Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jack The Ripper - Word

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Anta C, Pau A i Carlota L 1r BATX A 

JACK THE RIPPER 


Background: 
From August 7 to September 10 in 1888, Jack the Ripper terrorized the Whitechapel 
district in London’s East End. He killed at least five prostitutes and mutilated their 
bodies in an unusual manner, indicating that the killer had knowledge of human 
anatomy. Jack the Ripper was never captured, and remains one of England’s and the 
world’s, most infamous criminals  
 
Victims:  
Before​​the five famous murders, Jack the Ripper had been a suspect for two other 
deaths that happened in Whitechapel. Their name were Martha Tabram and Emma 
Elizabeth Smith but they didn’t include them on the file of the main five victims, 
because Elisabeth Smith before dying explained that she had been attacked by two or 
three men.  
These were five women that were murdered: Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, 
Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddowes, and Mary Jane Kelly. They were all killed by 
Jack the ripper because he had killed them in the same way, by cutting their throats 
and stabbing them on the abdomen. Elisabeth and Catherine were killed the same 
morning because he was interrupted during the first attack, so he was unsatisfied and 
killed another woman. 
 
 
Nicknames​: ​Jack the Ripper did have other names – one popular moniker was 'The 
Whitechapel Murderer'. To some people, he was also known as Leather Apron. 
Where Did the Name Come From? 
In September 1888, a letter was received by the Central News Agency. It was written 
in red ink and boasted about the Ripper’s crimes, ending with a signature from ‘Jack 
the Ripper’. 
October saw a second delivery to the Central News Agency, only this time it was a 
postcard. Again this message was signed by the Ripper, but it wasn’t until this arrived 
that the authorities took any notice. 
Why Did the Name Stick? 
After the letters were sent to the Central News Agency, the police thought it was a 
hoax until they realized that in the second letter, the writer referred to the first. As 
they noticed similarities, they became convinced that the sinister mail may have 
actually been sent by the killer himself. As a result, they released the letters to the 
public in an attempt to gather more information. Because both the letter and the 
postcard were signed by Jack the Ripper, the name was adopted by the media and the 
culprit then became known under that name. 
Was This a Good Idea? 
Due to the police having very little information on the killer, they hoped that by 
releasing the letters someone would be able to offer them some further details. Of 
course, this would have been a gamble as there weren’t any solid clues about the 
killer’s identity or who it was from. Similarly, the chances of the general public 
having any valuable information were very small. In actual fact, it later became 
obvious that perhaps this wasn’t the best decision. For months and years after the 
letters were released into the public domain, the police received hundreds of letters 
Anta C, Pau A i Carlota L 1r BATX A 

and postcards addressed from ‘the Ripper’ - something which clearly did not help 
their investigation. 
Jack the Ripper has fascinated the public for years and the tale of his murders is 
known around the world. Because the killer has been referred to by this name for so 
long, many people simply don’t question where this nickname first came from - but 
now you know! 
 
Investigations and possible authors:  
The investigation was very slow and there was no clear suspect, at first it was 
believed that the murder had knowledge of anatomy, then some sources denied it. 
The only thing that the police had from the murderer was two letters, the first one is 
believed to be made by the press, was the one signed by a Jack the Ripper, the second 
one is believed to be from the real murderer since it was accompanied by a kidney 
from the victims. Today many people continue to investigate what happened. Of the 
different suspects, three stand out:  
William Withey Gull: Queen's Victorian doctor. Because he has a knowledge of 
anatomy. 
Aaron Kominski: He was a barber for Whitechapel,. He hated women and had 
“homicidal tendencies”. 
Prince Albert Victor, Duke of Clarence and Avondale: He stayed with one prostitute 
from whitechapel, after he had syphilis. He blamed the prostitute for this.  
Montague John Druitt: a man from a “fairly'' good family, although some believed that 
he was “sexually insane”. He resided next to Whitechapel and he was suicide seven 
weeks after killed Mary Jane Kelly. 
Carl Feigenbaum: Was known to be a psychopath who confessed to mutilating 
women, he worked next to Whithechapel. 
Nowadays the case is open and different people have different theories.  
 
Films: 
There are several films about the whitechapel murders and jack the ripper but the 
ripper, and from hell are more recent movies. Whitechapel is a series in which some 
detectives from London dealt with murders that were trying to copy Jack the Ripper. 
The documentary of Jack the Ripper talks about the suspects, locations and they even 
recreate some of the crime scenes.   
 
Methodology: 
Did Jack the ripper hate women? 
This could be produced by multiple causes, since his mother hit him as a child, until 
he had a sister who felt contempt for him. All this, moreover, was favored by the type 
of society in which he lived. 
Why did he murder prostitutes? 
That he chose to murder women may be associated with misogyny, but that they were 
prostitutes may be related merely to the ease of committing the crimes. Jack wanted 
to look for easy prey, women who would approach him on the promise of money and 
who could be led into dark streets without suspicion. A normal person will not escort 
a hooded man into a secluded alley, but a prostitute will. 
 

You might also like