Amathole DM SMME Development Strategy
Amathole DM SMME Development Strategy
Amathole DM SMME Development Strategy
• Background [4]
• Purpose of this report [5]
• Approach and Methodology [5]
• Introduction [7]
• Reasons why SMME’s are important [7]
• SMME Contribution to Employment and GDP [9]
• Key National Challenges Facing SMME’s [10]
• The National Small Business Act of 1996 [11]
• The Small Enterprise Development Agency [12]
• Introduction [14]
• Demographic Profile [14]
• Economic Profile [17]
• Introduction [21]
• Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises [21]
• Definition of SMME’s [21]
• Concentration of SMME’s [21]
• SMME Contribution to GGP and Employment [22]
• SMME Market Profile of Amathole [23]
• Key Sector Challenges [25]
• Policy Environment in Amathole [27]
• Institutional Development [32]
SECTION [1]
INTRODUCTION
The SMME Strategy for the Amathole District Municipality must achieve the following key
objectives:
The strategic planning process followed in the implementation of this assignment consists
of the following key phases:
This involved the review and analysis of the external and immediate SMME development
environment in Amathole District Municipality through limited primary research and
extensive secondary data collection and analysis methods. Upon a draft completion, the
Report was tested with the relevant key stakeholders at a strategic workshop held in East
London on 15 April 2005. At this workshop an in-principle decision to support the outcomes
of this phase was taken.
This was the formulation of key strategic objectives, strategies and interventions in line
with the accepted findings and recommendations of the Situational Analysis Report. This
area also formed part of an input area for the stakeholder workshop held on 15 April
2005.
This report attempts to present the results of a situational analysis research process into
the structure, challenges and opportunities for SMME development in Amathole District
Municipality and to some extent, its local municipalities.
This paper is geared towards kick-starting a rigorous debate on what the real issues and
opportunities for job creation and poverty alleviation through SMME development in the
area are. Its ultimate purpose is to guide the formulation of an SMME Strategy for the
Amathole District Municipality.
To gain the most applicable perspective on the social, economic and SMME development
factors of the Amathole District Municipality the following approach was undertaken:
The following documents, in the form of existing completed research and information
sources on the various aspects of the Amathole municipal area or as related thereto, were
reviewed and taken into account in the preparation of this paper.
Given the very limited financial budget for this assignment, the fieldwork aspect for this
project was only limited to interviews with the LED Managers and Officers, and in some
instances the Municipal Manager and SMME Manager in the following listed municipalities
of Amathole:
• Nxuba Municipality
• Mnquma Municipality
• Great Kei Municipality
• Buffalo City Municipality
• Nkonkobe Municipality
• Amathole Municipality
• Mbashe Municipality
The interviews were conducted through an emailed, and sometimes, faxed information
form followed by telephonic follow-ups with the relevant persons within the Municipalities.
Of these Municipalities, the Great Kei could not provide responses with relation to this
assignment as the institution is in the process of appointing an LED Officer.
SECTION [2]
THE NATIONAL SMME SECTOR
The review of the national small business regulatory and policy frameworks provides an
overview of the South African legal and policy positions by national government for the
SMME sector. These policies and frameworks are largely aimed at providing guidance to
the provincial and local governments on planning, implementation and management of
SMME development.
The White Paper on a National Strategy for the development and promotion of small
business in South Africa states: “The stimulation of small, medium and micro enterprises
must be seen as part of an integrated strategy to take the South African economy onto a
higher road – one on which is diversified, productivity enhanced, investment is stimulated
and entrepreneurship flourishes” (Ntsika, 1997).
The case for employment creation and wealth distribution through small business is based
on sound economic sense. Small businesses have been identified as labour-intensive, have
the need for little capital and make use of the local resources available. By channeling
these resources to the small business sector, particularly in a growing and developing
economy like South Africa’s, employment opportunities can be maximized and people are
given the opportunity to contribute to the development of the economy.
Governments worldwide have assisted SMME‘s for various reasons, which include:
• SMME‘s are usually locally owned and controlled, and can strengthen the extended
family and other social systems and cultural traditions.
• Because the profits of small enterprises are not dependent on long production runs,
small firms can manufacture smaller quantities of products, which have a regional
or even a local market only.
• SMME’s satisfy local needs not only by making differential products but also by
being scattered throughout the country. This ensures a more equitable distribution
of employment opportunities and that raw material producers are more likely to
find local markets.
• Local technology is more likely to use locally produced raw material and equipment,
saving foreign exchange.
• SMME‘s provide employment for and sometimes expand the entrepreneurial talents
of women.
• SMME‘s tend to use less capital, a scarce resource, than large firms. They also
(arguably) require appropriate management skills, which are scarce in Third World
situations.
• Comparative studies of large and small businesses, carried out in countries at all
stages of development, confirm that small firms generally employ more labour per
unit of capital and require less capital per unit of output, than do large ones
(Harper, 1984:16).
• For the economy as a whole, Harper (1984:16) argues: “Small businesses are likely
to be more resilient to depression and to offer a steadier level of employment than
large ones; their activities and locations are diverse, they depend on a wide variety
of sources and types of raw material, and their owners, if only for the want of any
alternative, are likely to stay in business and maintain at least some activity and
employment in conditions where foreign investors would have closed their
factories”.
Available statistics indicate that the SMME sector is already playing an important role in the
South African economy. And, in all probability, its role will become crucial in the country’s
socio-economic development in the years that lie ahead.
Small and medium sized businesses are an important part of the economy. This is borne
out by their significant contribution to GDP and employment in the country. Estimates for
2001 indicate that SMME’s (excluding survivalists and informal) accounted for 36,1 % of
GDP as opposed to 32,7% in 1995. In 2001 SMME’s accounted for at least half of GDP in
the agricultural and construction sectors and more than 40% of GDP in trade, catering and
accommodation, as well as transport, storage and communication sectors [Annual Review
2002, Ntsika].
