Effect of Social Media On La Nuage
Effect of Social Media On La Nuage
Effect of Social Media On La Nuage
There’s no denying that social media has transformed the way we interact with each other. From
sharing our thoughts and photos to planning a night out, most people tend to organise their social
lives, or at least have it significantly influence them, through some form of technology-based
engagement. But, has this shift away from more physical interaction actually affected the way we
speak and write English?
What social media has done is enable us to communicate with a much larger number of people
on a global scale in a way that we only really used to be able to do on a local level. This is great
when it means we’re keeping friendships alive over great distances, but it’s also increasing the
demands placed on an individual to keep a much larger number of relationships going
simultaneously. For example, the average number of friends a person has on Facebook in the
UK is around 300 – even if you’re only actually really friends with, say, 10% of that number that’s
still 30 friendships to be maintaining.
The use of acronyms (an abbreviation formed from the initial letters of other words and
pronounced as a word) are now commonplace substitutes to whole sentences; LOL (laugh out
loud), OMG (Oh my God), TTYL (talk to you later) are just a few that demonstrate how social
media speeds things up by lessening the need to write longer phrases and reduces space.
or
Language is an evolving thing. It’s naive to think that the language of social media isn’t having an
effect on the way we use English in day-to-day life. It’s more appropriate to consider just how
much of an effect it’s having on the way we communicate.
A whole host of words originating from social media and the wider Internet have become so
commonplace that they’ve now slipped into popular usage, and we don’t even realize it. Just a
few interesting words that have their origins in technology are blogosphere (the collective word
for personal websites called blogs), troll (someone who creates conflict online by starting
arguments or upsetting people) and buzzword (a word or phrase that is fashionable at a
particular time or in a particular context). Even some acronyms have made the transition into
everyday speech as words, ‘lol’ for example.
Another curious phenomenon we’ve seen in recent years is the reappropriation of existing words
and words based on brands to refer primarily to their social media context. Reappropriation is the
cultural process by which a group claims words that were previously used in a certain way and
gives them a new meaning. In this way the people who engage with social media are quite
literally creating new words and giving new meanings to existing words.
‘Friended’ and ‘unfriended’ are two examples of words that have been given a new meaning due
to their usage online. The word ‘friend’ and ‘befriend’ is from Old English originating in the 13th
Century, but it has been given an entirely new meaning thanks to Facebook (the process of
adding or removing someone from your circle of friends). ‘Like’ and ‘viral’ are other popular
examples of words that have had their meaning reappropriated by social media.
There are even instances of online brands becoming so powerful that words have crept into
the English language based on them. ‘Google’ is the world’s leading search engine and it has
become so universal in its usage that the phrase ‘Google it’ has virtually replaced the phrase
‘search for it’ in common speech. There are examples of this lifted directly from social media too;
‘tweet it’ refers to writing a message using Twitter, but has essentially come to mean ‘share it’.
So, has social media changed the way we speak and write English? Yes, undeniably.
Just think, ten years ago, if someone you’d just met asked you to “be their friend” or “Instagram”
a photo of their lunch you’d have scratched your head and wondered if in fact they were feeling
alright
By Jon Reed
From unfriend to selfie, social media is clearly having an impact on language. As
someone who writes about social media I’m aware of not only how fast these online
platforms change, but also of how they influence the language in which I write.
The words that surround us every day influence the words we use. Since so much of
the written language we see is now on the screens of our computers, tablets,
and smartphones, language now evolves partly through our interaction with
technology. And because the language we use to communicate with each other
tends to be more malleable than formal writing, the combination of informal, personal
communication and the mass audience afforded by social media is a recipe for rapid
change.
From the introduction of new words to new meanings for old words to changes in the
way we communicate, social media is making its presence felt.
Emoticons such as ;-) and acronyms such as LOL (‘laughing out loud’ — which has
just celebrated its 25th birthday) add useful elements of non-verbal communication
— or annoy people with their overuse. This extends to playful asterisk-enclosed
stage directions describing supposed physical actions or facial expressions (though
use with caution: it turns out that *innocent face* is no defence in court).
