Conceptual Framework For Financial Reporting: Background
Conceptual Framework For Financial Reporting: Background
Conceptual Framework For Financial Reporting: Background
A conceptual framework is a set of theoretical principles and concepts that underlie the preparation and
presentation of financial statements. If no conceptual framework existed, then it is more likely that
accounting standards would be produced on a haphazard basis as particular issues and circumstances
arose. These accounting standards might be inconsistent with one another, or perhaps even contradictory.
A strong conceptual framework therefore means that there is a set of principles in place from which all
future accounting standards draw. It also acts as a reference point for the preparers of financial statements
if there is no adequate accounting standard governing the types of transactions that an entity enters into
(this will be extremely rare). This section of the text considers the contents of the Conceptual Framework
for Financial Reporting ('the Framework') in more detail.
Background
In 1989 the Board issued the Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements. In
2004 a decision was made to work with the US FASB in order to develop a common framework. The first
phase concentrated on two areas:
• The objectives of financial reporting
• The qualitative characteristics of useful financial information.
The Board issued the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting in 2010. This was the original 1989
version updated for the two areas above. The joint project with the FASB was then suspended.
In 2012 the Board decided to revisit the Framework, although this time without the US FASB. It decided
to focus on the following areas:
• elements of financial statements
• measurement
• reporting entity
• presentation and disclosure.
IAS 1 requires an entity to disclose income tax relating to each component of OCI. This may be achieved
by either:
• disclosing each component of OCI net of any related tax effect, or
• disclosing OCI before related tax effects with one amount shown for tax.
Going concern
IAS 1 states that management should assess whether the going concern assumption is appropriate.
Management should take into account all available information about events within at least twelve
months of the end of the reporting period.
The following are indicators of a going concern uncertainty:
• A lack of cash and cash equivalents
• Increased levels of overdrafts and other forms of short-term borrowings
• Major debt repayments due in the next 12 months
• A rise in payables days – this may suggest that payments to suppliers are being delayed
• Increased levels of gearing
• Negative cash flows, particularly in relation to operating activities
• Disclosures or provisions relating to material legal claims
• Large impairment losses – this might suggest a decline in demand or productivity.
Accruals basis of accounting
The accruals basis of accounting means that transactions and events are recognised when they occur, not
when cash is received or paid for them.
Consistency of presentation
The presentation and classification of items in the financial statements should be retained from one
period to the next unless:
it is clear that a change will result in a more appropriate presentation,
or
a change is required by an IFRS or IAS Standard.
Materiality and aggregation
An item is material if its omission or misstatement could influence the economic decisions of users taken
on the basis of the financial statements. This could be based on the size or nature of an omission or
misstatement.
When assessing materiality, entities should consider the characteristics of the users of its financial
statements. It can be assumed that these users have a knowledge of business and accounting.
To aid user understanding, financial statements should show material classes of items separately.
Immaterial items may be aggregated with amounts of a similar nature, as long as this does not reduce
understandability.
Offsetting
IAS 1 says that assets and liabilities, and income and expenses, should only be offset when required or
permitted by an IFRS standard.
Comparative information
Comparative information for the previous period should be disclosed.
Accounting policies
Accounting policies are the principles and rules applied by an entity which specify how transactions are
reflected in the financial statements.
Where a standard exists in respect of a transaction, the accounting policy is determined by applying that
standard.
Where there is no applicable standard or interpretation, management must use its judgement to develop
and apply an accounting policy. The accounting policy selected must result in information that is relevant
and reliable.
Changes in accounting policies
An entity should only change its accounting policies if required by a standard, or if it results in more
reliable and relevant information. New accounting standards normally include transitional arrangements
on how to deal with any resulting changes in accounting policy.
If there are no transitional arrangements, changes in accounting policy should be applied retrospectively.
The entity adjusts the opening balance of each affected component of equity, and the comparative figures
are presented as if the new policy had always been applied.
Where a change is applied retrospectively, IAS 1 revised requires an entity to include in its financial
statements a statement of financial position at the beginning of the earliest comparative period. In practice
this will result in 3 statements of financial position
• at the reporting date
• at the start of the current reporting period
• at the start of the previous reporting period
Changes in accounting estimates
Making estimates is an essential part of the preparation of financial statements. For example, preparers
have to estimate allowances for financial assets, inventory obsolescence and the useful lives of property,
plant and equipment.
A change in an accounting estimate is not a change in accounting policy. According to IAS 8, a change in
accounting estimate must be recognised prospectively by including it in the statement of profit or loss and
other comprehensive income for the current period and any future periods that are also affected.
Prior period errors
Prior period errors are mis-statements and omissions in the financial statements of prior periods as a result
of not using reliable information that should have been available.
IAS 8 says that material prior period errors should be corrected retrospectively in the first set of financial
statements authorised for issue after their discovery. Opening balances of equity, and the comparative
figures, should be adjusted to correct the error.
IAS 1 also requires that where a prior period error is corrected retrospectively, a statement of financial
position is provided at the beginning of the earliest comparative period.