In terms of employment, according to the September 2002 Labour Force Survey (LFS)
11, 03 million people were employed in South Africa out of an economically active
population of 15, 87 million. The labour market participation rate (i.e. the percentage of
people of working age that is economically active) was 56, 7%. Of these employed,
Overall it is clear that the small, medium and micro enterprises (SMME) sector plays and
could play an even more significant role than it currently does in terms of contribution to
employment and gross domestic output, but also in helping to combat unemployment,
encouraging wealth distribution and improving the quality of life for all sectors of the
national, provincial, district and local populations.
According to the national Annual Review of the SMME sector conducted by Ntsika in 2001,
SMME’s face a swathe of constraints related to:
The nature and extent of the influence of the above constraints differ according to size and
economic profile of an enterprise, sector and the regional profile of the area within which
According to Ntsika, constraints are particularly severe for entrepreneurs in rural areas and
for women, who face their own unique set of deterrents, such as cultural and behavioural
norms, and problems regarding access to land [Annual Review 2002, Ntsika].
The National Small Business Act was passed by Parliament in 1996 (Ntsika, 1998). The
National Small Business Act of 1996 provides for the:
[A] The formal establishment of the Ntsika Enterprise Promotion Agency (Ntsika)
as a subsidiary delivery arm of the Department of Trade & industry providing
non-financial support services in South Africa. Ntsika was established as
wholesale institution i.e. work through and with intermediary organizations such
as Local Business Support Centres, CBO’s, NGO’s and private service providers.
[B] The formal establishment of the now defunct National Small Business Council
(NSBC) as key player institutions of the national small business strategy. The
NBSC was established to provide a platform to fulfil the role of a ‘watchdog’ for
the SMME sector in South Africa.
In 2003 the Act was amended to incorporate some policy changes in so far as the
regulatory framework for the establishment and operations of Ntsika Enterprise Promotion
Agency.
The recent review of the national small business policy has led to the introduction of
interesting regulatory and policy changes by Parliament in an effort to streamline and
improve SMME support in South Africa. One of the key changes to the National Small
Business Act of 1996 has led to the disestablishment of Ntsika Enterprise Promotion Agency
(NEPA) and NAMAC Trust through the establishment of a merger institution – the Small
Enterprise Development Agency (SEDA).
SEDA was officially launched in December 2004 by the Honourable Minister of Trade and
Industry, Minister Mandisi Mpahlwa in Cape Town. SEDA has been established to
consolidate the provision and facilitation of non-financial support services to SMME’s in
South Africa.
In terms of its role, it is envisaged that SEDA will focus on the following key areas:
• TECHNICAL PROJECT SPECIFIC SUPPORT through sector, local area and project
specialists
SEDA is expected to operate in all the nine provinces of South Africa through the
establishment of provincial structures that will cascade down to district and metro-levels to
local municipal areas through various access points. Table 3 below provides an overview
of the Eastern Cape provincial structure with respect to SEDA establishment and
operations.
Table 3 Eastern Cape Provincial SEDA Structure [Department of Economic Affairs, Tourism and Environment, 2004]
1. INTRODUCTION
The development of a sustainable and vibrant small, medium and micro enterprise sector
cannot take place in a vacuum. It must appreciate the social, economic and physical
environment within which it is pursued. This section provides a synoptic overview of such
an environment within the Amathole District Municipality.
2. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
The ADM Spatial Development Framework alludes to the following settlement structure for
the study area:
The Primary Urban Node of the Amathole District is identified as the East London-
Mdantsane urban complex, which is located within the Buffalo City Municipality. It is
envisaged that this area would continue to function as the primary urban settlement in the
district, where higher order facilities and the greatest range of urban-economic
opportunities would be located. As such, it represents the area of greatest formal
economic opportunity and investment.
The urban complex of King William’s Town/Bisho, also located within the Buffalo City
Municipality, is the seat of the Eastern Cape Provincial Government. As such, it has
significance over and above its relatively low standing within the urban hierarchy of the
Amathole district. It is anticipated that this area will remain a focus for investment,
particularly focused on institutional and cultural heritage aspects. This node is seen to
include the town of King William’s Town, in itself an important urban service centre for the
surrounding hinterland.
Three Secondary Urban Nodes are proposed. These are listed as: -
These towns are identified as being of relative importance due to their present and
historical functions as centres where major investment has occurred in infrastructure (e.g.
Butterworth), or where significant successes and related impetus has been achieved in
local economic development (e.g. Stutterheim), or, finally, where cultural and heritage
factors are coincident with a growing importance as an administrative centre (Alice).
As such, these towns are considered to have growth potential that is relatively significant
within the Amathole district.
Five Urban Service Centres are identified, which are seen as towns that provide a higher
order level of service to their surrounding hinterland areas. It is also recognised that these
towns exhibit trends of population influx and, consequently, require investment in order to
accommodate these pressures. The towns identified are: -
Amathole accounts for more than 26% of the provincial population, making it the biggest
in terms of population [ECDC, 2003]. Of the 1, 84 million people in the District, 40% are
located within the Buffalo City Municipality, followed by Mnquma and Mbashe municipalities
with 17, 5% and 15, 3% respectively. The smallest contributors into the population are
Nxuba and Great Kei municipalities which account for 3, 9% collectively [LED Strategy,
2003].
