- The document discusses formulating a research hypothesis, including that a hypothesis should be an educated guess based on prior knowledge and observations, and should be simple, specific, and testable.
- A good hypothesis has certain characteristics: it is based on a research question, is simple and direct, uses clear operational definitions, and can be proven right or wrong through testing. Hypotheses can be stated in null, alternative, or cause-and-effect forms.
- The document provides examples of different types of hypotheses and discusses one-tailed versus two-tailed hypotheses. It emphasizes that a hypothesis allows a study to be structured in a manageable way to help achieve the desired outcome.
- The document discusses formulating a research hypothesis, including that a hypothesis should be an educated guess based on prior knowledge and observations, and should be simple, specific, and testable.
- A good hypothesis has certain characteristics: it is based on a research question, is simple and direct, uses clear operational definitions, and can be proven right or wrong through testing. Hypotheses can be stated in null, alternative, or cause-and-effect forms.
- The document provides examples of different types of hypotheses and discusses one-tailed versus two-tailed hypotheses. It emphasizes that a hypothesis allows a study to be structured in a manageable way to help achieve the desired outcome.
- The document discusses formulating a research hypothesis, including that a hypothesis should be an educated guess based on prior knowledge and observations, and should be simple, specific, and testable.
- A good hypothesis has certain characteristics: it is based on a research question, is simple and direct, uses clear operational definitions, and can be proven right or wrong through testing. Hypotheses can be stated in null, alternative, or cause-and-effect forms.
- The document provides examples of different types of hypotheses and discusses one-tailed versus two-tailed hypotheses. It emphasizes that a hypothesis allows a study to be structured in a manageable way to help achieve the desired outcome.
- The document discusses formulating a research hypothesis, including that a hypothesis should be an educated guess based on prior knowledge and observations, and should be simple, specific, and testable.
- A good hypothesis has certain characteristics: it is based on a research question, is simple and direct, uses clear operational definitions, and can be proven right or wrong through testing. Hypotheses can be stated in null, alternative, or cause-and-effect forms.
- The document provides examples of different types of hypotheses and discusses one-tailed versus two-tailed hypotheses. It emphasizes that a hypothesis allows a study to be structured in a manageable way to help achieve the desired outcome.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
your conceptual framework.
Remember the conceptual framework is your own
position in making your study. Take a closer look at these examples. Figure 1. Paradigm fro Science Teaching in High School Figure 2. Schematic diagram of Anti-Microbial Property of Pomacea canalicuta THE RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS Formulation of hypothesis is another factor that must be considered to make the study manageable. So what is a hypothesis? Most of us will answer that it is an educated guess. Why educated? Why not just a simple guess? Researchers have already a preconceived idea of what they wished to achieve when they conduct a study. They speculate upon the outcome of a research or experiment. Every true experimental design must have this statement at the core of its structure, as the ultimate aim of any experiment. The purpose of experimentation is to prove or disprove the hypothesis. Formulation of a hypothesis is not done by mere guessing. It is an “educated guess” based on prior knowledge, experiences, and observations. It also includes an explanation of why the guess may be correct. It is generated via a number of a process of inductive reasoning where observations lead to the formation of a theory. Scientists then use a large battery of deductive methods to arrive at a hypothesis that is testable, falsifiable, and realistic. CHARACTERISTICS OF A GOOD HYPOTHESIS A good hypothesis must be based on a good research question. It should be simple, specific, and tested in advance. 1. Hypothesis should be simple. A hypothesis should be direct to the point. The language used must not have a double meaning. The universal appeal can be used but it should be clear. It is necessary that the hypothesis should only show the relationship between one independent variable and one dependent variable. For example, positive history of albinism increases the rate of transfer of the trait to male first-degree relatives. Here, the independent variable is albinism, and the dependent variable is the transfer of trait. This can be tested using a single statistical tool. In instances that the study calls for multiple independent and dependent variables or complex hypothesis which cannot be tested with a single statistical test, it should always be separated into 2 or more simple hypotheses. 2. Hypothesis should be specific. A specific hypothesis leaves no ambiguity about the subjects and variables, or about how the test is statistical significance will be applied. It uses concise Qualified Teachers Effective methods Adequate facilities Adequate supervisory assistance Science Instructional Program Improvised academic performance in NAT Pomace canalicular mucus Effectiveness of Pomacea canalicuta mucus as growth inhibitor of bacillus subtilis and Bacillusoperational definitions that summarize the nature and source of the subjects and the approach to measuring variables. It is formulated from the specific questions upon which they are based. 3. Hypothesis should be testable. A testable hypothesis can be proven right or wrong depending upon the outcome of the experiment. When you want to prove if the number of hours spent by students playing computer games affects their academic performance in school, this hypothesis can be tested. You can have two groups of students for the same section and year level. Then, one group can be used as an experimental treatment where they will be allowed to play computer games for a specific period of time and another group will just focus on their studies without playing computer games. Then both will be given the same set of tests before and after the period of observation. Through this, you can prove if your hypothesis is accepted or rejected using a specific statistical tool. For the purpose of testing statistical significance, hypotheses are classified by the way they describe the expected difference between the study groups. It can be stated in three ways, namely; null form, alternative form, and cause-and-effect statement. i. Null Form (Ho). The null hypothesis states that there is no association or significant difference between the results of the two conditions being tested. The null hypothesis is the