Mens Rea: Mens Rea Term Miscellaneous Common Law Mens Rea
Mens Rea: Mens Rea Term Miscellaneous Common Law Mens Rea
Mens Rea: Mens Rea Term Miscellaneous Common Law Mens Rea
Objective = “unjustifiable”
Recklessness the actor disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk of which he was aware
Subjective = “was aware”
A gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would have
observed in the actor’s situation Reasonable Person? constant pressure to add subjectivity into it.
Traditional rule: a def’s unusual physical characteristics, if relevant
Negligence Must be a gross deviation for criminal liability—person takes a substantial and to the case, are incorporated, but def’s mental characteristics
unjustifiable risk of causing the social harm (PL far outweighs B) aren’t
In non-homicide cases, a person acts with malice if he intentionally or recklessly —Today, it’s rarely used to mean “wickedness” or “ill-will” or
Malice causes the social harm prohibited by the offense “spite”
—Has a more complicated meaning w/r/t homicide
Historical Meaning: referred to any offense for which the only
mens rea required was a blameworthy state of mind (proof of
General Intent Modern Meaning: essentially offense level mens rea
offense level mens rea)
Modern Meaning: (1) the crime requires proof that the actor’s conscious object,
or purpose, is to cause the specific social harm, or (2) the crime requires proof of Historical Meaning: was meant to emphasize that the definition of
Specific Intent an intention by the actor to perform some future act or achieve some further the offense expressly required proof of a particular (specific)
consequence, beyond the conduct or result that constitutes the social harm of mental state (proof of elemental level mens rea)
the offense