Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

ABS CBN Franchise

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

ABS-CBN’S BROADCAST SHOULD BE CONTINUED DESPITE PENDING DECISION OF CONGRESS FOR ITS

FRANCHISE RENEWAL.

The case of ACWS-UBN VS. NTC cannot be made as a basis for ABS-CBN’s discontinuation of broadcast.

ACWS-UBN

-- NTC already issued ACWS a temporary permit without requiring a congressional franchise (2 years).
This is while their case for renewal of franchise was still pending. NTC here gave a temporary permit
based on the Memorandum of Understanding that the NTC, the Committee on Legislative Franchises of
Congress, and the Kapisanan ng mga Brodkaster sa Pilipinas of which ACWS is a member of good
standing, entered into.

-- ACWS was aware that a congressional franchise is necessary to operate its television station. Shortly
before the December 31, 1994 deadline set in the MOU, ACWS filed an application for a franchise with
Congress. It was not, however, acted upon in the 9th Congress for ACWS’s failure to submit the
necessary supporting documents; ACWS failed to re-file the application in the following Congress. ACWS
also filed an application for a franchise with Congress before the November 30, 1998 deadline under
Memorandum Circular. – later denied.

ABS-CBN

--So far, ABS-CBN has met all the requirements (e.g. documents) needed for the processing of the
renewal of franchise. Therefore, ABS has no violation regarding the steps to be made for the franchise
renewal.

--The problem is that it is still pending before the Congress in which ABS-CBN has no fault.

THEREFORE, both cases cannot be compared because their facts are not similar.

You might also like