Rebbe Nachman On Dance
Rebbe Nachman On Dance
Rebbe Nachman On Dance
371-387 © 1997
Reprints available directly from the publisher
Photocopying permitted by licence only
371
372 Michael Pishbane
There was once a musician who performed on a very fine instrumenr with great
sweetness and pleasantness, and all who heard it could not restrain themselves
and danced (roqedim) with great abandon. The closer one stood to the music the
greater his pleasure and the more enrhusiastic was his dancing. (Now) amidst
the tumult came a deaf person who could not hear any sound (qol) of the
pleasanr instrumenr. Seeing the people dance mightily, he thought them mad,
and wondered "What can joy (simbah) accomplish?"·Truly, were he wise and
undetstood that all this was due to the gteat pleasure and loveliness of the
instrument's sound, he too would have begun to dance then and there.
Now the meaning (of the parable) is clear, and one may apply it to the verse
"And all the people saw the sounds (qolot)." They saw that the Holy One, blessed
be He, appeared before all (the people) in the unity of His divine light, which
they altogether perceived. When they saw the great joy (roundabout them) - for
"the angels of the hosts were dancing about" (Psalm 68: 13) - they understood
that it was because of the sweetness and loveliness of the light of the holy Torah,
and strained forward to hear its sound (qol). For though they were still deaf, and
did not "hear" the sounds, their minds and eyes were illumined when they saw
the great happiness and joy (of the angels). They then understood that this was
due to the sounds (qolot); that is, to the loveliness and pleasanrness of the sound
(qol) of the Torah. Thus: even though they did not perceive the loveliness of the
Torah, they understood from the joy (expressed by the angels) that this was due
to the great loveliness of the Torah - and so they pressed forward to hear the
sound itself, in the hope that they might even perceive and understand the love-
liness of the light of the Torah. The enlightened will understand.1
and does not achieve any deeper understanding. In the latter, the
people first perceive a limited, visual truth, and then desire a
deeper (aural) understanding. From this difference we may infer
that the parable was formulated independently of the biblical verse
and its interpretation. In fact, we may infer that the Baal Shem's
parable was originally intended to ridicule the opponents of early
Hasidism (the Mitnaggedim), who aggressively criticized their
counterparts ecstatic movements in prayer.2 The Hasidic counter-
thrust here is that such rebuke is devoid of religious insight. The
citation put into the deaf man's mouth, "What can joy achieve?"
(from Ecclesiastes 2: 2), underscores this jibe - for through it the
rebukers are made to condemn themselves as spirirually deaf, and
able to perceive only the external aspects of religious expression. 3
On the other hand, the true believers, or Hasidim, penetrate to
hidden realms of Divinity. Rabbi Moshe Hayyim makes this point
by a striking application of the parable to the opening scriptural
verse, concerning the visions heard at Sinai (Exodus 20: 18). For
now the nation is shown to transcend an original "deafness" by its
readiness to see beyond the dancing angels to the source of their
joy - the holy Torah and the sweet sound of God's word. And if
the angelic dance is n0'Y transfigured as an act of supernatural joy,
so too, we reason, is the dance of true believers also an ecstatic
expression of transcendence. Indeed the discourse instructs its
audience that through joy one may transcend one's earthly nature
and connect with the inner light of Scripture, whose splendor is a
facet of God Himself.
The movements of dance thus express a desire for divinity-
even the pull of transcendence upon the spiritually awakened soul.
Concerning joy (sim~ah), consider rhis parable: Sometimes when people are
rejoicing and dancing, they grab a person from outside (the circle) - one who is
sad (be-'atzvut) and depressed - and press him against his will into the circle
(ma~ol) of dancers (meraqqedim), and force him to rejoice with them. So it is with
joy: for when a person is happy, his depression and sufferings stand off to the
side. But the higher level is to strive and pursue that very depression, and bring
it into joy... For (indeed:) there are (types of) sorrow and woe that are
(manifestations of) the (demonic) Other Side, and do not want to be bearers of
holiness; hence they flee from joy, and one must force them into (the sphere of)
holiness - namely, joy - against their will ... 4
II, 49.
