Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Argumentative Essay: Advance Montessori Education Center of Isabela, Inc

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Advance Montessori Education Center of Isabela, Inc.

Maligaya, Tumauini, Isabela,


amecimontessori@gmail.com

MODULE IN ENGLISH X (GRADE 10 – EUCLID)


THIRD QUARTER
Week 1-2 (JANUARY 04-15, 2021)

ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY
Learning Competency:
Compose an argumentative essay (EN10WC-IIh-13).
BUILD YOU KNOWLEDGE!
DIRECTIONS: Think of five words that best describes an argumentative essay and use those to come up with you
own
definition of Argumentative Essay.
1. _______
2. _______
3. _______
4. _______
5. _______

What is an argumentative essay?


The argumentative essay is a genre of writing that requires the student to investigate a topic; collect, generate,
and evaluate evidence; and establish a position on the topic in a concise manner.
Argumentative essay assignments generally call for extensive research of literature or previously published
material. Argumentative assignments may also require empirical research where the student collects data through
interviews, surveys, observations, or experiments. Detailed research allows the student to learn about the topic and to
understand different points of view regarding the topic so that she/he may choose a position and support it with the
evidence collected during research. Regardless of the amount or type of research involved, argumentative essays must
establish a clear thesis and follow sound reasoning.
The structure of the argumentative essay is held together by the following.

 A clear, concise, and defined thesis statement that occurs in the first paragraph of the essay.

In the first paragraph of an argument essay, students should set the context by reviewing the topic in a general
way. Next the author should explain why the topic is important (exigence) or why readers should care about the issue.
Lastly, students should present the thesis statement. It is essential that this thesis statement be appropriately narrowed
to follow the guidelines set forth in the assignment. If the student does not master this portion of the essay, it will be
quite difficult to compose an effective or persuasive essay.

 Clear and logical transitions between the introduction, body, and conclusion.

Transitions are the mortar that holds the foundation of the essay together. Without logical progression of
thought, the reader is unable to follow the essay’s argument, and the structure will collapse. Transitions should wrap
up the idea from the previous section and introduce the idea that is to follow in the next section.

 Body paragraphs that include evidential support.

Each paragraph should be limited to the discussion of one general idea. This will allow for clarity and direction
throughout the essay. In addition, such conciseness creates an ease of readability for one’s audience. It is important to

1|Page E N G L I S H X
note that each paragraph in the body of the essay must have some logical connection to the thesis statement in the
opening paragraph. Some paragraphs will directly support the thesis statement with evidence collected during research.
It is also important to explain how and why the evidence supports the thesis (warrant).
However, argumentative essays should also consider and explain differing points of view regarding the topic.
Depending on the length of the assignment, students should dedicate one or two paragraphs of an argumentative essay
to discussing conflicting opinions on the topic. Rather than explaining how these differing opinions are wrong outright,
students should note how opinions that do not align with their thesis might not be well informed or how they might be
out of date.

 Evidential support (whether factual, logical, statistical, or anecdotal).

The argumentative essay requires well-researched, accurate, detailed, and current information to support the
thesis statement and consider other points of view. Some factual, logical, statistical, or anecdotal evidence should
support the thesis. However, students must consider multiple points of view when collecting evidence. As noted in the
paragraph above, a successful and well-rounded argumentative essay will also discuss opinions not aligning with the
thesis. It is unethical to exclude evidence that may not support the thesis. It is not the student’s job to point out how
other positions are wrong outright, but rather to explain how other positions may not be well informed or up to date on
the topic.

 A conclusion that does not simply restate the thesis, but readdresses it in light of the evidence provided.

It is at this point of the essay that students may begin to struggle. This is the portion of the essay that will leave
the most immediate impression on the mind of the reader. Therefore, it must be effective and logical. Do not introduce
any new information into the conclusion; rather, synthesize the information presented in the body of the essay. Restate
why the topic is important, review the main points, and review your thesis. You may also want to include a short
discussion of more research that should be completed in light of your work.
A complete argument
Perhaps it is helpful to think of an essay in terms of a conversation or debate with a classmate. If I were to
discuss the cause of World War II and its current effect on those who lived through the tumultuous time, there would
be a beginning, middle, and end to the conversation. In fact, if I were to end the argument in the middle of my second
point, questions would arise concerning the current effects on those who lived through the conflict. Therefore, the
argumentative essay must be complete, and logically so, leaving no doubt as to its intent or argument.
The five-paragraph essay
A common method for writing an argumentative essay is the five-paragraph approach. This is, however, by no means
the only formula for writing such essays. If it sounds straightforward, that is because it is; in fact, the method consists
of (a) an introductory paragraph (b) three evidentiary body paragraphs that may include discussion of opposing views
and (c) a conclusion.
Longer argumentative essays
Complex issues and detailed research call for complex and detailed essays. Argumentative essays discussing a number
of research sources or empirical research will most certainly be longer than five paragraphs. Authors may have to
discuss the context surrounding the topic, sources of information and their credibility, as well as a number of different
opinions on the issue before concluding the essay. Many of these factors will be determined by the assignment.

