Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 159 views

    Firme Vs Bukal Corp.

    Uploaded by

    Ian Cabana
    The Spouses Firme owned land that Bukal Enterprises wanted to purchase. Bukal's vice president authorized his friend Aviles to negotiate the purchase. Aviles negotiated with the Spouses Firme but the sale was not perfected. The trial court found no contract existed because the Spouses Firme did not consent to the sale and Aviles had no authority to bind Bukal Enterprises. The Supreme Court affirmed, noting Aviles was not an officer or director of Bukal Enterprises and no board resolution authorized Aviles to negotiate the purchase.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Firme Vs Bukal Corp.

    Uploaded by

    Ian Cabana
    159 views1 page
    The Spouses Firme owned land that Bukal Enterprises wanted to purchase. Bukal's vice president authorized his friend Aviles to negotiate the purchase. Aviles negotiated with the Spouses Firme but the sale was not perfected. The trial court found no contract existed because the Spouses Firme did not consent to the sale and Aviles had no authority to bind Bukal Enterprises. The Supreme Court affirmed, noting Aviles was not an officer or director of Bukal Enterprises and no board resolution authorized Aviles to negotiate the purchase.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Firme vs Bukal Corp.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The Spouses Firme owned land that Bukal Enterprises wanted to purchase. Bukal's vice president authorized his friend Aviles to negotiate the purchase. Aviles negotiated with the Spouses Firme but the sale was not perfected. The trial court found no contract existed because the Spouses Firme did not consent to the sale and Aviles had no authority to bind Bukal Enterprises. The Supreme Court affirmed, noting Aviles was not an officer or director of Bukal Enterprises and no board resolution authorized Aviles to negotiate the purchase.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    159 views1 page

    Firme Vs Bukal Corp.

    Uploaded by

    Ian Cabana
    The Spouses Firme owned land that Bukal Enterprises wanted to purchase. Bukal's vice president authorized his friend Aviles to negotiate the purchase. Aviles negotiated with the Spouses Firme but the sale was not perfected. The trial court found no contract existed because the Spouses Firme did not consent to the sale and Aviles had no authority to bind Bukal Enterprises. The Supreme Court affirmed, noting Aviles was not an officer or director of Bukal Enterprises and no board resolution authorized Aviles to negotiate the purchase.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Cabana, Adrian C.

    Case Title : Firme vs Bukal Corp.


    G.R. No. 146608, October 23, 2003

    Facts

    Spouses Constante and Azucena Firme are the registered owners of a parcel of land located on
    Dahlia Avenue, Fairview Park, Quezon City. Renato de Castro, the vice president of Bukal Enterprises and
    Development Corporation authorized his friend, Teodoro Aviles, a broker, to negotiate with the Spouses
    Firme for the purchase of the Property. On 28 March 1995, Bukal Enterprises filed a complaint for specific
    performance and damages with the trial court, alleging that the Spouses Firme reneged on their
    agreement to sell the Property

    The trial court held there was no perfected contract of sale as Bukal Enterprises failed to
    establish that the Spouses Firme gave their consent to the sale of the Property; and that Aviles had no
    valid authority to bind Bukal Enterprises in the sale transaction.

    ISSUES:

    Whether there was a perfected contract between the Spouses Firme and Bukal Enterprises, the
    latter allegedly being represented by Aviles.

    Ruling

    No. The Supreme Court held Aviles, who negotiated the purchase of the Property, is neither an
    officer of Bukal Enterprises nor a member of the Board of Directors of Bukal Enterprises. There is no
    Board Resolution authorizing Aviles to negotiate and purchase the Property for Bukal Enterprises. There
    is also no evidence to prove that Bukal Enterprises approved whatever transaction Aviles made with the
    Spouses Firme

    You might also like