7 The Talmudic passage builds on a contradiction between Ecclesiastes
8: 15, "Then I commended joy", and Ecclesiastes 2: 2, "And what does joy
To Jump for Joy 375
that (religious) joy may be regenerated from the most natural and
seemingly frivolous of acts (ve-'afi/u be-milei de-she{uta).8 Hence
simple dance - when performed in the service of religious ends,
and not purely private passions (hit/ahavut ha-yetzer) - may induce
a catalytic catharsis and lead to a higher healing. But this requires
the celebrant to direct the energies so elicited toward the divisive
and depressive dimensions of the self. Accordingly, the master
instructs his hearers to work for psychic wholeness - urging a
psychological activism that pursues the agents of one's depres-
sion in all their guises, and transforms them through the agency
of joy.
Dance is thus both the arch-act and arch-metaphor for this
cathartic process. In another, related teaching, Rabbi Nahman
goes on to stress how depression is an illness, a po/a'at, when the
cords of joy are snapped and one is put in a bad temper, so to
speak. 9 The antidote (refu' ah) is the joy of dance, or mapo/. Its
circular swirl draws the heavenly Shekhinah (or feminine gradation
of supernal Divinity) down to the earthly realm, where it may
alight upon the sick soul (po/eh) in healing union.10 This process
of spiritual therapeutics gives a new mystical application to the
accomplish?" (see foot note 3). The contradiction is resolved as follows. '''Then
I commended joy' - this refers to the joy (sim~ah) of (observing) a commandment
(shel mitzvah); 'And what does joy accomplish?' - this alludes to joy that does
not come from (the fulfillment) of a commandment. Thus Scripture teaches you
that the Shekhinah (Divine Ptesence) does not rest (on a person) eithet when he
is in a melancholy, or indolent, or frivolous mood ... but only when he is
inspired by something joyful (davar sim~ah)". The standard edition of the
Talmud now reads shel mitzvah ("of the commandment"), but this phrase is not
found in the Mss. or in earlier editions (see Diqduqei Soferim, ibid., 57, n. 4). The
words were apparenrly known to Rabbi Nahman.
For a further discussion of the Talmudic passage and its Zoharic and other
developments, see my more wide-ranging discussion in "The Inwardness of Joy
in Jewish Spirituality", In Pursuit o/Happiness, L. Rouner, ed. (Boston University
Studies in Philosophy and Religion, 16; Notre Dflme, Indiana: University of
Notre Dame Press, 1995),71-88.
8 Liqqutei Moharan, II, 24.
9 Ibid.
10 For the transformation of the Shekhinah from Divine Presence in
classical rabbinic sources to a supernal (feminine) hypostasis in kabbalistic texts,
and a penetrating review of the subject, see G. Scholem, On the Mystical Shape
0/ the Godhead (New York: Schocken Books, 1991), Chapter 4.
376 Michael Pishbane
rabbinic teaching cited by Nahman: "In the future the Holy One,
blessed be He, will be at the head of every ill person (boleh), for
the righteous ones (tzaddiqim) in the future." 11 For struck by the
two central nouns boleh and tzaddiqim, the sick and the healthy,
Nahman depicts a ritual process whereby danc (mabol) transforms
the depressed pers (bola'at) into a righteous one (tzaddiq) through
its power to engender joy and a conjunction with the heavenly
realm. Indeed, Nahman's substitution of the feminine epithet
'Shekhinah' for the masculine 'Holy One, blessed be He' not only
hints at the erotic valence of this Holy Union - whereby the
supernal gradations (of Yesod, also called Tzaddiq; and Malkhut,
also called Shekhinah) are unified in Divinity and in the dancer12
it also points to the psychosomatic process whereby the fragmented
self is regenerated into a whole and healthy being. At once, the
dancer is both male and female: a whirling circle and its axis of
rotation; the engendering foundation and the orbit of eros. Given
the language of Nahman's exegesis (playing on bola'at and maf?ol),
and the fact that he elsewhere recites the dictum that God will
himself be a maf?ol (dance) for the righteous in the future, 13 I would
suggest that the whole hermeneutic is based on a calculated
mishearing. To his Yiddishized ear, the Hebrew word maf?ol was
perceived as mobol, that is, as having the overtone of spiritual healing
and forgiveness <mebilah). Nahman concretized this (dialectal) con-
vergence, deeming it a linguistic sign of supernal and spiritual truth.