Two thirds of the district is made up of ex-homeland areas, which are largely rural by
nature. Despite this fact, the district has a relatively high population density of 78/square
Based on the annual population growth rate for the area, it is envisaged that the
population will grow to about 2 million people by 2006. This figure very much takes into
account the impact of HIV/Aids and out migration, which effects have not been fully
researched. [LED Strategy, 2003]
It is estimated that more than half the population live below the poverty line (R9 600 per
annum per household in 1999). The level of poverty in the area are also mirrored in low
levels of service provision, which reflect that 65% of the district population has no access
to water on-site, 30% have no flush sanitation, and that 70% are without on-site
electricity. [IDP 2004/5]
The level of unemployment in Amathole follows national and provincial trends. In 2003 the
number of unemployed looking for work was estimated to be 23%, whereas those not
working and not looking for work constituted about 25%. Those not working for other
reasons totalled another 14%. Given the two scenarios, the average unemployment count
in 2003 in Amathole was about 62%. The table below provides a breakdown of the
employment / unemployment figures. [LED Strategy, 2003]:
Amathole is the second largest economy (the first being the Nelson Mandela Metro) in the
province, providing 27% of value added. The private sector is dominated by manufacturing
which contributed 21% to value added in 2000 [ECDC, 2003]. The presence of a strong
automotive industry in East London (in the form of Dymler Chrysler and its first and second
tier suppliers) is central to thriving manufacturing base. Other key sub-sectors include
food processing and textile / clothing. While East London has invested in a state-of-art-
car export terminal, food processing is centred on pineapple canning and juicing,
confectionery and dairy products. Furnisher and leather goods are smaller industries with a
historic base in the area, although having facing strong foreign competition in recent years
(as would the textile and clothing).
The performance of the primary sectors (agriculture and mining) has been rather
disappointing in terms of GDP distribution. In the contrary, Trade and Finance sectors have
strengthened collectively summing 28,5% into the value added. The government (also
known as the community services sector) remains the highest contributor and is indicative
of the high levels of government spending in the area. This is understandable given the
economic history of the area, in particularly the ex-Transkei areas.
Government is the biggest employer accounting for 35% of formal employment in the DM.
This is followed by the manufacturing sector at 22% of employment as well as the trade
sector, which accounted for 10% of formal employment in 1999. Total employment in
1999 was estimated at 211 454 of which 178 000 was formal employment and 33450 was
informal (16% in total) [ECDC, 2003].
Agriculture provides only 8% of formal employment but varies greatly within the district.
The ex-homeland areas are mostly under communal land tenure, although significant areas
of private tenure exist in ex-homeland areas around Peddie and Butterworth [ECDC, 2003].
Agriculture in the ex-homelands is mostly small scale, although some black commercial
farmers are present. The coastal belt south of East London is the centre of pineapple
farming industry, with citrus, horticulture and livestock also farmed. Significant forestry
plantations are sited in both the Amatola Mountains and around Butterworth.
The visible contribution of the trade, finance and transport sectors are indicative of the
strong tourism potential in Amathole. The district boasts a wide range of tourism
attractions, from beaches and the natural beauty of the Transkei Wild Coast, to the forests
and waterfalls of the Amatola Mountains. It also hosted many of the conflicts between
Xhosa and settlers during the Boarder Wars, and is home to many of the leaders of the
struggle against apartheid [Laphum’ Langa eEastern Cape, 2003]. East London, which
forms part of the Buffalo City Municipality, is the emerging example of the thriving tourism
industry in the district and southern parts of the Eastern Cape.
The key economic-related challenges in Amathole are largely the results of failed former
industrial policies purported by the apartheid regime in its endeavour to control urban
sprawling through industrial decentralization mechanisms. This resulted in the
establishment of small industrial sectors in homelands through heavy subsidies, centred on
Structurally, Amathole‘s challenge is that of a dual economy, in this case, referring to rural
and urban economies. This invariably calls for a more innovative approach on how
resources are prioritized to unlock natural resources in the ex-homeland and rural areas
while also ensuring exponential growth in the urban economy. It has been suggested that
by focussing on manufacturing, tourism, forestry agriculture and infrastructure
development - the competitive advantages of both economies can be extrapolated to
ensure meaningful growth and positive livelihood change.
The following table (adapted by Threesixty Consulting, 2005) provides a synoptic overview
into possible key opportunities in Amathole:
1. INTRODUCTION
The analysis of the district SMME environment provides insight into the immediate local
challenges, opportunities and possibilities for sustainable enterprise development in
Amathole. This section provides a review of present environmental factors and highlights
key strategy issues.
2. PROVINCIAL CONTEXT
Informal and micro enterprises account for the vast majority of all business enterprises in
the Eastern Cape. The following table shows numbers of enterprises in the province:
Category Number
Micro 174 000
Small 15 0000
Medium 640
Large 360
Total 190 000
Table 9: Numbers of SMME‘s in the Eastern Cape 1999 [ECDC, 2003]
A survey by Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) conducted in March 2001 found that about
nine percent of all small businesses in South Africa (mostly black or PDI) are in the Eastern
In terms of Table 10 above, the projected number of SMME’s in Amathole should have
been about 67 621 in 2003. This is calculated on the basis of the total population,
population density as well as the measure of the business coverage ratio of 20,4% per 78/
square km. By virtue of these calculations, the largest number of SMME’s in the province
can be found in Amathole.
Informal and micro enterprises account for only a small proportion of the total provincial
economic product as depicted in the table below:
Small and medium enterprises have a significant contribution into the provincial economy
as opposed to informal and micro businesses. The same scenario prevails in terms of
employment contribution by the small and medium enterprises.
Category % Employment
Micro 17
Small 16
Medium 21
Large 45
Total 100
Table 12: SMME Employment Contribution in the Eastern Cape [ECDC, 2003]
In 2001 the contribution of SMME’s (excluding survivalist and micro) to GDP was 36,1% as
opposed to 32,7% in 1995 in South Africa. In the agricultural and construction sectors,
SMME’s accounted for at least 50% of the sector GDP‘s. In terms of employment an
interesting trend has been established. In 2002 SMME’s employed 68,2% of people as
opposed to 44% in 1995 and 53,9% in 2001. Small enterprises constitute the most
significant SMME employer, accounting for 21% of SMME employment [SMME Annual
Review, 2002].