formal basis for testing statistical significance. By starting with the proposition that there is no association, statistical tests can estimate the probability that an observed association could be due to chance. This is also the hypothesis of no difference or equality. ii. Ho. There is no significant difference between the effects of animal manure and urea on the height of the plant, the color of the leaves, and the yield produced by the plant. iii. Ho. Liberal arts and education students do not differ significantly on their level of assertiveness. b. Alternative Form (Ha). Alternative hypothesis states the nature of the connection between or among the variables that the researcher expects. It shows that there is a significant difference between the results of the two conditions being tested. It is a hypothesis of inequality or difference. i. Ha. There is a significant difference between the effects of animal manure and urea on the height of the plant, the color of the leaves, and the yield produce by the plant. ii. Ha. Liberal arts and education students differ significantly on their level of c. Cause-and-Effect. Cause-and-effect hypothesis states that if a certain condition (cause) is true, then a supporting observation (effect) occurs. i. If there is a difference between the effect of animal manure and urea, then the growth of the plant will differ significantly in terms of the height of the plant, colors of the leaves and the yield produced by plants. One- and two-tailed alternative hypotheses. A one-tailed (or one-sided) hypothesis specifies the direction of the association between the independent and dependent variables. The hypothesis that plants treated with animal manure fertilizers will have a higher percentage of yields is a one-tailed hypothesis. A two-tailed hypothesis states only that an association exists: it does not specify the direction. The hypothesis that plants treated with animal manure will have more or less yield is a two-tailed hypothesis. (the word tails refers to the tail ends of the statistical distribution such as the familiar bell-shaped normal curve that is used to test a hypothesis. One tail represents a positive effect or association; the other a negative effect.) A one- tailed hypothesis is used if the sample size is small but for a bigger sample size, it is better to use a two- tailed hypothesis. Unfortunately, one-tailed hypotheses are not always appropriate; in fact, some investigators that they should never be used. However, they are appropriate when only one direction for the association is important or biologically meaningful. An example is a one-sided hypothesis that a drug has a greater frequency of side effects than a placebo, the possibility that the drug has fewer side effects than the placebo is not worth testing. DE eriences (e.g. failing a subject) b. SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITATIONS socioeconomic status location of neighborhood (e.g. armed, disorganized, or violent neighborhood) abusive relationships (e.g. emotional abuse) negative influences (e.g. drug use)41 OVERCOMING LIMITATIONS Bodily limits can be tested by trying on new experiences and working on challenges with increasing levels of difficulty. The human body, if given enough exposure to any situation, can attain a goal with efficiency. Social and environmental limitations are more difficult to overcome than bodily limitations because they involve the influence of other people and the external world. However, with a proper mindset, clearly defined goals, and motivation to rise above challenges, one may successfully overcome his or her limitations. RECOGNIZE AND EVALUATE OWN LIMITATIONS AND POSSIBILITIES FOR TRANSCENDENCE Even though you are still young, you are not prevented from further understanding yourself. Transcendence is even more possible when you begin to understand that you can go beyond your limitations if you set your mind on your goals. SOME POINTS TO REMEMBER WHEN GOING BEYOND YOUR LIMITS you are connected to the external or eternal world challenges are learning opportunities your goal is more important than your fears think outside the box recognize that everyone has fears TIPS The terms “transcendent” and transcendental” should not be used interchangeably. According to Immanuel Kant, “transcendent” is a term used to refer to God, while “transcendental” refers to all other matter. While transcendence may not occur for everyone, all people have the capacity to experience it regardless of any sociodemographic, biological, or personal factors. Exercise 3. “Knowing who am I” Directions: Complete the chart by rewriting your present limitations with reference to your answers in the previous activities. Make an action plan towards transcendence. My Limitations Plan Towards Transcendence REVISED KNOWLEDGE: Actual answer to the process questions/ focus questions 1. What is transcendence? Transcendence is the ability to change, be dynamic, and continually redefining one’s self which works with our facticity to create things. 2. How do you show love toward others? Friends? Family? People in need? Important things in life are the times we made the life of others meaningful. It is not just the material things but the love, time, patience, and kindness extended to others that count. 3. How can our attachment to, or craving for worldly pleasures cause suffering? Cite examples Suffering is caused by hurting others by means of lying, theft, harming the environment, being lazy, or not helping those in need. One view is that evil balances the good. Another is God lets us choose and decide freely. Evil or suffering could also be God’s test to humanity. For Christians, the suffering of Jesus on the cross serves as a symbol of God’s love for humanity. For Buddhism, suffering leads to compassion for the suffering humanity.42 FINAL KNOWLEDGE: Generalization/ Synthesis/ Summary Indian thought recognizes the complimentary thought of all systems of belief. Hinduism is neither rooted in any single doctrine, nor does it claim a monopoly on truth or wisdom. Similarly, Buddhism preaches tolerance of all sincere viewpoints and includes many of these with its own spiritual teachings. Between humanity and God, there is an infinite gap, which God alone can bridge through His power. Perfection by participation means that it is a union of humanity with God. Change should promote not just any purely private advantage, but the good of the community. The transpersonal worldview of the Filipinos underlies the belief that the individual can go beyond human limitations such as geography, space, and time. The transpersonal worldview encompasses the world as run by “spirit” or “spirits” such as God, mind, providence and others. Human beings therefore, has a supernatural transcendental destiny. This means that he/she can rise above one’s ordinary being or self to a highest being or self. For St. Thomas Aquinas, in the plan of God, a human being has to develop and perfect one’s self by doing his/her daily task. Hence, if a human being perseveringly lives a righteous and virtuous life,