Zhao Et Al 2014 Phosphorus-Assisted Biomass
Zhao Et Al 2014 Phosphorus-Assisted Biomass
Zhao Et Al 2014 Phosphorus-Assisted Biomass
*xdcao@sjtu.edu.cn
Abstract
OPEN ACCESS There is often over 50% carbon loss during the thermal conversion of biomass into
Citation: Zhao L, Cao X, Zheng W, Kan biochar, leading to it controversy for the biochar formation as a carbon
Y (2014) Phosphorus-Assisted Biomass Thermal
Conversion: Reducing Carbon Loss and Improving sequestration strategy. Sometimes the biochar also seems not to be stable enough
Biochar Stability. PLoS ONE 9(12): e115373. due to physical, chemical, and biological reactions in soils. In this study, three
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115373
phosphorus-bearing materials, H3PO4, phosphate rock tailing (PRT), and triple
Editor: Zhi Zhou, Purdue University, United States
of America superphosphate (TSP), were used as additives to wheat straw with a ratio of 1: 0.4–
Received: June 15, 2014 0.8 for biochar production at 500˚C, aiming to alleviate carbon loss during pyrolysis
Accepted: November 21, 2014 and to increase biochar-C stabilization. All these additives remarkably increased
Published: December 22, 2014
the biochar yield from 31.7% (unmodified biochar) to 46.9%–56.9% (modified
biochars). Carbon loss during pyrolysis was reduced from 51.7% to 35.5%–47.7%.
Copyright: ß 2014 Zhao et al. This is an open-
access article distributed under the terms of the Thermogravimetric analysis curves showed that the additives had no effect on
Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and repro- thermal stability of biochar but did enhance its oxidative stability. Microbial
duction in any medium, provided the original author mineralization was obviously reduced in the modified biochar, especially in the
and source are credited.
TSP-BC, in which the total CO2 emission during 60-d incubation was reduced by
Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data
underlying the findings are fully available without 67.8%, compared to the unmodified biochar. Enhancement of carbon retention and
restriction. All relevant data are within the paper biochar stability was probably due to the formation of meta-phosphate or C-O-PO3,
and its Supporting Information files.
which could either form a physical layer to hinder the contact of C with O2 and
Funding: This work was supported by the National
Natural Science Foundation of China bacteria, or occupy the active sites of the C band. Our results indicate that pre-
(No. 21107070, 21377081), Shanghai Science and treating biomass with phosphors-bearing materials is effective for reducing carbon
Technology Commission (13231202502), and
Shanghai Education Commission (14ZZ026). This loss during pyrolysis and for increasing biochar stabilization, which provides a novel
work was also partially supported by State Key
method by which biochar can be designed to improve the carbon sequestration
Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource
Reuse Foundation (NO. PCRRF12009). The fun- capacity.
ders had no role in study design, data collection
and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of
the manuscript.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Turning biomass into biochar through pyrolysis is being actively explored as a
tool for long-term carbon sequestration in soil and as a promising strategy to
mitigate global warming [1, 2]. The thermal conversion of biomass into biochar is
a carbonization process which generally involves an initial carbon loss followed by
aromatization. Thus, the carbon sequestration efficiency of biochar depends on
both the carbon loss during pyrolysis and the stability of the final product leading
to carbon emission over time [3, 4].
In general, over 50% of the carbon present in biomass is lost during pyrolysis
due to thermal decomposition and volatilization. This results in low yields of
biochar production, especially during the conversion of some plant-based
biomasses [5]. Our recent study shows that yields of biochar produced at 500 ˚C
from twelve different biomass feedstocks ranged from 27.8% to 58.4%, but the
yield of plant-based biomasses such as sawdust or crop wastes was generally low,
between 27.8–32.0% [5]. In another study, Hossain et al. (2011) attained biochar
yields from sludge ranging from 72.3% to 52.4% with temperatures increasing
from 300 ˚C to 700 ˚C [6].
