Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Literary Theory in The Great Gatsby

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Literary Theory in The Great Gatsby

Grace Parent

ENG4UL-02
Mrs. Taylor
26 July 2021
Parent 1

It is possible for the reader to view The Great Gatsby from several archetypal

perspective, for example the tragic hero, or the quest. In addition, recurring colours play a

significant role throughout the novel, yellow, gold and green being three of the most prominent.

Fitzgerald uses yellow to represent money, materialism, high society and luxury - the yellow car,

the girls in twin yellow dresses, Dr. T.J. Eckleburg’s enormous spectacles. The yellow car was

the cause of Myrtle’s death, which Daisy was driving at the time. This represents how luxury can

cause serious harm and tragedy and “the golden girl” (Fitzgerald 120) who caused the accident

was not held accountable. Fitzgerald uses green for the colour of Daisy’s dock light across the

river to represents Gatsby unattainable image of Daisy and their relationship, but it also

symbolizes Gatsby’s jealousy now that Daisy is with another man. Gatsby bought his house so

he could see that light from his backyard. It remined him of how close (just across the river) he

was of achieving his dream of being with Daisy, but crossing the river was much more difficult

that originally thought and there were many challenges on the way.

The strongest literary theory that can be used to analyse The Great Gatsby is feminist

literary criticism. The women in the novel are all very strong and clever, although the men still

view their wife’s/girlfriends and women in general as objects to own and dominate. We see this

whenever a woman stands up to Tom, he feels threatened and reasserts control by physically

reminding them of his superiority. For example, when Myrtle tried to prove she had a right to say

Daisy’s name, Tom responded by, “Making a short deft movement… [breaking] her nose with

his open hand” (Fitzgerald 37). Wilson, Gatsby, and Nick also treated their partners like objects

or property to be bought and sold.

The weakest theory to analysis The Great Gatsby through was reader’s response. Each

person interprets a text in a different way. The story is not meant to be experienced by only the
Parent 2

words on the paper, but also by the experiences the reader brings to the text and the connections

they make. I did not find myself relating to a lot of the characters but the one I did the most was

Nick. One of the first things Nick refers to is something his father told him, “’ Whenever you

feel like criticizing any one… just remember that all the people in this world haven’t had the

advantages that you’ve had’” (Fitzgerald 1). Even though I do not come from a rich family I still

have been given many advantages that others have not. Similar to Gatsby, both of my

grandparents did not come from privilege, but used the opportunities presented to them, worked

hard, and built a good life for themselves. This allowed them to give their children opportunities

they did not enjoy, something Gatsby never was able to.
Parent 3

Work Cited

F. Scott Fitzgerald. The Great Gatsby, Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1925

You might also like