The following profile has been constructed on the basis of an SMME study in the Buffalo
City Municipality focussing on the Mdantsane Urban Renewal Programme [Mdantsane
SMME Market Assessment, ECDC, 2005]. This has been collaborated further by
extrapolating from similar studies carried out by Threesixty Consulting in the ex-Transkei
areas to provide a rural perspective as well.
2.4.1 Ownership
The majority of enterprises are operating within the trade and service sector, followed by
manufacturing. In terms of trade/service sector, the majority of businesses are spaza
shops, general dealers, shoe repairers, hair salons, caterers and service stations. In
Mdantsane 81% of SMME’s operate within the trade and services sector. Manufacturing
constitutes about 13% and is dominated by dressmaking and sewing (clothing and
textiles).
The majority of businesses earn up to R5000 per month with a very limited number
generating above R25 000 per month. In Mdantsane, 90% of businesses earn up to R5000
per month. The majority of businesses are not registered for VAT, Pay-As-You-Earn and
Income Tax.
The majority of businesses in the area are most likely to be operating from home and on
the streets. In Mdantsane this constituted about 67% of the businesses falling within this
category. In rural areas, this number could very well top 80%, with the majority leaning
more towards street-trading within rural service centres of Amathole. Visits to Mbashe and
Mnquma municipal service centres paint a glaring picture of a serious lack of appropriate
trading facilities.
In the rural areas access to electricity and water by SMME’s remains a challenge [based on
the fact that 65% of population has no access to water-on-site, 70% of the population are
without on-site-electricity, IDP 2004/5]. In urban areas such as Mdantsane, access to water
and electricity by population, and indicatively SMME’s, exceeds provincial averages. In
Mdantsane 76% of businesses have access to on-site-electricity and water. 62% of
businesses in the rural areas of ex-Transkei may not have access to on-site water and
electricity [based on similar study in Alfred Nzo (Alfred Nzo DM SMME Situational Analysis,
2005)].
Given the above profile, it can be safely deduced that the majority of businesses (with a
high probability of exceeding the 70%-mark) fall within the informal and micro enterprise
sector i.e. earn less than R300 000 per annum and employ between 1 and 5 people each.
A good number of SMME’s in the district are owned by women. In Mdantsane, only 50%
of SMME’s are owned by men. In Chris Hani District, a rural economy, women
entrepreneurs account for 64% of SMME business ownership. According to the Stats SA
research conducted in 2001, women entrepreneurs in the Eastern Cape out numbered men
by almost three to one– a figure well above the national average [Stats SA, 2002].
In Mdantsane youth business ownership constitutes about 21% of SMME enterprises. Given
the high youth dependency ratio in Amathole (94% less than 65 years – Wefa, 2000),
possibility exists that youth business ownership may very well be consistent with the urban
trend in Mdantsane.
Challenges facing SMME’s in Amathole are in a large extent no different to the most
common setbacks experienced by SMME’s elsewhere in South Africa, its provinces, districts
and local municipalities.
The following table provides an overview of the key challenges facing SMME‘s in Amathole
and further seeks to highlight the extent of these challenges in terms of urban/rural
enterprise distribution in Amathole:
As stated in the sector review carried out by Ntsika in 2001, the nature and extent of the
influence of the above constraints differ according to size and economic profile of an
enterprise, sector and the regional profile of the area within which the enterprise operates.
For instance, inadequate finance and limited appropriate skills tend to be the major
deterrent to survivalist and micro-enterprises. For medium-sized enterprises, the rigours of
international competition and technology transfer are significant growth obstacles.
According to Ntsika, constraints are particularly severe in for entrepreneurs in rural areas
and for women, who face their own unique set of deterrents, such as cultural and
behavioural norms, and problems regarding access to land [Annual Review 2002, Ntsika].
Table 15 below advocates the need to delineate the business support needs on the basis of
varying degree of business sophistication at the various levels of the SMME market. It
classifies businesses into survivalists, emerging, growth-oriented and globally competitive
firms that require specialized services based on the degree of sophistication.
Table 15: Business Sophistication Index [Adapted by Threesixty Consulting from the Cape Town City
Business Support Policy, 2004]
The IDP of Amathole sets out a series of immediate, medium and long-term strategies for
the growth and development of the district area. The IDP vision states that “The Amathole
District Municipality strives for a future where constituent communities have a peaceful,
stable and sustainable environment with basic needs being met through a participatory
development process (and) where communities have access to economic
opportunities.
The IDP sets out key strategy parameters for a range of sectors in Amathole. In terms of
this vision, a participatory development process and access by district communities to
economic opportunities is seen as key to achieving a peaceful, stable and sustainable
(livelihood) environment. This invariably, sets out a key objective towards which
sustainable SMME development in Amathole must be pursued - the intent to provide a
conduit for individuals to enter and participate in the mainstream economy.
In term of strategies to achieve the aforementioned objectives, the IDP stipulates that the
DM will:
This paper is aimed at providing a baseline for the SMME Strategy (invariable a policy
framework for SMME‘s) for Amathole.
The LED Plan of Amathole provides a framework for sustainable LED in the region. It sets
out overall objectives for LED, as paraphrased below [LED Strategy, 2003]:
A key feature of the LED Plan is its implied role definition for the Amathole District
Municipality in LED. The Plan identifies this role as that of aligning, facilitating,
strengthening, providing a series of interlinking interventions in partnership with other
stakeholders. Invariably, this sets the platform in defining the role of the ADM in SMME
development.
