Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

15.401 Finance Theory: Andrew W. Lo Harris & Harris Group Professor, MIT Sloan School

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 27

15.

401

15.401 Finance Theory


MIT Sloan MBA Program

Andrew W. Lo
Harris & Harris Group Professor, MIT Sloan School

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT


Critical Concepts 15.401

 Review of Portfolio Theory


 The Capital Asset Pricing Model
 The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
 Implementing the CAPM
 Does It Work?
 Recent Research
 Key Points

Reading
 Brealey and Myers, Chapter 8.2 – 8.3

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 2


Review of Portfolio Theory 15.401

Risk/Return Trade-Off
 Portfolio risk depends primarily on covariances
– Not stocks’ individual volatilities
 Diversification reduces risk
– But risk common to all firms cannot be diversified away
 Hold the tangency portfolio M
– The tangency portfolio has the highest expected return for a given
level of risk (i.e., the highest Sharpe ratio)
 Suppose all investors hold the same portfolio M; what must M be?
– M is the market portfolio
 Proxies for the market portfolio: S&P 500, Russell 2000, MSCI, etc.
– Value-weighted portfolio of broad cross-section of stocks

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 3


Review of Portfolio Theory 15.401

2.4%

1.8% Motorola
Tangency
portfolio M
IBM
1.2%
Expected

GM
Return

0.6%

T-Bill

0.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
Standard Deviation of
Return

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 4


The Capital Asset Pricing Model 15.401

Implications of M as the Market Portfolio


 Efficient portfolios are combinations of the market portfolio and T-Bills
 Expected returns of efficient portfolios satisfy:

 This yields the required rate of return or cost of capital for efficient
portfolios!
 Trade-off between risk and expected return
 Multiplier is the ratio of portfolio risk to market risk
 What about other (non-efficient) portfolios?

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 5


The Capital Asset Pricing Model 15.401

Implications of M as the Market Portfolio


 For any asset, define its market beta as:

 Then the Sharpe-Lintner CAPM implies that:

 Risk/reward relation is linear!


 Beta is the correct measure of risk, not sigma (except for efficient
portfolios); measures sensitivity of stock to market movements

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 6


The Capital Asset Pricing Model 15.401

The Security Market Line

 Implications:

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 7


The Capital Asset Pricing Model 15.401

What About Arbitrary Portfolios of Stocks?

 Therefore, for any arbitrary portfolio of stocks:

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 8


The Capital Asset Pricing Model 15.401

We Now Have An Expression for the:


 Required rate of return
 Opportunity cost of capital
 Risk-adjusted discount rate

 Risk adjustment involves the product of beta and market risk premium
 Where does E[Rm] and Rf come from?

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 9


The Capital Asset Pricing Model 15.401

Example:
Using monthly returns from 1990 – 2001, you estimate that Microsoft’s
beta is 1.49 (std err = 0.18) and Gillette’s beta is 0.81 (std err = 0.14).
If these estimates are a reliable guide going forward, what expected
rate of return should you require for holding each stock?

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 10


The Capital Asset Pricing Model 15.401

Security Market Line

25%

20%

15%
Expected
Return

10% β = 1, Market Portfolio

5%

0%
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Beta

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 11


The Capital Asset Pricing Model 15.401

The Security Market Line Can Be Used To Measure Performance:


 Suppose three mutual funds have the same average return of 15%
 Suppose all three funds have the same volatility of 20%
 Are all three managers equally talented?
 Are all three funds equally attractive?
25%

20%

A B
Expected Return

15%
C
10% β = 1, Market Portfolio

5%

0%
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Beta

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 12


The Capital Asset Pricing Model 15.401

Example:
Hedge fund XYZ had an average annualized return of 12.54% and a
return standard deviation of 5.50% from January 1985 to December
2002, and its estimated beta during this period was −0.028. Did the
manager exhibit positive performance ability according to the CAPM?
If so, what was the manager’s alpha?

