Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 271 views

    Rubric Timeline Cell Theory

    Uploaded by

    John Osborne
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating a cell theory timeline project. It evaluates the digital platform used, inclusion of important scientists and dates, use of images/visuals, and overall presentation. A score of 3 is given for fully meeting criteria in each category, down to a score of 0 for not meeting criteria. The total score out of 13 corresponds to a letter grade out of 10.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubric Timeline Cell Theory

    Uploaded by

    John Osborne
    271 views1 page
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating a cell theory timeline project. It evaluates the digital platform used, inclusion of important scientists and dates, use of images/visuals, and overall presentation. A score of 3 is given for fully meeting criteria in each category, down to a score of 0 for not meeting criteria. The total score out of 13 corresponds to a letter grade out of 10.

    Original Description:

    Assessment Rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides a rubric for evaluating a cell theory timeline project. It evaluates the digital platform used, inclusion of important scientists and dates, use of images/visuals, and overall presentation. A score of 3 is given for fully meeting criteria in each category, down to a score of 0 for not meeting criteria. The total score out of 13 corresponds to a letter grade out of 10.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    271 views1 page

    Rubric Timeline Cell Theory

    Uploaded by

    John Osborne
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating a cell theory timeline project. It evaluates the digital platform used, inclusion of important scientists and dates, use of images/visuals, and overall presentation. A score of 3 is given for fully meeting criteria in each category, down to a score of 0 for not meeting criteria. The total score out of 13 corresponds to a letter grade out of 10.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    8vos June 2021

    RUBRIC FOR CELL THEORY TIMELINE


    3 2 1 0 Score
    Digital platform

    A suitable digital platform has A suitable digital platform has


    The digital platform is not suitable
    been chosen and mastered to show been chosen but not well mastered
    or has not been used correctly.
    the timeline. to show the timeline.

    All the most important scientists


    have been shown, including Robert
    Scientists

    One or two of the most important Three or four of the most important More than four of the most
    Hooke, Anton van Leeuwenhoek,
    scientists have not been referred to scientists have not been referred to important scientists have not been
    Mathias Schleiden, Theodor
    in the timeline. in the timeline. referred to in the timeline.
    Schwann, Robert Remak and
    Rudolf Virchow.

    The timeline correctly places the


    One or two of the most important Three or four of the most important More than four of the most
    dates according to the discoveries
    Dates

    dates are incorrect or missing from dates are incorrect or missing from important dates are missing from
    or developments made by each
    the timeline. the timeline. the timeline.
    scientist.
    Images and

    The timeline is made more useful


    display

    The timeline contains some extra The timeline contains no extra


    and is visually enhanced by the use
    visual or digital material. visual or digital material.
    of images or other digital material.
    judgement
    Holistic

    Marks (3, 2, 1or 0) are awarded here for a combination of factors which might include a demonstration of intellectual initiative, commitment, an
    unusual sense of ownership of the presentation, special insights or depth of understanding, originality and creativity.

    Score / 13 Grade / 10
    13 10
    12, 11 9.5, 9
    10, 9 8.5, 8
    8, 7 7.5, 7
    6, 5 6.5, 6
    4, 3 5.5, 5

    You might also like