Furthermore, the LED Plan proposes a range of key priority sectors for the DM, namely:
• SMME development
• Agriculture development
• Tourism development
• Human resources
• Business development (could mean industrial development)
The Spatial Development Framework provides a spatial interpretation of the LED Plan
implications in Amathole. Key to this is the fact that the ADM SDF proposes to channel
economic activities of the district into specific spatial nodes to direct investment and
economic growth.
The Agricultural Plan (Draft) highlights serious sector development challenges in Amathole,
namely:
At a municipal level within the Amathole DM, the following serious shortcomings are
highlighted in the draft agricultural plan:
The policy will achieve the above by providing employment opportunities to Historically
Disadvantaged Individuals [HDI’s] and disadvantaged communities, enabling socio-
economic transformation objectives to be linked to fair, transparent, equitable, competitive
and cost effective procurement practices.
In terms of SMME definition, the policy defines an SMME as a separate and district business
entity, including cooperative enterprises and non-governmental organizations, managed by
one owner or more which, including its branches or subsidiaries, if any, is predominantly
carried on in any sector or sub-sector of the economy. This definition is not consistent
with the Small Business Act.
In terms of sureties, a very common setback for HDI SMME’s, the Policy dictates the
following thresholds:
AMOUNT PERCENTAGE
R300 000 Nil
R300 001-R1 000 000 2.5%
R1 000 001-R3 000 000 5%
R3 000 001-R5 000 000 7.5%
R5 000 001- and above 10%
Table 16: Contract Sureties in the Amathole DM [Procurement Policy, 2002]
The majority of SMME’s cannot afford to raise the required sureties. This is reason why the
surety threshold has in the past been increased from R120 000 to R300 000 work
contracts. In some municipalities, SMME’s are not required to raise surety for work
contracts less than R1 000 000 thus increase participation by HDI’s and SMME’s in the
category below R1 million.
4. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
The following table provides a status summary in terms of SMME development within the
DM and its LM’s:
According to the Amathole District Municipality’s LED Plan [2003], the objectives
of the Amathole Development Agency are defined as follows:
In terms of its relationship with the ADM Economic Development Unit, the Agency is
considered as the implementing agency and works at a lower operational level. The Agency
is still in its infancy. Nkonkobe has also setup a Development Agency and the Buffalo City
Municipality is in the process of establishing one for its beachfront development area. It is
not clear to what extent these Agencies will prioritize SMME development in terms of their
mandate.
Based on the above dipstick survey of the municipal environment within the DM and LM’s,
the following challenges are glaring:
• Need to improve SMME market and sector research across the board
• Need to define more clearly the role of the district and local municipalities in
SMME development
Some Banks active in SMME lending in the Eastern ABSA East London (10 branches)
Cape Nelson Mandela (15 branches)
Uitenhage, Despatch, Kirkwood, Grahamstown,
Fort Beaufort, Kenton-on- Sea, Port Alfred,
Adelaide, Alexandria, Humansdorp, Jeffreys Bay,
Joubertina, Kareedouw, Patensie, King Williams
Town, Cradock, Middelburg, Graaff Reinet,
Aberdeen, Jansenville, Murraysburg, Somerset
East, Queenstown, Cathcart.
Nedbank East London (3 branches)
Nelson Mandela (7 branches)
Uitenhage (1 branch)
Standard Bank Nelson Mandela (13 branches,
Aberdeen, Alexandria, Alice, Aliwal North, Barkley
East, Bedford, Butterworth, Cathcart, Cradock,
Dordrecht, Elliot, Engcobo, Fort Beaufort, Graaff
Reinet, Grahamstown, Humansdorp, Jansenville,
Jeffrey’s Bay, Kenton-on-Sea, King Williams Town
(2 branches), Kirkwood, Komga, Lady Grey,
Maclear, Mdantsane, Middelburg, Misgund,
Molteno, Port Alfred, Port St. Johns, Somerset
East, Sterkspruit, Steynsburg, Steytlerville,
Stutterheim, Ugie, Uitenhage, Umtata.
Table 22: Some Banks Active in SMME Lending in the Eastern Cape, [adapted by Threesixty Consulting from the EC
Programme of Support to LED, 2004]
The following strategy issues can be isolated from the tables above with regards to the
spread, access to and delivery of SMME development support services in Amathole:
• Except for provincial development agencies such as the ECDC, ECMAC and
others, available SMME support services are more prevalent in the urban areas –
the Buffalo City Municipality (King Williams Town, Mdantsane and East London)
being the most beneficiary.
• In rural and small urban centres of Amathole in areas such as the Great Kei,
Mbashe, Mnquma and Nxuba the existence of an integrated support system
for SMME’s is almost non-existence. This is reason why many of these
municipalities have cut themselves a direct role in SMME support by providing
equipment, skills training etc. – a matter of strategic debate as to whether or not
these municipalities are in fact suppose to be fulfilling these roles directly or
indirectly.
• A service delivery gap in terms of sector specific support for agriculture, tourism
and small-scale manufacturing exists across the board. This further extends to
technology-related support programmes.
1. INTRODUCTION
This section will present the results of our strategic problem analysis process using the
SWOT Analysis as a tool. It will also summarize the SWOT into key problem statements
that the SMME Strategy of Amathole District Municipality will need to address to achieve a
growing and sustainable SMME sector.
• Lack of plans to grow and revive small towns and rural economies
• Urban sprawling placing additional pressure on urban infrastructure
• Poor SMME planning and development capacity within LM’s
• Undefined SMME support delivery mechanisms in rural and urban
• Absence of support agencies in rural and small town areas
Having reviewed and analyzed various sources of information and trends within the SMME
development sector of Amathole, its immediate environment – the Eastern Cape Province
and national landscape, it is our proposition that Amathole faces some of the following key
SMME development challenges [Please not these are for high-end strategy development]:
At a secondary level, there is a general lack of appropriate institutional support within the
district for cooperatives development and sector-specific enterprises within agriculture,
tourism and manufacturing.
