Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 71 views

    591-B Artex vs. NLRC

    Uploaded by

    Eloise Coleen Sulla Perez
    The labor arbiter found Artex Dev't Co. guilty of illegally dismissing employee Noriel Gonzales. Artex claimed it did not attend scheduled hearings because it did not receive summons or notice. The NLRC affirmed the labor arbiter's findings. The Supreme Court ruled the labor arbiter's decision was proper because even if Artex was not heard initially, it was given the opportunity to present its case through its motion for reconsideration and appeal, so its right to due process was not violated.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    591-B Artex vs. NLRC

    Uploaded by

    Eloise Coleen Sulla Perez
    71 views1 page
    The labor arbiter found Artex Dev't Co. guilty of illegally dismissing employee Noriel Gonzales. Artex claimed it did not attend scheduled hearings because it did not receive summons or notice. The NLRC affirmed the labor arbiter's findings. The Supreme Court ruled the labor arbiter's decision was proper because even if Artex was not heard initially, it was given the opportunity to present its case through its motion for reconsideration and appeal, so its right to due process was not violated.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The labor arbiter found Artex Dev't Co. guilty of illegally dismissing employee Noriel Gonzales. Artex claimed it did not attend scheduled hearings because it did not receive summons or notice. The NLRC affirmed the labor arbiter's findings. The Supreme Court ruled the labor arbiter's decision was proper because even if Artex was not heard initially, it was given the opportunity to present its case through its motion for reconsideration and appeal, so its right to due process was not violated.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    71 views1 page

    591-B Artex vs. NLRC

    Uploaded by

    Eloise Coleen Sulla Perez
    The labor arbiter found Artex Dev't Co. guilty of illegally dismissing employee Noriel Gonzales. Artex claimed it did not attend scheduled hearings because it did not receive summons or notice. The NLRC affirmed the labor arbiter's findings. The Supreme Court ruled the labor arbiter's decision was proper because even if Artex was not heard initially, it was given the opportunity to present its case through its motion for reconsideration and appeal, so its right to due process was not violated.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    PASTOR

    Case No. 591-B


    Issuance of FAN and Letter of Demand
    Artex Development Co., Inc. vs. NLRC, 187 SCRA 611, G.R. No. 65045
    July 20, 1990

    FACTS: The labor arbiter held that petitioner Artex Dev’t Co., was guilty
    of illegal dismissal against its employee Noriel Gonzales. The Company,
    in its MR, claims that its failure to appear at the scheduled hearings was
    due to the fact that it did not receive summons nor any notice of hearing.
    The NLRC affirmed the LA’s findings.

    ISSUE: Whether or not the decision of the LA was proper?

    RULING: YES.
    Even if the petitioner was not heard at the stage of mediation and fact-
    finding, it may not complain of lack of due process for it was given an
    opportunity to present its side of the controversy when its motions for
    reconsideration and appeal were given due course. What due process
    abhors is not lack of previous notice, but absolute lack of opportunity to
    be heard.

    You might also like