Petition For Leave To Resume Practice of Law Benjamin Dacanay
Petition For Leave To Resume Practice of Law Benjamin Dacanay
Petition For Leave To Resume Practice of Law Benjamin Dacanay
DACANAY
B.M. No. 1678
December 17, 2007
FACTS
Benjamin M. Dacanay was admitted to the Philippine Bar in 1960. He migrated to Canada to
seek medical attention for his ailments. He renounced his Philippine citizenship and applied for
Canadian citizenship to avail its free medical program. Two years after, pursuant to Republic Act
(RA) 9225 (Citizenship Retention and Re-Acquisition Act of 2003) petitioner reacquired his
Philippine citizenship and intended to resume his law practice. Hence this petition.
ISSUE
Whether or not the petitioner Benjamin M. Dacanay lost his membership in the Philippine bar
when he gave up his Philippine citizenship in May 2004.
HELD
No. Section 2, Rule 138 (Attorneys and Admission to Bar) of the Rules of Court: SECTION 2.
Requirements for all applicants for admission to the bar. – Every applicant for admission as a
member of the bar must be a citizen of the Philippines, at least twenty-one years of age, of good
moral character, and a resident of the Philippines; and must produce before the Supreme Court
satisfactory evidence of good moral character, and that no charges against him, involving moral
turpitude, have been filed or are pending in any court in the Philippines.
Applying the provision, the Office of the Bar Confidant opines that, by virtue of his reacquisition
of Philippine citizenship, in 2006, petitioner has again met all the qualifications and has none of
the disqualifications for membership in the bar. It recommends that he be allowed to resume the
practice of law in the Philippines, conditioned on his retaking the lawyer’s oath to remind him of
his duties and responsibilities as a member of the Philippine bar.
The Constitution provides that the practice of all professions in the Philippines shall be limited
to Filipino citizens save in cases prescribed by law. The practice of law is a privilege denied to
foreigners. The exception is when Filipino citizenship is lost by reason of naturalization as a
citizen of another country but subsequently reacquired pursuant to RA 9225. Under RA 9225, if
a person intends to practice the legal profession in the Philippines and he reacquires his Filipino
citizenship pursuant to its provisions "(he) shall apply with the proper authority for a license or
permit to engage in such practice." Stated otherwise, before a lawyer who reacquires Filipino
citizenship pursuant to RA 9225 can resume his law practice, he must first secure from this
Court the authority to do so, conditioned on:
(a) the updating and payment in full of the annual membership dues in the IBP;
(b) the payment of professional tax;
(c) the completion of at least 36 credit hours of mandatory continuing legal education; this is
specially significant to refresh the applicant/petitioner’s knowledge of Philippine laws and
update him of legal developments and
(d) the retaking of the lawyer’s oath which will not only remind him of his duties and
responsibilities as a lawyer and as an officer of the Court, but also renew his pledge to maintain
allegiance to the Republic of the Philippines.
Compliance with these conditions will restore his good standing as a member of the Philippine
bar.
FALLO