The IDP vision states that “the Amathole District Municipality strives for a future where
constituent communities have a peaceful, stable and sustainable environment with basic
needs being met through a participatory development process (and) where communities
have access to economic opportunities”.
In terms of this vision, the ADM needs to achieve the following key priority outputs:
To achieve this vision, the IDP statement proposes two main principles:
Based on this analysis, the SMME vision for Amathole must assist the Municipality and its
stakeholders in achieving access to economic opportunities by all inhabitants of the district
area.
It is on this basis that it is believed that an IDP-aligned SMME vision for the ADM should
seek to achieve the following:
• The Amathole District Municipality promotes the creation of vibrant and sustainable
SMME’s that contribute towards increased wealth generation, employment creation
and poverty alleviation.
By virtue of this vision, the Amathole District Municipality and its stakeholders commit
themselves to achieving the following outputs:
By so doing, it is believed that the SMME sector would provide the needed platform for
local communities to enter and play a meaningful in the development of the district’s
economy.
In order to achieve the stated SMME vision for the area, the ADM and its partners commit
themselves to the following strategic goals and objectives:
2.2 To improve the planning and institutional capacity for SMME support in the District thus
ensuring the creation of a conducive environment for SMME’s;
2.3 To diversify the existing SMME development base through agricultural, tourism and
manufacturing development;
2.4 To increase youth participation in the entrepreneurial and SMME development sector of the
District and its economy.
2.5 To increase the number of start-up and existing small and medium-sized enterprises thus
their contribution into the economic and job growth in the district;
The above strategic objectives set out a performance measure for this SMME
Strategy and are congruent with those set-out in the Provincial Growth and
Development Plan of the Eastern Cape, which seeks to increase the number of
start-up and existing enterprises in the Province.
3. STRATEGIC T THRUSTS
A strategic thrust defines an area of priority focus. It has a collective economic force that
can generate sufficient economic energy and momentum to create a series of sustainable
opportunities to achieve short, medium and long-term objectives of any strategy.
We believe by focussing on the following priority areas, reasonable impact on the SMME
sector and eventually job and income creation.
• To increase the number of small, medium and micro enterprises operating within
tourism, agriculture and manufacturing sectors;
It is crucial to note that important issues such as new commercial investments into major
agricultural developments and provision of hard infrastructure such as roads, railways etc.
should be addressed as part of the greater LED and Agricultural Plans of Amathole.
It is, once more, crucial to highlight that the formulation of a Tourism Master Plan for
Amathole will be necessary to support the successful implementation of the aforesaid
tourism enterprise development programme framework. This must invariable address
issues of tourism infrastructure, branding and market audits to identify how the existing
gaps could be strategically addressed to achieve on even higher tourism growth in the
District.
Once again, the development of manufacturing within Amathole must be integrally linked
to the LED, Agricultural, Transportation and other sectoral plans.
• To increase the number of BEE deals between local black small, medium and micro
enterprises and local white-owned businesses;
• To promote BEE within the key economic growth sectors of Amathole namely,
agriculture, tourism and manufacturing and sub-sectors.
Black Economic Empowerment Support will focus on the following primary market:
• To enhance the role of the informal economy or improve its capacity to meet rural
and township consumption / consumer needs.
• To develop quality management, technical and life-skills in line with labour market
demands of the area, its key sectors and the region at large;
• To build the appropriate internal [municipal] and to some extent, the external
institutional capacity necessary to ensure the successful implementation of the
Council‘s SMME Strategy.
Institutional Development and Service Delivery Improvement will target the following
primary beneficiaries:
• District Municipality
• Local Municipalities
• Municipal Implementation Agencies
• Provincial Government Agencies
• Community-Based Organizations [CBO’s]
• Non-Governmental Organizations [NGO’s]
• Business Support Organizations [BSO’s]
• National Government Departments
• International Donors
• Private Sector
The following core values and principles shall at all times guide and direct the
implementation of this SMME Strategy:
4.1 To add value to existing SMME and related programmes and thus not duplicate.
4.2 To be innovative and creative to achieve sustainability of support programmes
4.3 To establish meaningful partnerships with the private and non-governmental sectors
4.4 To adhere to the strict standards of sustainable development as per the WSSD outcomes
4.5 To be transparent, fair and equitable
These are non-negotiable and are mandatory mechanisms that the Amathole Municipality
and its stakeholder will adhere to in the rolling-out of this SMME strategy.
1. INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
In designing the appropriate institutional framework for SMME development for Amathole
District Municipality, the following factors were taken into consideration:
• Every type of organizational structure has both its legal and management-based
strength and weaknesses, hence no institution is totally flawless;
• All institutional arrangements should be able to fit into the overall economic
development framework for the region as well as the complex web of existing
structures and services;
• Coupled to the Municipal Structures and Systems Acts, the Municipal Finance
Management Act of 2004 provides guidance as to the powers, functions and
legal structural options available to South African municipalities.
This section will articulate the role of the Amathole District Municipality with respect to
SMME development [and this Strategy] and will outline the appropriate institutional
arrangements to plan, manage, implement and monitor SMME development within this
area.
The ADM acts as a co-ordination body for SMME development matters for its area.
Through its Integrated Development Plan (IDP), LED Strategy and this SMME Strategy, the
ADM will act to ensure alignment between government, business, labour and community
programmes as a fundamental step towards achieving the shared SMME vision for the
area. The SMME Strategy forms the basis for the coordination of such programmes.
