A Case Study On "What Corporate America Can't Build: A Sentence"
A Case Study On "What Corporate America Can't Build: A Sentence"
A Case Study On "What Corporate America Can't Build: A Sentence"
“What Corporate America Can’t Build: A Sentence” and published in the New York Times on
December 7, 2004. The author Sam Dillon discussed the continued increase in problems
focusing on the inability of various members to write business correspondences using proper
grammar and punctuation. A recent survey of 120 American corporations reached a similar
conclusion. The study, by the National Commission on Writing, a panel established by the
College Board, concluded that a third of employees in the nation's blue-chip companies wrote
poorly and that businesses were spending as much as $3.1 billion annually on remedial training.
Because of the fast growth of technology which enabled today’s generation to access the internet
and use various devices like mobile phones and laptops contributed to the use of suitable words
and phrases with perfect punctuations, capitalization, correct spelling and follow grammatical
rules. The case study is discussed on the continued increasing problem of lack of writing skills of
their personnel and the need for organizations to spend considerable amounts of money for
should have been detected and addressed while majority of employees were still in their schools,
taking up English courses. The problem was rooted from the lack of strictness of teachers to
develop the skills of students in writing, using correct grammatical rules. This was a problem
also by lack of strictness in recruitment procedures of organizations where writing should have
been main priority to acceptance to the organizational setting. Rather than spending millions of
dollars for remedial training for courses that should have been taken prior to employment, these
funds could have been designate for a particular purpose for giving bonus to employees for their
performance.
Name: G. Pawan Santhosh Reddy
Roll no: F20003
enhanced as the problem stems here. Students, at very early stages, should be made to practice
writing and develop skills up to the appropriate level of competence which should prepare them
for future. It is the responsibilities of teachers to be aware that the growing problems of writing
At the corporate level, one believes that at the recruitment stage, human resources
administrators must intensify their screening efforts to include competencies in writing as one of
the relevant factors for employment. If applicants were determined to lack even the basic skills in
writing, then, these applicants should have been denied entry to the organization outright.
There is so much advantage for individuals to learn the proper grammar and use it to
effective writing. Learning must have been initiated and developed while students are still in
their respective academic institutions not when they are already employed. Dillon’s article
provided opportunities for awareness that this business and technical writing problem continue to
exist and spread through contemporary global organizations. However, this article must be used
by school administrators as a wake-up call to develop and monitor the competence of their
students.