From this perspective, dance is a deep transformational grammar.
The full messianic aspect of Rabbi Nahman's teaching may be
approximated in stages. As a first step, let us mention his treat-
ment of Isaiah 35: 10 - a verse which functions as a biblical subtext
for the rabbinical dicta quoted above. Speaking to the nation in
11 Yer. Megillah II. 4 reads rosh bolah (lir., "head of rhe dance troupe").
Midrash Vayiqra'Rabba 11.9, M. Margoliot, ed. (Jerusalem: Wahrmann Books,
1962), 240-241, reads rosh bola', with a proof text from Psalm 48: 14 (rosh
beylah); see further, Midrash Sober Tov, S. Buber, ed. (Vilna, 1891), ad loe.
12 For the supernal (masculine) gradation known as Tzaddik, or Righteous
One, see G. Scholem, 0p. cit., Chapter 3.
13 b. Ta'anit 31a (this ends rhe tractate on a messianic theme; cf. also the
end of Chapter 1, which also concludes with a promise to the righteous). This
source is cited again in Liqqutei Moharan, I, 65 (ad fin.).
ToJump for Joy 377
exile, the prophet says: "The redeemed of the Lord will return
(yeshuvun): they shall come rejoicing to Zion, with eternal joy on
their ad (simf;;at 'olam 'al rosham); they shall attain (yasigu) gladness
and joy, while sorrow and despair flee." Nahman reads this promise
psychologically, and gives it a more activist character. For him, joy
is not simply received by divine grace, but aggressively pursued; for
with the arousal of joy the forces of sadness flee (boref;;im),and must
therefore be forcibly seize (yitpesu) - in order that the self may be
integrated and perfected as a true "chariot of holiness." 14 This is
clearly a complex and paradoxical doctrine, whereby personal
redemption requires the self to absorb (and not just neutralize)
negative energies. The deeper mythic dimension is indicated by
Nahman's designation of despair as the demonic Other Side.1s
In Rabbi Nahman's worldview, which derives ultimately from
features in the book of Zohar as mediated through Lurianic belief and
practice, the Other Side (or Sitra Af;;ra) has its root as negative
"judgments" (dinim) in the divine attribute of Understanding
(Binah).16 In the conception of the supernal hierarchy imagined as an
Anthropos, this gradation corresponds to the heart (lev). From here
the deposits of dinim descend through the thighs and feet of the
Divine Body (the gradations of Netzaf;; and Hod), and become lodged
in the lowest extremities, the heel(s).l 7 Significantly, Nahman says
14 Liqqutei Moharan, I, 23; for other uses of this verse, see ibid., I, 22.9. The
aggressive will required for integrating the forces of sadness is marked by
Nahman's language: in I, 24 he says one "must force (le-hakhriaf?) them into (the
domain of) holiness"; and this temerity is also called 'azut de-qedushah (I, 229).
15 Ibid.
that the means to force these negative extrusions (pitzonim) "to flee"
(le-havria/;) the lower Corpus is to "draw down" (mamshikh) joy from
(its source in) the inner-root of Understanding. This theurgical
"action" (Pe'ulah) is effected on earth through a psychosomatic
activation of energy (hitlahavut) which results in the movements
of dance (riqqudin).18 Indeed the arousal of human feet in holy
(divinely directed) dance releases the fluids of joy from the heav-
enly heart; and as they course through the Divine Body and its
earthly image, the demonic deposits are leached and purified. Thus
are the thighs (birkayim), for example, transformed into a blessing
(berakhah) and a birthright (bekhorah). 19
The patriarch Jacob exemplifies this supernatural process. For
though he was born holding on to the "heel" ('aqev) of his brother
Esau (Genesis 25: 26), and, indeed, has that very fact inscribed in
his own name (Ya'aqov), the hidden reality is that his name is a
complex multiple of the divine Name Elohim, which symbolizes the
powers of "judgment", and through that identity he perceived that
the source of these powers is in Binah, whose essence is- joy.20
Accordingly, says Nahman, when Jacob perceived that the thighs
of the divine hierarchy (Nezap and Hod) were invaded by destruc-
tive judgment, he went to their source, his father Isaac (who
symbolizes True Power), and brought him wine to drink (Genesis
27: 25) - knowing that "Wine makes the heart of man rejoice"
(Psalm 104: 15). That is, through his mystical understanding that
wine connotes the spiritual stimulus which opens the heart of the
Divine Anthropos (the 'Man') to the blessed energy of joy, Jacob
brought wine to his earthly father so that he, Isaac, might rejoice
and infuse him with supernal bounty.21 In this way, both upper
and lower worlds were blessed.
