The Supreme Court denied Texas's motion to file a complaint challenging the election results in Pennsylvania and other states. The Court ruled that Texas lacked standing under Article III as it did not demonstrate a judicially cognizable interest in how another state conducts its own elections. Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, agreed with denying other relief but would have allowed Texas to file its complaint, as he believes the Court does not have discretion to deny filing in original jurisdiction cases. In a separate order, the Court granted certiorari in Goldman Sachs Group v. AR Teacher Retirement regarding an securities law issue.
The Supreme Court denied Texas's motion to file a complaint challenging the election results in Pennsylvania and other states. The Court ruled that Texas lacked standing under Article III as it did not demonstrate a judicially cognizable interest in how another state conducts its own elections. Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, agreed with denying other relief but would have allowed Texas to file its complaint, as he believes the Court does not have discretion to deny filing in original jurisdiction cases. In a separate order, the Court granted certiorari in Goldman Sachs Group v. AR Teacher Retirement regarding an securities law issue.
The Supreme Court denied Texas's motion to file a complaint challenging the election results in Pennsylvania and other states. The Court ruled that Texas lacked standing under Article III as it did not demonstrate a judicially cognizable interest in how another state conducts its own elections. Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, agreed with denying other relief but would have allowed Texas to file its complaint, as he believes the Court does not have discretion to deny filing in original jurisdiction cases. In a separate order, the Court granted certiorari in Goldman Sachs Group v. AR Teacher Retirement regarding an securities law issue.
The Supreme Court denied Texas's motion to file a complaint challenging the election results in Pennsylvania and other states. The Court ruled that Texas lacked standing under Article III as it did not demonstrate a judicially cognizable interest in how another state conducts its own elections. Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, agreed with denying other relief but would have allowed Texas to file its complaint, as he believes the Court does not have discretion to deny filing in original jurisdiction cases. In a separate order, the Court granted certiorari in Goldman Sachs Group v. AR Teacher Retirement regarding an securities law issue.
Third-Party Defendant Kyle J. Bristow's Reply to Third-Party Plaintiff Martin Lindstedt's Response to Motions of "De Facto Satanic U.S. Mighty Evil Empire," "Satanic Homosexual Mongrel/Mischling/Agent Provocateurs," Et Al.