Checklist in Evaluating A Research Paper

CATANDUANES NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Constantino, Virac, Catanduanes
WORKSHEET IN EVALUATING A RESEARCH PAPER

Quarter 1
MELC/Code: Utilize the standards (criteria or checklist) in evaluating a research paper
(peer/group/expert evaluation).
Name of Learner: Sean Albert P. Valeza Date: October 19, 2020 Score: ___________
Address: Calatagan Proper, Virac, Catanduanes Parent’s Signature: ____________________
ACTIVITY: EVALUATING THE PARTS OF A RESEARCH PAPER

CHECKLIST IN EVALUATING A RESEARCH PAPER
Title: Effects of COVID-19 on business and research
1=Not addressed 2=Partially addressed 3=Fully addressed NA=Not Applicable
INDICATORS 1 2 3 NA
Title/Title Page
1. The title is clear and concise /
2. It interests the reader and reflects the content of the paper /
3. It follows the correct format /
Comments: Important words on the title should be capitalized like “business” and
“research.”
Abstract (The Abstract contains the following:)

1. Brief background of the study /
2. Clear statement of the purpose/s of the study /
3. Short description of the methods /
4. Summary of main findings /
5. Conclusions of the study /
6. Recommendations /
Comments: Since the research is descriptive, methods are not necessarily
included. However, conclusions and recommendations are not clearly stated.
Introduction (Chapter I)
1. It provided a clear background information of the topic /
2. It gets the reader’s attention right from the beginning /
3. The research problem/s is/are properly defined /
4. It is deemed significant to the society /
5. Hypotheses, assumptions and limitations are clearly stated /
6. Important terms are appropriately defined /
Comments: Important terms like COVID-19 should be appropriately defined.
Review of Related Literatures (Chapter II)

1. Important aspects of the study are covered in the review of literatures /
2. Significant findings are noted /
3. It is well organized /
4. The literatures are summarized effectively /
Comments: This part should be included especially because this is a descriptive
research.
Methodology (Chapter III)

1. The research design is described in detail /
2. The respondents of the study are described in sufficient detail /
3. Sufficient data are collected from a variety of participants over an /
appropriate length of time
4. The setting of the study is adequately described /
5. The materials and methods are clearly described so the experiment /
could be repeated
6. The data gathering instrument is appropriate /
7. The techniques for data collection are appropriate for the research /
problem
8. The statistical treatment is appropriate for the study /
Comments: Not necessarily included but ways data collection must be included.
Results and Discussions (Chapter IV)

1. Charts, tables and graphs are understandable and appropriately and /
consistently labeled.
2. The textual discussions are clear and concise /
3. Findings are adequately justified /
4. The statistical analysis is accurately interpreted /
Comments: Not necessarily included.
Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations (Chapter V)/

1. The problem is restated /
2. The findings and conclusions are justified by the data presented and /
analyzed.
3. Recommendations are included and are based on the findings of the /
study
Comments: Should be included.
References and Appendices

1. A suitable style or format (e.g., APA) is used consistently for all /
references
2. References are free of errors /
3. All appendices referenced in the text are included in the appendix /
section, in the order they are referenced
4. Data and information in the appendices are clearly presented and /
explained
Comments: All references in the research must be included to validate the
information.
CHECKLIST IN EVALUATING A RESEARCH PAPER
Title: High School Students’ Social Media Usage Habits
1=Not addressed 2=Partially addressed 3=Fully addressed NA=Not Applicable
INDICATORS 1 2 3 NA
Title/Title Page
1. The title is clear and concise /
2. It interests the reader and reflects the content of the paper /
3. It follows the correct format /
Comments: The title follows appropriate format and is clear and concise
Abstract (The Abstract contains the following:)

1. Brief background of the study /
2. Clear statement of the purpose/s of the study /
3. Short description of the methods /
4. Summary of main findings /
5. Conclusions of the study /
6. Recommendations /
Comments: Recommendations are not necessarily included.
Introduction (Chapter I)
1. It provided a clear background information of the topic /
2. It gets the reader’s attention right from the beginning /
3. The research problem/s is/are properly defined /
4. It is deemed significant to the society /
5. Hypotheses, assumptions and limitations are clearly stated /
6. Important terms are appropriately defined /
Comments: Literatures should be separated from this part so information is more
organized. It is very tiring to read because of the small spacing.
Review of Related Literatures (Chapter II)

1. Important aspects of the study are covered in the review of literatures /
2. Significant findings are noted /
3. It is well organized /
4. The literatures are summarized effectively /
Comments: The literatures from the introduction must be placed here.
Methodology (Chapter III)

1. The research design is described in detail /
2. The respondents of the study are described in sufficient detail /
3. Sufficient data are collected from a variety of participants over an /
appropriate length of time
4. The setting of the study is adequately described /
5. The materials and methods are clearly described so the experiment /
could be repeated
6. The data gathering instrument is appropriate /
7. The techniques for data collection are appropriate for the research /
problem
8. The statistical treatment is appropriate for the study /
Comments: Details about the respondents like the sample school from a
population must be included. It is also very tiring to read because of the format.
Procedures should be organized so it is easy to read.
Results and Discussions (Chapter IV)

1. Charts, tables and graphs are understandable and appropriately and /
consistently labeled.
2. The textual discussions are clear and concise /
3. Findings are adequately justified /
4. The statistical analysis is accurately interpreted /
Comments: Should be included for validation of conclusions.
Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations (Chapter V)/

1. The problem is restated /
2. The findings and conclusions are justified by the data presented and /
analyzed.
3. Recommendations are included and are based on the findings of the /
study
Comments: Conclusions should be short. The details about the result should be
placed on the results and discussion part. Excessive information should not be
included.
References and Appendices

1. A suitable style or format (e.g., APA) is used consistently for all /
references
2. References are free of errors /
3. All appendices referenced in the text are included in the appendix /
section, in the order they are referenced
4. Data and information in the appendices are clearly presented and /
explained
Comments: All references in the research must be included to validate the
information.

Checklist in Evaluating A Research Paper

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Checklist in Evaluating A Research Paper

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Checklist in Evaluating A Research Paper

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CATANDUANES NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Constantino, Virac, Catanduanes

WORKSHEET IN EVALUATING A RESEARCH PAPER

Address: Calatagan Proper, Virac, Catanduanes Parent’s Signature: ____________________

ACTIVITY: EVALUATING THE PARTS OF A RESEARCH PAPER

Title: Effects of COVID-19 on business and research

1=Not addressed 2=Partially addressed 3=Fully addressed NA=Not Applicable

Abstract (The Abstract contains the following:)

Review of Related Literatures (Chapter II)

Methodology (Chapter III)

Results and Discussions (Chapter IV)

Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations (Chapter V)/

References and Appendices