22 See Ibid., 1., 32; also I, 10.6, where the same technical terms appear.
23 Ibid.
24 It is stated in Genesis 29: 25 that only in the morning, after the
nuptuals (v. 23), did Jacob realize that the woman "is (hiy') Lea". Midrash Genesis
Rabba 70.19. Theodor-Albeck, edd. <Jerusalem: Wahrmann Books, 1965), I, p.
818, inteprets this phrase as the recitation of the celebrants who cheered "Yea
(hey) Leah". Nahman understood the cheer as the letter he', and as a sign to
Jacob that Leah is he' (the 5th lettet); that is, she is binah and lev, which ate also
the 5 alephs in the divine Name 'eheyeh, and which form the healing source of din
(judgment; and there follow a whole futther series of numerical equiva-
lents which ate 5 times d-y-n), and so the purification of the uppet female (Leah)
for the lower realms. See Liqq11tei Moharan, I, 32. For the relationship between
din, blood, and the purification of the feminine, see ibid. I, 169 and 22.11.
25 See Liqqt1tei Moharan, I, 169, especially. This "messengers of judgment"
are called "runners" in the Zohar (1. 43) and "feet" in Nahman's corpus.
380 Michael Fishbane
26 Ibid.
27 See b. Makkot 22b (R. Simlai); and in Pesiqta de-Rav Kahana, pisqa 12.1,
B. Mandelbaum, ed. (New York: The Jewish Theological Seminary of America,
1963), I, 203 (R. Judah b. Rabbi Simon).
28 Pesiqta de-Rav Kahana, pisqa 25.1; Mandelbaum edition, II 380. And
see the discussion of M. Idel, Kabbalah New Perspectives (New Haven: Yale
University Press, 1988), 157-60.
29 Midrash Tan&uma, Parashat 'Eqev, 1. The homily refers to the sum of
613 commandments, and mythicizes the metaphorical cargo of Psalm 49: 6.
ToJump for Joy 381
30 See Zohar II. 85b (the passage continues: "some with the King's head,
some with the body, some with the King's hands, and some with his feet - and
none go beyond the body"); III. 136b (ldra Rabba); Tiqqunei ha-zohar, Tiqqun
21, 60a, and 70, 130a-132a. Reciprocally, sins diminish the divine Body or
block its channels; d. Zohar 1. 67a; 85b; II. 162b, 165b; III. 297a-b.
31 See the edition of E. Wolfson, The Book of the Pomegranate. Moses De
Leon's Sefer Ha-Rimmon (Atlanta, GA: Scholar's Press, 1988). Over 100 com-
mandments are discussed by De Leon.
32 See A. Altmann, Kirjath Sepher 40 (1964/5), 256-76, 405-12.
33 Cf. Sha'ar Ha-Mitzvot, by Rabbi I:Iayyim Vital (Jerusalemm 1872); and
Metzudat David, by Rabbi David be Shelomoh ibn Abi Zimra (Zolkiew, 1862).
34 For this theosophy in the context of 'walking', see the valuable
discussion (with earlier references) by E. Wolfson, "Walking as a Sacred Duty:
Theological Transformation of Social Reality in Early Hasidism", in Along The
Path (Albany, New York: State University of New York Press, 1995),89-109,
and 223-45.