On the other hand, though biochar is regarded as being stable for 1000 years in
soil, it still undergoes a slow cumulative degradation, which determines the
dispute of biochar as a tool for long-term carbon sequestration. The potential
biotic or abiotic mineralization of biochars has been reported by many researchers
[6, 7]. Carbon release from abiotic incubations of biochar was 50–90% that of
microbially inoculated incubations, and carbon release from both incubations
generally decreased with increasing charring temperature [6]. An accelerated aging
method which models the long-term stability of biochar indicated that carbon loss
ranged between 41.6% and 76.1% [8].
It has been reported that rapid oxidation on the surface of biochar may have
important implications for its environmental stability, because aromatic ring
structures in biochar may be more available to further microbial decomposition
following surface oxidation [9]. Certain chemical substances may be able to
strengthen the oxidative resistance of lignocellulosic materials. For example,
H3PO4 is often used during the production of activated carbon because it
facilitates the generation of thermally stable phosphorus complexes on the surface
of activated carbons (C–O–PO3/(CO)2PO2) [10]. These phosphorus complexes
could reduce the reactivity of active sites on carbon and act as a physical barrier
for oxygen diffusion in micropores [11, 12]. To the best of our knowledge, no
studies have previously been conducted to study this effect on biochar yield and
carbon stability of chemical or mineral additives to biomass feedstock prior to
pyrolysis.
The overall objective of this study is develop a chemical pre-modification
method to improve the potential carbon sequestration capacity of biochar. Thus,
three P-bearing substances, including H3PO4, phosphate rock tailings (PRT), and
triple superphosphate (TSP) were used as additives during biochar production.
H3PO4 was chosen because it has been shown to enhance the oxidative resistance
of lignin in woodchips [9]. PRT and TSP may coexist with biochar in the soil since
these two phosphorus materials are widely used in soil remediation for
inactivation of heavy metals [13, 14].
The specific objectives of this study were (i) to determine carbon loss during
pyrolysis of the pretreated biomass, (ii) evaluate the effects of these additives on
biochar chemical and biological stability, and (iii) to explore the formation
mechanisms of these designed biochars.
Biochar production
Biochar production was conducted in a laboratory-scale pyrolysis system with a
stainless steel column of about 3.5 L in a muffle furnace [16]. The production was
performed under N2 gas with the highest treatment temperature at 500 ˚C. Briefly,
about 100 g unmodified or chemically modified wheat straw was weighed into the
pyrolyzer, and the heating temperature was then raised at 15 ˚C?min21 to reach
four settled gradient temperatures (200 ˚C, 300 ˚C, 400 ˚C and 500 ˚C). At each
gradient temperature, the heat temperature was held for 1 h, respectively, to allow
enough time for carbonization. Biochar production is an aromatization process,
in which volatile compounds are separated from biomass and the rest of carbon is
converted to chemically and biological recalcitrant forms. Upon heating, the
organic compounds are initially cracked at different temperatures to smaller and
unstable fragments. These highly reactive fragments, mainly free radicals with a
very short average lifetime, can polymerize into a recalcitrant aromatic structure.
Thus it is assumed the gradual temperature enabled biomass components to
thoroughly carry out the decomposition and aromatization process. After the
pyrolysis treatment was completed, the carbon-rich solid left in the pyrolyzer was
the biochar product [5]. For simplicity, the biochars without pre-modification
and pre-modified with H3PO4, PRT, and TSP were referred to as BC, H3PO4-BC,
PRT-BC, and TSP-BC, respectively. The experiments were conducted in three
replicates.
Characterization
Biochar pH was measured in de-ionized water with a solid/liquid ratio of 1:20 (w/
v) after 48 h equilibrium (EUTECH pH510, USA). The elements concentration
was measured using an element analyzer (Vario EL III, Elementar, Germany). The
bonding environments of P and C atoms (P 2p, C 1s) on the surface of biochar
particles were determined using XPS (AXIS UltraDLD, Shimadzu, Japan) with a
beam diameter of 200.0 mm and a pass energy of 26 eV. The solid phases of
biochar were characterized by X-ray diffraction (D/max-2200/PC, Japan Rigaku
Corporation) operated at 35 kV and 20 mA. Data was collected over 2h range
from 10 to 50 using Cu Ka radiation with a scan speed of 2o per minute.
