This document provides a draft rubric for evaluating reflective journals. It outlines 4 levels of performance - Expert, Proficient, Competent, and Criteria Not Met - across 4 criteria: depth of reflection, relation of work to personal learning, communication and support of thinking, and depth of thought. For each criteria, it describes the characteristics of reflections that would meet the expectations at each performance level, with Expert reflections demonstrating conscious, thorough analysis and Proficient reflections showing thoughtful consideration of issues. Feedback on this draft rubric is requested.
This document provides a draft rubric for evaluating reflective journals. It outlines 4 levels of performance - Expert, Proficient, Competent, and Criteria Not Met - across 4 criteria: depth of reflection, relation of work to personal learning, communication and support of thinking, and depth of thought. For each criteria, it describes the characteristics of reflections that would meet the expectations at each performance level, with Expert reflections demonstrating conscious, thorough analysis and Proficient reflections showing thoughtful consideration of issues. Feedback on this draft rubric is requested.
This document provides a draft rubric for evaluating reflective journals. It outlines 4 levels of performance - Expert, Proficient, Competent, and Criteria Not Met - across 4 criteria: depth of reflection, relation of work to personal learning, communication and support of thinking, and depth of thought. For each criteria, it describes the characteristics of reflections that would meet the expectations at each performance level, with Expert reflections demonstrating conscious, thorough analysis and Proficient reflections showing thoughtful consideration of issues. Feedback on this draft rubric is requested.
This document provides a draft rubric for evaluating reflective journals. It outlines 4 levels of performance - Expert, Proficient, Competent, and Criteria Not Met - across 4 criteria: depth of reflection, relation of work to personal learning, communication and support of thinking, and depth of thought. For each criteria, it describes the characteristics of reflections that would meet the expectations at each performance level, with Expert reflections demonstrating conscious, thorough analysis and Proficient reflections showing thoughtful consideration of issues. Feedback on this draft rubric is requested.
Expert (30 points) Proficient (20 points) Competent (10 points) Criteria not met (0 points) Depth of reflection Demonstrates a conscious Demonstrates a thoughtful Demonstrates a basic Little or no reflection and thorough reflection reflection (exploring reflection (exploring (exploring issues, (exploring issues, analyzing issues, analyzing context, issues, analyzing analyzing context, context, critical thinking) critical thinking) context, critical critical thinking) thinking) Relation of work Fully comprehends and has Understands what has Understands there has No indicate there has in the course to insight into what has made a made a difference in been a difference in been a difference in personal learning difference to personal work personal work with the personal practices personal work and/or experience with the course/tasks, siting course/tasks changes that have positively influenced understanding of the ideas Communicates and Writing is clear, concise, Writing is mostly clear, Writing is unclear or Writing is unclear and supports thinking and well organized with concise, and well disorganized. Thoughts disorganized. Thoughts - appropriate excellent organized with good are not expressed in a ramble and make little - creative and sentence/paragraph sentence/paragraph logical manner. sense. original construction. construction. Depth of thought Very frequent comments More frequent comments Some random comments Some random comments - the more representing analysis of representing some analysis apparently written over apparently written on frequent the reflection. Narrative, if any, of reflection. Narrative several days. More one day. More narrative entries the more supports the reflection slightly supports the narrative than reflective than reflective time for self- reflection analysis
This is a draft rubric. It is more a guideline for this quarter. Please let me know if it helps, or if some part is confusing. There are both vertical and horizontal ranges. Horizontal is the depth/competence of the work in each category. Vertical ranges from how well you explain/understand your thoughts/conclusions to how well you explored and communicated them.
