3 Lateral Load Distribution
3 Lateral Load Distribution
3 Lateral Load Distribution
GTU # 3732007
Earthquake Resistant
Design of structures
Inertia force due to vertical acceleration Inertia force due to Horizontal acceleration
Types of Diaphragm
Rigid Diaphragm
Flexible Diaphragm
𝑚𝑖 𝑥𝑖
𝑋=
𝑚𝑖
𝑚𝑖 𝑦𝑖
𝑌=
𝑚𝑖
𝑘𝑖 𝑥𝑖
𝑋=
𝑘𝑖
𝑘𝑖 𝑦𝑖
𝑌=
𝑘𝑖
In the Y-direction,
Let the lateral stiffness of each transverse frame = k,
CM CS CM
CS
Center of mass and center of stiffness coincide Center of mass and center of stiffness is not coinciding
CM CM
CS CS
1) If CM & CS will not coincide then EQ force produces translation + rotation of floor
2) Rotation of floor produce torsion in vertical elements.
𝑘𝑖 𝑥𝑖 𝑘𝑥0 + (𝑘𝑥12) CR CM
𝑋= = =6𝑚
𝑘𝑖 2𝑘 (6.0, 4.0) (8.0, 4.0)
𝑘𝑖 𝑦𝑖 𝑘𝑥0 + (𝑘𝑥8)
𝑌= = =4𝑚
𝑘𝑖 2𝑘
43.07 kN 71.92 kN
2.31 kN 2.31 kN
51.54 kN 14.62 kN
H / L <= 1 H/L>3
• This system consists of shear wall (or braced frame) and moment resisting frame
• The two systems are designed to resist the total design force in proportion to their lateral stiffness
considering the interaction of the dual system at all floor levels
• The moment resisting frames are designed to independently resist at least 25% of design seismic base shear
Dynamic Analysis
Response Spectrum Method
Time History Analysis
For seismic resistant design of structures, only these maximum stresses are of interest, not the time
history of stresses.
The equivalent lateral force for an earthquake is defined as a set of lateral static forces which will
produce the same peak response of the structure as that obtained by the dynamic analysis of the
structure under the same earthquake.
Vb = m a
Vb = (W/g) a
Vb = W (a/g)
Vb = W Ah
The use of smoothed envelope spectra makes the analysis independent of the characteristics of a particular
earthquake record.
RSA can very often be useful as a preliminary analysis, to check the reasonableness of results produced by time-
history analyses.
The results are in terms of peak response only, with a loss of information on frequency content, phase and number
of damaging cycles, which have important consequences for low-cycle fatigue effects.
𝑚3 = 2000 kg
𝑘3 = 5𝑥105 𝑁/𝑚
𝑚2 = 3000 kg
𝑘2 = 5𝑥105 𝑁/𝑚
𝑚1 = 3000 kg
𝑘1 = 5𝑥105 𝑁/𝑚
𝑘 − 𝜔2 𝑚 = 0
10 −5 0 0.03 0 0
2
−5 10 −5 − 𝜔 0 0.03 0 =0
0 −5 5 0 0 0.02
10 − 0.03𝜔2 −5 0
−5 10 − 0.03𝜔2 −5 =0
0 −5 5 − 0.02𝜔2
2𝜋 2𝜋
𝑇1 = = = 0.992 𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝜔1 6.33
2𝜋 2𝜋
𝑇2 = = = 0.362 𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝜔2 17.34
2𝜋 2𝜋
𝑇3 = = = 0.262 𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝜔3 24
8.798 −5 0 ∅11 0
−5 8.798 −5 ∅21 = 0 ∅11 = 1
0 −5 4.198 ∅31 0
0.979 −5 0 ∅12 0
−5 0.979 −5 ∅22 = 0 ∅12 = 1
0 −5 −1.02 ∅32 0
−7.28 −5 0 ∅13 0
−5 −7.28 −5 ∅23 = 0 ∅13 = 1
0 −5 −6.52 ∅33 0
𝐿𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐿𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐿𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟
𝜔1 = 6.33 𝑟𝑎𝑑/𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝜔2 = 17.34 𝑟𝑎𝑑/𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝜔3 = 24.00 𝑟𝑎𝑑/𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝜔1 𝜔2 𝜔3
𝛽11 𝛽21 𝛽31 𝜔1 𝜔1 𝜔1 1 2.73 3.79
𝛽32 = 𝜔1 𝜔2 𝜔2 𝜔3
𝛽 = 𝛽12 𝛽22 𝜔2 𝜔2 = 0.365 1 1.384
𝛽13 𝛽23 𝛽33 𝜔1 𝜔2 𝜔3 0.263 0.722 1
𝜔3 𝜔3 𝜔3
V3 = 1576.015 𝑁
V2 = 3054.209 𝑁
Prof. Dipak Jivani 76
𝜌𝟏𝟏 𝜌𝟐𝟏 𝜌𝟑𝟏 V11
V1 = V11 V12 V13 𝜌𝟏𝟐 𝜌𝟐𝟐 𝜌𝟑𝟐 V12
𝜌𝟏𝟑 𝜌𝟐𝟑 𝜌𝟑𝟑 V13
V1 = 4016.184 𝑁
V3 = 1590.96 𝑁
V2 = 3056.23 𝑁
V1 = 4008.72 𝑁
𝑄3 = 1576.015 𝑁
+ Comparison of Storey shear
Storey CQC (N) SRSS (N) ABS (N)
𝑄1 = 961.975 𝑁
𝑉1 = 4016.184 𝑁
+
𝐂𝐐𝐂 𝐌𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐝
Thank you…!
Next Topic