Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Le Corbusier 5 Points PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

1926 Le Corbusier/Pierre Jeanneret:

Five points towards a new architecture

The declaration Five points towards a new architecture is roughly


contemporaneous with the designs for Le Corbusier's houses in the
Weissenhof settlement, Stuttgart, 1927, the second big exhibition of the
Deutscher Werkbund. Under the guidance of Mies van der Rohe, who - with
the support of comrades-in-arms of the G group, such as Werner Graeff-gave
each architect the greatest possible freedom to carry out his ideas, the
exhibition became one of the most important events in domestic architecture
between the two wars and led directly to the famous Berlin housing estates
under Martin Wagner at the end of the twenties.

The theoretical considerations set out below are based on many years of
practical experience on building sites.
Theory demands concise formulation.
The following points in no way relate to aesthetic fantasies or a striving for
fashionable effects, but concern architectural facts that imply an entirely new
kind of building, from the dwelling house to palatial edifices.

1. The supports. To solve a problem scientifically means in the first place to


distinguish between its elements. Hence in the case of a building a distinction
can immediately be made between the supporting and the non-supporting
elements. The earlier foundations, on which the building rested without a
mathematical check, are replaced by individual foundations and the walls by
individual supports. Both supports and support foundations are precisely
calculated according to the burdens they are called upon to carry. These
supports are spaced out at specific, equal intervals, with no thought for the
interior arrangement of the building. They rise directly from the floor to
3, 4, 6, etc. metres and elevate the ground floor. The rooms are thereby re­
moved from the dampness of the soil; they have light and air; the building
plot is left to the garden, which consequently passes under the house. The
same area is also gained on the flat roof.

2. The roof gardens. The flat roof demands in the first place systematic utihza-
tion for domestic purposes: roof terrace, roof garden. On the other hand, the
reinforced concrete demands protection against changing temperatures. Over­
activity on the part of the reinforced concrete is prevented by the maintenance
of a constant humidity on the roof concrete. The roof terrace satisfies both
demands (a rain-dampened layer of sand covered with concrete slabs with
lawns in the interstices; the earth of the flowerbeds in direct contact with the
layer of sand). In this way the rain water will flow off extremely slowly. Waste
pipes in the interior of the building. Thus a latent humidity will remain con­
tinually on the roof skin. The roof gardens will display highly luxuriant
vegetation. Shrubs and even small trees up to 3 or 4 metres tall can be planted.
99
In this way the roof garden will become the most favoured place in the build­
ing, In general, roof gardens mean to a city the recovery of all the built-up
area.

3. The free designing of the gronnd-plan. The support system carries the inter­
mediate ceilings and rises up to the roof. The interior walls may be placed
wherever required, each floor being entirely independent of the rest. There are
no longer any supporting walls but only membranes of any thickness required.
The result of this is absolute freedom in designing the ground-plan; that is to
say, free utilization of the available means, which makes it easy to offset the
rather high cost of reinforced concrete construction.

4. The horizontal window. Together with the intermediate ceilings the supports
form rectangular openings in the facade through which light and air enter
copiously. The window extends from support to support and thus becomes a
horizontal window. Stilted vertical windows consequently disappear, as do
unpleasant mullions. In this way, rooms are equably lit from wall to wall.
Experiments have shown that a room thus lit has an eight times stronger
illumination than the same room lit by vertical windows with the same
window area.
The whole history of architecture revolves exclusively around the wall
apertures. Through use of the horizontal window reinforced concrete sud­
denly provides the possibility of maximum illumination.

5. Free design of the facade. By projecting the floor beyond the supporting
pillars, like a balcony all round the building, the whole facade is extended
beyond the supporting construction. It thereby loses its supportive quality and
the windows may be extended to any length at will, without any direct rela­
tionship to the interior division. A window may just as well be 10 metres long
for a dwelling house as 200 metres for a palatial building (our design for the
League of Nations building in Geneva). The facade may thus be designed
freely.
The five essential points set out above represent a fundamentally new
aesthetic. Nothing is left to us of the architecture of past epochs, just as we
can no longer derive any benefit from the literary and historical teaching
given in schools.

Constructional considerations
Building construction is the purposeful and consistent combination of build­
ing elements.
Industries and technological undertakings are being established to deal
with the production of these elements.
Serial manufacture enables these elements to be made precise, cheap and
good. They can be produced in advance in any number required.
Industries will see to the completion and uninterrupted perfecting of the
elements.
Thus the architect has at his disposal a box of building units. His archi­
tectural talent can operate freely. It alone, through the building programme,
determines his architecture.
The age of the architects is coming.

You might also like