2.2 Facilitator
The ADM acts to facilitate the creation of an enabling SMME development environment as
an integral mechanism to bolster local economic development in the area. The Municipality
promotes and encourages proactive participation by government, business, labour and
communities in processes that will yield remarkable transformation and growth of local
SMME’s. This involves the facilitation of access to appropriate business services,
infrastructure, resources such as funding and infrastructure as well as market and business
opportunities for SMME’s.
2.3 Stimulator
The ADM will at all times seek to pioneer new approaches, strategies and interventions to
develop, identify and leverage new support and growth opportunities for its SMME sector.
These approaches may at time appear to be in the form of direct interventions and
incongruent with the conventional role of facilitation and coordination. The implementation
of a preferential procurement and value chain management policy is an example of a direct
intervention to stimulate a sector of the economy [SMME’s and PDI enterprises] to become
major economic players.
The planning, execution and monitoring of SMME development in the ADM area consists of
the following two most critical levels of institutional responsibilities:
This responsibility, which includes the planning of short, medium, and long-term strategies
and policies to guide and direct SMME development within the area, is considered the first
and high-end level of institutional responsibilities in the Amathole District Municipality. The
most fundamental purpose is to create an appropriate and conducive business and
This involves the implementation of all or some aspects of the SMME Strategy of the ADM.
This level of responsibility will include packaging the strategy into manageable programmes
and projects as well as the provision of ongoing support services to strategy beneficiaries.
This level is considered the most critical in the planning and execution of the SMME
strategy of the ADM as it ensures that stakeholders participate effectively in the
monitoring of the implementation processes. Involved as well is the constant evaluation of
the impact and performance of the execution process against original plans and strategic
directions decided jointly with stakeholders.
Based on the levels of institutional responsibilities identified above (2), the implementation
of the SMME Strategy of the Amathole District Municipality will be carried out through
the following three main SMME development institutional vehicles as per the
diagrammatical illustration of Diagram 5.
[Development Planning
Committee]
[SMME Workgroup]
5.1.1 Mandate:
To advise the Amathole District Municipality and its local economic development entities on
matters pertaining to SMME development in general as well as the implementation of the
SMME Strategy.
[3] MANUFACTURING 1.1 Manufacturing Development Formulate a Manufacturing Development Strategy ADM High R150 000-00
DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT Strategy and Plan aimed at increasing the number and
sustainability of SMME’s and competitiveness of the
manufacturing sector in general.
1.2 Regional DTI Office Facilitate the establishment of the DTI regional ADM, DEAET, DTI High R50 000-00
office within the District to improve access to
industrial information, incentives etc.
1.3 Manufacturing Research Partner with tertiary institutions to develop and Tertiary Institutions High R100 000-00
Programme implement a comprehensive manufacturing and private sector
research database covering all key sub-sectors.
1.4 Manufacturing Development Establish a dedicated Unit within the Amathole AEDA High R50 000-00
Unit Economic Development Agency to implement the
Manufacturing Development Strategy and
coordinate sector activities.
1.5Institutional Partnership Sign MOU’s with key government departments and ECDC, CSIR, DEAET, High R25 000-00
Programme agencies to improve coordination of manufacturing AIDC, DTI,
programmes, leverage funding and improve market ECMAC/SEDA
and infrastructural needs.
1.2 SMME Help Line Launch a local SMME Hotline, as a toll-free facility ADM, AEDA, SEDA Medium R50 000-00
aimed at assisting informal traders, aspiring
entrepreneurs and general business to gain
business advice and information telephonically
thereby minimizing the travel and time cost.
1.3 Radio Outreach Programme Launch a radio programme to provide business ADM, AEDA, SEDA High R100 000-00
information to the community at large, promote
entrepreneurship and improve awareness about
existing support services.
1.4 SMME Tabloid Implement a regular local SMME supplement or ADM, AEDA, SEDA High R100 000-00
tabloid as a tool to provide business information
such as tenders, business opportunities as well as
an advertising medium for SMME ‘s and big
business.
1.5Mobile Outreach Campaign Implement a mobile business outreach programme ADM, AEDA and High R600 000-00
to provide business advice and information to rural support organizations
communities, township and home-based
entrepreneurs.
1.6 Walk-In Centres Establish facilities wherein the majority of the ADM, DBSA, DEAET Medium R500 000-00
existing and new support organizations can all and support
operate, part-time or full-time, under a single roof organizations
and offer a variety of support services for informal
and established businesses across the District.
1.7 Informal Sector Forum Establish and operate a Forum representing ADM High R50 000-00
poverty-alleviation and hawker associations to
consolidate support and resources and improve
communication at various government levels
INFRASTRUCTURE AND 1.9 Infrastructure Support Provide or facilitate access to appropriate business ADM, AEDA High R5 000 000-00
BUSINESS ACCOMMODATION Programme trading places such as hawkers stalls, business
hives as well as access to affordable electricity,
water and sanitation services.
MARKET DEVELOPMENT 1.10 Consumption Pattern Studies Implement a study into sources of income and ADM, AEDA High R120 000-00
SUPPORT spending / consumption patterns in Amathole
District Municipality as way of determining local
opportunities for new and existing businesses. This
will also assist to determine community needs i.e.
where they are spending their money. This study
could further ascertain where spazas and general
dealers are buying from, opportunities to increase
distribution by private sector providers.
1.11Spaza Development Initiative Partner private sector to implement a targeted AEDA High R100 000-00
programme for spaza shops and general dealers to
improve viability and profit margins.
1.12 Taxi Industry Development Formulate and implement a programme aimed at AEDA, ECDC Medium R100 000-00
Initiative formalizing businesses operating within the taxi
industry and thus increase sustainability and
contribution to the informal economy.
