Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Draft of Civil Pleading

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

CIVIL PLEADINGS

EXERCISE-I

FACTS

S. Janardhana Naidu, S/o. Krishnaiah residing at D.No. 249, Netaji


th
Road, Tirupati, borrowed Rs. 25,000 agreeing to pay 24% on 26 Feb, 2008
from G. Srinivasa Yadav, S/o. Ramaiah at D.No. 247, Netaji Road and
executed a promissionary note. The promissionary note was scribed by
K. Venkatasubbaiah a document writer in Tirupati and attested by a
K. Damodhar Reddy and M. Subramanyam Naidu.

G. Srinivasa Yadav made demands for the Repayment of the loan and
also caused a lawyers notice dated 04.01.2011 to be send to S. Janardhana
Naidu.

S. Janardhana Naidu who received the notice on 27.01.2011 neither paid


th
the amount nor did he respond to the notice on 20 February, 2011. G.Srinivasa
Yadav filed a suit for the recovery of the debt Draft the plaint.

1
PLAINT
ORDER-6, RULE-17, SECTION-
26
In the court of the Junior Civil Judge of
Tirupati.
O.S. No …………………/2011
G. Srinivasa Yadav …….. Plaintiff
Vs.
S. Janardhan Naidu ……. Defendant
Plaint filed on behalf of the plaintiff under order VII Rule-10 and long cause
title.
(1) Plaintiff

G. Srinivasa Yadav, S/o. Ramaiah aged 45 years, Hindu business,


residing at D.No. 247, Netaji Road, Tirupati, within jurisdiction of this
honourable court.

The address for services of notices etc. on the plaintiff is as stated above
and come of ……………… advocate, Tirupati.

(2) Defendant

S. Janardhan Naidu, S/o. Krishnaiah, 40 years, Hindu, Business, residing


at D.No. 249, Netaji Road, Tirupati within jurisdiction of honourable court.

The address for service of process etc. on the defendant as stated above.

(3) Defendant borrowed a sum of Rs. 25,000 on 26.02.2008 and is


consideration there of executed a promissory note the like sum in favour of the
plaintiff, agreeing to pay interest at 24% per annum.

(4) The plaintiff made several demands on the defendant for the repayment of
the debt. The plaintiff also caused a registered lawyer‟s notice dated
04.01.2011 to be sent to the defendant did not respond.

(5) The plaintiff submits that the defendant is not an agriculturist and he is not
entitled to the benefits under any of the debt relief of law.

(6) Cause of Action: For this suit arose on 26.02.2008 at Tirupati, within the
jurisdiction of this honourable court.
(7) The plaintiff values this suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction of
39,000/- and pays a court fee of 1.666 under section 20 of A.P. Court fee and
suits valuation Act.

(8) Particulars of Valuation


Principal borrowed 25,00
0
Interest 24% p.a from 26.02.2008 to 20.02.2011 14,00
0
39,00
0
Court fee paid there on relief 1,66
6
Prayer

(9) It is therefore, prayed that the honourable court may be pleaded to pass a
judgement and decree against the defendant and in favour of the plaintiff

(10) Directing the plaint defendant to pay the plaintiff the sum of Rs.39,000 on
with further interest at the contact rate till the date of realization.

(11) Awarding the plaintiff the cost of this suit and

(12) Passing such further or other order as the honourable court may deem. Fit
and proper in the circumstance of the case.

xxxx xxxx

Advocate for the plaintiff Plaintiff

Verification

I the plaintiff, to hereby declared that the facts stated above true and
correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.

List of document filed

(1) Documents original promissory note executed by the defendant.

Special plaints in suits by a licensor against his licencee by a notice as


per the licence agreement.

You might also like