Enforcing Conditional Payment Clauses post-CIPAA - CIPAAMalaysia PDF
Enforcing Conditional Payment Clauses post-CIPAA - CIPAAMalaysia PDF
Enforcing Conditional Payment Clauses post-CIPAA - CIPAAMalaysia PDF
The Federal Court in Ireka Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd v PWC Corp Sdn Bhd And Other
Appeals [2020] 1 MLJ 311 made it clear that CIPAA applied only prospectively and not
retrospectively because it impacted substantive rights. One of the sections in CIPAA said to
affect substantive rights is s.35 CIPAA which prohibited conditional payments (i.e. pay-if-paid
However, the reality is that employers continue to insist on making direct payments to nominated
sub-contractors (NSCs) and by virtue of such direct payment arrangements, it becomes a given
that the NSCs are paid only when the employers choose to pay.
For subcontractors, the issue is clear-cut. Since conditional payments are prohibited by CIPAA,
subcontractors can willy-nilly sign any contract imposing conditional payment terms because
they can rest assured that such payment terms are void. Therefore, at the end of the day, the
main contractors still have to make payment based on default payment terms under s.36 CIPAA
For employers, the issue is also clear-cut. Notwithstanding any direct payment arrangements, the
fact is that there is no privity of contract between employers and subcontractors. Therefore,
there is usually no legal possibility for subcontractors to sue employers direct, although a few
cases successfully did so on non-contractual grounds like unjust enrichment and promissory
estoppel.
However, for main contractors, the issue is not so simple. As the employers insist on making
direct payment, the main contractor therefore relies on the employer’s payment to pay the
subcontractor. However, any default on the part of the employer would fall on the head of the
main contractor, not the employer. Therein lies the challenge for the main contractor.
Privacy - Terms
https://www.cipaamalaysia.com/blog/enforcing-conditional-payment 1/5
10/16/2020 Enforcing conditional payment clauses post-CIPAA - CIPAAMalaysia
Here are three possible ways that may overcome this di culty:
Enter into a tripartite agreement among the employer, the main contractor and the NSC
instead of the usual subcontract. In this way, the main contractor overcomes the challenge
of there being no privity of contract between the employer and the subcontractor.
Make it expressly clear in both the main contract and the subcontract that the “paying
party” is the employer. In the subcontract, reference should also be made to the same
payment term in the main contract. If the subcontractor has agreed that the employer is the
“paying party”, then adversely it may be argued that in the event of any default of payment,
then surely it is the employer who would be the “non-paying party” under CIPAA.
Insert a term in the subcontract to state that in the event of failure on the part of the
employer to pay, then the subcontractor will give notice to the main contractor and require
the main contractor to initiate adjudication proceedings against the employer, and the
Of course, the best case scenario is for the main contractor to retain the responsibility to pay the
subcontractor, and not allow a direct payment arrangement. With the control of the purse-strings,
the main contractor may be better-positioned to ensure that the subcontractor carries out its
works accordingly. Otherwise, the main contractor ends up in the position of having all the
responsibilities, with no accompanying rights.
CIPAA is intended to help contractors with their cash ow. If you need a preliminary assessment
of your claim or defence, email us at queries@cipaamalaysia.com
(mailto:queries@cipaamalaysia.com).
SEARCH
POPULAR POST
Submit
8 (https://www.cipaamalaysia.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?
action=process_simple_like&nonce=5bdec57ae9&post_id=21777&disabled=true&is_comment=0)
RELATED POSTS
Meridian Contracts Sdn Bhd v Bauer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (2020) Adjudication Decision
(https://www.cipaamalaysia.com/blog/meridian-vs-bauer-adjudication-decision)
Is a contractor estopped from claiming under-certi cation after accepting payment on the under-
SEPTEMBER 7, 2020
Privacy - Terms
https://www.cipaamalaysia.com/blog/enforcing-conditional-payment 3/5
10/16/2020 Enforcing conditional payment clauses post-CIPAA - CIPAAMalaysia
It is common in adjudication proceedings for adjudicators to deny any request for oral
hearings....
Privacy - Terms
https://www.cipaamalaysia.com/blog/enforcing-conditional-payment 4/5
10/16/2020 Enforcing conditional payment clauses post-CIPAA - CIPAAMalaysia
LATEST UPDATES
CONTACT US
CIPAA Malaysia
A3-3-3A,Block A3, Solaris Dutamas, 1 Jalan Dutamas 1, 50480 Kuala Lumpur
Phone: +603-6205-3928 (tel:+603-6205-3928)
Fax: +603-6205-4928 (tel:+603-6205-4928)
LINKS
Websites (https://www.cipaamalaysia.com/where-we-are-found-on-web)
Privacy - Terms
https://www.cipaamalaysia.com/blog/enforcing-conditional-payment 5/5