Wbiochar
Yield (%)~( )| 100 % ð1Þ
Wbiomass zWadditive
Carbon loss after pyrolysis was calculated based on yield and total carbon
content (eq. 2).
2 3
TCbiochar :Yield:
6 (W 7
6 biomass zWadditive ) 7
C loss in pyrolysis (%) ~61- 7|100% ð2Þ
4 TCbiomass :Wbiomass z 5
TCadditive :Wadditive
TCbiomass, TCadditive and TCbiochar refer to the total carbon (TC) content in
biomass, additive, and biochar, respectively. Wbiomass and Wadditive refer to the
weight of biomass and additive, respectively; whereas, additives were inorganic
substances and contained negligible amounts of TC.
Fixed carbon (FC) represents a relatively stable fraction of carbon in char as
calculated by proximate analysis [17]. The FC calculation is shown in eq 3.
FC%~100%-VS%-ASH% ð3Þ
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115373.t001
the ‘‘sequestrated C’’. FC partially originates from feedstock carbon, but it is also a
conversion product from pyrolysis processes [20]. FC was calculated as the non-
ash fraction that could be burned in air but not be lost in N2 at 900 ˚C. The FC
values for H3PO4-BC, PRT-BC and TSP-BC were 17.2%, 17.9% and 36.1%,
respectively, which were lower than that of the control BC (59.9%). Note that the
relative low FC values were due to the high ASH content in PRT-BC and the high
VS fraction in H3PO4-BC.
Fig. 1. Carbon loss during pyrolysis for biochar production from wheat straw at 500˚C with different
modifications.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115373.g001
Fig. 2. TGA curves of the biochars in N2 (a) and air (b) atmosphere.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115373.g002
much difference in the temperature at which the main weight loss occurred
between the unmodified and modified biochars, indicating that these additives
had no influence on the thermal stability of biochars.
The mass loss of biochars in air is generally related to their oxidative stability,
and it is believed that the more stable a substance is, the higher the temperature
needs to be for decomposition [21]. Fig. 2b shows TGA curves of biochars under
normal air conditions. All the modified biochars decomposed at higher
temperatures (490 ˚C–650 ˚C) than the unmodified ones (400 ˚C), especially the
H3PO4-BC (650 ˚C). The results indicate that these additives could increase the
oxidative stability of biochar. Significant oxidation inhibition by phosphorus has
also been observed in many other carbon materials production [22, 23, 24] and
possible mechanisms will be discussed in section 3.5.
Fig. 3. Emission rates of CO2 from the biochars during aerobic incubation.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115373.g003
Fig. 4. XPS spectra of P 2p and C 1s electron for the unmodified and modified biochars.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115373.g004
from soluble TSP and H3PO4. A weak peak of P-C compounds was observed at
2h0526.6 in the PRT-BC (Fig. 5). Qian et al. (2014) pointed out that the P-
containing radicals react with the aromatic rings produced by the pyrolysis of
lignin to form P-containing species, which is an important factor influencing the
distribution and stabilization of P in char [36]. Uchimiya and Hiradate (2014)
indicated that orthophosphate such as CH32O2PO322 and phenyl2O2PO322
formed in pyrolysis were stable [37]. Klupfel et al. (2014) also proposed that
biochar has redox properties and acts as electron-donating [38]. This indicated
that P has potential to react with the carbon in biochar. Overall, all three P-
bearing additives induced the formation of P-C compounds.