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 13


The Capital Asset Pricing Model 15.401

Example (cont):
Cumulative Return of XYZ and S&P
500
January 1985 to December 2002
16

14

12

10
Cumulative Return

Month

XYZ S&P 500

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 14


The Arbitrage Pricing Theory 15.401

What If There Are Multiple Sources of Systematic Risk?


 Let returns following a multi-factor linear model:

 Then the APT implies the following relation:

 Cost of capital depends on K sources of systematic risk

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 15


The Arbitrage Pricing Theory 15.401

Strengths of the APT


 Derivation does not require market equilibrium (only no-arbitrage)
 Allows for multiple sources of systematic risk, which makes sense

Weaknesses of the APT


 No theory for what the factors should be
 Assumption of linearity is quite restrictive

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 16


Implementing the CAPM 15.401

Parameter Estimation:
 Security market line must be estimated
 One unknown parameter: β
 Given return history, β can be estimated by linear regression:

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 17


Implementing the CAPM 15.401

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 18


Does It Work? 15.401

Biogen vs. VWRETD

40%

30%
y = 1.4242x -
0.0016
R 2 = 0.3336 20%

10%

0%
-20.0% -15.0% -10.0% -5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0%
-10%

-20%

-30%

-40%

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 19


Does It Work? 15.401

NASDAQ vs. VWRETD

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%
-20% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
-5%

-10%

-15%

-20%

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 20


Does It Work? 15.401

Market-Cap Portfolios:
Over the past 40 years, the smallest firms (1st decile) had an average
monthly return of 1.33% and a beta of 1.40. The largest firms (10th
decile) had an average return of 0.90% and a beta of 0.94. During the
same time period, the Tbill rate averaged 0.47% and the market risk
premium was 0.49%. Are the returns consistent with the CAPM?

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 21


Does It Work? 15.401

Size-Sorted Portfolios, 1960 – 2001

1.40

1.30

1.20

1.10
Average Monthly

1.00

0.90
Returns

0.80

0.70

0.60
0.70 0.90 1.10 1.30 1.50 1.70
Beta

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 22


Does It Work? 15.401

Beta-Sorted Portfolios, 1960 – 2001


18%

16%

14%

12%
Average Annual

10%
Returns

8%

6%

4%
0.50 0.70 0.90 1.10 1.30 1.50 1.70
Beta

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 23


Does It Work? 15.401

Beta-Sorted Portfolios, 1926 – 2004

16.0

14.0

12.0

10.0

8.0

6.0

4.0
Low 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 High
Firms sorted by ESTIMATED BETA

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 24


Does It Work? 15.401

Volatility-Sorted Portfolios, 1926 – 2004

16.0

14.0

12.0

10.0

8.0

6.0

4.0
Low 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 High
Firms sorted by ESTIMATED VOLATILITY

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 25


Recent Research 15.401

Other Factors Seem To Matter


 Book/Market (Fama and French, 1992)
 Liquidity (Chordia, Roll, and Subrahmanyam, 2000)
 Trading Volume (Lo and Wang, 2006)

But CAPM Still Provides Useful Framework For Applications


 Graham and Harvey (2000): 74% of firms use the CAPM to estimate
the cost of capital
 Asset management industry uses CAPM for performance attribution
 Pension plan sponsors use CAPM for risk-budgeting and asset
allocation

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 26


Key Points 15.401

 Tangency portfolio is the market portfolio


 This yields the capital market line (efficient portfolios)

 The CAPM generalizes this relationship for any security or portfolio:

 The security market line yields a measure of risk: beta


 This provides a method for estimating a firm’s cost of capital
 The CAPM also provides a method for evaluating portfolio managers
– Alpha is the correct measure of performance, not total return
– Alpha takes into account the differences in risk among managers
 Empirical research is mixed, but the framework is very useful

Lectures 15–17: The CAPM and APT Slide 27

You might also like