An Eighteenth-Century Description of The Symphony and Sonata Form: Heinrich Koch, Introductory Essay
An Eighteenth-Century Description of The Symphony and Sonata Form: Heinrich Koch, Introductory Essay
An Eighteenth-Century Description of The Symphony and Sonata Form: Heinrich Koch, Introductory Essay
In order entirely to satisfy this aim and be an integral part of the opera or the
church music that is to follow, the symphony should, in addition to suggesting the
grand and the festive, put the listener in the proper frame of mind for what follows,
and make apparent by means of the art of composition what is distinctive about
church and theater music.
The independent symphony is entirely free standing, unconnected to any fol-
lowing music, achieving its end only through its volume and fiery style. The Allegro
of the best symphonies contains broad, bold ideas—powerful bass melodies and uni-
son writing, concertante middle voices, free imitation, often a single theme that is
treated fugally, sudden transitions and changes from one key to another that tend
to be more striking if they are not closely related, sharp distinctions between louds
and softs, and especially the crescendo, which if combined with a rising, expressive
melody, will achieve a particularly brilliant effect.
The Andante or Largo between the first and last Allegro has, needless to say,
a completely different character. It is often introspective, full of pathos, or replete
with sadness. Yet it must have a dignity that is worthy of the symphony.
The symphony preceding an opera has more or less the same quality as the in-
dependent symphony, but suited to the character of the opera that is to follow. Yet
it appears that it does not have to be as extravagant or as thoroughly worked out,
because the listener is concentrating more on what is about to happen in the opera
than on the symphony itself.” [end of extract from Sulzer]
as does the overture [the French overture, for example, usually has a grave tempo and
double-dotted configurations]. Rather, it can employ any meter and any figurations
that are serious in character. This introduction is also distinguished by the fact that it
stays in the main key, aside from transitory modulations, and ends on the dominant
or with a cadence. Often a seventh will be added to the dominant chord and supplied
with a fermata, which binds it to the following Allegro, that is to say, the caesura pitch
of the cadential chord, is also the beginning pitch of the Allegro.
102: [Compositional Process in the Development]
The second section of the Allegro consists of two parts [the development and recapitu-
lation], the first of which tends to make use of a variety of compositional techniques,
but these can be usefully reduced to just two. The first and most common technique
is to start in the dominant key with the theme and sometimes with another main me-
lodic idea, either note for note or in invention, or with some other kind of alteration,
which then leads back, perhaps employing another melodic idea, to the tonic key, and
from here to the minor key of the sixth degree, or also the minor key of the second
or third degree. Or, the modulation might not go at first to the tonic key, but rather
the phrase that goes from the dominant into one above-mentioned keys will drive
through a sequence or another type or progression, generating along the way
more thorough-going development. Then a few of those melodic phrases that work
best in these tonalities should be incorporated in other combinations than they had
appeared in the first section of the piece [the exposition]. At this point this part
[development] concludes in this key.
The second part [recapitulation] of this second section of the symphony is usually
preceded by a short passage [retransition] making use of a motive drawn from the main
thematic material and that unfolds as a sequential progression. By means of the prog-
ress of this modulation, we arrive back in the tonic key, which will carry through for
the last main part [recapitulation].
The second compositional technique found in this [first part of the second] section
[the development] very often in modern symphonies involves taking a theme from the
first section, or often only a section of it, that is particularly useful for this purpose and
placing it either in the upper voice or perhaps alternately in the other voices only, dis-
sected or transposed, sometimes to closely related keys and sometimes to distant ones.
Eventually the key is reached in which the [development] section will end. This occurs
either until an ending in the dominant chord is reached, or the material will continue
in a similar way until the conclusion of the entire part. (When we get to the part of
this book dealing with the unification of sections, we will see an example of this.)
If the fragmentation of such a phrase continues only to the concluding dominant chord,
then after this dominant chord some melodic material from the first section, usually in
an altered form, should be inserted in this key, before the cadence is reached. Examples
of this process can be found in many symphonies by Haydn and almost all of those
of [Karl Ditters von] Dittersdorf [1739–1799]. Likewise in this second compositional
approach [to the development section], the conclusion is supplied with an appendix
[the retransition] in which the modulation leads back to the start of the last part
[recapitulation] in the tonic key.
Moreover, one sometimes encounters in the modern symphony instances in which
the second part [the recapitulation] doesn’t begin in dominant [this seems to be a
reference to the old binary form, in which the main theme returned in the dominant
before the key changed back to the tonic], but in an entirely unexpected key either
without any preparation or by means of only a few tones that follow the cadence in the
dominant.
4
Source: Extracts translated from the original German of Versuch einer Anleitung zur Composition, Vol. III
(facsimile, 1969), p. 304ff.