FUNDING AND FINANCIAL 1.13 Micro Lending Facility Lobby for the establishment of a number of micro- ADM High R15 000-00
ACCESS lending facilities by or in partnership with the
private sector to provide micro funding less than
R50 000 to informal and micro businesses.
1.14 European Union LED Partner with the Department of Local Government, ADM, DLGH&TA, High -
Programme Housing and Traditional Affairs through the ECDC, IDC
European Union LED Programme for the
establishment of various business support funds to
improve access to grant and micro-finance.
YEAR ONE [2005/2006] PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION LEAD PARTY BUDGET
1.1 SMME Development Appoint an SMME Coordinator on a full-time basis to manage the ADM R200 000-00
Coordinator rolling out of the SMME Strategy.
1.2 SMME Workgroup Establish the SMME workgroup as a coordinating body of all SMME ADM R50 000-00
related matters and advisor to Amathole District Municipality.
1.3 SMME Research Database Implement comprehensive study to collect and analyze information ADM [AEDA] R400 000-00
on types of businesses by ownership, sector, size, turnover, location,
services as well the database of support organizations, their services,
target market and location.
1.4 SMME Service Delivery Model Design a plan on how services will be delivered in the rural, urban ADM [SWG] R60 000-00
and small town areas of the District and what instruments will be
used and managed.
1.5 Manufacturing Development Formulate a sector plan for that will guide the development of the ADM R75 000-00
Plan manufacturing industry of Amathole.
1.6 Sector Programme Designs Design sector enterprise programmes for agriculture, tourism and ADM [AEDA] R100 000-00
manufacturing and establish capacity to deliver them through the
district.
1.7 SMME Service Directory Production of a detailed brochure, leaflet or directory of available ADM [AEDA] R100 000-00
support services for different sectors in Amathole
1.8 Municipal SMME Capacity Partner with the Vulindlela SMME Programme and other SP’s to ADM [DEAET] R200 000-00
Building Programme implement SMME training and capacity building programmes for LED
Officers, Coordinators and relevant municipal officials.
1.9 Municipal SMME Support Fund Establish a Fund from which to financially assist local municipalities ADM R200 000-00
towards their SMME programmes by providing annual grants. The
Fund will leverage funding from the ADM, government departments
and other private sector partners
1.10 Mobile Outreach Campaign Implement a mobile business outreach programme to provide ADM [SWG] R200 000-00
business advice and information to rural communities, township and
home-based entrepreneurs.
YEAR THREE [2007/2008] PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION LEAD PARTY BUDGET
1.22 SMME Tabloid Implement a regular local SMME supplement or tabloid as a tool to ADM [AEDA, SEDA] R100 000-00
provide business information such as tenders, business opportunities
as well as an advertising medium for SMME ‘s and big business.
1.23 Infrastructure Support Provide or facilitate access to appropriate business trading places ADM [AEDA] R2 000 000-00
Programme such as hawkers stalls, business hives as well as access to affordable
electricity, water and sanitation services.
1.24 Comprehensive Skills Audit Conduct a detailed skills audit of the existing businesses, employed AEDA [DoL] R450 000-00
and unemployed persons in the ADM. The first phase would focus on
existing business and economic projects to determine training and
human resource needs.
1.25 SMME Skills Plan Formulate a skills development programme containing key training AEDA [DoL] R100 000-00
areas to build the SMME capability of ADM. Partner with local tertiary
institutions to develop appropriate training programmes for local
SMME’s, support organizations, municipalities and communities.
1.26 Skills Programme Partnering Sign an MOU with the Department of Labour and relevant SETA’s to ADM, [SETA’s, AEDA, R15 000-00
fund and rollout specific technical and business training programmes LM’s]
in line with the needs of local municipalities, business and major
developments in the area.
1.27 Mobile Outreach Campaign Implement a mobile business outreach programme to provide ADM [SWG] R100 000-00
business advice and information to rural communities, township and
home-based entrepreneurs.
YEAR FOUR [2008/2009] PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION LEAD PARTY BUDGET
1.28 SMME Help Line Launch a local SMME Hotline, as a toll-free facility aimed at assisting ADM [AEDA, SEDA] R50 000-00
informal traders, aspiring entrepreneurs and general business to gain
business advice and information telephonically thereby minimizing
the travel and time cost.
1.29 BEE Support Centres [BEEC’s] Facilitate the establishment of BEEC‘s that will provide information on ADM [DEAET, DTI] R100 000-00
tenders, opportunities, conduct BEE audits, facilitate twinning
between small and big enterprises and broaden the base of BEE
suppliers across sectors.
1.30 Infrastructure Support Provide or facilitate access to appropriate business trading places ADM [AEDA] R1 000 000-00
Programme such as hawker’s stalls, business hives as well as access to affordable
electricity, water and sanitation services.
YEAR FIVE [2009/2010] PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION LEAD PARTY BUDGET
1.34 Mobile Outreach Campaign Implement a mobile business outreach programme to provide ADM [SWG] R100 000-00
business advice and information to rural communities, township and
home-based entrepreneurs.
1.33 Infrastructure Support Provide or facilitate access to appropriate business trading places ADM [AEDA] R1 000 000-00
Programme such as hawker’s stalls, business hives as well as access to affordable
electricity, water and sanitation services.
1.35 Impact Evaluation Programme Design and implement a programme to evaluate impact of the ADM [SWG] R500 000-00
Council‘s interventions on SMME’s.
2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Amathole District Municipality acknowledges the valuable input and support provided
by its local stakeholders during the process of formulating this SMME Strategy. Our special
thank you for the role played is accorded to the following organizations:
The LED Manager further acknowledges the support role played by the Communication Department
and Special Programmes Unit during this strategy formulation process.