How to Outline an Argumentative Essay in 4 Steps?


Argumentative essays should have a straightforward structure so they are easy for readers to follow. The
goal of an argumentative essay is to clearly outline a point of view, reasoning, and evidence. A good argumentative
essay should follow this structure:

1. Introductory paragraph. The first paragraph of your essay should outline the topic, provide background
information necessary to understand your argument, outline the evidence you will present and states your
thesis.
2. The thesis statement. This is part of your first paragraph. It is a concise, one-sentence summary of your
main point and claim.
3. Body paragraphs. A typical argumentative essay comprises three or more paragraphs that explain the
reasons why you support your thesis. Each body paragraph should cover a different idea or piece of
2|Page E N G L I S H X
evidence and contain a topic sentence that clearly and concisely explains why the reader should agree with
your position. Body paragraphs are where you back up your claims
with examples, research, statistics, studies, and text citations. Address opposing points of view and
disprove them or explain why you disagree with them. Presenting facts and considering a topic from every
angle adds credibility and will help you gain a reader’s trust.
4. Conclusion. One paragraph that restates your thesis and summarizes all of the arguments made in your
body paragraphs. Rather than introducing new facts or more arguments, a good conclusion will appeal to a
reader’s emotions. In some cases, writers will use a personal anecdote explaining how the topic personally
affects them.
How to Write a Thesis Statement in 3 Steps
Your thesis statement is only one sentence long, but it’s the most important part of your argumentative
essay. The thesis appears in your introductory paragraph, summarizes what your argumentative essay will be about,
and primes the reader for what’s to come. These steps will help you get your point across clearly and concisely:

1. Turn the topic into a question and answer it. Set up a big question in the title of your essay or within the
first few sentences. Then, build up to answering that question in your thesis statement. For example, in your
title or introduction, you could pose the question, “What is the best type of sandwich?” And then answer
with your thesis statement: “The best type of sandwich is peanut butter and jelly.” This method is effective
because intriguing questions draw readers in and encourage them to keep reading to find the answer.
2. State an argument—and then refute it. Introduce an idea that contrasts with your belief, and immediately
explain why you disagree with it. For example: “While some people believe peanut butter and jelly
sandwiches are too simple, they’re versatile sandwiches that you can easily turn into a gourmet meal.” This
method is effective because it uses evidence and immediately demonstrates your credibility.
3. Briefly outline your main points. Introduce your main point and explain how you’ll back it up. For
example: “You can turn a peanut butter and jelly sandwich into a gourmet meal by using artisanal bread,
toasting the bread, and adding additional toppings.” This method is effective because it gives readers a clear
idea of everything you’ll discuss in your essay. It also serves as a roadmap to help keep you organized and
on track.
ACTIVITY 1
DIRECTIONS: Using the topics given below, compose your own thesis statement.

1. AMECI:
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Cagayan River:
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Tumauini:
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
4. Bicycle:
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
5. The Filipino People:
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________

5 Types of Argument Claims


Once you decide what you’re arguing and know your thesis statement, consider how you’ll present your
argument. There are five types of argument claims that can drive your essay:

3|Page E N G L I S H X
1. Fact: whether the statement is true or false.
2. Definition: the dictionary definition of what you’re arguing, plus your own personal interpretation of it.
3. Value: the importance of what you’re arguing.
4. Cause and effect: what cause the problem in your essay and what effects it has.
5. Policy: why the reader should care and what they should do about it after reading.
3 Main Types of Arguments and How to Use Them
There are three main ways to structure an argumentative essay. Choose one of the following or combine
them to write your persuasive paper:

1. Classical. Present the main argument, state your opinion, and do your best to convince the reader why your
stance is the right one. Also called Aristotelian, this is the most popular strategy for making an argument
because it’s the simplest line of thinking to follow. It’s effective when your audience doesn’t have a lot of
information or a strong opinion about your topic, as it outlines the facts clearly and concisely.
2. Rogerian. Present the problem, acknowledge the opposing side of the argument, state your point of view,
and explain why yours is the most beneficial to the reader. This type of argument is effective for polarizing
topics, as it acknowledges both sides and presents the middle ground.
3. Toulmin. Present your claim, present grounds to back up that claim, and then justify that the grounds are
linked to the claim. This type of argument is also effective for polarizing topics, but rather than present both
sides, it presents one, hinging particularly on facts presented in a way that makes the claim difficult to argue
with.
Activity 2
DIRECTIONS: Decide on a topic or subject you want to discuss for your argumentative essay. Using the given organizer below,
create a draft for you essay.

INTRODUCTION
Catchy Hook:

Thesis Statement:

What is the issue?


___________________________________________________________________________________________

Who are concerned in the issue?


___________________________________________________________________________________________

Why is the issue relevant?


