Yula Ocean and Mibaco Virus Outbreak: Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (Decision) (2007) ICC-01/04-01/06-803, 209
Yula Ocean and Mibaco Virus Outbreak: Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (Decision) (2007) ICC-01/04-01/06-803, 209
Yula Ocean and Mibaco Virus Outbreak: Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (Decision) (2007) ICC-01/04-01/06-803, 209
Desi Angraini along with my co-counsel, rani harahap will be appealing on the present case
on behalf of the respondent, the State/Republic of Rupta, may it please?
I will be submitting our submission in regards to CASE CONCERNING THE SOUTH
YULA OCEAN AND MIBACO VIRUS OUTBREAK
(of the case) for 3 minutes.
1
Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (Decision) [2007] ICC-01/04-01/06-803, ¶ 209.
2
Report of the United Nations Secretary General, ‘Relationship between Disarmament and
International Security’ (1982) UN Doc A/36/597, [124].
3
Oxford Public International Law, Innocent Passage, Oxford University Press (2015), p. 6.
4
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (16 November 1994) 1883 UNTS 397Art. 19(1)
Provision of prohibition to use of force is not solely absolute. 5Unless it is directed only
against legitimate military objectives that are defined by their nature, location, purpose or
use6 will provide an effective contribution and particular military advantage when attacking
them. The attack was proportionate as it was limited tofall under military necessity related
to the purpose of safeguarding the peace and security of Rupta as a State.
5
UN Charter, n. 12, art. 2(4); James A Green, Questioning the Peremptory Status of the Prohibition of
the