Syntax aside, social media has also prompted a more subtle revolution in the
way we communicate. We share more personal information, but also
communicate with larger audiences. Our communication styles consequently
become more informal and more open, and this seeps into other areas of life
and culture. When writing on social media, we are also more succinct, get to
the point quicker, operate within the New words and meanings
Facebook has also done more than most platforms to offer up new meanings for
common words such asfriend, like, status, wall, page, and profile. Other new
meanings which crop up on social media channels also reflect the dark side of social
media: a troll is no longer just a character from Norse folklore, but someone who
makes offensive or provocative comments online; a sock puppet is no longer solely a
puppet made from an old sock, but a self-serving fake online persona;
and astroturfing is no longer simply laying a plastic lawn but also a fake online grass-
roots movement.
Social media is making it easier than ever to contribute to the evolution of language.
You no longer have to be published through traditional avenues to bring word trends
to the attention of the masses. While journalists have long provided the earliest
known uses of topical terms — everything from 1794’s pew-rent in The
Times to beatboxing in The Guardian (1987) — the net has been widened by the
“net.” A case in point is Oxford Dictionaries 2013 Word of the Year, selfie: the
earliest use of the word has been traced to an Australian Internet forum. With
forums, Twitter, Facebook, and other social media channels offering instant
interaction with wide audiences, it’s never been easier to help a word gain traction
from your armchair.
Keeping current
Some people may feel left behind by all this. If you’re a lawyer grappling with the
new geek speak, you may need to use up court time to have terms such
as Rickrolling explained to you. And yes, some of us despair at how use of this
informal medium can lead to an equally casual attitude to grammar. But the truth is
that social media is great for word nerds. It provides a rich playground for
experimenting with, developing, and subverting language.
It can also be a great way keep up with these changes. Pay attention to discussions
in your social networks and you can spot emerging new words, new uses of words
— and maybe even coin one yourself.
It’s easy to assume that new forms of technology have dumbed down the English
language. Text messaging has reduced phrases to letters (CU L8r) and tweets have
so many abbreviations and hashtags they’re barely legible.
Less obvious, though, are the ways in which social media is strengthening the
English language. A South by Southwest panel, "Slap My Words Up: Language in
the Digital World," addressed this topic on Sunday. Panelists were Fast Company's
Neal Ungerleider, McKinney's Gail Marie; Digitaria's Kristina Eastham; and Sean
Carton, director for digital communication commerce and culture at the University
of Baltimore.
Here are five ways that social media is having a positive effect on writing and the
English language.
Instead of looking at social media sites as platforms for making mistakes, the
panelists said, look at them as platforms for catching mistakes. Ungerleider said
that when Fast Company readers see errors, they often point them out via social
media.
“Twitter has become the arbiter of language for us,” he said. “If we have a
misspelling, people will let us know.”
DIFFERENTIATES WRITERS
If your audience writes sloppily on social media sites, that's not an excuse to start
doing the same. Instead, think of it as an opportunity to differentiate yourself by
writing well.
You can also differentiate yourself by advancing the conversation on social
networks. I was reminded of this when the panelists shared a quote by Peter
Lunenfeld, a digital media critic and theorist.
“The growth of blogs, Twitter and Facebook considered in tandem with Tumblr
and other social softwares that enable posting and tagging accounts creates an
environment of continuous partial production.”
Journalists can turn that partial production (strings of tweets, Facebook posts, etc.)
into a full production -- a story, a project, an interactive -- that offers the analysis
and context you can’t find in a 140-character tweet.
Social media shows us the value of short storytelling. With Vine videos, we have
just six seconds to get a message across. Similarly, Twitter's 140-character limit
forces us to make every word count. The site is a constant reminder that writing
short and well isn't easy.
“Shorter is better -- if you can do it well,” Marie told the SXSW crowd. “It takes
some level of skill.” Audience member Claire Willett responded "that's a biiiiiiiig
if."
There are some journalists who do an especially good job writing short on
Twitter -- including Xeni Jardin (@Xeni), Frank Bruni (@FrankBruni) and Joanna
Smith (@SmithJoanna).
The panelists said people's concerns about digital media reflect concerns from the
past. "Is technology taking us back to the future?" Marie asked. She shared a quote
from new media research developer Paulien Dresscher:
“Just as Socrates was concerned that the invention of writing would make people
forgetful, people today are worried about the degree to which we are permanently
shaped by digital technologies.”
“When we first began to write things and moved away from oral culture, it
changed the way things worked,” Carton said. “Now we’re moving to a post-
printed era. If you look at the characteristics of social media … it’s much more like
oral culture than written culture" because it's so conversational.
“I’d say that the big keystone of success is if you can work a word into the English
language based on your brand or based on your technology.” Case in point:
“googled,” “friended,” “liked,” “tweeted,” “instagrammed” and “storified.”
The word “friending,” Marie said, has actually “been a transitive word since the
13th century.” We just tend to use the word “befriend” instead.
“It’s interesting to look at how the word ‘friending’ is changing the word ‘friend,’
Carton said. “On Facebook, they’re not your friends in the traditional sense;
they’re your acquaintances.” He noted that he’s still waiting for someone to come
up with a shorter version of “www.”
Social media sites like Twitter that impose a character limit force users to condense their
thoughts. For many, this results in excessive use of textspeak. This type of shorthand
involves a whole new language of abbreviations.
Some popular terms like LOL (for “laugh out loud”) have evolved into unique words that
have a meaning greater than their original abbreviation. LOL is now used to add a joking or
lighthearted inflection to messages almost like a type of punctuation. It doesn’t always
indicate literal laughter. This is just one example of how Internet and text shorthand is
becoming a language all its own.
Where writing was once a solitary activity, it has now become a very social way to
communicate. Before the Internet, most people wrote to communicate with one other
person. Now we reach hundreds or thousands of people with a single post. We search for
laptop deals with an eye to wireless connectivity in order to stay connected and
communicate with a global audience at a moment’s notice. Rather than eroding our writing
skills, this has sharpened them. Blogging, in particular, is a powerful way for people to
improve their writing.
We Have to Discern Between Textspeak and Proper Grammar
There are many different types of communications in the world of social
media. Textspeak and overuse of abbreviations or slang is not appropriate for every setting.
Social media users have to learn the proper time and place for different types of writing.
While Twitter is forgiving of textspeak, Facebook’s longer text limits encourage proper
grammar. While shorthand does slip into Facebook, emails, blogs, and even some written
papers, most writers are still aware of how to write properly, and do so often.
We Often Overshare
Social media quickly breaks down personal barriers. People will post things to their
Facebook accounts that they probably never would have called dozens of people over the
phone to share. These little tidbits open up a whole new world of conversational
opportunities when we see our friends in person.
Before social media, jumping into a conversation about breastfeeding with a coworker may
have felt awkward. After seeing her pictures and posts online, however, it’s much easier to
broach the subject. While there are certainly pros and cons to oversharing, this proves that
social media isn’t as isolating as some believe.
Another side effect of Twitter’s text limit is the ability to get to the point faster. Gone is
small talk. Kiss goodbye to lengthy intros. The sweeping prose of earlier generations is
giving way to a new way of writing that’s more concise, jumping right to the point. Blogging
has contributed to this as well, since most successful bloggers know they only have a few
seconds to draw a reader in before he clicks away. Short punchy sentences and the active
voice are taking over as the most popular way to communicate in writing.
Public speakers are noticing a real change in the way they have to communicate with their
audiences. Where speakers once saw the eyes of their listeners, they’re now seeing the
backs of laptops and tops of heads. This is because many attendees are typing notes or
tweeting updates throughout the presentation. Speaking to this type of audience is an
unsettling experience for some, but it’s just one more change that we’ll have to adapt to.
With the prevalence of smartphones and popularity of texting, chances are you’ve been with
someone who was there, but not quite there. It’s not uncommon to see people glued to
their technology even in social settings. If you can’t recall a time this has happened, you
might be the offender yourself. Though we’re no less social, we are more distracted. Putting
down our social media connections to focus on the ones right in front of us is something
that takes a real effort.
Social media is definitely changing the way we communicate, but in many ways it’s for the
better as we expand our social circles and explore new horizons through our online
connections.
Written by: Miles Young | Edited and Compiled by: Karan Chopra