___________________________________________________________________________________________

DEVELOPMENT OF
ARGUMENT

1. Claim 1
_____________________________________________________________________________
Evidence:
__________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
4|Page 2. EClaim 2N G L I S H X
_____________________________________________________________________________
REFUTING OPPOSING
ARGUMENT

1. Opposing Argument 1
_____________________________________________________________________________
Counter Argument/Refutation
__________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
2. Opposing Argument 2
_____________________________________________________________________________
Counter Argument/Refutation
__________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________

3. Counter Argument/Refutation 3
_____________________________________________________________________________
Counter Argument/Refutation
__________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________

CONLUSION
Re-statement:

Description of the issue

5|Page E N G L I S H X
Activity 3
DIRECTIONS: Using your outline above, write your three claims in the box below and classify them appropriately. Then prove
your claims through a thorough research and writing pieces of evidence that can back-up your claims.
Claim 1 Type Evidence

Activity 4
DIRECTIONS: Using your outline, compose an argumentative essay. Write your essay on a whole sheet of paper and write
Legibly.

Argumentative Essay Rubric

Aspirational (5) Acceptable (4) Marginal (3) Unacceptable (2)


Intro Paragraph Thesis clearly states a Thesis states a relevant Thesis is largely unclear or is Thesis is completely unclear,
relevant position. position, but is somewhat not directly relevant to not relevant, or missing
Argument preview vague or unclear. Preview assignment. Little entirely. No preview of
complete, in same order as is incomplete, not in correct identifiable preview, or argument. Paragraph consists
Thesis body of essay, not simple order; some recitation of preview is largely class largely of opinion, filler, or
Preview of argument recitation of class class material. Nothing material. Contains sentences "contextualizing" material.
material. Contains other than thesis and that are neither preview nor
nothing other than thesis preview. thesis.
and preview.

6|Page E N G L I S H X
Body paragraphs and Main points directly Main points develop One or more points not Ideas have little or nothing to
Concluding paragraph develop preview and preview, but not all are clearly related to either do with the assignment,
explicitly link to thesis. explicitly linked to thesis. preview or thesis. and/or are poorly developed.
No extraneous material is Little to no extraneous Extraneous material is Evident that reading material
included. Accurate material is included. Most included. Significant errors has not been understood.
account of material from information from readings in material from readings; Body is Frankenstein Ian:
readings, restated in own is restated in own words, most information is quoted; largely stitched-together
words; any quotations are with errors being few and two quotations are long, quotes, many of which may
few, short, seamlessly small; one quotation is inaccurate, not well- also be inaccurate. More
integrated, and correctly somewhat too long, not integrated, or incorrectly than two references for
referenced. Conclusion well-integrated, or referenced. Conclusion quotations are missing. No
effectively restates incorrectly referenced. doesn’t effectively capture conclusion, or mere
argument. Conclusion restates thesis thesis and/or argument. repetition of intro.
but not full argument.
Structure Logical progression of Logical progression of Some level of High level of disorganization
Transitions ideas with a clear ideas; argumentative disorganization/lacunae or large lacunae. More than
argumentative structure. structure can be followed disrupts progression of ideas. one transition is missing.
Transitions are graceful. although it is not clearly Argumentative structure not
developed. All transitions easy to follow. A transition
are present. is missing.
Sentences Writing is clear, concise, Writing is clear and Writing is clear, but Writing is unclear,
Diction and coherent.  Sentences coherent, but sometimes sometimes lacks coherence confusing, incoherent, or
Mechanics are strong and expressive, wordy. Sentences have or is often wordy. Sentences verbose. Contains fragments
Format with varied structure. varied structure.  There are lack variety. One question and/or run-on sentences.
There are no questions. no questions. Diction is appears. Diction is often Two or more questions are
Diction is consistently usually appropriate to inappropriate. Two included. Inappropriate
appropriate to formal formal writing. No more philosophical or other words diction. Three or more
writing. All language is than one philosophical or are inaccurate or used philosophical or other words
accurate and used other word is inaccurate or incorrectly. There are three are inaccurate or used
correctly. No errors in used incorrectly. There are to five errors in punctuation, incorrectly. Six or more
punctuation, spelling, no more than two errors in spelling, or capitalization. errors in punctuation,
capitalization. Essay has a punctuation, spelling, or Two format errors. spelling, or capitalization.
title, author's name on capitalization. One format More than two format errors.
each page, all pages error.
numbered, 12-point font,
easily legible print.

Reference/s:
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/essay_writing/argumentative_essays.html#:~:text=
The%20argumentative%20essay%20is%20a,topic%20in%20a%20concise%20manner.&text=Expository
%20essays%20involve%20less%20research%20and%20are%20shorter%20in%20length.
https://www.masterclass.com/articles/how-to-write-a-good-argumentative-essay#3-main-types-of-arguments-and-
how-to-use-them

Prepared by: Checked by: Recommending Approval:

RIC JAY T. TULIAO CHARLENE D. DEGUZMAN RYAN B. BACANI


Subject Teacher Subject Coordinator Head, JHS Department

Approved by: Noted by:


JERIC T. VALDEZ NELIA Z-ANGULUAN, PhD
Principal Director

7|Page E N G L I S H X
8|Page E N G L I S H X

You might also like