION-FFW (USAEU-
    FFW), AND INDIVIDUAL
    UNION OFFICERS
    THEODORE NEIL
    LASOLA, MERLYN JARA,
    JULIUS MARIO,
    FLAVIANO MANALO,
    RENE CABALUM,
    HERMINIGILDO
    CALZADO, MA. LUZ
    CALZADO, RAY
    ANTHONY ZUÑIGA,
    RIZALENE VILLANUEVA,
    RUDANTE DOLAR,
    ROVER JOHN TAVARRO,
    RENA LETE, ALFREDO
    GORIONA, RAMON
    VACANTE AND MAXIMO
    MONTERO,
    PETITIONERS, VS. THE
    COURT OF APPEALS
    AND UNIVERSITY OF
    SAN AGUSTIN,
    RESPONDENTS G.R.
    169632 March 28, 2006
    12. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, Strikes and Lockouts Alfin Madamba
    INC., PETITIONER, VS.
    THE HON. ACTING
    SECRETARY OF LABOR
    JOSE S. BRILLANTES
    AND THE PHILIPPINE
    AIRLINES EMPLOYEES’
    ASSOCIATION,
    RESPONDENTS. G.R.
    119360 October 10,
    1997
    13. INTEC CEBU INC., Constructive Dismissal – Illegal Reem Ibnouf
    AKIHIKO KAMBAYASHI Dismissal
    AND WATARU SATO,
    Petitioners, v. HON.
    COURT OF APPEALS,
    ROWENA REYES,
    ROWENA ODIONG,
    HYDEE AYUDA,
    TERESITA BERIDO,
    CRISTINA LABAPIZ,
    GEMMA JUMAO-AS,
    SIGMARINGA BAROLO,
    LIGAYA B. ANADON,
    DONALINE DELA TORRE,
    JOY P. LOMOD,
    JACQUELINE A. FLORES,
    SUSAN T. ALIÑO,
    ANALYN P. ABALLE,
    CAROLINE A. LABATOS,
    LENITH F. ROMANO,
    LEONILA B. FLORES,
    CECILIA G. PAPELLERO,
    AGNES C. CASIO,
    VIOLETA O. MATCHETE,
    CANDIDA I. CRUJIDO,
    CLAUDIA B.
    CUTAMORA, ROSALIE R.
    POLICIOS, GENELYN C.
    MUÑEZ, ALOME
    MIGUE, ELSIE ALCOS,
    LYDIALYN B. GODINEZ
    AND MYRNA S.
    LOGAOS, Respondents.
    G.R. No. 189851 June
    22, 2016
    14. Ergonomic Systems Strike Neil Balmes
    Philippines, Inc. vs.
    Emerito C. Enaje, et al.
    G.R. No. 195163,
    December 13, 2017
    15. Asian Institute of Petition for cancellation of Sharmaine Delos Reyes
    Management vs. Asian Institute union registration
    of Management Faculty
    Association
    G.R. No. 207971,
    January 23, 2017
    16. Jinky S. Sta. Isabel vs. Perla Administrative investigation Patrick John Zafra
    Compañia De Seguros, Inc.
    G.R. No. 219430, November 7,
    2016

    You might also like