382 Michael Pishbane
God's word is blocked and the human being is not only cut-off from
its holy energy but lefr with the depressive deadness of a wholly
natural being.35 For "The commands of the Lord are upright,
rejoicing the heart" (Psalm 19: 9); and how can these agents of
divine vitality act on the heart if they are not absorbed through the
limbs which perform the commandments with joyful intent?36
Accordingly, each and every commandment has a structure of joy
inherent to it, and one must activate that joy in its proper
manner - the hands, say, through gift-giving or holding the Lulav
and Etrog correctly; the mouth, through pure prayer and honest
speech; arid of course the sexual organs, through the holiness of
matrimonial union and procreation. The feet or legs also have their
ideal functions, such as walking on the Sabbath, going on a
pilgrimage, or dancing before the Bride - both divine and human.
The full activation of the entire body in holy actions is thus a
therapeutic of total joy, whereby the currents of divine energy
enliven and integrate the human being in all 613 parts. No
wonder that Nahman says that
Joy (simf;ah) is a total structure (qomah shelemah), comprised of 248 limbs and
365 arteries, and therefore when one rejoices or dances, he must be certain that
he activates (ya'avor) the entirety of joy, from head to heel; for sometimes joy is
only in the feet, or only in the heart, or only in the head, as alluded to by the
verse, "and eternal joy on their head" (Isaiah 35: 10). But the essence of joy is
that one activate the entirety of joy; that is, through the whole structure that
joy comprises. And for that one needs many mitzvot: for the root of the points
of the mitzvot are in [the gradation of] joy; and "the commands of the Lord
rejoice the heart" (Psalm 19: 9); and everyone of the 613 commandments has
a specific limb [in the structure of joy] - each one according to its type. 3 7
35 Liqqutei Moharan, I, 178; cf. II, 81. The idea derives from the Zohar,
where it is frequently remarked how sin blocks the channels of the divine realm;
d. 1. 67a and III. 297a-b.
36 Ibid., I, 178.
37 Ibid.
To Jump for Joy 383
41 Liqqutei Moharan, 1,22.11; d. 10.6. Torah and prayer also have 'feet';
42 The number 13 may refer to the 10 gradations plus the 3 pure lights
above them; and also to the 13 petaled rose, which stands fot the 13 atttibutes
of mercy that emerge from Binah for the benefit of the Assembly of Israel (viz.,
they flow down to surround and protect Malkhut). Accotding to Zohar 1. la,
this rose or lily is the "cup of salvation (s)" - a clear messianic allusion. The 13
petals are linked there to the 13 "words" or references to the diine Name Elohim
in Genesis 1:1-2: 1.
43 Liqqutei Moharan, I, 22.9.
386 Michael Pishbane
44 Ibid., 22.10.
45 Ibid.
46 Ibid., end. According to Zohar II 117b-118a (Ra'aya' Meheymna'), the
righteous are "like the limbs of the Shekhinah"; and cf. Tiqqunei ha-Zohar,
Tiqqun 70, nab.
47 See lfayyei Moharan, no. 340, for the Hebrew and Yiddish versions. By
the Yiddish expression oys gegangen, Rabbi Nahman means a mystical 'death' of
expiry of the soul; viz., an annihilation of self-conciousness. The idiom also
appears in the Kun(res ha-Hitpa'alut ('Tract on Ecstasy') by Rabbi Dov Ber of
Lubavitch (1773-1827), a contemporary of Rabbi Nahman. Near the end of
ToJump for Joy 387
section 4 of the Kunrres, Rabbi Dov Ber speaks of an "ecstasy of the whole
essence (hitpa'alut kol ha-'atzmiyut), in which one is "so completely transported
that nothing remains of him and he is without any self-consciousness". A
Yiddish gloss immediately follows referring to "the very deep absorption of the
whole of the soul to the extent that he leaves (or: dies to any sense of) the vessels
of his mind or heart (er kan oys gehn fun di keli ha-maob veha-lev)". See in the
edition of Sefer Liqqurei Bei'urim (Jerusalem, 1974), 55. For Rabbi Dov Ber's
mystical experience in the context of Jewish spiriruality,ee my Kiss of God.
Spiritual and Mystical Death in Judaism (Seattle and London: University of
Washington Press, 1994), Chapter 3, especially pp. 117-20.
48 Ibid., end.