G8 Lesson 1 Weekly Home Learning Plan
G8 Lesson 1 Weekly Home Learning Plan
G8 Lesson 1 Weekly Home Learning Plan
Monday: 7:30-7:50am Homeroom, 7:50-8:50am 8-Aster, 8:50-9:10am Break time, 9:10-10:10am 8-Heather, 10:10-
10:30am Break time, 10:30-11:30am 8-Anthurium, 11:30-12:30pm Lunch break, 12:30-1:30pm Vacant and 1:30-1:50pm
Homeroom
As you evaluate a source, consider whether he author’s bias affects his or her
presentation of information and opinions. Ask whether this results in one side
of an issue being treated more favorably than another. To explore an author’s
biases, you must ask where his or her allegiances lie. Is the bias hidden or
stated? Ask yourself if you need to look for balancing viewpoint or approach?
Just because an author has a strong bias does not mean that he or she has written something invalid.
However, in the interest of being prepared to fend off attacks from those who want to challenge your
analysis or argument, it is best if you recognize, early on, to what biases an author does hold.
Being objective in your writing is a skill that you will develop, just like your academic voice. Though
having a passion for your topic makes the writing process easier, it is important not to let it take over
your draft.
Many people are biased about certain things. Bias is often very unfair or unbalanced. For example,
football fans make think that a referee made a bad call just because they really like the team the call
was against.
BIAS in writing can be defined as:
1. A prejudice against something an author is writing about.
2. Favoritism for something an author is writing about.
3. An author letting feelings or emotions cloud his or her objectivity with regard to something he
or she is writing about.
When writing, authors make claims based on their own judgments which are expressed in opinions
that ultimately shape their discussion. However, when these opinions seem to favor only one side of
an idea, author commits biases. As a wise reader, you must be able to detect how biases may be
examined in texts, whether they are explicit or implied.
1. The author uses words that are too sensational, dramatic, emotional, or strong.
2. The author presents evidences that seem to support only one side of an issue.
3. The author makes claims that magnify either the good or the bad side of a group or idea, but
not both.
4. The author fails to present any argument that may counter his or her claims.
5. The author fails to cite his sources, and thus biases his or her arguments solely on his own
opinions.
An example of bias:
When I met with Mayor Geovelli, I noticed that he had the appearance of a hobo-loaded, negatively
charged word). He was unshaved and wearing dirty clothes (one sided- notice that the author doesn’t
tell us why the mayor was dressed this way. Maybe there was a good reason). He spoke to me about
his horrible plan to fix our city’s roads (vague language- what specifically is horrible about it?). Anyone
who knows the plan will tell you that it will bankrupt our city (is this a fact or opinion? The author
offers no supporting evidence). The plan to fix our roads mostly benefits friends of the Mayor. He
plans to pay his buddies in the construction business thousands of dollars over the next two years. I
do not want to insult anyone, but the Mayor is of Italian decent, and we all know what reputation they
have in this part of the country. Need I remind you of Al Capone and other Italian Mafia members?
(This is a clearly a stereotype – not all Italians are mobsters).
Enrichment Activity:
Instruction:
Read and analyze the excerpt entitled “A Heritage of Smallness.” Identify the Author’s Biases by
answering the following questions.
Reference:
https://theurbanhistorian.tumblr.com/post/5966825494/a-heritage-of-smallness-by-nick-joaquin
1. Author
a. Who wrote it?
b. Google the author to find out more about him. Once you know more about the author, what is their
stake in making this argument? In other words, why do they care?
2. Publication
a. Who published it? (Sometimes the author and publisher are the same , as on some websites or
blogs)
b. Who is/are the audiences?
3. Opposing Viewpoints
a. Does the author recognize a viewpoint that opposes his or her own? If so what is it?
b. Is that viewpoint presented objectively or emotionally?
c. List some quotations to support your claim.
4. Language
a. Does the author present his argument in extreme language? Does he write to appeal to emotions? If
so provide some examples.
b. Does the author use value-laden terms or loaded words that lend a negative impression (as in
‘illegal aliens’ versus ‘undocumented workers’). If so provide some examples.
5. Overall, what would you say about the bias of this excerpt?
Rubrics:
Shows greater understanding through the excerpt being read - 35%
Organization of ideas within the questions - 30%
Correctness of grammar usage - 25%
Over-all - 10%
Valuing:
Students reflect on the lessons through answering the following questions:
1. Do you agree with the author’s argument on the Filipino’s heritage of smallness? Explain your
answer.
2. Are you in favor of author’s technique in advancing the purpose of writing? Why or why not?
Assignment:
Accomplish the activity:
After discussion of lesson, the teacher will give an assignment to the students to accomplish it
during self-paced learning.
Post-Assessment:
Activity 1:
Teachers are expected to accomplish several activities and paper works every Friday:
School-based
Attending General Faculty Meeting
Checking of Output and Assessments
Checking of Modules
Saturday
Participating in Aerobic Fitness workout and Sports activity promoting healthy lifestyle
through cardiovascular endurance exercises (Non-contact sports such as: Volleyball and
Badminton)
Co-curricular Organization’s Meeting
Make-up classes (Prior Approval)
Prepared by: Submitted to: