Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

F Lecture o L 15 3 Documentation and Obtaining Consideration of Laws and

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9

DOCUMENTATION AND OBTAINING

CONSIDERATION OF LAWS AND


REGULATIONS IN AN AUDIT (ISA 230 & 250)
Audit documentation is an essential element of audit quality and
has always been a critical component of an audit process as it
evidences the work done by the auditor. The Auditing and
Assurance Standards Board has brought out this revised edition of
the Implementation Guide to SA 230, “Audit Documentation”
whose first edition was issued in 2013.

Documentation” defined

SA 230, “Audit Documentation” defines audit documentation as


“The record of audit procedures performed, relevant audit
evidence obtained, and conclusions the auditor reached (terms
such as “working papers” or “work papers” are also sometimes
used”.

Hence, “document”, in the context of audit refers more to that


which is required to be maintained by an auditor to record his
findings during the course of the audit.

Scope of SA 230

1
Ans:SA 230 deals with the auditor’s responsibility to prepare audit
documentation for an audit of financial statements. It is to be adapted as
necessary in the circumstances when applied to audits of other historical
financial information. The specific documentation requirements of other SAs

do not limit the application of SA 230. Laws or regulations may establish


additional documentation requirements.
Nature and Purpose of Audit Documentation?
Audit documentation that meets the requirements of this SA and
the specific documentation requirements of other relevant SAs
provides:
(a): Evidence of the auditor’s basis for a conclusion about the
achievement of the overall objectives of the auditor; and
• Objective:
Prepare documentation that provides:
i) Sufficient & Appropriate record of basis of auditor’s
report
ii) Evidence that audit was planned & performed in
accordance with SAs Provides
I. evidence of auditor’s basis to conclude on achieving
overall audit objectives ; &
II. II. evidence that audit was planned & performed as per
SAs & applicable legal, regulatory requirements.
III. • Timely, sufficient & appropriate audit documentation
enhances audit quality,
2
IV. • facilitates effective review & evaluation of audit
evidence obtained & conclusions reached before
finalizing audit reports.

Documentation is essential because….

 It supports the auditor’s basis for a conclusion


about achieving the auditor’s objectives.
 Provides evidence that audit was planned and performed.
 It assists supervision and review.
 It results in better conceptual clarity, clarity of
thought and expression.
 It facilitates better understanding and helps
avoid misconception.
 It supports and evidences compliance with
standards, applicable legal & regulatory
requirements.
 It results in better conceptual clarity, clarity of
thought and expression.
 It facilitates better understanding and helps
avoid misconception.
 It supports and evidences compliance with
standards, applicable legal & regulatory
requirements.

3
Form and Content of Documentation
The form and content of audit documentation should be designed to
meet the circumstances as necessary of the particular audit. It
should satisfy the requirements of the governing standards and
substantiate the conclusions arrived at by the auditor.The form and
content of documentation depends on various factors such as:
 Size, nature and type of entity.
 Risk assessment.
 Materiality.
 Sampling methods, etc.
Documents are segregated into those forming part of the
Permanent Audit File and Current Audit File. Permanent
audit file contains those documents, the use of which is
not restricted to one time period, and extends to
subsequent audits also. e.g. Engagement letter,
Communication with previous auditor, Memorandum of
Association, Articles of Association, Organization
structure, List of directors/partners/trustees/bankers/
lawyers, etc. On the other hand, a current audit file
contains those documents relevant for that time period of
audit.
Documentation includes the following:
 Understanding the entity.
 Time and cost constraints.
 Audit Programme.
 Risk assessment.
4
 Team discussion.
 Working papers pertaining to significant areas.
 Review points.
 Communication with those charged with governance
 Basis for conclusions.
 Reporting & completion.
 Quality/Engagement quality control review.
In general, a working paper may contain the following:
 Risk and controls relevant to the area.
 Assertions to be tested and satisfied.
 Substantive and analytical procedures performed.
 Persons performing/reviewing the work.
 Dates on which the work was performed/reviewed.
 Extent of review.
 Documents prepared by client.
 Nature, type and size of the entity.
Audit documentation may be lesser in case of less complex
entities and small entities as compared to large and complex
entities.
Examples of the audit documentation
A4:.Examples of audit documentation include the following:
 Engagement letter.
 Audit programmes defined, with details of work carried out
and  results filled, including planning memorandum.
5
 Analyses of various account balance through
comparatives and corroborative.
 Summaries of significant matters.
 Letters of confirmation and representation.
 Checklists.
 Correspondence (including e-mail) concerning
significant matters.
 Abstracts or copies of the entity’s records/contracts/
agreements.
 Audit documentation, however, is not a substitute for the
entity’s accounting records and vice versa.
A significant matter is a finding or issue that, in the auditor's
judgment, is significant to the procedures performed, evidence
obtained, or conclusions reached. Significant matters either are, or
could be, important to our audit opinion/report, or to the support for
the assurance engagement opinion/conclusion(s).

Auditors Responsibility
We conducted our audit in accordance the SA’s issued by the ICAI – These
Standards require that we comply with the ethical requirements & plan &
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial
statements are free from MM
Material Misstatement (MM)
Material - important, significant, substantial
Misstatement – false incorrect statement MM is untrue information in FS that
could affect the financial decision of one who relies on the statement /

6
misleads users MM – not true and fair MM - result of omissions - errors of
transactions & balances
True and Fair – Factually correct & faithfully represent without bias
Faithfully represent economic substance of the transaction rather than the
legal form
Over-under valuation of asset/ liability Omission of asset / liability Non-
disclosure of charges on assets Accounting policies not followed consistently
unusual- exceptional, non-recurring items not disclosed separately Accounts
not drawn as per ARFF / Schedule III of Co’s Act Non Compliance with AS -
Sec 143(3)(e) / IFRS - disclosure of deviation with reasons & financial impact
Examples of significant matters?
Judging the significance of a matter requires an objective analysis
of the facts and circumstances. Examples of significant matters
include:
 Matters that give rise to significant risks. As defined in SA31
significant risks mean an identified and assessed risk of
material misstatement that, in the auditor’s judgment,
requires special audit consideration.
 Results of audit procedures indicating (a) that the financial
statements could be materially misstated, or

(b) a need to revise the auditor’s previous assessment of the


risks of material misstatement and the auditor’s responses to
those risks.
 Circumstances that cause the auditor significant difficulty in
applying necessary audit procedures.
 Findings that could result in a modification to the audit
7
opinion or the inclusion of an Emphasis of Matter paragraph
in the auditor’s report.

CONCLUSION: When assessing how important it is for an audit firm to


maintain adequate documentation for all audit engagements, students should
focus on the extent to which an audit firm relies on working papers prepared.
This reliance is not limited to the importance placed on them in allowing the
audit firm to arrive at a conclusion about the truth and fairness of financial
statements – it extends as well to reliance on the fact that they have been
prepared in a professional manner to defend any subsequent allegations that
the audit firm has acted negligibly in the event of an alleged audit failure. By
following the procedures and guidance set out in ISA 230, audit firms should
be assured that audit documentation has been prepared in a professional
manner

8
9

You might also like