A3 - Magsalin vs. National Oprganization, Gr. No. 148492
A3 - Magsalin vs. National Oprganization, Gr. No. 148492
A3 - Magsalin vs. National Oprganization, Gr. No. 148492
148492
FACTS:
Of the business of the company.
- Coca Cola Bottlers Phils engaged the - If it is true that complainants work is
services of complainants as sales route not necessary in the business
helpers for a limited period of five operation then, the company would
months and later paid on day to day not have maintained regular sales
basis. Accordingly, they were hired to route helpers. the nature of the
substitute the regular sales route helpers worked performed must be viewed
in case of unavailability and unexpected from a perspective of the business
shortage of manpower. or trade in its entirety and not on a
- The complainants seek to extend to them confined scope.
regular appointments but was refused.
- Hence this complaint - Likewise, in determining whether an
employment should be considered
COMPLAINT FOR: Regularization, notice of regular or non-regular, the applicable
strike, illegal dismissal and unfair labor practice test is the reasonable connection
between the particular activity
ISSUE: 1.) WON the nature of work of the performed by the employee in the
complainants are necessary and desirable in the relation to the usual business or trade
usual business of the company to qualify them to of the employee.
be regular employees?