According to the results of this study, the P-bearing additives seemed to have
no influence on the thermal stability of biochar products, but they did improve
oxidative stability and biological degradation. Thermal stability is a function of
Fig. 5. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the unmodified and modified biochars.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115373.g005
bond energy, while both the incineration of volatile matters and the carbon to
CO2 conversion require contact between C and O2 or bacteria. Thus it could be
speculated that the bond energy of the reaction products from additives is low,
and these additives could also form a physical layer to hinder the contact of C with
O2 or bacteria or occupy the active sites of the carbon band.
Conclusions
During the charring process of biomass to biochar, over 50% carbon is typically
lost, and the generated biochar may not be stable enough in soil due to physical,
chemical, and biological reactions. In this study, the biomass precursor was pre-
treated using three P-bearing chemical substances including H3PO4, PRT and
TSP, aiming to reduce carbon loss during charring and simultaneously increase
the carbon stability of the final biochar product. The results show that these
chemicals reduced the carbon loss, improved the oxidation stability and reduced
the microbial mineralization. This study put forward the novel idea that people
can design biochar to improve its carbon residue and stability through passivator
addition during feedstock preparation, which enables it to be a prospective tool
for carbon sequestration.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: LZ. Performed the experiments: LZ.
Analyzed the data: LZ XC WZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LZ
YK. Wrote the paper: LZ XC. Conducted the instrumental analysis: LZ YK.
Polished the manuscript language: XC WZ LZ.
References
1. Whitman T, Nicholson CF, Torres D, Lehmann J (2011) Climate change impact of biochar cook stoves
in western Kenyan farm households: System dynamics model analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45: 3687–
3694.
2. Meyer S, Bright RM, Fischer D, Schulz H, Glaser B (2012) Albedo impact on the suitability of biochar
systems to mitigate global warming. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46: 12726–12734.
4. Matovic D (2011) Biochar as a viable carbon sequestration option: Global and Canadian perspective.
Energy 36: 2011–2016.
5. Zhao L, Cao XD, Masek Q, Zimmerman A (2013) Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of
feedstock and production temperatures. J Hazard Mater. 256: 1–9.
6. Hossain MK, Strezov V, Chan KY, Ziolkowski A, Nelson PF (2011) Influence of pyrolysis temperature
on production and nutrient properties of wastewater sludge biochar. J Environ Manage. 92: 223–228.
7. Zimmerman AR (2010) Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (Biochar).
Environ. Sci. Technol. 44: 1295–1301. 4.
8. Cross A, Sohi SP (2013) A method for screening the relative long-term stability of biochar. GCB
Bioenergy 5: 215–220.
9. Cheng CH, Lehmann J, Thies JE, Burton SD, Engelhard MH (2006) Oxidation of black carbon by
biotic and abiotic processes. Org. Geochem. 37: 1477–1488.
10. Rosas JM, Ruiz-Rosas R, Rodriguez-Mirasol J, Cordero T (2012) Kinetic study of the oxidation
resistance of phosphorus-containing activated carbons. Carbon 50: 1523–1537.
11. Lu WM, Chung DDL (2002) Oxidation protection of carbon materials by acid phosphate impregnation.
Carbon 40: 1249–1254.
12. Wu XX, Radovic LR (2006) Inhibition of catalytic oxidation of carbon/carbon composites by phosphorus.
Carbon 44: 141–151.
13. Cao XD, Ma LQ, Singh SP, Chen M, Harris WG (2003) Phosphate induced metal immobilization in a
contaminated site. Environ. Pollut. 122: 19–28.
14. Park JH, Bolan N, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2011) Isolation of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their
potential for lead immobilization in soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 185: 829–836.
15. Cao XD, Liang Y, Zhao L, Le HY (2013) Mobility of Pb, Cu, and Zn in the phosphorus-amended
contaminated soils under simulated landfill and rainfall conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 20: 5913–
5921.
16. Cao XD, Ma LQ, Liang Y, Harris W (2011) Simultaneous immobilization of lead and atrazine in
contaminated soils using dairy-manure biochar. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45: 4884–4889.
