Restatement and Internal Investigation Alert - Mattel Inc. (MAT) PDF
Restatement and Internal Investigation Alert - Mattel Inc. (MAT) PDF
Restatement and Internal Investigation Alert - Mattel Inc. (MAT) PDF
This alert indicates that a company traded on a major exchange identified material errors
and as a result had to restate financial statements.
On October 30, 2019, Mattel Inc. [Nasdaq: MAT] disclosed several notable events, including: a non-reliance restatement
determined to be necessary following an independent investigation stemming from a whistleblower letter, internal
control weakness, auditor independence issues with its lead audit engagement partner, and the impending departure of
the Chief Financial Officer.
Regarding the non-reliance restatement, Mattel disclosed that financial statements for the third and fourth quarters of
2017 can no longer be relied upon due to material errors related to income tax expense. It was determined that income
tax expense was understated by $109 million in the third quarter of 2017, and overstated by $109 million in the fourth
quarter of 2017, with no impact for the full year. The errors had no impact on Mattel’s full year financial results for 2017
or subsequent periods.
Restatement
Company Mattel Inc. [Nasdaq: MAT] Source 8-K 2019-10-30
Location El Segundo, California CIK 63276
Revenue $4,511 million Market Cap $3,514 million
Industry Game, Toy, and Children’s Vehicle Manufacturing
Auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (auditor since 1974)
Restated Period 2016-01-01 to 2019-06-30
Auditor Letter or Discussion Yes
Board or Audit Committee Involvement Yes
SEC (or Other Regulatory) Investigation No
Accounting Rule (GAAP/FASB) Application Failures:
➢ Tax expense/benefit/deferral/other issues
Other Significant Issues:
➢ Material Weakness – Section 404 or 302 issues identified
The need for a restatement was discovered during an independent investigation into the allegations contained in a
whistleblower letter that was sent to Mattel’s outside auditor on August 2, 2019. Both the Audit Committee of Mattel’s
Board of Directors and their outside auditor conducted investigations into the allegations contained in the letter.
The investigation of the whistleblower letter found errors in Mattel’s financial statements, in addition to failures to
properly disclose errors to the then-CEO and the Audit Committee once they became known. Mattel’s management
identified the 2017 accounting error during its accounting closing procedures for the quarter ended December 31, 2017,
but the error was not appropriately assessed, and the findings were not documented.
According to Mattel, “the investigation revealed that a confluence of one-time events, management’s reliance on the
accounting advice sought and received on the error from the lead audit engagement partner of Mattel’s outside auditor,
and lapses in judgment by management contributed to these failures”.
Mattel asserts that management did not engage in fraud, but a material weakness in internal controls was identified.
As a result of the independence violations, Mattel’s auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers, replaced its lead audit
engagement partner and other members of its audit team for its engagement with Mattel. Earlier this year, PwC was
fined $7.9 million by the SEC due to violating auditor independence rules and engaging in improper professional
conduct.
Worth noting, in 2018, the lead audit engagement partner in question also served as the lead engagement partner for
Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. [NYSE: HLF] and Spout’s Farmers Market, Inc. [Nasdaq: SFM]. Interestingly, Herbalife’s auditor
resigned in 2013 due to auditor independence violations, and the Company subsequently engaged PwC as its
independent auditor.
Going forward, Mattel will restate the quarterly financial data for the three month periods ended September 30, 2017
and December 31, 2017, in addition to restating Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures on the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2018. Mattel’s
auditor will also be reissuing its audit report to reflect an adverse opinion on the Company’s internal controls over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.
Additionally, the Company will revise its previously issued 2016, 2017, 2018 annual financial statements to correct other
immaterial misstatements, as well as interim financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and six
months ended June 30, 2019.
In the same SEC filing announcing the non-reliance restatement, Mattel also disclosed that the Company is conducting a
search for its next Chief Financial Officer and that its current CFO, Joseph Euteneuer, will leave the Company after a
transition period of up to six months; Mr. Euteneuer served in the capacity of CFO since September 2017.
Characterization of Restatements
A financial restatement is perhaps the most immediate and significant red flag in respect to a company’s accounting
quality. It should come as no surprise, then, that financial restatements have negative implications on stock
performance.
Studies have found that company stock of a restating firm underperforms the market for the
fifty days following a restatement (Audit Analytics, 2007)1. Negative market reaction to a
restatement lingers even longer, close to three years after a restatement is announced.
(Chen, Cheng and Lo, 2013)2
1
http://www.auditanalytics.com/0002/view-custom-reports.php?report=410f7913a36b50e25a3281bd0959b10f
2
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2253689
Non-Reliance Mattel will restate financial statements for Q3 2017 and Q4 2017 to correct
2019-10-30 8-K
Restatement material errors related to income tax expense
Whistleblower Letter & Mattel disclosed they were made aware of an anonymous whistleblower
2019-08-08 8-K
Internal Investigation letter and would investigate the matters set forth in the letter
Deviation from Deviation from Benford’s Law indicates higher probability of earnings
2019-02-22 10-K
Benford’s Law manipulation
2019-02-22 10-K Altman Z-Score Noted Company Z-Score indicates deteriorating financial health
Deviation from Deviation from Benford’s Law indicates higher probability of earnings
2015-02-25 10-K
Benford’s Law manipulation
Audit Analytics, a service of IVES Group, Inc., is an independent data and research provider, not a registered broker dealer nor an investment,
accountant, tax, or legal advisor. The information provided in this, or any Audit Analytics report, is not a solicitation of any security. Although Audit
Analytics provides information it believes to be reliable, Audit Analytics makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, regarding the
information’s timeliness, accuracy, suitability, or completeness. Likewise, Audit Analytics makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied,
regarding the content of the corporate disclosures that may be referenced in a report. Please be aware, that each report is a separate and distinct work
product based on different assumptions, methodology, and focus and thus past and future reports may provide observations and judgments that are
inconsistent with the instant analysis. Under such circumstances, Audit Analytics is not obligated to advise you of the inconsistencies. Furthermore, the
information provided by Audit Analytics is of a general nature without consideration of particular circumstances and is not, nor should be construed as
investment advice or used as a personal recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Audit Analytics is not predicting the performance of any
security and is not liable for any consequence, financial or otherwise, that may result from any reliance on the information provided. If you are interested
in a securities transaction, Audit Analytics highly recommends that you consult an independent investment advisor so as to understand all the risks
involved.