Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

33 People Vs Malapo Digest

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

People vs.

Malapo, 294 SCRA 586

Facts: Amalia Trinidad, complainant, was put into the custody of her aunt, Nenita
No. Previously, she was a ward of the Elsie Gaches Village institution as she was
considered a retardate.

On September 1991, accused Malapo went into the house of Nenita No. At that time,
Amalia was alone in the said house. Malapo then and there, willfully, unlawfully, and
feloniously succeeded in having carnal knowledge of the said victim against her will.
The rape resulted to Amalia bearing a full-term baby boy on May 18, 1992. RTC
ruled that Malapo was guilty of the crime but he was contending that if Amalia’s
baby was born on May 18 1992, the baby could not have been a full-term baby
because the rape happened on September 1991, below 9.3 months, the duration for
a full-term baby.

Issue: Whether or not Malapo is correct in saying that Amalia’s child is not his,
claiming support from his argument for a full-term baby.

Ruling: Supreme Court affirmed RTC’s decision of sentencing Malapo for the crime
of rape. An infant can be considered a full-term baby if it weighs more than 2,275
grams even if it is born before the thirty-seventh week which is less than 9.3
months. Amalia’s baby weighs 2,400 grams. Further, in the case at bar, it can be
inferred that conception occurred at or about the time that accused is alleged to
have committed the crime, i.e., within 120 days from the commission of the offense
in September 1991.

You might also like