17. ASTM D 3172–07a Standard practice for proximate analysis of coal and coke (2007).
18. Li KZ, Song Q, Qi Q, Ren C (2012) Improving the oxidation resistance of carbon/carbon composites at
low temperature by controlling the grafting morphology of carbon nanotubes on carbon fibres. Corros.
Sci. 60: 314–317.
19. Cao XD, Harris W (2010) Properties of dairy-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use in
remediation. Bioresour. Technol. 101: 5222–5228.
20. Cantrell KB, Hunt PG, Uchimiya M, Novak JM, Ro KS (2012) Impact of pyrolysis temperature and
manure source on physic-chemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour. Technol. 107: 419–428.
21. Harvey OR, Kuo LJ, Zimmerman AR, Louchouarn P, Amonette JE, et al. (2010) An index-based
approach to assessing recalcitrance and soil carbon sequestration potential of engineered black carbons
(Biochars). Environ. Sci. Technol. 46: 1415–1421.
22. Lee YJ, Radovic LR (2003) Oxidation inhibition effects of phosphorus and boron in different carbon
fabrics. Carbon 41: 1987–1997.
23. McKee DW, Spiro CL, Lamby EJ (1984) The inhibition of graphite oxidation by phosphorous additives.
Carbon 22: 285–290.
24. Oh SG, Rodriguez NM (1993) In situ electron microscopy studies of the inhibition of graphite oxidation
by phosphorus. J. Hazard. Mater. 8: 2879–2888.
25. Spokas KA, Koskinen WC, Baker JM, Reicosky DC (2009) Impacts of woodchip biochar additions on
greenhouse gas production and sorption/degradation of two herbicides in a Minnesota soil.
Chemosphere 77: 574–581.
26. Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Watts DW, Laird DA, Ahmedna MA, et al. (2010) Short-term CO2
mineralization after additions of biochar and switchgrass to a Typic Kandiudult. Geoderma 154: 281–
288.
27. Kuzyakov Y, Subbotina I, Chen HQ, Bogomolova I, Xu XL (2009) Black carbon decomposition and
incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by 14C labeling. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41: 210–219.
28. Bruun S, Jensen ES, Jensen LS (2008) Microbial mineralization and assimilation of black carbon:
Dependency on degree of thermal alteration. Org. Geochem. 39: 839–845.
29. Richards GN, Zheng G (1991) Influence of metal ions and of salts on products from pyrolysis of wood:
applications to thermochemical processing of newsprint and biomass. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 21: 133–
146.
30. Antal MJ Jr, Mok WSL, Varhegyi G, Szekely T (1990) Review of methods for improving the yield of
charcoal from biomass. Energy & Fuels 4: 221–225.
31. Wan YQ, Chen P, Zhang B, Yang CY, Liu YH, et al. (2009) Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of biomass:
Catalysts to improve product selectivity. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 86: 161–167.
32. Trompowsky PM, Benites VDM, Madari BE, Pimenta AS, Hockaday WC, et al. (2005)
Characterization of humic like substances obtained by chemical oxidation of eucalyptus charcoal.
Org. Geochem. 36: 1480–1489.
33. Peng L, Ren YQ, Gu JD, Qin PF, Zeng QR, et al. (2014) Iron improving bio-char derived from
microalgae on removal of tetracycline from aqueous system. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 21: 7631–7640.
34. Yao FX, Arbestain MC, Virgel S, Blanco F, Arostegui J, et al. (2010) Simulated geochemical
weathering of a mineral ash-rich biochar in a modified soxhlet reactor. Chemosphere 80: 724–732.
35. LeCroy C, Masiello CA, Rudgers JA, Hockaday WC, Silberg JJ (2013) Nitrogen, biochar, and
mycorrhizae: Alteration of the symbiosis and oxidation of the char surface. Soil Biol. Biochem. 58: 248–
254.
36. Qian TT, Li DC, Jiang H (2014) Thermochemical behavior of Tris (2-Butoxyethyl) phosphate (TBEP)
during co-pyrolysis with biomass. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48: 10734–10742.